cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Is IPL recession proof? | | The invisible man »

The hall of shame

Posted on 02/18/2009 in The Stanford saga





ECB's involvement with Stanford was a "huge mistake" © PA Photos

Now that Stanford's involvement with English cricket has crumbled, the ECB has little choice but to admit that their reputation has taken a beating. Derek Pringle in the Daily Telegraph has more.

If they did look into his past they would have discovered that Stanford had been kicked out of the Caribbean island of Montserrat by the British Government in 1990, after setting up his bank there five years earlier. He then took his bank in Antigua where, at the last count, his commercial interests employ five per cent of the island's workforce, a human travesty in the making if it all goes pop.

James Lawton in the Independent believes that Allen Stanford should not be the only one heading for the dock, but also those who are entrusted with running the game once described as the foundation of the British Empire.

There was an obligation to move with the times, the critics were told. Twenty20 generated vast revenue in India, it was the future. Stanford was seen as English cricket’s ally against the growth of the Indian cricket empire. No matter that the subtleties of the game may be beyond him, that the meaning of cricket’s past was of no consequence. He had what everyone wanted. He had oodles of money.
That, despite the third-rate nature of his cricket circus, meant he was not a man to be discounted when the future of the game was weighed.

The ECB certainly isn't the only loser, reveals Mike Selvey in his blog on the Guardian website. The Chance to Shine campaign for the development of cricket throughout the Caribbean, the 2,000-odd people he employed and the players in his Stanford Superstars team who invested the money on advice, would have no doubt been dealt a severe blow as well.

Money often brings out the worst in people. It has certainly brought out the worst in English cricket and the men who run it, and they have got exactly what they deserved, writes Mike Atherton in the Times.

Patrick Kidd in the same newspaper reveals more about the steely businessman beneath the charm of a typical Texan.

The seeds of Stanford's downfall were evident when ECB made their move. Andy Bull in his blog on the Guardian website throws up questions about what due diligence was done.

Elena Moya in the Guardian, sifts through VenEconomía, a Venuzuelan economics magazine, and reveals how the alarm, regarding Stanford's suspicious finances, was raised.

 
Feedback Feedback

Categories
2009 English domestic season (4) American Premier League (1) Ashes (325) Australia in India 2008-09 (101) Australia in South Africa 2008-09 (14) Australian cricket (795) Bangladesh cricket (27) Betting/Corruption (1) Bob Woolmer (8) Books (7) Bowling actions (3) Champions Trophy (55) Champions Twenty20 League (16) Charity (4) Commentary (65) Compaq Cup (1) Corruption (2) Cricinfo (3) Cricket (18) Cricket and war (1) Cricket books (8) DLF Cup (2) Drugs (2) England in India 2008-09 (66) England in South Africa 2009-10 (12) England in West Indies 2008-09 (72) English cricket (819) Falkland Islands (1) France (1) ICC (79) ICC World Twenty20 (58) ICC anti-doping policy (10) India in Australia, 2007-08 (65) India in New Zealand, 2008-09 (34) India in Pakistan 2008-09 (1) India in Sri Lanka 2008 (18) India in Sri Lanka 2008-09 (2) Indian Cricket League (27) Indian Premier League (204) Indian cricket (596) Interviews (6) Irish cricket (3) Kenyan cricket (2) Miscellaneous (205) Neutral venues (1) New Zealand cricket (251) New Zealand in Australia 2009 (4) New Zealand in Sri Lanka 2009 (4) Obituaries (15) Offbeat (131) Olympics (1) One-day cricket (10) Pakistan cricket (127) Pakistan in England (56) Pakistan in Sri Lanka 2009 (1) Racism (1) Security concerns (19) Shootout in Lahore (10) Sourav Ganguly (1) South Africa in Australia 2008-09 (36) South Africa in England 2008 (49) South African cricket (128) Sri Lankan cricket (85) Stanford 20/20 for 20 (24) Stats (3) T20 Canada (1) Technology (12) Television (24) Test Championship (2) Test rankings (2) The Delhi crisis (1) The Stanford saga (6) Twenty20 (60) UAE cricket (1) Umpires (48) West Indies cricket (125) West Indies in England 2009 (14) West Indies in New Zealand, 2008-09 (8) Women's cricket (27) World Cup 2007 (133) Zimbabwe cricket (47)
Recent Posts
Young players beware IPL's lure Tendulkar's band of brothers Appalling lack of consistency in Indian bowling Wizened four-pronged attack has sharp look Anura Tennekoon - the spirit of cricket International Cricket Council or Indian Cricket Council? Time for England to come good The God of fine things Dead track sure way to kill Test cricket Nehra's superb transformation
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007February 2007January 2007December 2006November 2006October 2006September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006May 2006April 2006March 2006February 2006January 2006December 2005November 2005October 2005September 2005
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009
website stats