Caddick and Hick. Sounds like a shady law firm. If talent was the only passport required for entry into sport’s promised land, their Test curriculum vitaes would be festooned with 400 wickets and 10,000 runs, and a century of caps apiece.
As it is, notwithstanding the fact that Andrew Caddick and Graeme Hick are the leading active first-class performers in their respective disciplines, one is generally regarded as a byword for nerdiness and prima donnaesque truculence, the other as the flat-track bully who couldn’t stop Australians kicking sand in his face, the underachievers’ underachiever. Flags of convenience never were entirely convenient.
At 38 and 41 respectively, Caddick and Hick are now the grand old men of county cricket, as much a part of the furniture as Hove’s deckchairs. Indeed, Caddick, who played his 62nd and last Test in January 2003, has defied virtually every rule in the book by keeping his mojo working for as long as he has: only Danish Kaneria has taken more first-class wickets this summer than his 44. Yet unlike Hick, who at international level wore an uncertain heart on both sleeves and hence stirred sympathy, he has never quite inspired affection: that sensitivity about his ears and a certain social gauchness proved difficult to overcome. Has any England cricketer with 200 Test wickets to his name been so unloved?
When they chose England over New Zealand and Zimbabwe (to be fair, Caddick insists his native land showed scant interest after he played for them in the 1987-88 Youth World Cup while the prospects of Harare becoming a major international venue were pretty dim in the mid-1980s), Poms rubbed hands in gleeful anticipation. Caddick, we were assured, was Richard Hadlee on stilts, Hick a high-heeled Bradman. Most were quite happy to sheath their objections to so-called “equivocal Englishmen”.
Unfortunately, expectations were pitched so high that instant damnation followed early struggles. Hick’s first, fatal faux pas was not to score quadruple Test hundreds from the get-go; Caddick’s was to mosey into the pressbox in the Caribbean and call home without permission. In time, both recovered, albeit to varying extents.
Caddick forged a highly fruitful alliance with Darren Gough that helped reboot the Test side under Nasser Hussain and Duncan Fletcher. Yet even then he was chastised as a second-innings bowler – 103 scalps at 20.81 compared with 131 at 37.06 in the first. Which always struck me as a tad absurd, not to mention grossly unfair, not least because, with draws increasingly scarce, second-innings wickets became more valuable as his career evolved. In all he took part in 21 Test victories, in which he claimed the not insignificant matter of 114 victims at 19.67.
While Hick’s 65 Tests saw him average an under-par 31, he saved his strutting for the ODI stage, where restraint is actively discouraged and meekness intolerable. Among Englishmen with 3000 runs, only Nick Knight, Allan Lamb and Marcus Trescothick have averaged more than his 37.12; for St George, only Lamb and Graham Gooch have surpassed his 635 World Cup runs. It was his 83 that won the 1992 semi-final against South Africa: the sight of Zimbabwe’s big brother so often spurred him to his best. The pity was the neglect. With an average of 34.20 and a strike rate of 41.20 balls/wicket, he leads all England spinners who have pocketed more than 13 scalps. Yet over the span of his 120 internationals he averaged well under two overs per game. If only he’d had Kevin Pietersen’s disdain for self-effacement.
Hick, much the more modest of the pair, has no such illusions, but it says much for Caddick’s seemingly untarnished self-image that he still believes he is good enough to play Tests. With his endlessly repeatable action and undiminished capacity for generating lift from a good length, a straight swap for Steve Harmison or Liam Plunkett against the West Indies would certainly have been beneficial to the efficiency of England’s attack. Nor would it have been at all incongruous but for the ruthless tyranny of age and the undue importance selectors place on the least significant numbers.
Instead, he has walked the walk for Somerset. At the mid-point of the County Championship campaign, Somerset sit atop Division Two courtesy of a multitude of factors: Justin Langer’s leadership and runs, a Taunton square that can play even the biggest duffer into form, six regulars with batting averages in excess of 60, and the circuit’s most venerable and dynamic new-ball duo. Last year, Caddick and South African Charl Willoughby (32) combined for 129 first-class wickets, a figure they are on schedule to exceed. In their most recent outing, they sealed a thumping of Gloucestershire with 19 of the 20 wickets. Caddick’s match haul of 12-71 was a career-best; no active non-spinner comes within a country mile of his 1114 first-class victims.
Hick is some way from his pomp, but he has just become the fifth-fastest player to 40,000 first-class runs. His two centuries this term, meanwhile, have hoisted his career tally to 134, eighth on the all-time list. He and Worcestershire are talking about another contract, and provided his appetite remains hearty, Frank Woolley, seventh in that chart with 145, may not be beyond reach.
Currently on a one-year deal at New Road, he insists he is “really enjoying it” and has no desire to heave his coffin into the attic just yet. “There will be somewhere along the line, whether it is this year or next year, that will suddenly make me think, ‘I am letting myself and other people down’ and it will be time to go. At the moment I am not thinking that way. I’d like to be here one day and gone the next.”
It is hard to imagine Caddick expressing those sentiments. They’ll have to wrench the ball from his hands and force him to sign an undertaking to spend the rest of his days flying that beloved helicopter. Instead, another quote rings long and loud. Talking to David Foot after being named one of Wisden’s Five Cricketers of the Year for his exploits in 2000 – the piece de resistance four wickets in an over against West Indies at Headingley – he thanked Hussain and Fletcher for the way “handled and encouraged” him. “I’m a quiet person, someone who needs his own space. I don’t like hassle.” His first 50 Test wickets came at 36 apiece, the next 110 at a jot under 24. That Fletcher and, to a lesser degree, Hussain were also geographical outsiders does not seem in any way coincidental.
How easy to imagine Hick uttering those very sentiments. In his 20s, he was too gentle by nature to impose himself on a dressing room chocabloc with larger-than-life personalities full of scepticism about a wunderkind from Africa for whose express benefit the registration rules had been revamped. Only latterly, like Caddick, did he feel a sense of belonging.
Now it’s Jonathan Trott’s turn to make the leap from imported fruit to national asset. How fortunate the young South African is to be selected in more enlightened, multicultural times, an age when Polish waitresses, Slovakian travel agents and Somalian shop assistants are part of the everyday scenery, when Team England newcomers are ushered into group hugs instead of being subjected to silent sneers and whispered resentments, when Kevin Pietersen can be twice as brash as Tony Greig and no-one bothers with phrases such as “equivocal Englishman”.
Graeme Hick was a class act when he first burst upon the international scene. It's not the run he has scored over the years, but the elegance with which he has scored them marks him as a standout player, his modest Tdest record, notwithstanding. When he first played for England, Graeme Hick had already scored 57 first-class hundreds. Many thought he would leave as lasting an impression on the international stage as the left-handed Graeme, the South African southpaw Graeme Pollock. But he couldn't carry his first class form to the Test level. And the debate is still on whether the best bowlers in the world had his number or he simply suffered from stage fright. In one-dayers, Hick proved that he was a class act. He was a rather effective off spinner with over 200 first class wickets and a brilliant slips fielder. Graham Gooch remarked in his book he would have Hick along with Mark Taylor and Ian Botham in his best slip cordon. I think while Hick was an underachiever in Tests with an average of just above 30, he never got due recognition as a topnotch one-day batsman for England. And a lot of it had to do with the fact that he wasn't a natural-born Englishman.
Posted by: Chatura Ranaweera on 06/22/2007
Great article. Loved reading it!
Posted by: Arsalan Khan on 06/23/2007
They were quality.
Underrated.
I remember Caddick breaking my heart in the 2003 world cup against Pakistan.. dismissing Afridi after being launched for a six on the previous ball.
Posted by: apu on 06/23/2007
Good one.
It was a moment to watch when Hick made his first hundred agaist India. Barring a couple of David Gower's innings, I have not enjoyed batting of any English batsman to the level of that particular 178. (Of course, it was not at all enjoyable when Gooch swept the whatever out of Indian spinners in world cup 87 :-). The fact that it took Hick 8 tests to reach his first fifty and another 6 to reach his first hundred, shows that English cricket board did invest in him as much as he invested his years to qualify to play for English international cricket. By that standard, most batsmen would be shown an exit. So, I would not agree that Hick wasn't recognized due to not being natural-born Englishman. It has continued to intrigue me what happens to such batsmen of brilliance in different circumstances that squeezes the juice out of them, and what remains is a shell of a player.
Posted by: Asif Haroon William on 06/23/2007
Hick is the classic example of talent going to waste.He easily could have scored 8,000 runs with 25 centuries with an average of over 50.But alas,it was not meant to be.I am sure that somewhere in a parallel universe, hick ended up with 14,000 test runs, at an average of 100 with 40 centuries, including 10 double and 5 quadruple centuries.He sure did have the talent to do so.
Posted by: Joel Brittenden on 06/23/2007
Nice article, thanks.
I remember watching Graeme Hick playing for Northern Districts against my beloved Canterbury back in the late 80's during summer holidays. He seemed unstoppable and marched on to another 100. To my young mind it made perfect sense to refer to him as Mr Hick. On this day once he got to his 100 he put one over the long on fence to the bowler moved a man back on to the fence, next ball same result, six over the head over the recently moved man on the long on fence.
I seem to remember at the time some talk of changing the residential requirements to fast track him into the NZ team.
Memories of Caddick are more recent and are him been smashed all around and out of the park by Astle during his record 222 at Lancaster Park.
Posted by: vineet on 06/23/2007
Caddick's credentials as a test class fast bowler should never have been doubt. Those 4 wickets in an over against West Indies in that 2 day test will never be forgotten. Probably he was a classic case of late blooming Englishmen. Still, for a while he formed a formidable opening pair with Gough.
Hick though is another story. Comparable to Indian middle order batsman VVS Laxman. A special talent that never got fulfilled because of a weak heart. Laxman averages in 20s in one dayers which gives scant respect to his batting abilities. Like Hick, he too is a victim of team politics.
Posted by: Serchers on 06/23/2007
There are many of us - correction - all of us at Worcester who dread the day that Hick calls it a day. He has been a wonderful servant for WCCC and I'm sure that he knows how much we all appreciate what he's achieved over his career.
Last week he reached the 40,000 run mark, a record which is unlikely to be surpassed these days. Interestingly, he scored the vital run whilst batting at local rivals Warwickshire. To a man there was a standing ovation for Hick who must be one of the most popular players on the professional circuit.
It is a great pity that he never achieved the same greatness at Test level, partly I believe was bad luck as he started off his career against the West Indies in their pomp and glory days.
But I don't think anyone in the England set-up really knew how to manage the guy properly. He is a quiet soul, reserved and modest. The 'go-get-'em' attitude in those early days did him no favours.
That is all in the past now and nothing can change it. And yet he's still performing week in, week out accumulating more runs each week.
If you get the chance to go and watch him then you should. In Worcestershire he is nothing less than a Legend.
Posted by: Azfar Khan on 06/23/2007
I was very young then, but I still remember watching the 1992 world cup semi final and there he was; Graeme Hick leading from the front, taking the talented and threatening South African bowling to task. His cuts and pulls were a treat to watch. Being a Pakistani I was actually disappointed watching him get out early in the Final. For a long time after that I remember I would imitate Hick and try to copy his stance and his shots while playing for school. Hick and Vaughan and Alec Stewart remain my favourite English batsmen. Caddick too was a fighter. He came into the side at a time when there were no senior fast bowlers to guide him like Iman Khan for Wasim Akram and Waqar Younis and then these two for Shoaib Akhtar. Caddie alongwith Goughie started from scratch and set new challenging standards for the new breed to achieve. I loved watching Caddie bowl those banana outswingers. I hope the selectors show some courage and give him another shot while Sajid Mehmood is injured and Harmison going for his operation.
Posted by: g parthasarathy on 06/24/2007
Yes, a good article. Many of the remarks are worded nicely. I liked the bakground to this essay. Thanks
Posted by: Spaceman! on 06/24/2007
i always maintained - and i still do - that had Illingworth not dropped Hick at a period when he was averaging 40+ then he could well have gone on to become as succesful in tests as in CC.
Posted by: cricfan on 06/24/2007
How many wickets has Caddick taken in tests in tests in the subcontinent? How often has he even bothered to tour the subontinent? You talk about Caddick as an underachiever. Spare a thought for those quick bowlers who have toiled season after season bowling for India, Pakistan or Srilanka. Caddick pales in comparison to them. The truth is that if Caddick had played the majority of his cricket in the subcontinent, his wickets tally would have struggled to reach three figures. By playing in seaming wickets in England, bouncy and pacy wickets down under and fast wickets in West Indies, he has picked up 200 odd wickets. Any average bowler could do that.
Posted by: Paul Clarke on 06/24/2007
Graeme has been my hero for more than 20 years. Not solely for his cricket - more for the manner of the man. Here in sunny Worcester he is a hero to all the cricket lovers..and the "but" that appends every conversation about him from outsiders is met with a knowing smile. We know - and we don't really care (ahem...anymore). As for Caddo. What a fantastic bowler - like a lot of tall bowlers he finds the fuller length ball takes 2 yards off his pace, and It became boring for the ex-batsmen in commentary boxes bemoan his "powderpuff" deliveries when he tried them.
Both of these great players would have been world beaters under better management. But under Sgt Major Illingworth and his acerbic coaching - they didn't stand a chance. It's a testiment to them both that we are still talking about them now
Posted by: Brian on 07/01/2007
Just wanted to chip in and say that regardless of Caddick's record he has one of the most fluent and beautiful bowling actions I or possibly the game has ever seen.
Posted by: Chris on 07/05/2007
cricfan - that is the most pointless post I have ever seen.
Have to agree with Spaceman - had Hick not been dropped the summer after touring SA (where the only way they could get him out was umpiring mistakes) he would have averaged 40+
As for Caddick, he and Gough as a partnership were so far ahead of what we have now - they just had to play better opposition and struggle with low totals to bowl at
Posted by: Rajesh on 08/03/2007
Well, Hick may not have become the next Bradman as the English press first proclaimed when Greame burst onto the scene but he wasnt as bad either as they portrayed him later ......
If a fast bowler of Allan Donald's stature picks Sachin Tendulkar and Greame Hick as two of the best he has bowled to, it says something about the quality of that guy....
Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at
the University of Brighton whose books include biographies of Desmond
Haynes and David Gower (1995 Cricket Society Literary Award winner) and
500-1 - The Miracle of Headingley '81. His 2004 investigation for The
Wisden Cricketer, Whatever Happened to the Black Cricketer?, won the
EU Journalism Award For diversity, against discrimination. Sports
Journalism - A Multimedia Primer, his latest offering, will be
published by Routledge in August.