cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Forget over-rate fines, send someone off | | The Barnacle turns 85 »

A secure but joyless series

Posted on 12/03/2008 in Security concerns

England could decide to tour India for the Tests but Mike Atherton feels the series, under the current circumstances, will be a joyless one. He writes in the Times:

Lord’s has yet to be given any indication that its requirements are deemed disproportionate, but while its desire to do everything possible to ensure the safety of its players is understandable, the fact that neither cricket nor cricketers have been targeted on the sub- continent gives rise to the suspicion that the Mumbai atrocities have resulted in a high degree of paranoia among England players and officials.

In the same paper Richard Hobson talks to a former counter-terrorism expert who believes England should not return to India because though a targeted attack on the players is unlikely, they could find themselves caught up in a more general attack.

“Although what happened in Bombay was tragic, these acts of terrorism are not isolated,” the expert said. “Over the past two or three years it has been a regular feature of life in India. People are shocked by the events of last week, but I am not. It is a volatile, uncertain country and if anybody thinks that one part is safer than any other, they are living in a dreamworld.”

Nasser Hussain believes part of being an international cricketer these days is the realisation that you could be a terrorist target. He writes in the Daily Mail that England should tour India because the country is so important to cricket and to the Indian people that the players owe it to them to go back and play, as long as every possible precaution has been taken.

When we toured India in 2001 under my captaincy just after the attacks on New York I had no problem accepting the decisions of Robert Croft and Andrew Caddick not to tour. I told them it would not be held against them and it should not be held against Andrew Flintoff, Steve Harmison or any other England players if they decide they are not prepared to go. On that occasion, Mark Ramprakash stood up at a team meeting and said we should go because we were in just as much danger in London as in India. I agreed. I felt no extra pressure as captain because I was desperate to tour India, partly as my dad was Indian.

Iafrica.com's Rob Peters looks back at occasions in the past when sports and politics colllided.

 
Feedback Feedback

Categories
2009 English domestic season (4) American Premier League (1) Ashes (325) Australia in India 2008-09 (101) Australia in South Africa 2008-09 (14) Australian cricket (794) Bangladesh cricket (27) Betting/Corruption (1) Bob Woolmer (8) Books (7) Bowling actions (3) Champions Trophy (55) Champions Twenty20 League (16) Charity (4) Commentary (65) Compaq Cup (1) Corruption (2) Cricinfo (3) Cricket (18) Cricket and war (1) Cricket books (8) DLF Cup (2) Drugs (2) England in India 2008-09 (66) England in South Africa 2009-10 (12) England in West Indies 2008-09 (72) English cricket (819) Falkland Islands (1) France (1) ICC (79) ICC World Twenty20 (58) ICC anti-doping policy (10) India in Australia, 2007-08 (65) India in New Zealand, 2008-09 (34) India in Pakistan 2008-09 (1) India in Sri Lanka 2008 (18) India in Sri Lanka 2008-09 (2) Indian Cricket League (27) Indian Premier League (204) Indian cricket (594) Interviews (6) Irish cricket (3) Kenyan cricket (2) Miscellaneous (205) Neutral venues (1) New Zealand cricket (251) New Zealand in Australia 2009 (4) New Zealand in Sri Lanka 2009 (4) Obituaries (15) Offbeat (131) Olympics (1) One-day cricket (10) Pakistan cricket (127) Pakistan in England (56) Pakistan in Sri Lanka 2009 (1) Racism (1) Security concerns (19) Shootout in Lahore (10) Sourav Ganguly (1) South Africa in Australia 2008-09 (36) South Africa in England 2008 (49) South African cricket (128) Sri Lankan cricket (85) Stanford 20/20 for 20 (24) Stats (3) T20 Canada (1) Technology (12) Television (24) Test Championship (2) Test rankings (2) The Delhi crisis (1) The Stanford saga (6) Twenty20 (60) UAE cricket (1) Umpires (48) West Indies cricket (125) West Indies in England 2009 (14) West Indies in New Zealand, 2008-09 (8) Women's cricket (27) World Cup 2007 (133) Zimbabwe cricket (47)
Recent Posts
Wizened four-pronged attack has sharp look Anura Tennekoon - the spirit of cricket International Cricket Council or Indian Cricket Council? Time for England to come good The God of fine things Dead track sure way to kill Test cricket Nehra's superb transformation Martin's wise head running on young legs Do you want to be Australia's Test captain? Time for Australia to face facts
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007February 2007January 2007December 2006November 2006October 2006September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006May 2006April 2006March 2006February 2006January 2006December 2005November 2005October 2005September 2005
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009
website stats