cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox It Figures
Long Stop Pak Spin Sarwan & Gayle Tour Diaries The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Unrepentant rebels | | Let the markets decide »

Umpiring cock-eyed

Posted on 07/19/2008 in Technology

Billy Bowden and Daryl Harper had a moderate day, but their reputations could have been saved by use of television replays and a greater trust of the player's word, writes Simon Hughes in the Telegraph.

Unfortunately, the ICC, who rule on how technology should be used, display a total lack of comprehension of its benefits. Television can quickly evaluate whether a ball has brushed a pad or a glove, but cameras used to adjudicate whether a catch has been grassed present a flat image and usually cloud the issue. Yet the umpires are allowed to refer the latter and not the former. They are effectively umpiring cock-eyed.
 
Post this story on your favourite website Feedback

Categories
2009 English domestic season (2) American Premier League (1) Ashes (230) Australia in India 2008-09 (98) Australia in South Africa 2008-09 (14) Australian cricket (760) Bangladesh cricket (22) Betting/Corruption (1) Bob Woolmer (8) Books (5) Bowling actions (3) Champions Trophy (30) Charity (4) Commentary (65) Corruption (2) Cricinfo (2) Cricket (10) Cricket books (8) DLF Cup (2) England in India 2008-09 (66) England in West Indies 2008-09 (72) English cricket (753) Falkland Islands (1) France (1) ICC (77) ICC World Twenty20 (58) India in Australia, 2007-08 (65) India in New Zealand, 2008-09 (34) India in Pakistan 2008-09 (1) India in Sri Lanka 2008 (18) India in Sri Lanka 2008-09 (2) Indian Cricket League (27) Indian Premier League (198) Indian cricket (529) Interviews (3) Irish cricket (3) Kenyan cricket (2) Miscellaneous (191) New Zealand cricket (221) New Zealand in Australia 2009 (4) Obituaries (13) Offbeat (124) Olympics (1) Pakistan cricket (107) Pakistan in England (56) Pakistan in Sri Lanka 2009 (1) Racism (1) Security concerns (19) Shootout in Lahore (10) Sourav Ganguly (1) South Africa in Australia 2008-09 (36) South Africa in England 2008 (49) South African cricket (123) Sri Lankan cricket (74) Stanford 20/20 for 20 (24) Stats (3) T20 Canada (1) Technology (11) Television (20) The Stanford saga (6) Twenty20 (56) UAE cricket (1) Umpires (45) West Indies cricket (108) West Indies in England 2009 (14) West Indies in New Zealand, 2008-09 (8) Women's cricket (26) World Cup 2007 (133) Zimbabwe cricket (44)
Recent Posts
Panesar provokes more questions for selectors Ashes grounds rated The ultimate showdown The way we did it in 2005 Time for Sharma and Raina to step up Conveniently ignoring the truth Don't bury the past, England Instinctive cricket rules One rule for one, one for Fred? Who's the better leader?
Archives
July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007May 2007April 2007March 2007February 2007January 2007December 2006November 2006October 2006September 2006August 2006July 2006June 2006May 2006April 2006March 2006February 2006January 2006December 2005November 2005October 2005September 2005
RSS Feeds Web Feeds
© Cricinfo 2009
website stats