Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Alternate Reality Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes Fantasy Post First Class, First Person Girls Aloud    Inbox   
It Figures Long Stop Pak Spin Rob's Lobs The Buzz The Surfer Tour Diaries Tour of Duty

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Goodbye ugly duckling, hello Swann | | When the Law is an ass »

October 13, 2007

Posted by Rob Steen on 10/13/2007

England's Brave New World (Chapter 382)





Paul Collingwood led England to their second successive series win in ODIs © AFP

Let’s forget, for the moment, all those horrid stories about performance-boosters, match-fixers and vengeful umpires. If anyone fancies making a movie about the sporting year of 2007, they could do a lot worse than call it Daze of the Underdogs. Or even The Year They Bashed the Bookies.

Ireland beat Pakistan at the World Cup; Gretna FC, representing a town hitherto known only for servicing impatient marriage-seekers, skipped up to the Scottish Premier League; Catalan Dragons, from the rugby league coldbed of France, reached the Challenge Cup final; Argentina’s rugby unionists beat the French and the Irish to qualify for the World Cup semi-final. As I write, the perennially unfancied Colorado Rockies (18 wins in their last 19 games) are marching towards baseball’s World Series armed with a bunch of rookies. And England, perhaps least probably of all, have just taken an ODI series in Sri Lanka armed with a worn-out KP and a non-ringing Ian Bell. And no Fredster.

Granted, some might reasonably argue that beating the World Cup finalists without having to contend with Muttiah Muralitharan is the contemporary equivalent of invading Carthage while Hannibal’s on holiday. Besides, as any fool knows, England’s one-day dawns of the past 15 years have proved about as genuine as Joan Collins’ eyelashes. Nevertheless, advances on six key fronts on a single tour – half of them perpetrated by those rejected by the previous coaching regime - are not on any account to be sniffed at. Given the oft-propounded theory that Englishmen are too critical of their cricketers, and notwithstanding today’s ghastly surrender in Colombo, please consider the following a proudly treacherous antidote.

From the top, all hail the versatile verve of Graeme Swann, ebullient contributor with bat and ball in the first three games, Man-of-the-Match in the third. This column was berated for allegedly going overboard on the evidence of his chirpy return to national colours in the series opener, but nothing he did subsequently dulled that glowing impression. In Colombo he did an anti-Monty, decelerating to 48 mph and lobbing those grenades ever higher: when was the last time you could describe an English offie as a big tease? And when, more to the point, was the last time you could justly accuse England of fielding a match-winning one-day spinner?

The first of those victories, furthermore, showcased another revitalised 28-year-old, Owais Shah, flourishing in the pivotal No .6 role and gracing Dambulla with his most mature international innings yet. That trimly elegant beard soon vanished, but despite a rash charge against Sanath Jayasuriya in Colombo, it is hard to stifle the conviction that he has finally attained manhood, a process that his graduation to fatherhood this weekend should only cement. The next step is to ensure more crease time, which can only mean a place in the top four.

Fearlessly touted by his PR company as “The Next Big Thing In English Cricket”, it is now more than 10 years since the Middlesex man had his A-level studies interrupted by a call-up to tour with England A. Back then he and Ben Hollioake, teen prodigies stationed on opposite banks of the Thames, appeared to be the most unfairly gifted prospects the counties had thrown up in a generation.

The first 18-year-old to don the non-baggy blue cap in almost half a century, Hollioake, soon fell from favour, and was killed just as he was beginning to fulfil a fraction of those pumped-up visions; under Duncan Fletcher, Shah, who’d struggled to satisfy the demands of either county or parents, also drifted in and out of contention. To be fair, only after a brief dalliance with county captaincy did he emerge as a consistent force in the shires (in the most recent campaign, Mark Ramprakash was alone among Poms in bettering his first-class average of 70.92).

All too well does this father remember Shah’s reaction when he requested an autograph for his three-year-old son in 1999: to call it a sullenness born of youthful insecurity might be too kind. Brattish is possibly more accurate. He led England to triumph at the Under-19 World Cup, and celebrated catches with the most elaborate routine I’ve ever seen, throwing the ball up and firing an imaginary arrow at it from an equally imaginary bow. A poppy begging to be cut down? I’m sure that was how many saw it.

Prior to his return this summer, indeed, Shah had seldom done much of worldwide note since his second ODI, at Lord’s in 2001, when he added 170 with Marcus Trescothick to put England within sniffing distance of overhauling Pakistan’s 242, only for the restless new boy’s needless run-out to trigger a collapse that left them three runs shy. Only once in his next 16 ODI innings, prior to being ditched after the 2002-03 series in Australia, did he reach 40. Self-inflicted deaths, the handiwork of a spirit straining at the leash, were not uncommon.

That England won just three of Shah’s first 18 ODIs, including two against the un-might of Zimbabwe, spoke of a discouraging environment. Fletcher’s approval, moreover, was rarely apparent: just once did Shah play more than two consecutive games. Like father, like coach? Quite possibly. Shelved for the best part of three years, forgiveness proved fleeting: he was dumped again for another 18 months after failing to translate an audacious 82 on his belated Test debut against India into 50-over plunder.

Yet in the first dozen ODIs since his recall against the West Indies in July, he made 604 runs at 60.40, more than double Kevin Pietersen’s average output over that span. England won seven of those games, six of them against purportedly superior rivals. The link is fiendishly tricky to resist. Deft against spin and with trips to Kandy, Colombo and Galle next on the schedule, now, surely, is the time to give “Ace” a decent chance to trump Test bowlers.





Ryan Sidebottom has carried on with his dream comeback into the England fold © Getty Images

Ryan Sidebottom has already had an extended run and all the signs are that he is growing in stature with every outing. So much so, the absence of the owner of the country’s most famous dodgy ankle was barely noticeable. As Richard Hobson noted in the Times, the Yorkshireman could be to Moores what Marcus Trescothick was to Fletcher – a productive hunch plucked from county middling-ness.

Only Farveez Mahrouf matched Sidebottom as a wicket-taker in this series. That he had the guts not to jettison those decidedly unhip Jacobean curls says as much about his inner iron as having a one-cap-wonder for a dad says about his motivation.

Stuart Broad has the opposite sort of paternal act to follow: his father, Chris, enjoyed conspicuous if short-lived success internationally. Stuart has also had to cast off the shadow of those six sixes Yuvraj Singh swashed off him at the World Twenty20. In Sri Lanka, the fact that he outbowled James Anderson, the anointed spearhead, would have been sufficient evidence of inner strength; that nerveless match-winning knock in the third match underlined it in indelible red ink.

Then there was Paul Collingwood. If looks could kill, Phil Mustard would have been six feet under by the time the scoreboard had registered the fall of Sri Lanka’s eighth wicket in the second ODI. “Get up,” roared England’s conductor at his Durham confrere, who had somehow contrived to act as if Chaminda Vaas’s fairly blatant edge had missed contact by a couple of pitch-lengths. One TV commentator was so bemused he suggested Collingwood’s verbal blast was directed at Vaas.

What bothered Collingwood, exactly? That his keeper had made him - as bowler, let alone captain - look like a cheat? That, by not “going up” and supporting his bowler-captain, Mustard had put the dismissal at risk (as he would do again when Sangakkara walked for that wafer-thin edge in Colombo)? It is perhaps best not to wade overlong through such a philosophical minefield, but there was no mistaking Collingwood’s ire during the ensuing huddle. Even though Vaas’s departure effectively spelled the end for the hosts, that tense, Gary Cooper-ish smile took an age to emerge.

It was good, nevertheless, to see an England ODI captain have a bit of a growl. I’m quite prepared to accept that Ottis Gibson, the bowling coach, had something to do with it too (and his influence on the execution of slower balls and deployment of bouncers seems plain). But maybe it was simply fear of the skipper’s wrath that did most to fuel the bowlers’ remarkably steadfast refusal to overstep?

The nation’s first such specialist captain since Adam Hollioake (if one discounts Michael Vaughan’s brief reign) looks to have much in common with his scandalously under-used predecessor: serious all-round nuisance value, an aura of matey authority that encourages self-expression but defies disobedience, and a severe dose of defeatophobia.

Collingwood’s fielders, as flawless a unit as any boasted by an English team in recent memory, have followed Collingwood’s personal example: quick, agile and accurate, thoughtful and proactive. Much the same can be said of the running between the wickets. Multi-faceted, happiest confounding expectations and largely uncowable: this could, in short, be a side constructed in its captain’s image. Maybe getting caught in a lap-dancing club has its career benefits. Discovering that your leader is human can do wonders for morale.

Nor does it seem entirely coincidental that all this has been happening on the watch of the personable Peter Moores, whose tolerance of individuality and respect for county cricket are both distinct improvements on the previous incumbent’s mostly admirable modus operandi. As is the non-aversion to free(ish) speech, though Fletcher’s lip-zipped pragmatism and passion for platitudes could be traced to some extent, as a Zimbabwean, to his outsiderhood.

For a coach to blithely confess to the media that he has been passing on the teachings of Buddha is to wave a red rag at the bull of ridicule. That Moores was prepared to do so confirmed him as a fellow longer on perspective than ego. It spoke even greater volumes for his awareness that a coach’s fate depends on events over which, ultimately, he has scant if any control.

Moores gives his charges pearls from the Dhammapada, wherein Buddha offers his son, Rahula, the benefit of his otherworldly wisdom. "Thus, Rahula, you should train yourself: 'I will purify my bodily actions through repeated reflection. I will purify my verbal actions through repeated reflection. I will purify my mental actions through repeated reflection.' "

Constant, objective and rigorous self-analysis as the route to enlightenment? Not exactly a novel concept. Still, after Shah’s dismissal of Sangakkara today, one can only conclude it to be a philosophy hell-bent on enhancing self-esteem and destroying self-imposed limitations. As Elliott Gould’s laconic Phillip Marlowe never tired of saying in The Long Goodbye, that’s okay by me.

Go to Comments

Comments

Posted by: Rohit on 10/13/2007

Good to see England doing well , especially on a tour to the subcontinent. I guess cricketers these days adapt better. Hope we see a good hard fought test series between England and Sri Lanka in a few weeks . I feel both teams are well matched , with Sri Lanka having the slight upper hand when it comes to experience in the bowling dept. Like South Africa showed in Pakistan , if the seamers maintain a tight line and length and pepper the batsman with the occasional bouncer , with a spinner plugging away at the other end , wickets are to be had even on flat subcontinental wickets.

Posted by: Isam on 10/13/2007

good piece.

Posted by: Anthony on 10/14/2007

There is no way this ridiculous result will be repeated in the Test series:

1. Murali will be back.
2. Hopefully Atapattu will finished his juvenile spat with the selectors in December, and the political peace that graced Tom Moody's reign returns for Trevor Bayliss.
3. The fact that all the games were day night was a huge factor in England's favour (given that Sidebottom went into the A/C room after every over anyway). Five days in Sri Lanka's heat will give a new meaning to KP's incessant whining about "burn-out".

Hope to see you lot in the Barmy Army this December for some fun in the sun.

Posted by: Jamie Dowling on 10/14/2007

This is how England's test and one day teams should have been since the days of Adam Hollioake - run by separate captains. And Peter Moores is flexible enough to understand this and make it work.

Yes, England needed a Duncan Fletcher figure for a time but he stayed past his best before date and now Moores has a bigger rebuilding job on his hands. There's something about Collingwood - the man's as hard as nails, he wouldn't ask you to do something he wouldn't do himself, hell I could almost see him playing Michael Caine's role in Get Carter!

I'm still not convinced by Shah. Swann's return is nice to see. I don't understand why Duncan Fletcher didn't like Swann but was happy with KP who has to be the number one FIGJAM on the planet! I'm not saying that's bad, I'm just questioning Fletcher's judgement.

Sidebottom and Swann returning successfully (and Anderson's performances) have shown Duncan Fletcher's disregard for county cricket to be completely wrong. You have to learn your craft somewhere. S&S were originally picked before they were ready. Now they are back as more like the finished articles.

Ottis Gibson's taken the bowling coach job. If people get crocked in Sri Lanka Ottis might be playing for us. And in his current form that would be very interesting.

Peter Moores likes to quote Dhammapada. I wonder what Paul Collingwood likes to quote? Some of Jack Regan's lines from The Sweeney perhaps?

The test series will be a different affair. But no less compelling. I'd love to see Ramps selected for that tour. His statistics since moving to The Oval are incredible!

Posted by: Brian on 10/14/2007

Rob: interesting article. I'd like to see your pick for the SL test series. According to this and an earlier blog you think both Ramprakash and Shah should be in, and presumably Swann as well. Like Jamie Dowling I am not convinced by Shah, but I don't see how Ramprakash can be left out regardless of his earlier record. But who would you drop? Apart from Strauss, of course. Assuming you keep Vaughan, Cook, Bell, KP, Collingwood, there is not enough room for 2 more batsmen.

And then, who will you pick for the bowlers? Hoggard and Harmison, out of practice and not acclimatised? Or Anderson, Sidebottom & Broad, acclimatised, fit and in form? Who's your first spinner, Swann or Monty? And who keeps wicket?

It's all very ticklish.

Please enlighten us with your views.

Posted by: Henry on 10/15/2007

England's batting is still a bit shaky, but Shah has indeed been excellent. What has been great is that the bowlers are putting England into match-winning positions, through disciplined line and length, and some clever spin. The batting will come together in time, but I'm glad D. Fletcher's idea of playing rubbish if moderately fast bowlers has been put to rest.

Posted by: johnron on 10/15/2007

This series win is well worth taking stock of and even enjoying! Yes, there are areas of weakness which need to be addressed but we need to enjoy successes such as this one when they come along and recognise what an accomplishment this was. England's one day cricket team continues to move in the right direction but we can't suddenly expect to be world-beaters.
All too often in this country a side gets a little bit of success (the India series) and everyone seems to go a bit crazy. Let's keep our feet on the ground here. We've won a one-day series in one of the toughest places in the world, and that's with the team not firing on all cylinders. Yes, the top-order batting has probably been the weakest area of the unit but a good team doesn't become a bad team over night and players like KP, Bell and Collingwood have proved their worth over an extended period of time. We can't turn a blind eye to their lack of runs in this series but nor should we be too critical just yet.
It aggravates me that KP in particular gets so much criticism at this time. It's not that he hasn't made mistakes this series and been in poor form relative to his own high standards, but where a number of players could have been singled out for their batting shortcomings in Sri Lanka, it's Pietersen who seems to cop it more than most. He has earned the right to have a poor series - even a comparatively quiet year! There's too much cricket and I don't understand why we are dismissive of the reasons a player such as Pietersen who has proved his worth gives for his slump in form. Heed should be taken of such comments and something done about the perpetual merry-go-round of international cricket which is gradually being devalued through its over-exposure.

Posted by: Harold on 10/15/2007

"3. The fact that all the games were day night was a huge factor in England's favour"

Oh, come on. While I agree that the Test series will be a very different thing, to say this about the ODIs is to ignore the reality--which was that the side batting second had a MUCH harder time of it, due both to the lighting conditions and the increased swing. If I remember correctly, SL won the toss four times, and batted first each time. England managed to win two of those, and won the game when they won the toss and batted first.

England won the series. Would they have done so if Murali had been available? Maybe not, but that's the way it goes.

Posted by: Anthony on 10/16/2007

Fair enough Harold. Just meant to say it took Sri Lanka's oppressive climate out of the picture, part of the "home team advantage". Anyhow, there were very few good excuses this series. If SL could win two games by 100+ runs, I have no idea why we fell asleep in the middle 3.

Posted by: Jackie Litherland on 10/16/2007

Glad that England's fielding has been appreciated at last by a commentator. I thought the fielding in the Series was absolutely crucial and not only supported the bowlers but strangled the SL batting. Collingwood is always mentioned and he leads by example but Ian Bell is superb in the field and together they are formidable. They are so active on the ball and even in the heat didn't flag. That is some achievement. It set the all important tone of aggression because we lost the toss four times. When we look at the performance of our top order we have to compare it with the home side. Both struggled on those pitches and it was generally acknowledged that the first 20 overs was the killer. Bell's vital partnership of 50 with Cook in the penultimate game which won the Series was achieved within the first 20 overs. It was enough to put us ahead on D/L when the rain came. The team then rested and Cook and Pietersen came out refreshed and won the game. Don't forget the openers had suffered from having only a 20 min break after hours in the searing heat. They were tough games and they weren't won by individuals but by a team with terrific team spirit. English commentators are too critical. They also pick teams apart even when they are successful. No-one in a team is going to fire all the time. The team should take the strain. That is how they win, isn't it? To win the Series was an extraordinary achievement. A less grumpy set of cricket commentators would have lauded it to the skies. I do believe our media are too ready to criticise and throw the towel in. Hence they are often wrong with their predictions. When it was suggested by our sporting media to Paul Collingwood that the English public wasn't that interested in their achievement, he replied: "I don't give a monkey's." That sums up the spirit of our England captain and also says everything about our media.

Posted by: prikand on 10/16/2007

It was good contest.Nice to see England is reaching the highs of botham, Gooch and Gower days.Good luck.But I think SL boys need a good break.Their bogged with too much cricket.Cheers guys.Thanks for the entertainment.

Posted by: Manesha on 10/17/2007

Well let's say that Engalnd had some situations where they had things going in theira way.England had done some home work before coming to Srilanka & it has certinaly paid off. Sri lanka come on popele!!!
1. Need to streanthen theiar top order
2. Get some allrounders in the side.
3. Get Muaralie back to the team with 100% fit for the test's

Sri lanka are much better at home & I cannot belive they lost a series to a team liek England.
THe boewlers did well but batsman specially the top order failed. We need to get regroup have to paly better in Austrelia & from that experiance we can enter to the game for the test's matches vs Engalnd back at Home. I'm sure Srilankan taeam will fight back & threy will regain thair stauts again by payning thier own branded Cricket.I wish all the best to Srilankan team & to Engaland team.

Posted by: Raj Singh on 10/18/2007

The writer conveniently forgot about India winning the T20.

Posted by: vijay raghavan on 10/19/2007

Dear Rob, You got one thing wrong when you said it was the year the bookies got slammed. When the underdogs or outsiders win, the happiest people are the bookies. The biggest amounts are bet on the favourites and when they win the bookies' payout is the largest. Bookies are very happy when the outsiders win. The odds are very long, even 100 to one, but the amounts bet are small. Therefore the payouts are much less than what the bookies got from the large number of heavy bets on the favourites. Bookies always cheer for the underdogs; winning outsiders set off bookie celebrations for days. Cheers, Vijay

Posted by: saif zia on 10/26/2007

England now means chokers.They are always on the receiving end because they lack focuss&discipline.They are the most immature side I have ever seen.Even on a cricket tour they act like frisky teenagers.Andrew Flintoff who formed the backbone of the english side in the 2007world cup instead of playing cricket went to a nightclub to enjoy himself with 4 others.The englishmen donot try to give their best in a match because they are not determined to do so.So first they should learn what is discipline & maturity and then play cricket

Posted by: S.Thyagaraj on 11/14/2007

I agree taht greed has creeped into cricket and it is more so when you are making more Money, Now BCCI has give rights to NEO sports and they have shared with DD. DD usually shows only 5 bal overs as they want to maximise revenue.THis time sincethey took the rights at 81 crores they ahve tried to showonly 4 balls per over. Usually fist ball you get to see after the ball is bowled and the last ball as soon as it is bowled it is gone even if a wickethas fallen it is no concern to DD.I have thought,ask DD to pay about 100 crores and teleccat only the feild change over after every over so that we can see changes over and get scores there off. If this is not greed what else is.Both BCCI and there counter parts dont bother about the two most important ingridients of there popularity taht is player and veiwer. I think if we conduct a poll for most greedy BCCI will beat every body by a large magin. It is disheartening to note that this degradation in cricket because money has become more powerful.

Posted by: kennstar on 11/15/2007

Look,Overseas Media Co's have made this out to be all about “centuries old journalistic freedoms”. What a load of crap! They are not charging you for writing stories about it, they are charging you a licence fee for your commercial exploitation of photos taken at the games. If I have a product to sell, why would I let people take photos of it and then on-sell them purely for their own profit? Surely I would say, “I have an exclusive product here, in which I have invested an enormous amount of time and money. You will need to pay me a fee before you can go running off selling your photos of it”.

Cricket Austlia are right on this issue and must stop International Media Co.s like Reuters pilfering images at no cost and on-selling them for a massive profit!

Rob Steen wake up you pommie goose!

Again well done CA and stick to your guns on this issue.


  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton whose books include biographies of Desmond Haynes and David Gower (1995 Cricket Society Literary Award winner) and 500-1 - The Miracle of Headingley '81. His 2004 investigation for The Wisden Cricketer, Whatever Happened to the Black Cricketer?, won the EU Journalism Award For diversity, against discrimination. Sports Journalism -­ A Multimedia Primer, his latest offering, will be published by Routledge in August.
Categories
English cricketIPLSouth African cricketStanford Super Series
Recent Posts
All hail Lord SnootyA one-sided coinPlay it again, AllenIn search of wisdomA tide in sore need of turningThe sweet taste of humble pieChampioning the causeThe pain of DwayneOf winners and nice guysStop shopping at Tresco
Archives
November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007
RSS Feeds Web Feeds
© Cricinfo 2008