<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Match Vox</title>
      <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/</link>
      <description></description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:16:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

            <item>
         <title>Sreesanth stakes his claim</title>
         <description>After a series of poor one-day outtings Sreesanth turned in figures of 2 for 39 off ten overs. Has he done enough to book his ticket to the West Indies? What about Irfan Pathan and his failings? Do you think Munaf Patel should make the trip - he&apos;s bowled really well but his fielding is shambolic. Post your opinion on Match Vox.</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/02/sreesanth_stakes_his_claim.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/02/sreesanth_stakes_his_claim.php</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">India v Sri Lanka, 2nd ODI, Rajkot</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 06:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Vying for a ticket to the West Indies</title>
         <description>One match to go before the selectors pick their squad for the Caribbean. The sole question mark seems to be over Sreesanth, who&apos;s been out of sorts in the one-day game. With India bowling on a lively wicket, this is his chance to turn the tide in his favour. Sehwag is the other person who needs a good outing, though his passage seems assured.  What do you think the selectors will do on Monday?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/02/vying_for_a_ticket_to_the_west.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/02/vying_for_a_ticket_to_the_west.php</guid>
                  <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">India v Sri Lanka, 2nd ODI, Rajkot</category>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2007 03:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Will inexperience count? - India v Sri Lanka, 1st ODI</title>
         <description>With just four games left before the World Cup, both India and Sri Lanka go into this match without some experienced players. Sri Lanka haven&apos;t included Chaminda Vaas and Muttiah Muralitharan in the series squad, while for this match India are without Yuvraj Singh, Ajit Agarkar and Irfan Pathan. Will inexperience count? And can the youngsters getting a chance to perform do so with so much pressure on them? </description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/02/_india_v_sri_lanka_1st_odi.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/02/_india_v_sri_lanka_1st_odi.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2007 08:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Series in the balance - India v West Indies, 4th ODI</title>
         <description>The series is in the balance as the teams walk out at Vadodara. Opinion is split over how India should tackle these matches: Some feel they should try to win at any cost and so field its strongest team, others feel the smaller victories - an opening combination that clicks, a middle-order bat who scores, a bowler who fits into the attack - are crucial in the longer run. What&apos;s your take on this? Win now or set things up for a win down the line?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/series_in_the_balance_india_v.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/series_in_the_balance_india_v.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 03:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Let&apos;s talk about West Indies...</title>
         <description>After being hit all over the park, West Indies have bounced back to ask India some searching questions - first with some excellent fielding and steady bowling, now with their strokeful batting. Let&apos;s talk about West Indies now: have they shown signs of being serious contenders for the World Cup?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/lets_talk_about_west_indies_1.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/lets_talk_about_west_indies_1.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Let&apos;s talk about West Indies...</title>
         <description>After being hit all over the park, West Indies have bounced back to ask India some searching questions - first with some excellent fielding and steady bowling, now with their strokeful batting. Let&apos;s talk about West Indies now: have they shown signs of being serious contenders for the World Cup?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/lets_talk_about_west_indies_2.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/lets_talk_about_west_indies_2.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 14:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>A pleasant distraction? - India v West Indies, 3rd ODI</title>
         <description>India are off to a flying start, thanks mainly to two fringe players (and a helpful batting track). Uthappa&apos;s innings was a delight but does it really solve any of India&apos;s batting problems or is he a pleasant distraction?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/a_pleasant_distraction_india_v.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/a_pleasant_distraction_india_v.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 10:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>India v West Indies, 3rd ODI</title>
         <description>India cannot lose this series and will use that position of advantage to try out new combinations. Yet though they are 2-0 up, they haven&apos;t fully convinced and today&apos;s changes may help them answer a few questions. What do you think are the signs that India should be looking for in this match?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/india_v_west_indies_3rd_odi.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/india_v_west_indies_3rd_odi.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2007 08:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The one shining exception - India v West Indies, 2nd ODI</title>
         <description>On a day when India batted pathetically, the one shining exception was Dinesh Karthik, who made an intelligent 63 (till he allowed himself to be bowled). Karthik is reinventing himself as a batsman, though his keeping isn&apos;t bad, and his emergence is good news for India</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/the_one_shining_exception_indi.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/the_one_shining_exception_indi.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 13:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>There&apos;s one thing that&apos;s worse than the Indian batting</title>
         <description>There&apos;s one thing that&apos;s worse than the Indian batting: The state of the Barabati pitch. The bounce is uneven, though consistently low, and doesn&apos;t seem to be any kind of preparation for the World Cup. We are unable to find any rationale for this pitch; can you?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/theres_one_thing_thats_worse_t.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/theres_one_thing_thats_worse_t.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Lara&apos;s absence could be key - India v West Indies, 2nd ODI</title>
         <description>Welcome to Match Vox, to a game that&apos;s important for several reasons. At Nagpur, India flattered to deceive, with poor fielding almost undoing the heavy scoring on a flat track; West Indies, by contrast, will take heart from the manner in which they almost upset their opponents. However, Lara&apos;s absence could be the key to what happens at Cuttack. What&apos;s your take on the match prospects? Post your comments here</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/laras_absence_could_be_key_ind.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/laras_absence_could_be_key_ind.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2007 08:18:35 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Sachin&apos;s dilemma</title>
         <description>Chakravarthy, one of our readers, wishes to start a debate regarding Tendulkar. He raises two points: one, that Tendulkar hasn&apos;t been able to really dominate the ball pitched outside his leg stump in the rough for quite few years now (ever since Nasser Hussain employed Ashley Giles for it) and that teams around the world have picked up his perceived weakness for this delivery; and two, that he should retire from one day cricket after the World Cup and prolong his Test career by addressing these problems. Comments?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/sachins_dilemma.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/sachins_dilemma.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 10:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Which choker will choke first?</title>
         <description>South Africa require a further 156 to seal the deciding Test with India after closing day four in Cape Town on 55 for 2. They have eight wickets in hand, which India will hope to grab. A tense final beckons, especially with the storied history of choking these two teams possess. Its just a matter of who coughs up first...isnt it?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/which_choker_will_choke_first.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/which_choker_will_choke_first.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jan 2007 08:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>The difference between the sides?</title>
         <description>For sheer attitude, application, and discipline, South Africa have left India in the shade today. What is the fundamental aspect between the sides that kept South Africa on top and India faltering?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/the_difference_between_the_sid.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/the_difference_between_the_sid.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 13:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
            <item>
         <title>Ganguly leads India&apos;s fightback - 3rd Test: South Africa v India at Cape Town</title>
         <description>After India lost their openers, Sourav Ganguly and Rahul Dravid added 67 before lunch to propel India&apos;s lead past 100. Ganguly was the aggressor in the stand, and for a man lambasted by almost every quarter this past year, he has come back into the team and become India&apos;s highest run-scorer in the series. How much confidence can the man take into the future, especially given the heavy one-day calendar in 2007?</description>
         <link>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/ganguly_leads_indias_fightback.php</link>
         <guid>http://blogs.cricinfo.com/matchvox/archives/2007/01/ganguly_leads_indias_fightback.php</guid>
        
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 11:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
