cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Blogs home
First Class, first person Blues Brothers Rob's Lobs Tour Diaries Pak Spin Girls Aloud
Beyond The Test World On The Circuit What's New The Surfer It Figures The IPL Buzz

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Monkeyline revisited | | When substitution adds up »

January 21, 2008

Posted by Rob Steen on 01/21/2008

Ricky's dream





I told you last time how much I wanted to beat the company record for the number of consecutive completed deals, mate, how I wanted to stop people comparing me with You Know Who © Getty Images

The curtain opens on a therapist’s office. We hear David Bowie sing – “Alllll … you’ve got … to do … is … wiiiinnnn ...”

On the back of the door is a dartboard featuring the face of a man in a battered green cap, a dart in each eye and a third through his neck. The walls are bedecked with posters of Steve Waugh, Don Bradman, Paul Hogan, Kylie Minogue, Phar Lap and Skippy the Bush Kangaroo, and a Mike Hussey “Diets for Hungry Cricketers” calendar. Lying on the couch is a man wearing a sports jacket, chinos, open-neck shirt and battered green cap. He is sweating profusely, a paperback entitled “How To Make People Stop People Hating Your Guts” clasped to his chest.

Therapist: So…[puffs on pipe]…how’ve you been?

Patient: Not too clever, mate, not too clever at all.

Therapist: Had a bit of a bluey after that trip to Perth, did you?

Patient: Biggest one I’ve ever had, I reckon.

Therapist: Did you feel a bit of a prat, then?

Patient (angrily): Prat?! You know better than to use that word with me, mate. You know it brings back bad memories.

Therapist: Of course, how could I have forgotten? Many apologies. Had a heavy session last night. Let me rephrase it more delicately. So you felt a bit of a loser, right?

Patient (even angrier, shouting): Whaaat!? That’s no better, is it, mate? I thought we managed to work that word out of my vocabulary three years ago!

Therapist: Whoops, sorry. I’ll shut up. Tell me.

Patient: Okay. Well, you never like to come off second-best, do you mate? Almost forgotten what it was like. In a way, I missed getting the passions roused, having something to prove, you know. I just wish I didn’t have to go straight to Adelaide on another job.

Therapist: Come on, you’re avoiding the issue. Why’d you have that bluey?

Patient: Because, mate, I knew we didn’t approach the Perth job in the right frame of mind. We were too nice, too soft. And because, mate, I’m supposed to set the tone and dictate strategy, I’m to blame, mate. I should have told them not to listen to what everyone back at the office was saying.

Therapist: What were they saying?

Patient: Oh, you know, mate. A load of guff about how getting the job done wasn’t enough, about how we needed to be … well, more polite, less ruthless. They were peed off, mate, about the Sydney business. There’d been letters, mate. They felt we were spoiling and betraying the company image, though I’m not sure how they work that out, mate. After all, mate, given their treatment of migrant workers and minorities in general, the company image has never exactly been as white as an albino’s balls. Anyway, mate, the fact is, once we start being nice, being chummy, being Pommy … we just don’t operate the same, mate.

Therapist (puffs on pipe with almost manic vigour): So why did you insist your team be nice?

Patient (waving away clouds of smoke): Look, mate … [cough] … had to give my … [splutter] … word … mate. They demanded it. Even the … [cough] … managing director had a word … [splutter] …mate. My job was on the line. Mate.

Therapist (through gritted teeth, snapping pipe in two): But losing one deal isn’t that big a deal, surely? You’ve got to forgive yourself.

Patient: Ain’t that easy, mate. I told you last time how much I wanted to beat the company record for the number of consecutive completed deals, mate, how I wanted to stop people comparing me with You Know Who.

Therapist (plucking another pipe from a well-stocked rack on his desk): Oh yeah. You Know Who. The bloke who met Mother Teresa and wrote all those bestselling books …[barely suppressing a giggle] … what was his name? You know you’ve got to get beyond this.

Patient (clutching book even harder and slowly turning blue): I’m not ready. Soon … just not yet. Not now, mate. Have a care, mate.

Therapist (grinning): Of course. Silly me. Carry on.

Patient: And I was off my game, mate. Hopeless. Let some kid outsmart me. Not once but twice, mate. Same kid, mate. Had the worst haircut I’ve seen since Dizzy was on the staff but boy, he knew his stuff. Maybe my time has come.

Therapist (nods slowly but firmly): Now, now, what’s all this defeatism? You’re better than that. One blip, that’s all it is. There’s only a couple of guys better than you.

Patient: Yeah, mate, thanks, mate. But now they expect us to up our game but still be nice. The MD said he’d had letters and emails from all over the place, mate, saying how much they admired the company, and thanking us for all our good work, but they were switching suppliers. Maybe they’re right to think we’re not what we were. I had quite a few rookies in my team and only one of them was up to scratch, mate, one. The rest of us thought we’d be able to cope okay without the guys who retired last year, partly because we have so much experience, partly because the competition isn’t much cop. But there’s something about that lot we came up against in Perth and Sydney, mate. We’d smacked them good and proper in Melbourne, mate, but my opposite number is smarter than anyone ever gave him credit for. He’s got a couple of rookies too but they seem to respond better to him than mine do to me.

Therapist (smiling): Have you thought any more about what we discussed a couple of years back?

Patient: What? Doing that sponsorship deal with Jack Daniel’s?

Therapist (stifling a giggle): No. Changing career.

Patient (shifting uneasily): Well,sort of. But I’m still not sure I’m ready, mate, to run my own betting website. There’s still so much to do, mate, so many goals, mate. I’m only just short of 10,000 deals now, you know, mate. Not many in this company have done that, mate. Can’t stop now.

Therapist (impatiently): Yes, yes, but you’ve done so much, conquered so many mountains. How many Tasmanians have got to where you’ve got, done what you’ve done? You can rest on your laurels. Remember our mantra?

Patient (wearily): Yeah, yeah. “Been there, done that, earned this …” But really, I’m still hungry for this.

Sighing, the therapist rises from his chair, reaches into his desk drawer and gets out a gun, with which he proceeds to shoot the patient dead. Returning the gun to the drawer, he taps out a number on his mobile phone.

Therapist (whispering urgently): Here, mate, it worked. No name, no pack drill, right? Had to take the ultimate option, mate, but hell, when it comes to national security, you did say anything went. [Pause] No worries, mate. Just make sure I get those tickets to the company ball, right. Next to that Pommy shrink, what's his name … Spike Dreary. I hear he’s a well-connected boy as well as a bundle of laughs.

Go to Comments

Comments

Posted by: Deejav on 01/21/2008

LOL, Sounds like an episode of Frasier, Wicked 1 Mate!!

Posted by: muhammad umar sethi on 01/21/2008

hi!i m from pakistan n fan of australian cricket team.they are verx good on d field

Posted by: Pete on 01/21/2008

Yes, Ponting should retire and India are better than Australia. Riiiiight. Not worried Ponting will hand the English attack's backside to it on a plate in 2009?

Posted by: Peter on 01/21/2008

Stick to the serious writing Rob and leave the funny stuff to the comedians - they know how to do it...

Posted by: Ashwin on 01/21/2008

Hilarious, you really ripped into him didn't you !!! My tummy hurts from all the laughing. Quite anti-climactic in the end though.

Posted by: Aditya on 01/21/2008

I don't think Australia changed their approach. They were fighting till the very end, and were aggressive in the right sense of the word. They just lost to the team that played better cricket, and that can happen even with Australia. They're not unbeatable.

Posted by: DineshIyer on 01/21/2008

Hey Rob ... didnt find this funny at all. Go easy with the humor mate!

Posted by: nicko on 01/21/2008

Please read some Peter Carey, Thomas Kenealey, DBC Pierre, David Malouf, Helen Garner, Tim Winton or Kate Granville. Someone needs to remind you what is good writing... hack!


Posted by: Urban_Legend on 01/21/2008

Not funny - What a load of BS. Better do it the aussie way - hard but fair:) BTW - fans will start re-appraising Ricky's batting as a no swing - no spin zone. The aussie comentators kept harping about Sachin's second inning average vs AUS. Ponting's second inning average vs IND is 20.46.

Posted by: Nas on 01/21/2008

What on earth was that all about???
India played better cricket and that's all there is to it... Australia will hit back in the next test.

(We wont mention the 2 terrible umpiring decisions that they got on the last day however...notice the Aussies didnt carry on about Symonds and Husseys decisions which did effect the outcome of the game... I suppose only one team can get an umpire sacked).

Nas

Posted by: Brian on 01/21/2008

Good for you, Rob, I mean mate. I found it funny anyway. Didn't get the bit about the pipe, but never mind ... if he does go to a shrink it will scupper him for sure.
One thing's certain - although I admire the aussie cricketers generally - no matter the result of the 4th test Anil Kumble will come out of the series with dignity and an enhanced rep while Ponting comes out a prat. Thank you for highlighting how silly the whole nonsense has been.

Posted by: Nathan on 01/21/2008

There was a bit made of Ponting's reaction to a journalist after the second test, but why should Ponting be expected to react to the press with respect and grace given articles like this, where no name journalists who've achieved less than a fraction of what Ponting has refuse to show him or his side any respect in return?
Besides, I would have thought that the international cricketer most in need of psychiatric help cricket is either Andre Nel or Steve Harmison. Geez, you could write a thesis about Harmison's actual mental problems (as opposed to the completely fictitious issues here), but no, one Australian loss and out come cheap shots.
Popularity in sport is overrated anyway ... many Australian cricket fans have a soft spot for guys like Michael Atherton, but is it good to be a laughing stock whom the opposition fans like, or would he be better off to have occasionally made some runs against Australia and thereby be less popular?

Posted by: V Trumper on 01/21/2008

Rob: Good on ya, mate, great job. Enjoyed every word....down to the Australian slang. I don't know why you're copping so much stick (being sledged?)-- I found it hilarious.

Posted by: me on 01/21/2008

loser! this is crap

Posted by: raddz on 01/21/2008

relax buddy.......that was a bit over the top at the end

Posted by: ss on 01/21/2008

aa

Posted by: Dimuthu Ratnayake on 01/21/2008

funny... sorta office humour type. Not worth getting paid for tho :P this better be a one off, we'll let you off the hook lol

Posted by: Amit on 01/22/2008

Lost you midway Rob. There is dearth of humour in it my friend unless you had it hidden in the pipe!
@Nas - Well you did mention about the umpiring errors didnt you? Yes, Symonds got a rough one and so did Sachin earlier in the same test (same as Hussey) but seriously dude, do u think the umpiring was as abysmal as benson & bucknor? If you think yes, then you had better checked into the therapist office Rob talks about here.
For umpires, I say bring on Taufel and Aleem Dar - the best 2 on board and we shall have a really good series.
@Nathan - I believe this piece is the effect of Ponting's misbehavior and not vice versa. He really needs to polish his speaking; really. Anyway, he handled himself well in Perth and thats the way to go.. may be in some time, he might find himself in favour of journos!

Posted by: silverpie on 01/22/2008

The pipe's just a stock stereotype of psychiatrists.

Posted by: rev on 01/22/2008

Loved the 'Prat' line but you lost me after that mate...got a bit long-winded!

Posted by: Marty on 01/22/2008

Wow, how did this guy get a job? Put away the vitriol please.

Posted by: Marcus on 01/22/2008

Quite funny, but you could have slipped a few "Aww looks" in there. :)

But I don't understand why "being nice" on the field is supposed to be a bad thing. Surely it's possible to win without being a bad sport?

Posted by: S.G.V.MANI on 01/22/2008

Isn't it strange many Aussies seem to have a tunnel vision whereby they see and absorb only some one incident and not the whole picture. For example, one of the commentators above says: (We wont mention the 2 terrible umpiring decisions that they got on the last day however...notice the Aussies didnt carry on about Symonds and Husseys decisions which did effect the outcome of the game... I suppose only one team can get an umpire sacked). How conveniently he forgets (or refuses to accept the fact) that Tendulkar and Dhoni suffred identical umpiring goofs in the first innings!

As someone has pointed out, Australia is not unbeatable. Yes, provided only the Aussie XI plays for the team without the active participation of the On-field Umpires and the Third (TV) Umpire in their favour. Please be honest to admit India XI played Aussie XIV at Sydney.

Posted by: honest on 01/22/2008

good attempt but it lacks the fine timing required for really funny stuff.. keep at at it..

Posted by: Anand on 01/22/2008

Hey Rob you forgot to mention the has beens like
Harvey and washed out sailor who helped the therapist. How about mention of the triple crowned coolie Gavaskar and his racial slants to the Sydney carnival.

Posted by: poor old bowler on 01/22/2008

they shouldnt change a thing for nobody,i like the way they play.it was disapointing to see the aussies take it soft,i would of come out more aggresive to prove the point tough cricket is good cricket.

i didnt like the attitude,the spirit of cricket was gone long ago when bowlers started bowling bounces at bowlers why does the spirit of cricket only apply to batsmen.

i didnt like phil jaques not claiming a catch off stuart clark how would the batsmen like if a bowler batting down the non strikers end started telling the umpire it should of been lbw or i think he got a knick on that one the batsmen wouldnt like it,i dont bowlers like when batsmen as fielders start pulling out this spirit of cricket rubbish.

ps i will pay peter roebucks flight back to england his a idiot,australians should be smarter than to let a whinging little pom interfer with australian cricket.he should sacked and sent home not ricky ponting who does australia proud with his aggresive attitude to cricket.

Posted by: Gaurav on 01/22/2008

Nas , surely you ought to be whipped on your butt for your comment. Ever heard of "Every day is not Sunday"?. As simple as that. Hussey and Symonds (in particular) , had the luck going their way throughout the series ( both you and me know that , just that you don’t want to accept it ).Hence , JUSTICE was done , when Symonds got out the way he did . And stop talking about Hussey being unlucky to be given out. HE was out (absolutely plumb) just before lunch on day 4 , when the umpire did not give him. LBW calls are always a touch and go case and it can go either way (because of the uncertainty). However in the case of third umpire referrals and caught behind (thick edges) , there is 100% certainty and there is no way the batsmen can get the benefit of the doubt. I hope your brain can stack up to such complex yet basic facts of cricket.

Posted by: v-factor on 01/22/2008

LOL......u've got quite an imagination mate....jus' blasted ricky ponting's a**....HA HA HA

Posted by: Sachin on 01/22/2008

all those who are saying that Aussie got two wrong decisions are forgettting that Asad Rauf has been giving those decisions consistently. Sachin and Dhoni were also given out in the first innings but they were not out. Ricky Ponting was twice lbw in second innings but not given out. How about that? And it is Aussies that is against the use of technology. Indians always wanted technology in game. and by technology i dont mean hawk eye and snicko. without them also we can give decisions. ppl come to watch batsmen bat, bowlers bowl and feilders field not some stupid umpires to umpire.

Posted by: Anindo on 01/22/2008

Nas: How convenient of you to ignore the two lbw decisions against Sachin and Dhoni in the 1st innings which restricted India to only 330, and harp on Aussie magnaniminty instead!

As far as this article is concerned, its clearly exaggerating the issue. Australia, under Taylor and in the begining of Waugh's reign, used to lose at least one test-match in a series. That did not stop them from being regarded as the best in the business. Why Ricky Ponting won't be given that luxury is beyond me.

Posted by: Badri on 01/22/2008

Bro,
Have a heart man!!! just one loss and too much has been written about Australia. Give them the credit for winning 16 consecutive matches. Sydney test match incident, I give you that, probably Australians got that one wrong (may be they should not have reported to the umpires - "monkey" issue) but why crucify them for just one incident. Regarding the umpiring decisions in perth test, it just evens out, first innings Sachin and Dhoni got a raw deal. So cant complain about Hussey and Symonds. On a whole man this test was right up there. It was played hard and fair! the Oz way!!!

Posted by: Nate on 01/22/2008

Whats it about fairness that seems to be brought up only when its convenient to Aussies? Why does no one mention the LBW against Sachin T in the 1st innings or the shouts against Punter that were turned down or the ones Hussey survived early on against Kumble? In the Sydney fiasco, it was more about Punter, Pup & Mr. Honesty Gilly claiming catches that were not clean. Personally, I give rats ass about the celebrations by the Aussie team or their demeanor on the field, but then when the Aussie team claims to playing fair but hard it sounds like a large container of BS.

Posted by: skar on 01/22/2008

this was funny, mate. the comments show that fellow company people don't find this as funny as I do, mate, those losers(just kidding) :)

Posted by: Liam on 01/22/2008

This is utter garbage and a sorry day that it could be published anywhere.

Posted by: Anonymous on 01/22/2008

this is absolute BULL. pontings going through a rough patch thats all and india played well in the last test while aus was not playing up to par. they still tried hard. And steve waugh was also pretty agressive and was known for his sledging. Aus is definetly going to bounce back in the lats test.

Posted by: sandeep on 01/22/2008

Excellent article, shows that the aussie fans can't take anything in the right spirit, as for mr.nas, typical aussie who forgot the two bad decisions that india got in the first innings of the perth test and still won!!! As opposed to 8 decisions that the aussies needed, with CHEATING BY ponting and clarke to win. I guess at the end of the day that's what seperates us from the aussies, they're so used to cheating, that its' just another day at the office for them.

Posted by: Andy on 01/22/2008

To Nas: India also got the wrong end of the stick twice in the first innings (Tendulkar & Dhoni). So I think the Hussey dismissal was similar and that is pardoned. I agree a bit about the Symonds dismissal, since that should have been more obvious to the umpire...though note that it was lot closer than the Ponting 1st inning dismissal in Sydney.

Btw, I agree with you and the others about this article being a load of BS.

Posted by: Aswin Kini on 01/22/2008

Hi Rob,
Nice try at some humour, i think you are better off writing good cricket articles rather than taking a dig at Ricky Ponting!
Give me a break ! I am an Indian and like all indians, i loved to see India defeating Australia at a venue where they were supposed to be crushed.
But, the matter of the fact is that Aussies did India a huge favor by rubbing them on the wrong side. First, they prepared a pitch for their wacky pacers and threatened to knock out India, in the process, they picked four pacers instead of three and cost themselves dearly. As Ian Chappel rightly said "You don't need four when you can knock them with three, if three can't do the job, the fourth one is not worth it".
Second, their so called aggression went over the limit and they pumped up the Indians.
Past is past, Aussies have been beaten, but they are still champions, so unless and until Ricky's side loses a few on the trot, you cannot make mockery of the world's best captain.

Posted by: chuckingmiralimakesmesick on 01/22/2008

You weren't dishing up this sort of tripe after the last test - bit scared of the BCCI, eh mate? Us Aussies are pretty relaxed about it though, no effigy burning nonsense - we'll bounce back. Talking about inflammatory, Kumble (only one team playing in the spirit of the game... - Sounds rather like Bill Woodfull to me!) nice bit of plagiarism from the supposed 'statesman' ...please! And Harbhajan, what a piece of nationalistic jingoism ...and he wasn't even playing! But did the Aussies have a sook... no! No texting the board, having a whinge, we'll get on with the job, not make excuses. We'll try and figure out where we went wrong (and fix it), what India did right (and they did do a lot of good work), then try to counteract that as well. Just one thing: if Australia wins in Adelaide, accept it and move on, OK.
PS Rob, give yourself an uppercut.
PPS VVS Laxman would be an immortal if he was born in Australia (we would have nurtured this truly special talent) - but he's awesome anyway!

Posted by: Anonymous on 01/22/2008

because V Trumper he is a idiot who makes lame jokes that are not funny or appropriate at this paticular time

Posted by: indi fan on 01/22/2008

o c'mon mate...this is just unfair to Ponting and Australian cricket...it's a great team and that's why teams take pride to beat them...Perth win showed India's steely guts more than Australia's weakness...btw din't find the article humorous

Posted by: Shekhar on 01/22/2008

Briliant way to sum ip the emptions punter must be going through. Loved it. About the match..it was a wripper. When Sachin and Dhoni got bad decisions in innings one - i felt there is no luck for this indian team. But then decisions on Mr Cricket and AS in the seconds innings kinda evened it out. Atlast!

Posted by: kalyanaraman s. on 01/22/2008

if Ponting is able to read this piece and laugh (or even smile, but more prodigiously), then he does not need to go to a psychiatrist. ability to laugh at oneself is what life/sports has to teach one ! by the way, i like Ponting's child-like smiles; makes him look so good !!

Posted by: Anonymous on 01/22/2008

This article demeans the very notion of words, let alone writing. This is a cricket website, not The Daily Telegraph. I get more intelectually stimulating writing from my 9 year old students, who speak english as a second language.

Posted by: Prasanna on 01/22/2008

There were 2 decisions went against India also in 3rd test.(Dhoni and Tendulkar) Also in 2nd test it is not just 2 decisions went against India, more than 8 decisions went against India.

Posted by: Radiohead on 01/22/2008

wicked stuff man.. we want more of it :)

Posted by: critical on 01/22/2008

Good one, mate. Someone needs to wake up the patient with a smack on the bottom and remind him that morally, India leads the series 2 - 1. No matter what the stats and officials say. So they will go home 2-2 in the worst case scenario, morally. Not a great advt. for the best in the business, is it ?

Posted by: Ryan on 01/22/2008

Nas,
Thank god you did not mention the 2 bad decisions YOU got on the last , i will also not mention the 2 bad decisions INDIA got (i.e. Sachin n Dhoni LBW)otherwise India wud have knocked down Aussies with 500+ score by the end of the first innings.

Posted by: DRSK on 01/22/2008

Hey Nas ... How blind you are !!! Am afraid u dunno your cricket mate.
The 2 decisions against Hussey and Symonds were unfortunate. But, the decisions against Sachin and Dhoni in the first innings at Perth were equally bad. Mind you, all these 4 were LBWs. Which most experts still feel that the field umpire is the best person to judge.
But, in SCG, the problem was with catches and stumpings. For heaven's sake open your eyes.

Posted by: Magitekwarrior on 01/22/2008

Im an indian fan, and I didn't find this article funny. Australia lost just once so far. I don't think its time to start knocking players just yet.
@Nas, The poor decisions in sydney were not only blatant umpiring errors but at least two decisions came about on the word of the australian players - the umpire consulted them instead of his fellow umpires. Also, in this last game, tendulkar and dhoni were also harshly judged lbw. So, this test's bad decisions balanced out whereas in sydney they really did not. In truth, only symonds really got the bad end of the stick while the other decisions were 50-50. But he already had luck twice in sydney, so he shouldn't complain to the umpire on the field.

This series is not over. I don't think its the beginning of the end for australia. They're still the best team in the world even if the winds of change are blowing. They are showing signs of humanity, struggling to replace mcgrath and warne and now, even their batting has been exposed.

Posted by: Pranav on 01/22/2008

@ chuckingmiralimakesmesick
Not whinging? Not burning effigies? And about what did they have to whinge, precisely? The fact that they were outplayed? Given that the umpiring in this test was dead even unlike in Sydney, the only thing they could've whinged about was why (oh why) their board hadn't given them more of srilanka this summer.
Just a few more points. (1) I think this article is in bad taste, and clearly case of one pom taking opportunistic pot shots at his country's bug bear. Your relationship with the English is not India's problem (or fault). (2) I like the Aussie team, their determination to win, their success. (3) But some people need to get it into their skulls that the Aussie win at sydney was NOT a fair result, a draw would've been. If the Indians had turned turtle at Perth, you could've called the Sydney reaction a whinge by an inferior team. On the evidence of the last three matches, however, the teams have been easily matched. Shut up and enjoy the cricket.

Posted by: Paul on 01/22/2008

Nice try mate. Nearly funny. I enjoyed it though - a good idea.

As an Englishman I am finding it hilarious to read the comments on these boards from irate, humourless Aussies. They are finding it so hard to deal with all this post-Sydney fallout. And I thought they were supposed to be a laid-back nation.

Just chill out Aussies. It's only a game. Nobody dies!

Look (to use your stupidly over-used expression), you have still got the best team in the world and you will still win more than anybody else for years to come. But guess what! Your team don't have to play like a bunch of arses in order to do that! They will still win loads even if they act like decent sportsman.

Posted by: ryanbrew on 01/22/2008

I find it so funny to see the poor Ausie comments here.

NAS - You might have got 2 bad decisions in Perth, but mate, Aus have always got the better end of the stick. During South Africa's last tour of Aus, there were 21 terrible decisions - not the touch and go LBW's, we are talking stinkers. Aus got 5 and South Africa got 16. In Perth you got 2, India got 2. In Sydney - everything went in your favour - Symonds caught, Symonds out stumped - even Ian Chappel was saying he was out on the air - and that is saying something.

With regard to Sydney - it is amazing that when the Ausies get back what they give (sledging), they run with their tails between their legs to the umpires. We have heard for years the Ausies insult players, their moms, granny's and everybody else. Come on Aus grow up!

Even Jeff Lawson (Pak coach) said recently that Aus would get a shock if the realised how they were perceived by the rest of the world!

Posted by: Robert on 01/22/2008

Hahahaha...

Amusing, but a long winded. Yeah, Ponting lost his cool with the press. Then again I do honestly believe that at times people don't realise the ball bounces/is grounded or even takes a very feint edge. If everyone were honest and fair we wouldn't need the umpire.

In any event the Aussies are an awesome side. But I do think this has taken quite a bit of wind out of their sails... for now.

Posted by: Krishna on 01/22/2008

Well...YUCK!!! That's the impression this creates. It is not funny. Am not a fan of Ponting. But still he is one helluva player. This is demeaning and sick. Wonder why cricketers don't sue columnists and critics and commentators, who think they are ultra-intelligent and "oh-so-witty!", when all they are capable of is being grumpy and disgusting. Wish Ponting sues Rob. That would be funny. Wouldn't it, Mr Steen?

Posted by: Shawry on 01/22/2008

To those complaining about the lack of mention of Tendulkar and Dhoni's LBW decisions, Dhoni's may be fair, but don't forget the life Tendulkar was given (off Symonds) and the shocker given not out off Johnson (Sehwag perhaps, maybe Dravid).

India clearly got the best of the umpiring, as Australia did in Sydney (though the errors in Sydney were quite decidedly more obvious). Let's give them one win each off the Umpires and see if India can level the series in Adelaide.

Australia gets it's fair share of rough decisions. The difference is that batsmen aren't allowed to go on and get big scores (as a rule) as the bowling is good enough to get them out again not long after. Whether that is a mental thing of the batsmen, or a quality question of the bowling is unknown. The Australian batsmen, when given a life through dropped catch or umpire error, are good enough to hurt the opposition for it, usually.

It is a sign of the gulf in quality between Australia and the rest of the world

Posted by: Shawry on 01/22/2008

Not out's given in error are as bad as out's given in error. India clearly got the better of the not out's this test match, much like Australia last match.

Over the journey, decisions balance out. It is clear India can't handle that and are ready to throw the toys out of the pram when it goes against them, but stays very quiet when it falls for them (they toured England not long ago and got one match in particular saved for them by Umpire error - no complaints then!)

As for the argument raised previously about the money coming from India - it only comes when India play the other nations (otherwise Indian domestic cricket wouldf like be the shambles it is). The Indian public provide the money, but to watch International cricket only.

Posted by: Sandeep on 01/22/2008

That's a bad one! below the belt and extremely personal. bad... really bad

Posted by: Faraz on 01/22/2008

Those who say the article is not funny are mostly australians, suprise suprise. Regardless, if u look at the subliminals behind the writing, its clever. Maby not SO funny, but certainly clever enough to fly past the radar of an aussie CRICKET FAN.

Posted by: ben on 01/22/2008

what the hell is everyone havin a dig at him for it for? It was nothing more than light hearted humour and his point of view of what it must feel like to lose after so long..

All of you need having a go at him have to grow up and get perspective on it...

Also, why are we argueing about decisions during the test.. this article has nothing to do with it.

I'm an Aussie btw... but not a fan. (Neither am I fan of India's) Although I do know alot about my cricket I watch it religiously.

Posted by: Anthony on 01/22/2008

I'm a Sri Lankan fan and I find this an absolutely disgusting article. What is funny about someone loving the game so much and taking it so seriously that he feels the need to win every game?

The Australians play the game hard and have taken it to another level. Show some respect for the champions of the game and stop pandering for cheap laughs.

Posted by: naveen on 01/22/2008

Just one loss and these guys are all over Ponting. I am an Indian and I am pretty sure that India will lose at Adelide. India got lucky in Perth as Hayden wasnt playing and for once in the entire Indian cricket history out bowlers bowled 20 wicket taking balls in non-subcontinent conditions.

Let us not bark about this win or Aus losing. Even Federer loses in tennis. Aus will lose once in a while. Bottom line is Indian wins are as rare as Aus loses. So dont over celebrate.

Posted by: sridhar on 01/22/2008

funny or not, rob makes a point that this is a sport and all this imagination of a shrink etc., should be exactly that - imagination... and i think he makes that point with the gun at the end.

chill and enjoy the sport. wins and losses are meaningless when the boards and the companies have already made it a business and making tons of money. more drama, more emotions = more money.

just enjoy the moment, bad decisions included and if you do not agree, switch off the TV and move on

Posted by: Rohit on 01/22/2008

Nice one , gave me real pleasure while reading this.We (meaning Indian and English and other nationalities) can't poke enough fun at Ponting,his men and his snobbish and arrogant Aussie fans.I have seen the Aussie fans on cricinfo blogs often use the good run of their cricket team to put other nations down in the most vile and disgusting manner.The events of the last few weeks should have certainly woken them up and they will probably start respecting their opposition more.

Posted by: sham on 01/22/2008

LOL @ people comparing TWO wrong decisions to about EIGHT india got in the last test & keep talkin bout bad umpiring. werent complainin when u got the good ones, were u, mate?

Posted by: Ronnie on 01/22/2008

haha... laughed my butt off... nicely done man... the ending was kinda out of the blue though... but its all good... never thought someone would have a poke at Ponting like this... message passed on through humor... awesome...

Posted by: Kunal on 01/22/2008

Shawry, mate, India got the worst of the umpiring decisions, particularly in Trent Bridge(where they won), most notably those of Sachin and Sourav.
As for appeals not given out, Ricky Ponting survived close shouts in the match too, mainly against Ishant, and he couldn't convert it into a big score.
The decisions in this match are the regular kinda LBW decisions which we see in every match- some are given, some aren't. They can't compare to the abysmal decisions at Sydney, which included some obvious ct.behinds that were given not out. No one would have been talking about these decisions had they not been after Sydney.


Btw, the article is funny in parts.

Posted by: Sandeep on 01/22/2008

Nice. Haha. This approach to getting under someone's skin is better than Roebuck's.

Still, Ponting's getting more shit from the media than he deserves nowadays. I reckon he will comeback with vengeance and let the winning do the talking.

Posted by: Gokul Krishna on 01/23/2008

I think the whole issue is being blown out of proportion. Australia still is the best team but will suffer the occasional defeat now and then. I have been a die hard Indian supporter for the last 15 years and I feel that India is the only team in the world with the skill to challenge Australia on a consistent basis and pull off the odd victory.
I have seen quite a few unfair decisions, and it would be fair to say that they even out. But the events in Sydney were just not right. I had a feeling of disgust while watching that match because of the quality of umpiring and the Australian attitude. I felt low countless times over the last 15 years when India was not doing well but the feeling of disgust never came.
Some people have pointed out that Hussey and Symonds got a raw deal, fair enough. So did Sachin and Dhoni during the first innings of the match. Does it even things out in the match, your call. Was it the same in Sydney???????????

Posted by: Sameem on 01/23/2008

Ahaaaa we have guys like Anthony and Naveen who think normally - When India won the Twenty20 they called themselves world champs innocently ingnoring the fact that it was one trophy in world cricket - now Austrlia has lost one match after 16 straight wins and India is on the verge of being world test cricket champs - more like chumps - as for sledging the Indians are not strangers to it (and I for one appreciate it - give back as much or more than you get but within the parametres of the law) It is common only among asian countries to threaten to take your bat and ball and walk away when you lose - Gavaskar started it and Arjuna followed suit - Rob can you remember any other team walking off the field in protest - Speed is bowing to filthy lucre just like some of the other ozie commentators who depend on India to keep their jobs - Ricky wins and he is too arrogent - he loses and he is a back patting puppy - I will pick the winner any day - nobody loves a loser = ask Graham Gooch !!!

Posted by: Murph of Adelaide on 01/23/2008

I am I the only one who thinks that Australia got more than 2 bad decisions in Perth - we got 2 on the last day BUT Rogers was shot out in his first test innings (same decision as Tendulkar's), and Tendulkar and Laxman were both out LBW in the first innings but not given. It did not cost Australia the match - India's good play did that - but it can not be suggested that the decisions evened up within the test. Australia got the rough end of the sticjk and that happens.

As to the Indian celebratioons after their win - how could the team be so 2 faced as to complain about Australia's celebrations after the Sydney test (having taken 3 wickets in 8 balls) and then put on the performance they did. And how many frivolous appeals did India make on the final day (especially Kumble)?

Posted by: Rock on 01/23/2008

Aussies got to feel proud of their 16 consecutive victories for the second time. Unfortunate that India has stopped them. This might probably provoke Aussies to thrash India when they tour the subcontinent. Without McGrath and Warne, Aussies always do face the pressure of losing and for once their weakness has been exposed. By the way, this article isn't funny.

Posted by: Andy on 01/23/2008

well, i thought the last one was funny... this seems a bit overdone though... The Aussies are still the best in the world, India and SA may be battling it out for 2nd but neither are close to Aussie

Posted by: Vijay Padmanabhan on 01/23/2008

Next time when Aussies are on a winning streak like this, they better had to be prepared not to bring india or play them. They might as well pretend not to go for the streak, or they cah have a backup team when they are playing for the record. Looks like no 16 has been the benchmark as well as the nightmare for this aussie team.Other thing which probably would have haunted them is last time when they toured india in 01, the streak ended when they batted 4th. Ricky would have probably batted first if he won the toss, which didnt happen. One thing is for sure, this team wants to win irrespective of how they play the game and Ashes loss in 05 proved how they hated losing. Punters attitiude towards losing took a ugly turn when he was run out of a substitite fielder that time and it wouldnt take them long enough to realise that it's just a sport
and losing is the other end of it too.

Posted by: Mahina on 01/24/2008

Rob machan you forgot to mention that Brett Lee became a Bollywood star bowling underarm thunderbolts at leading Indian actresses and Malcolm Speed was the lead singer in a Bhangra band in downtown Mumbai.

Posted by: Amma on 01/25/2008

YOu have to mention the Roebuck from England who died of active bowel syndrome and was buried on the Sommerset but later exhumed and reburied near the Khyber Pass when it was discovered that he had a Bin Laden blood line !!!!

Posted by: Not_relevent on 01/26/2008

lol, Oz criticizing Dravid, i just looked at their run rate, when 1 of them bite everybody else does the same and 1 they fail, lol funny to watch them, full of sloths

Posted by: Abhinav on 02/01/2008

real funny stuff - who was that guy on the dartboard supposed to be - "You Know Who" ?? :)

Posted by: Chiran on 02/03/2008

This made me like Ricky Ponting again!!!Well Mate its all about how you percieve it!!

Posted by: Samyell on 02/03/2008

I highly doubt anyone has ever used the phrase "have a care, mate". That was a terrible article.

Posted by: ksmk on 02/04/2008

Every Indian should apologize if somebody intented to call symonds a monkey, monkey look and behave better. If aussies do think only their way is best, hmmmmmmm........ "test match is not a place where an opponent can be a friend" if this is spoken from some other nations, what the hell aussie response would be, either they stop sledging or let them take it, no double standards

Posted by: mahe on 02/04/2008

Please everybody who criticize Symonds apologize, monkeys look and behave better, please do not criticize somebody good

Posted by: Philip John Joseph on 02/21/2008

As an Indian I find it really rather lame that Indians are making posts in support of Ricky Ponting on the basis that he is a winning captain. This Indian disease of worshipping those who are successful as gods is really quite pathetic. Whether it's a politician or a cricketer, Indians need to grow up about poking a little fun at a public figure. There can be no true democracy in India if Indians insist on treating public figures as gods. Nothing wrong with poking a little bit of fun at Ricky Ponting. Ponting is a public figure as a cricketer in the news, so grow up all you Indians who take offense at a post mocking Ricky Ponting. This is hardly the end of the world.

Posted by: michael on 02/25/2008

Mate, I'm Australian and we don't say mate that often, mate.

Posted by: jack on 03/11/2008

man dat was freakin hillarious. loved it, all of it. dont care wat ny1 else thinks mate, keep at it. Ricky ponting's description (his state of mind) is absolutely amazing and would generate praise from even the die hard aussie fans. A lot of fun. keep writing as such mate, looks good on ya

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton whose books include biographies of Desmond Haynes and David Gower (1995 Cricket Society Literary Award winner) and 500-1 - The Miracle of Headingley '81. His 2004 investigation for The Wisden Cricketer, Whatever Happened to the Black Cricketer?, won the EU Journalism Award For diversity, against discrimination. Sports Journalism -­ A Multimedia Primer, his latest offering, will be published by Routledge in August.
Categories
English cricketIPL
Recent Posts
The Spirit of Cricket 2008The Trouble With FreddieTaking The Lord’s name in vainThe new Murali?The greatest insignificant inningsThe best pound-for-pound captainOf sacred cowsTrading placesTest of willBig wedge, thin end
Archives
May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007
Web Feeds
© Cricinfo 2008