Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Alternate Reality Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes Fantasy Post First Class, First Person Girls Aloud    Inbox   
It Figures Long Stop Pak Spin Rob's Lobs The Buzz The Surfer Tour Diaries Tour of Duty

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« In praise of quotas | | New regime on Stats Island »

July 16, 2008

Posted by Rob Steen on 07/16/2008

A tale of two pities





Paul Collingwood's own self-image, as a tough but fair competitor, has taken a pounding. © Getty Images

Two years ago, Mohammad Asif was on a roll, whipping out 29 Indians, Sri Lankans and Englishmen in four Tests to confirm himself as Pakistan’s next planet-conquering fast bowler. In Adelaide a few months later, Paul Collingwood became the first Pom to score a double-century in Australia for nearly 70 years, matching the matchless Wally Hammond. Now, for both, the doldrums beckon. In neither case is sympathy unconfined. But neither is it negligible.

By failing sundry drugs tests, Asif was the one who actually broke some written rules, rather than merely ignored the urgings of a spiritual manifesto. So it is curious, yet entirely typical of cricket, that there appears to be more compassion for him. As Kamran Abassi wisely points out in his blog, the Pakistan Cricket Board, in failing to provide a proper lead on drug education and then indulging him, convincing him he was fire-proof, have hardly been blameless.

There is even talk of Indian espionage. Was it merely coincidence, wondered one poster, that, the day after the PCB decided to bar its players from next year’s IPL dollar-fest in the event of it coinciding with Australia's rescheduled tour, IPL released Asif's positive results? “Not to mention that he was previously found guilty in India. And, also at Dubai Airport where 95% of the working staff is Indian!” It’s all too easy to see where this one is heading!

I have still to be convinced that performance-enhancing drugs can do much to enhance performance in cricket [hence the apparent dearth of offenders], other than to ease recovery from injury - which doesn’t really seem that heinous a crime, other, of course, than to the player himself, whose body might suffer in the long run. Nonetheless, my sympathies lie more readily with Collingwood, if only because he appears to have paid a full-enough price for his crime against the cricketing state but seems unable to avoid placing himself in front of misfortune’s steamroller.

Many will contend that the only tears to be shed should be strictly those of a crocodilian persuasion. Collingwood, after all, shook sackloads of sensibilities with his ruthlessness in an ODI last month against New Zealand at The Oval, refusing to withdraw an appeal after Grant Elliott had accidentally been clattered, and injured, by Ryan Sidebottom. For all his subsequent apologies, for all that team-mates might have counselled him better, or at least helped him carry the can, it cost Collingwood a great deal more than his suspension for permitting a slow over-rate. And rightly so. There are even those who rejoiced when Billy Bowden gave him out so cheaply, and so wrongly, at Lord’s. Here was justice. Here was karma.

All the signs now are that he will be replaced by Andrew Flintoff for the second Test of the D’Oliveira Trophy series, starting at Headingley on Friday. Having served his country so splendidly and unstintingly, in all forms of the game, one trusts, feels almost completely certain, he will return, but he needs assistance to dig him out his trough.

I have never met Collingwood, but all the interviews and anecdotal evidence suggest he is an admirable man, a quietly passionate sportsman blessed with a rare and priceless brand of determination. He’s needed every ounce. A north-easterner, he had to scrap his way to the top of a pyramid run by north-westerners and southerners, overcoming prejudice and pigeon-holing. Durham’s first major contribution to the national cause since they became the 18th first-class county in 1992, he batted with a punchy responsibility, could outsmart the best with the ball, and consistently produced the sort of breath-snatching catches one never, ever, associates with an Englishman. Characterised - snottily, snobbishly - as a one-day specialist, he nailed that theory long ago.

Lord’s, though, was his first game for England since that Oval miscalculation. Was this really Colly we were watching? Kevin Pietersen and Ian Bell’s frolics meant that runs weren’t that crucial, rendering that single-figure score almost inevitable: here is a bloke who thrives on, lives for, the challenge; without a mountain to climb or a wall to be backed up against, he is a lesser player. Yet even in the field the colour appeared to have drained from his cheeks; a catch was dropped that, by his own admittedly celestial standards, was virtually undroppable. And, although he took a vital wicket in the first innings, there were no magic balls in the second, no flashes of sorcery to relieve the frustration, no “Goldenarm”.

It is hard not to sense that Collingwood is down on himself. Forget what the outsiders have said, outsiders who know nothing of him beyond boundaries and catches. Forget the number of hands that have been sheepishly raised when other players have been asked whether they would have acted, in the white-heat of battle, as he did. His own self-image, as a tough but fair competitor, has taken a pounding.

Whether he can recover will depend less, one suspects, on form alone than man-management. One of the main advantages of central contracts is that recipients no longer slink back to their counties after being dropped, tail between legs, confidence shot, sense of belonging evaporated. Yes, a few hundreds and wickets for Durham will help, but the phone calls and texts must continue, reassurance the theme.

The same should apply to Asif, who has fallen foul, like so many before him, of his own immaturity and short-sightedness, but has also been nobbled by immature bosses, by poor guidance. Not that long ago he was made vice-captain, suggesting a man of substance rather than substance-abuse. Pakistan cricket, and the art of fast bowling, are not so well-endowed with talent that we can afford to see him ditched to the wayside.

Go to Comments

Comments

Posted by: Jamie Dowling on 07/16/2008

Sympathy for Asif? Don't make me laugh! Cleared on a paper thin technicality when exposed by a dope test the first time. Arrested in Dubai for possession and now failed a dope test taken while playing for the IPL.

I had no sympathy for Asif when the first dope test failure came up. He should have been banned there and then. And you're comparing him to Paul Collingwood?

Failing drugs tests twice is a far worse thing than just once playing that little too hard. Collingwood admitted he was wrong soon after. Asif has insisted innocence. Even the PCB has washed their hands of him. Until he goes to court and overturns the ban (if the B test is positive).

Whether karma was in play when Billy Bowden triggered at Lords I know not. Justice must surely be seen to be done to the (alleged) drugs cheat as well.

Collingwood can come back and surely will. For a drugs cheat the road back is rightly much harder; look at Dwain Chambers. Asif has a cloud over him which may become a ban and a brand.

Posted by: Homer on 07/16/2008

I am sorry but this statement "For all his subsequent apologies, for all that team-mates might have counselled him better, or at least helped him carry the can, it cost Collingwood a suspension and – temporarily at least - the captaincy." doesnt gel.

Collingwood was handed a 4 match ban for slow over-rates - The ICC said it had to ban Collingwood because he had previously offended in the same way in the preceding 12 months - in a match against India in Bristol on 24 August 2007.

Cheers

Posted by: Khatri on 07/16/2008

Nice article. Just one correction if you please. Though he should have been, he was not suspended for the dishonest act he committed against Grant Elliott. His suspension was for England`s slow over rates.

Posted by: Sups on 07/16/2008

Dear Mr. Steen, your views are refreshing given the ever so popular pro 'capital punishment' attitude of common men. However, I could not concur with you to the fact that drugs cannot play a significant role in cricket. May be not so much for batsmen, but fast bowlers can surely benefit from a dose of performance boosters to put in a quick little spell of 4 overs for 3 wickets! So let us not try to belittle the 'crimes' committed, but try an appreciate that capital punishment does not work for cricketers just the way they don't work in other realms of life.

Posted by: Peter Parker on 07/16/2008

The apologists for Asif leave me cold. I can probably accept lack of education and immaturity as excuses for the first time he was caught. But the THIRD time?!
That is just inexcusable. Anyone caught once should make every effort possible to get the required information and observe the guidelines. If he didn't then that is culpability in itself. I'm sorry, but there should be absolutely no pity for Asif - he is completely responsible for his own situation.

Posted by: Moin on 07/16/2008

Weirdo. Did not expect this from Rob. I didnt understand what are you trying to justify, Is drugs ok in sports or is India to be blamed for everything. This article is a big let down on this issue.

Coming to Collingwood, it is very sad to see him being treated this way.I second you on this.

Posted by: Andy on 07/16/2008

Paul Collingwood did what any other international captain would have done. Yet he gets pilloried for it. Daniel Vettori would have done the same inf the boot had been on the other foot. Anyone who believes otherwise is being naive. As for this 'Spirit of Cricket'concept people go on about, just ask anyone who has played against Australia recently. People such as Rahul Dravid and Dwayne Bravo.
As for Mohammed Asif, he was misguided but unfortunately it's not his first offence so any sympathy is also misguided.

Posted by: Kiran on 07/16/2008

I am shocked to see that a lunatic's comment about espionage is being given credence to in this column. A so called senior journalist is indulging in rumour mongering is deplorable.

Posted by: Brian on 07/16/2008

Collingwood has not scored a hundred in his last 24 test innings and in that time he has averaged just 30. He's useful sometimes as a part-time bowler, but this is not significant as he has taken only 14 wickets in 37 tests at an average of 48. His usually brilliant fielding and his generally scrappy disposition are not enough to make up for the above shortcomings. Very few test teams would keep someone on after such a prolonged slump, so it's time for him to go. There is no room for sympathy with these stats. Truthfully, he is a good cricketer one can't help but admire, but he is just not up to test standard. This has nothing to do with the Elliot incident.

Posted by: sidd on 07/16/2008

Yeah Rob, nice of you to pick out that Indian espionage bit from Kamran's board. but dude you forgot to tell your thoughts about it. It is a pretty little trick to let the bit stand on its own, right! Besides, 'the talk of espionage' as you put it was forwarded by a single commentator out of, say, a hundred or so when I last checked. what a mighty talk, right!

Posted by: SC on 07/16/2008

I sympathise with Collingwood; though not in the same class as KP/Freddie, he comes across as a hard-working bloke who always wants to give his best.
Asif, on the other hand, deserves no sympathy. Also, as far as an Indian consipiracy is concerned, I think the Indians would have preferred to target the Aussies!! The Aussies have repatedly outclassed the Indians, even in the IPL. They are the world-leaders, while the Pakistani's are a shadow of their glorious past. Moreover the Paks are quite capable of imploding on their own.

Posted by: Ben Goldberg on 07/16/2008

A nice point is raised about how the effects of performance enhancing drugs can really make you a better bowler - bowlers are essentially judged by wickets in test cricket and economy in one day, neither of which can be enhanced by a pill or injection. Either way, Asif knows the rules and this point makes his repeated misdemeanous even more senseless. Shame on him and Pakistani cricket for allowing this to happen.

Your portrayal of Collingwood I find a bit fanciful - the idea of him weaving some magic with the ball in test cricket is ridiuclous, he's never been anything more than an occasional changing ends/drain the last few overs along with Panesar before the second new ball bowler in test cricket. He has always been a test cricketer that's needed to be on top of his game to thrive as shown by his recent glut. An extremely likeable sort of guy and tough as they come, but I fear Paul Collingwood MBE might be out for a while.

Posted by: Abhijeet on 07/17/2008

I don't understand what made the author write this article. Its like "Sun sets in west". Pretty much everybody in the world will and should say that Collingwood's crime (if at all it was a crime in the first place) was way way lesser than Asif. Asif should be banned forever if B sample also turns as positive.

Posted by: Usman on 07/17/2008

As for as Colly is concerned, i ll second you that what has happened was in the flow of a match emotions and should be ignored it and it happened many times in cricket before too, so i hope he ll recover it.
As for as Asif is concern (although you raised a good point) i believe he should be banned from cricket (Yes even though i am Pakistani) but i don't think so a player who has not learn from his mistakes , should deserve a position in a national team.

Posted by: Usman The Ghani on 07/17/2008

Asif Drugs Pakistan. Not since the Windies tour in '93 have I heard the last 2 in the same breath. Now it’s happened 3 times in the blink of an eye with the name Asif repeating each time. Sympathy, well, more like embarrassment. Sadness, undoubtedly. Gone, forever. Please.
He has tainted all Cricketers, Pakistani’s, Muslim’s and the name Mohammed.
He would understand this if said to him in English, Urdu or Punjabi.

Observation, thought provoking article thank you Rob, but mention of Asif and Drugs with no mention of Shoaib is barely believable - as many Pakistani’s believe him to have been the one to introduce Asif to drugs.

I never rated Colly as a test player, but a very hard trier. He will be back but he has to go for now. Pity your readers missed what you were saying in respect of the Over-rates ban / Elliott dismissal / subsequent dropping. I do feel for my fellow Karachite Shah, not sure what he has done wrong since 2001 - the same year Colly made his debut. For the s

Posted by: John on 07/17/2008

For the sake of the Ashes next year however, I hope Freddie does some magic. Test cricket needs it after the last test (no its not dead!!)

Posted by: Hari on 07/17/2008

Asif is gone, so should be Shoaib. Pakistan would do well if they hand over the captaincy to Misbah and allow Shoaib Malik to be a batsman [1,2 or3] in tests. For the moment they will have to be content with the resources they have in bowling. Sohail Tanvir is a good start, get some bowlers to support him and wait for the next great fast/spin bowler to emerge.

As for Collingwood its a bit tough no doubt. The best memories that i have of his game was when he lead [batting] England over Australia in the oneday finals after that 5-0 royal thrashing. He showed that had the mettle to take it to the Aussies. But that doesnt guarantee him a place in the squad for ever. And the man who would replace him, Flintoff, is defenitely a mightier force than Collingwood. So its tough on him, yes, but thats the way it is.

Posted by: Kunal on 07/17/2008

You are the worst writer in the world. Are you running out of topics to write on? No one EVER compared Asif to Collingwood. Why don't you compare Andrew Flintoff and Abdul Razzak next since both made the front page of Cricinfo as well.

Posted by: Anjo on 07/17/2008

I think the Elliot incident has been blown out of proportion, enough has been written comparing New Zealand's reaction to it and their reaction to McCullum running out Muralitharan. As Brian correctly pointed out, Collingwood was in woeful form long before the incident. On current form I'm afraid Collingwood just isn't good enough to get a spot in the squad with Flintoff returning. If anything he might be under pressure for being pilloried by the media and sanctimonious ex-cricketers after the incident, so a break from the spotlight might be best.
As for Asif, I'm going to play devils advocate here and recommend waiting for the B sample's result before condemning him. Having said that, he should have been banned after being caught the first time. Its disgusting to see Abdul Razzaq and Shane Bond being banned for joining the ICL while Harbhajan, Shoaib Akhtar and Asif are let off the hook for far worse infringements.

Posted by: Adeel Anwar on 07/17/2008

well india or no india ... i dont think asif should be thiking about it. To be honest reading too much into things is what is being done in this case by somehow involving india. Once a mistake twice is stupidity. Its common sense that performance enhancing drugs are banned. Whether they play a significant part or not thats another debate. But he broke the rules and not once. Is he nuts? He should realize that the future of pakistan fast bowling depends on him. Umar gul has been his bowling partner and how responsible and workhorse like he has been. Honest tryer with good abilities. He was as uneducated as asif if thats the defence point then why did'nt he go for the drugs. Hiding facts behind delusional reality wont work. I am a pakistani myself and he has put our heads down with shame which were once held high by his own performances.He needs to set his priorities right and get back to the noble spirit of the game only then we can expect a come back from him in international cricket.

Posted by: Mehul on 07/17/2008

Asif getting sympathy?! I think not.
All that man is getting, and rightly so, is condemnation, and I'm sure the worst is not over.
Comparing Collingwood's 'crime' to Asif's is not right - one is a misjudgement, admittedly criminal, but still only that; the other is complete disregard for the rules of the game. Neither deserves sympathy, but only one needs to be made an example of.

Posted by: saurabh somani on 07/17/2008

wow rob, you do manage to attract inflamed commenters with your posts.
to me as an indian, it seemed quite clear that you gave no credence to the ridiculous indian espionage angle.
as for asif and collingwood - well, it also seemed clear to me that colly deserves sympathy for copping more flak than necessary, while asif deserves sympathy for a lack of guidance.
whether i agree with it or not is another matter, but the tone and meaning of this post do not seem ambiguous to me.

Posted by: Shafiq on 07/17/2008

As a writer, it is always fantastic to see unique approaches, thank you writer.
I like the attitude & hunger of Colly, he is sort of Shoaib Malik, always fighting with available (limited) talents. But it was shame what he had done in Elliot incident, i will compare that with Greig Chappel captaincy to ask his bowler to bowl disgraceful delivery to no 11. What is happening to Asif is result of poor system and poor politics. I will definitely wait for B sample results.... still 3.--- nandorine level is how much more than in a normal healthy body? What can it make difference to a seam & swing bowler like Asif? Well can it not be because of his consistent injuries specially elbow problems? remember he played 9 out of 16 matches for Delhi. Still, if found guilty, he should be punished though system & board are involved in it but still we have to follow the rules. I will bitterly miss his magic (if anyone remembers matches in Karachi, Colombo, Oval & UK). Comparison is justified.

Posted by: Nabil on 07/17/2008

Great Article Mr. Steen. It is quite refreshing to read something so different from the normal drivel put out by some writers. Collingwood does deserve some sympathy for the decision he took with Elliot. I believe it was obvious he wanted England to win the one day series quite badly under his captaincy and so took a very, very immature and unsportsmanlike decision at the time. Let me hasten to add I believe Ponting, Vettori and Smith would have done the exact same thing. And would have laughed about it afterwards whilst patting themselves on their back would have announced their decision on the field as the greatest thing since the invention of peanut butter. At least Collingwood had the grace to apologize in the post match awards distribution whilst talking to Atherton. Asif on the other hand is an idiot.He is a man from a small village in Pakistan who has loved the party life after being exposed to it. During the IPL he has gone over to the dark side.

Posted by: aparajithl on 07/17/2008

Nice article,but as everyone know collingwood wanted his team to win and his decision was not really bad considering it was well with in the rules.. but comparing him with Asif is pathetic..Look what asif has done for past 2 years.he has been reported for possession of drugs for three times and still no one`s banning him for life.

Posted by: Manas on 07/17/2008

By highlighting that one stupid comment about Indian espionage, you are being unfair to a lot of sensible voices we have heard about Asif's case. Anyway I don't see the point of this article. Why take two completely unrelated issues with completely different degree of offense, and try to compare the reactions?

Posted by: Suresh Das on 07/17/2008

What is the relevance of the Grant Elliot run out? Collingwood was already going to miss ODIs because of his over rates dating back over a year, and he was already out of form in the New Zealand Tests well before the controversy. He's been dropped because of his poor form with the bat, so this article is merely an artifical attempt to lump two different issues together. Likening Collingwood's omission to Asif's would be stupid enough even if it was caused by the run-out, but it's not that unusual for a top six batsman who's unable to make runs to be dropped.

Posted by: Vikram Maingi on 07/17/2008

Hello Rob,
Your article deals with altogether unrelated issues. It is sad to see Collingwood being treated in this way, but Mohammed Asif doesn't deserve any sympathy.
A wise man is one who learns from others mistakes and an intelligent one learns from others'. Mohammed Asif is a fool who is repeating the same mistake again. If I remember correctly, he had to miss previous edition of Champions Trophy due to similar reasons. I feel even PCB should be held responsible for this offence of Asif as they couldn't control such a talent from ruining oneself.

Posted by: Sreeni on 07/17/2008

I am not one for invoking pity, as i think it is the most abject of emotions. I would rather, implore than all and sundry bring greater objectivity towards assessment of both these situations.
I unequivocally support Collingwood's action in light of the simple fact that games have gotten competitive, and more importantly because the right of way is not necessarily a batsman's prerogative.
As far as Asif goes, I reiterate what I said on Mr. Abbasi's blog. Performance enhancing drugs have minimal impact on a game like cricket, because of the skill intrinsic to its pursuit at any level. The usage of drugs like hashish and other psychoactives is purely a personal matter that should have little or no bearing on the recognition or adulation we bestow upon an individual. The entire "cricketers are role models" arguement is shaky at best, owing to the fact that we do not apply the same standards while idolizing rockstars, film personalities and so on.

Posted by: ST on 07/17/2008

Am I the only person who thinks Colly did the right thing at the Oval (I was there, in a great place to see the incident), given that Elliot deliberately ran at a 45 degree angle to get between Sid and the ball? Why did Elliot not run in a straight line towards the stumps? If he had, there would have been no "incident". As for Asif, we all know the ICC / PCB will ensure he gets away scot-free once again, so why the discussion???!

Posted by: karry on 07/17/2008

A beautiful comment, this article gives credence to a lunactic comment's about espionage. I would never expect a senior journalist to write such an article. 95% of working staff in dubai airport are Indians. Can you please cite your source other than the comment posted earlier on this same site. Moderators should start moderating articles also

Posted by: Theena on 07/17/2008

I have no sympathy for Asif's indiscretions - this is now, what, the third time? - and I hope he is punished. A ban, perhaps, for a year or two; a penalty stern enough that he doesn't do anything of the sort again.

To address the conspiracy theorists hailing from Pakistan, if an evil plan exists to damage Asif's name then I am sure we'd have an earlier precedent: Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis, for instance - if there ever was a case to get rid of two bowlers simply because they were too potent then its those two gents.

Not some nincampoop like Asif.

I am indifferent to Collingwood's plight.

Posted by: Farhan on 07/17/2008

I'll risk incurring the wrath of the people posting here by defending Asif. Here is the record:

1.Nandrolone: taken under Shoaib's bad influence and because he was not councelled by anyone on whether it is illegal or not. He himself checked with Bob Woolmer who then told him to stop using it. Let off, and rightfully so, because it was not his fault. Everyone here agrees with this.

2. Dubai: possession of Hashish. Hashish does not enhance performance. Hashish is just weed. Sporting bodies should not have any say in a person's choice of recreation drug. Hence that offence has no business in a sports related debate. Its between Dubai anti-narcotics and Asif.

3. IPL: As yet the illegal substance has not been identified. If it is nandrolone, then he should be banned. If its weed, then everyone should butt out. You dont ban people for drinking alcohol, then why would you for smoking weed? That smacks of cultural imperialism. However, I repeat, if its Nandrolone: Ban him for good!

Posted by: Partha Janard on 07/17/2008

Espionage ? Nice satire...Yes, I agree with some readers comments that if it is cannabis, hashish, weed, why bother. It's his money and body. He'll suffer in the long run. With a lack of discipline such as that, he won't cross 200 test wickets

Posted by: Dizy on 07/17/2008

Collingwood deserves sympathy because he acknowledged his own wrong doing. Asif has not done so because he is not facing a case because he is awaiting the B sample. Are we not judging without all the facts? He is presumed guilty because there were allegations that he had taken drugs in the past. He was not found guilty of his past actions so why are you all so willing to judge him on the basis of his past actions? You have already convicted the man without knowing the whole story. Learning from your mistakes is a nice concept but be honest, dont we all repeatedly make the same mistakes? Let all the facts come to the surface before you judge anyone.

Posted by: Chetan Asher on 07/17/2008

ICC & CA's crimes at Sydney -
1. Australians abused Indians & went scott free.
2. Indian abused Australian & was penalised. Mike Proctor went to the extent of penalising the Indian without even sufficient evidence !
3. Umpires win test match for a good-for-nothing Australia.
4. Blatant violations of the spirit of Cricket by Australians are ignored by the same match referee.

BCCI was forced to hit back. When BCCI hits back, ICC / CA probably fund jokers like Rob Steen to cook up imaginary problems insinuating problems with India.

Indian Espionage against Mohammed Asif - man you must be well paid by CA who have reason to hate India for removing Australia's secret weapon - "Human error from ICC Umpire" in Intl. Cricket to even think such rubbish, leave alone write it.

Posted by: gul khan on 07/17/2008

I'm disappointed that the espionage comment made by one person made this article. One over enthusiastic fan does not represent the majority. I'm a huge Pakistan cricket fan but Asif needs to be banned. As Kamran Abassi said in his article, Asif has be treated with kid gloves by the PCB and this has now led to his downfall. He obviously has some affection for narcotics considering his arrest for possession of opium (yes opiuim)in Dubai. How his illegal offences are being compared to Collingwoods unsportsman like behaviour I do not know!! What Collie did was undesireable and his apology afterwards lacked any sincerety. He knew exactly what he was doing when he decided to proceed with the appeal. He had time to make a judgement call, even Benson the umpire seemed to ask if he was sure about what he was doing? I believe Collie assessed the situation, looked at the ranking points gained through a win and the financial bonuses and decided not to worry about the 'spirit' of the game.

Posted by: umair on 07/17/2008

Goodness gracious me! When I read the now 'infamous' comment alleging Indian espionage in the Asif case in reply to Kamran Abbassi's column, my immediete reaction was "what mushrooms has THIS guy taken". It was a ridiculous comment, and should be treated as such. The more we discuss it, the more credence we give it. I say that as a Pakistani, and as a cricket fan.
As for Colly, he'll be back. He is one batsman I always love to see do well, and he will rise to get out of this hole as well. In the heat of the battle the best of us can be led astray.
Asif... sigh. Dizy makes a valid point about the B sample... but who is advising Asif? What is he thinking? It's just utterly inexcusable.. and the fault largely lies with the PCB. Asif, for all of his talent and potential, should be banned from active cricket if the B sample confirms his guilt.

Posted by: Smith on 07/17/2008

Sympathy for Asif who erred thrice. And do you have any proof whatsoever about Indian espionage. Better have it or we may have no sympathy when we sue you. Get your facts right and be a responsible writer. Just do not write what you please.

Posted by: Jamie on 07/17/2008

Cannabis is still an offence under WADA policy, although I also agree that it shouldnt be the case. Lets wait for the results before throwing him under the bus.

I think the IPL will have to make a judgement call if it is indeed cannabis, and should let him off. Its up to the individual sporting bodies on how strictly to implement WADA regulations and in this case (if it cannabis), Asif should be let off.

Posted by: Hammad Siddiqi, Cincinnati Ohio on 07/17/2008

I think I get your point Mr.Steen, a lot of people posting are taking your comparison of Colly and Asif too literally.
Colly's just slumping, he'll be back. As for our young tearaway from the Punjab, he's just a half wit. I really don't blame the PCB as much as Mr. Abbasi tends to do because I'm a firm believer in personal responsibility. Asif had a pretty simple decision to make in my opinion; work on the farm and kick back with a dooby at the end of the day or sweat it out all over the world playing top flight cricket and make millions. He tried to combine the dooby part with the cricket. Tough Shit, No Can Do.
Yes the PCB should have seminars and the like on the dangers of drugs and loose women but if one's head is as far up ones own ass, as Asif's seems to be, theres really not much good seminars and videos and workshops can do.
Ban his dumb-ass as a lesson. I don't say this lightly since I bleed Green and White all the way through. Asif at this point just needs to bugger off.

Posted by: Avinash on 07/17/2008

I feel bad for Collingwood. Poor guy. Being dropped from the test side to make way for a player that has a good history, but merely shows a modicum of form with the bat and took a few wickets for Lancs. They couldn't even bring in a REAL allrounder, or another batsman at the least. A real shame to see him go. Even Vaughan said he could come back and make a hundred at Headingley because that's how he is. When South Africa wins this next match, I won't be surprised.

As for Asif, my stance on this issue is very simple: Ban him. Three times he's used steroids and nothing has come of it. If Warne had to miss the 2003 World Cup because of it and all sorts of players before were banned for periods of time for one offense, Asif should be gone for life. The same goes for Shoaib. The only reason his "ban" was suspended was so he could play in the Champions Trophy. The PCB is one big farce and will never change.

Posted by: mullahmahendra on 07/17/2008

Must admit that i didn't read your article fully.Was directed to this blog by people who are aware of the Indian conspiracy to targer budding Pakistani players. Initially they paid the PCB to ban Shoaib, engineered an electoral setback for Musharaff( pakistan crickets biggest supporter) and now swithching Asif's urine sample with that of Sehwag's. Great going India. Thanks for the wonderful article

Posted by: Ramu on 07/17/2008

Actually this article is difficult to make sense of. I think Rob is pleading Collingwood's bosses should not fail him as Asif's bosses have failed Asif. But the writing is a bit convoluted and I can't be too sure. At any rate, if that's the point of the article then the article has no point. Asif is still a beginner, who played a handful of ODIs and Tests. Collingwood is a proven performer. What I would like to say in regards to Collingwood is that, sometimes people go through bad times. Whatever the reason may be, and he should be rested, to recover. It should not be made such a big deal of and he should not be considered to be "dropped". He's got nothing new to prove, although by Collingwood's own modest self, people often ignore his achievements. A gutsy cricketer he is and a champion in his own rights. He is not doing well for a while now and should be rested. Asif does not fit in this category. He hasn't proven himself completely and he's already falling off the deep. 'Nuff said.

Posted by: Jey Ananta on 07/18/2008

I have been vividly reading your blog for a while now.But i find myself at the other end of the cave when it comes to some of the arguments you made here. Regardless of the impact on the performance, drugs and sports must stay away in cricket crazy nations like India and Pakistan. It is a common sense that if you are deprived of your chance to play the world cup, you would never use drugs to even shed your puppy fat. So Asif should have no mercy.
Regardless of how good was his 200 against australia, performance alone should guarantee a place in the national team. I cannot keep playing "Beefy" now just because he was the best all rounder of his time. When batsmen like Rahul Dravid are not assured of their place if they fail to perform, i don't see English cricket getting any better with keeping repeatedly failing collingwood in the test line-up. Every one knows he is not the "partnership-breaker" in test cricket as he is in ODIs.

Posted by: bipin on 07/18/2008

About Collingwood and the run out controversy people forget that Tendulkar had similarly barged into Shoaib Akthar( the bowler ) and was run out in a test match.I had no sympathy for Tendulkar then and have none for New Zealand now.A batsman should watch where he is running,the bowler is not supposed to watch out for the batsman.Forget Vettori and his histronics.Also I think umpire Benson had no business asking Collingwood to reconsider.I remain amazed by the English board and press.Collingwood had to apologize for a crime which never took place.Could only happen in England.
As for Asif,one feels for such talent.I hope he comes back and has right head screwed on right.
And mullahmahendra,that was a funny post.As a fellow Indian, these conspiracy theorists leave me cold.

Posted by: floyd on 07/18/2008

Totally agree with Kunal - what a pile of garbage this article is!! What on earth has Collingwood's poor performance got to do with Asif's illegal drug use?!!

Posted by: Manas on 07/18/2008

The funniest part about this article is - they guy who has written this is also a "senior lecturer in sports journalism".. get ready for the next generation of sports journalists.

Posted by: stew on 07/18/2008

Some of the posters here have clearly not read the article properly or are so blinded by national prejudice that they feel the need to defend their nation against imagined slights. Rob Steen is not giving credence to the 'Indian conspiracy': he is citing the conspiracy theory as evidence of (possibly undeserved) sympathy for Asif. However,I do agree with some of the posters here pointing out that Collingwood was not dropped from the test side because of the Elliot incident (or his ODI banning for slow over rates) but because his recent form has been rubbish. He can hardly demand sympathy when he has been so obviously underperforming.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton whose books include biographies of Desmond Haynes and David Gower (1995 Cricket Society Literary Award winner) and 500-1 - The Miracle of Headingley '81. His 2004 investigation for The Wisden Cricketer, Whatever Happened to the Black Cricketer?, won the EU Journalism Award For diversity, against discrimination. Sports Journalism -­ A Multimedia Primer, his latest offering, will be published by Routledge in August.
Categories
English cricketIPLSouth African cricketStanford Super Series
Recent Posts
All hail Lord SnootyA one-sided coinPlay it again, AllenIn search of wisdomA tide in sore need of turningThe sweet taste of humble pieChampioning the causeThe pain of DwayneOf winners and nice guysStop shopping at Tresco
Archives
November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007
RSS Feeds Web Feeds
© Cricinfo 2008