cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Review system exposed again | | England's sporting bodies worse than bankers »

Are England better off without Flintoff?

Posted on 02/11/2009 in English cricket





Not the talisman of old? © Getty Images

He might be regarded as England's talisman, but Andrew Flintoff's not been at his best since 2005 and the team's Test record is better without him, Lawrence Booth says in his latest post on the Guardian website.

The facts are these. Since Flintoff made his debut at Headingley in 1998, he has played in 72 of a possible 131 Tests (excluding the game for the World XI). With him, England win less than 39% of their matches and lose 33%. Without him, they win 45% and lose 32%. When you consider that he missed three Ashes trouncings (in 1998-99, 2001 and 2002-03) at a stage of his career when he was still some way off becoming the titan who bestrode the 2005 Ashes, it's fair to say those stats could be even worse. Again, this is not to say England should drop Flintoff. Far from it. It's simply to get a few things in perspective.
Another thing. Flintoff last scored a Test hundred and took five wickets in an innings during that 2005 series - one that marked the end of an 18-month golden spell for England's supposed heir to Ian Botham. Since then, he has averaged under 30 with the bat and not far off 34 with the ball. Even taking injuries into account, these are not the stats of a world-class all-rounder.

In the Guardian, Vic Marks says Monty Panesar should blend patience and parsimony to revive his fortunes. He feels Panesar showed some signs of improvement in Jamaica after a disappointing tour of India.

Panesar should take note of how Benn achieved his success (no West Indian spinner since Lance Gibbs has taken eight wickets in a Test match). This may not be the fashionable response to Panesar's problems (most crave that he magically becomes a modern-day Bishen Bedi) and it is a rather prosaic one: he needs to be more miserly, to bowl more maidens and the wickets will eventually follow.


Nick Hoult throws up a few more numbers in the Daily Telegraph.

3 The number of Tests (out of 20) that England have won since the 2005 Ashes with Kevin Pietersen and Andrew Flintoff in the side.
10 The number of Tests (out of 21) that England have won since the 2005 Ashes without Flintoff in the side. Pietersen has played all 41 Tests in that time.
13 The number of Tests (out of 20) that England have lost with Pietersen and Flintoff in the side since the 2005 Ashes.
 
Feedback Feedback

Categories
2009 English domestic season (4) American Premier League (1) Ashes (325) Australia in India 2008-09 (101) Australia in South Africa 2008-09 (14) Australian cricket (796) Bangladesh cricket (27) Betting/Corruption (1) Bob Woolmer (8) Books (7) Bowling actions (3) Champions Trophy (55) Champions Twenty20 League (16) Charity (4) Commentary (65) Compaq Cup (1) Corruption (2) Cricinfo (3) Cricket (18) Cricket and war (1) Cricket books (8) DLF Cup (2) Drugs (2) England in India 2008-09 (66) England in South Africa 2009-10 (12) England in West Indies 2008-09 (72) English cricket (819) Falkland Islands (1) France (1) ICC (79) ICC World Twenty20 (58) ICC anti-doping policy (10) India in Australia, 2007-08 (65) India in New Zealand, 2008-09 (34) India in Pakistan 2008-09 (1) India in Sri Lanka 2008 (18) India in Sri Lanka 2008-09 (2) Indian Cricket League (27) Indian Premier League (204) Indian cricket (596) Interviews (6) Irish cricket (3) Kenyan cricket (2) Miscellaneous (205) Neutral venues (1) New Zealand cricket (251) New Zealand in Australia 2009 (4) New Zealand in Sri Lanka 2009 (4) Obituaries (15) Offbeat (131) Olympics (1) One-day cricket (10) Pakistan cricket (127) Pakistan in England (56) Pakistan in Sri Lanka 2009 (1) Racism (1) Security concerns (19) Shootout in Lahore (10) Sourav Ganguly (1) South Africa in Australia 2008-09 (36) South Africa in England 2008 (49) South African cricket (128) Sri Lankan cricket (85) Stanford 20/20 for 20 (24) Stats (3) T20 Canada (1) Technology (12) Television (24) Test Championship (2) Test rankings (2) The Delhi crisis (1) The Stanford saga (6) Twenty20 (60) UAE cricket (1) Umpires (48) West Indies cricket (125) West Indies in England 2009 (14) West Indies in New Zealand, 2008-09 (8) Women's cricket (27) World Cup 2007 (133) Zimbabwe cricket (47)
Recent Posts
Warne worried for Test cricket Young players beware IPL's lure Tendulkar's band of brothers Appalling lack of consistency in Indian bowling Wizened four-pronged attack has sharp look Anura Tennekoon - the spirit of cricket International Cricket Council or Indian Cricket Council? Time for England to come good The God of fine things Dead track sure way to kill Test cricket
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007February 2007January 2007December 2006November 2006October 2006September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006May 2006April 2006March 2006February 2006January 2006December 2005November 2005October 2005September 2005
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009
website stats