cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Blogs home
First Class, first person Blues Brothers Rob's Lobs Tour Diaries Pak Spin Girls Aloud
Beyond The Test World On The Circuit What's New The Surfer It Figures The IPL Buzz

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« From Stan to Ollie | | Saluting the equivocal Englishmen »

June 21, 2007

Posted by Rob Steen on 06/21/2007

The man who should have been king





Adam Hollioake practices in his new Essex kit © Essex CCC
This has already been quite a year for comebacks involving my favourite entertainers, what with The Police, Steely Dan and Squeeze all accepting sizeable sums to return to concert stages. I sincerely doubt he is in it for the money – he appears to be doing fairly nicely thank-you in the property game in his native Perth – but another is scheduled to return to the boards on Friday when Adam Hollioake makes his debut for Essex in the Twenty20 Cup. An ex-Surrey captain turning out for that Chelmsford lot? It’ll take some getting used to.

The upshot of a spot of beach cricket with Graham Gooch on the Gold Coast in January, Hollioake’s return to arms prompts the odd wild imagining. Since he was arguably the first player to master the super-abbreviated game – Surrey’s first defeat came in their 14th match, the 2004 final, and he was the leading wicket-taker in each of the first two seasons – might it be that Gooch was acting under ECB instructions? Even in semi-retirement, Hollioake is still the best man to captain England in the inaugural Twenty20 World Cup.

At Surrey, he succeeded where Stuart Surridge’s successors had repeatedly and miserably stumbled, presiding over a gift-laden dressing room yet subsuming egos to the point where trophies flowed whatever the format. Strong-minded yet flexible, tactically sharp and a decent psychologist, it was entirely typical that the one time I know I offended him was with praise and admiration.

In 2002, his brother Ben died, a loss he still feels keenly and the reason his appetite for the game drained. During the ensuing county campaign, he played a match winning knock and, according to one colleague, told his charges that he had done it “for Ben”. I duly mentioned this in the Sunday Telegraph only to be upbraided by my source: Adam saw it as an invasion of privacy.

He led a star-deprived, profoundly maverick but one-for-all XI to victory in the 1997-98 Champions Trophy, the only one-day pot England have won in a tournament featuring more than three sides. He should have led them at the 1999 World Cup, and probably the next one too. He would certainly have been worth his place as a player. A feisty and creative batsman, he was also a prolific wobbler of the seam and arguably the first bowler to draw inspiration from baseball’s knuckleballers and change-up artists.

There are a few reasons a fully-qualified conspiracy theorist such as myself might cite for the decision to persistently overlook him. For starters, one suspects he was a tad too in-your-face, a wee bit too Australian, the latter of which took quite some doing given the prevailing lust for all things formerly baggy and green of cap.

During their years of dominance, Surrey, moreover, were detested by all but the Kennington regulars (Englishmen always were rather good at disguising envy as contempt). Nor did it help that Nasser Hussain, a man of Essex, was his rival-in-chief. When Hollioake was summoned to the 2002-03 Australian tour, many observers reckoned that Hussain felt threatened by his presence, a suspicion borne out by his ensuing paucity of playing time.

Is it too late to correct this rank oversight? I don’t see why. After all, this is a bloke who recently lost 11kg in order to box Eric Rush, New Zealand’s former junior light-heavyweight champ and renowned All Black wing, a sacrifice for charity that only saw him lose on a split decision. Raising a family, and funds for the Ben Hollioake Foundation, may be his primary goals these days, but if the selectors are looking for a scrapper with nifty footwork, a strong jab and a meaty right hook, they could do a good deal worse.

Go to Comments

Comments

Posted by: Paul on 06/21/2007

Hollioake would be a good choice in theory to be captain, but I guess it would be wise to see how he plays for Essex first. Unfortunately, doubt the ECB would pick him, if he wanted to play even. Would be interesting though.

Posted by: Simon Lacey on 06/21/2007

'in his native Perth' and 'wee bit too Australian' says it all. He IS an Australian and always was.

Posted by: Aju on 06/21/2007

Still remember Holliaoke leading a very un-English, England team to Sharjah. It was a really long time back. And stunningly, given the context, England routed both Pakistan and India before the finals. I can remember how the English batting forced Anil Kumble to give up his attacking credentials and bowl a restricting line. Hollioake was the captain's captain, with Darren Gough to send down some sensational bowling at the death, and also welcoming a certain pudgy lad named Andrew Flintoff into English colours.

Posted by: Vasco Perry on 06/21/2007

Well written and thought provoking. Alas, your wishes will come to nothing as England will not look in his direction again. Sad, isn't it?

Posted by: Chris on 06/21/2007

Simon, do the words 'Kevin Pietersen' and 'wee bit too South African' say much to you?

Posted by: Rohit Puri on 06/21/2007

How does it make sense to point the finger at just Hollioake? England's best player is South African for godssake!!

Posted by: mike on 06/21/2007

I think Steve Waugh and even Simon O'donell might disagree with your comment about the knuckleballers and change ups,but it does take England a while to catch on, and it usually takes an australian to show them the way.

Posted by: Dave on 06/21/2007

Simon: 'in his native Perth' and 'wee bit too Australian' says it all. He IS an Australian and always was.

Since when has England been concerned about where their players come from?

Posted by: Chayya on 06/21/2007

The man who brought back life to the English One day game! He was able to manage a bits and pieces team to be a Potent force in world cricket at that time. A true leader and an innovator for any shortened version of the game, who unfortunaitley couldnt find his feet in the test arena, and ultimaitely lost out to Nasser Hussain. So Hussain, Thorpe and Gough may have opened the door for England to emerge from the darkness, but it was Holliaoke that unlocked it.

Posted by: Jamie on 06/22/2007

Why would you bring him back to Essex first, if your a youngster comin through you'd be pretty dirty if you missed out because they have brought a 35 year old back, and why would you ever consider him for the English 20/20 team and captain. It just makes a mockery of what English cricket already is!

Posted by: Simon Lacey on 06/22/2007

Obviously England have a long tradition of shoehorning foreign players into the team (right back to Ranji) but it doesn't make it the correct thing to do. KP is South African and, but for the quota policy, would be playing for their national team now. Again, one freak player doesn't make it a correct policy in the long term. How many of the other guys have been a success (Hick? Lamb? Jones? Caddick?). I just think it's sad that we cannot get by without nicking players from other countries.

Posted by: Cat on 06/22/2007

What a gentleman Adam is! The way he led the way at the Phuket International Cricket Sixes Tournament and his team in the Twenty/20 game against Trevor Cahppell's X1 was exceptional. A really nice guy and England could have used him in Australia during their Ashes Series. How they could have used him!

Posted by: Anne Bodman on 06/22/2007

One day cricket and test cricket are two different products and require totally different strategies. Its a pity that England could not accept that and kept Adam Hollioake as one day captain with Nasser as test captain.

If its looked at in this way then the test captain does not have to feel threatened by the one-day captain.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left

Rob Steen is a sportswriter and senior lecturer in sports journalism at the University of Brighton whose books include biographies of Desmond Haynes and David Gower (1995 Cricket Society Literary Award winner) and 500-1 - The Miracle of Headingley '81. His 2004 investigation for The Wisden Cricketer, Whatever Happened to the Black Cricketer?, won the EU Journalism Award For diversity, against discrimination. Sports Journalism -­ A Multimedia Primer, his latest offering, will be published by Routledge in August.
Categories
English cricketIPL
Recent Posts
The Spirit of Cricket 2008The Trouble With FreddieTaking The Lord’s name in vainThe new Murali?The greatest insignificant inningsThe best pound-for-pound captainOf sacred cowsTrading placesTest of willBig wedge, thin end
Archives
May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007October 2007September 2007August 2007July 2007June 2007
Web Feeds
© Cricinfo 2008