Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Statsguru Home

« One huge partnership, and nothing else | | Test Captains - an in-depth look »

January 2, 2009

Posted by Ananth Narayanan at 11:40 AM in Trivia - batting

McCullum's blitzkreig and other demolition jobs





Brendon McCullum launched such an assault on Bangladesh that their bowlers didn't know what hit them © Getty Images
This is my second lightweight post in preparation for the serious analysis on Test Captains.

While I was perusing a table I found that there was an innings scoring rate of 15.83. I went back to the scorecard and saw what could be termed as the most devastating win in ODI history. I started thinking about such matches. Until now we have only looked at wins by huge number of runs or by 10 wickets as comprehensive wins. Now there is a different angle in terms of scoring rates.

This also enables us to look across both types of matches, whether teams win batting first or second. In both these matches the RpO differential is a clear indicator of the extent of domination. We should remember that a 10-wkt win need not be that dominating a victory. Imagine a team bats first and scores 200 in 40 overs. The chasing team bats very carefully and wins, say, in 45 overs by 10 wickets. This is certainly not a very comprehensive a win.

There are no qualifying conditions for this analysis. It is a very simple one of finding the RpO differential and ranking by this measure. I have separated the two tables so that we can have a clearer understanding of the win margins.

Let us look at the tables.

Big wins in ODI matches : Batting second

No. MtId Year FBt Score         RpO WonBy Score         RpO   RpO  Result
                                                              Diff

 1. 2660 2007 Bng  93/10 (37.5) 2.46 NZL  95/ 0 ( 6.0) 15.83 13.38 10 wkts
 2. 1776 2001 Zim  38/10 (15.4) 2.43 SLK  40/ 1 ( 4.2)  9.23  6.81  9 wkts
 3. 1940 2003 Eng 117/10 (41.0) 2.85 AUS 118/ 0 (12.2)  9.57  6.71 10 wkts
 4. 1958 2003 Can  36/10 (18.4) 1.93 SLK  37/ 1 ( 4.4)  7.93  6.00  9 wkts
 5. 1961 2003 Bng 108/10 (35.1) 3.07 SAF 109/ 0 (12.0)  9.08  6.01 10 wkts
 6. 1883 2002 Hol 136/10 (50.0) 2.72 PAK 142/ 1 (16.2)  8.69  5.97  9 wkts
 7. 1221 1997 Bng 130/ 8 (43.0) 3.02 IND 132/ 1 (15.0)  8.80  5.78  9 wkts
 8. 2172 2004 Usa  65/10 (24.0) 2.71 AUS  66/ 1 ( 7.5)  8.43  5.72  9 wkts
 9. 2521 2007 Pak 107/10 (45.4) 2.34 SAF 113/ 0 (14.0)  8.07  5.73 10 wkts
10. 1464 1999 Bng 178/ 7 (50.0) 3.56 AUS 181/ 3 (19.5)  9.13  5.57  7 wkts
11. 1758 2001 Ken  90/10 (37.1) 2.42 IND  91/ 0 (11.3)  7.91  5.49 10 wkts
12. 1963 2003 Can 202/10 (42.5) 4.72 WIN 206/ 3 (20.3) 10.05  5.33  7 wkts
13. 2575 2007 Ire  77/10 (27.4) 2.78 SLK  81/ 2 (10.0)  8.10  5.32  8 wkts
14. 2574 2007 Eng 154/10 (48.0) 3.21 SAF 157/ 1 (19.2)  8.12  4.91  9 wkts
15. 1465 1999 Sco  68/10 (31.3) 2.16 WIN  70/ 2 (10.1)  6.89  4.73  8 wkts
16. 2677 2008 Eng 158/10 (35.1) 4.49 NZL 165/ 0 (18.1)  9.08  4.59 10 wkts 
(D/L)
17. 2063 2003 Eng  88/10 (46.1) 1.91 SLK  89/ 0 (13.5)  6.43  4.53 10 wkts
18. 1891 2002 Bng 154/ 9 (50.0) 3.08 SAF 155/ 0 (20.2)  7.62  4.54 10 wkts
19. 1977 2003 Can 196/10 (47.0) 4.17 NZL 197/ 5 (23.0)  8.57  4.40  5 wkts
20. 2026 2003 Pak 185/10 (44.0) 4.20 ENG 189/ 3 (22.0)  8.59  4.39  7 wkts
The first match in this table defies description. Bangladesh is not a weak team such as Hong Kong or Bermuda are. It is not clear what prompted McCullum's assault on the hapless Bangladesh bowlers. Maybe a Bangladeshi remark on beating New Zealand before the match or a personal comment on McCullum. Anyhow here are the details. Bangladesh, batting first, scored 93 in 38 overs and would have expected to pick up a wicket or two in 20 overs during which New Zealand would have cantered towards a comprehensive win.

What happened cannot be forgotten. New Zealand scored these 95 runs in 6 overs at a rate of 15.83, the highest for an innings, by a margin of over 50%, in ODI history. McCullum scored 80 in 28 balls, the second fastest completed 50+ innings in history. The difference in RpO is 13.38. The mind goes blank.

Given below is McCullum's scoring sequence. 6x6s, 9x4s and only 7 dot balls. Makes great viewing on print and should have made greater viewing, in person. Shahid Afridi, being the only batsman with a 100+ strike rate, who I consider the most attacking batsman ever in ODI cricket would have been proud to own this innings.

4 . 4 4b . 4 6 4 6 . . 2 . 4 4 6 4 1 2 1 6 . 6 2 4 6 . 4

Look at the next entry. In terms of RpO difference, it is almost half of the first. Sri Lanka, chasing the third lowest ever ODI total of 38, reached this target in over 4 overs. McCullum might have reached in 2 overs. The blast in this match did not come from batsmen but from Vaas who took 8 for 19.

The third match is interesting. England were dismissed for 117 and then mayhem. Gilchrist and Hayden (the vintage Hayden, not the 2008 imposter) reached this target in 12 overs (including 22 boundaries).

The West Indies innings rate of 10.05, in the 12th match against Canada, is the secong highest innings scoring rate, one of only two exceeding 10.0. This was a great performance since as many as 206 runs were scored in just over 20 overs, during which 36 boundaries were scored.

Note the number of 10-wicket wins. There are 8 such wins in the top 20. Also the number of times England have been at the receiving end of such margins, four in all, sharing the lead with Bangladesh.

It is surprising that 6 of these losses have been inflicted on the top teams, England 4 times and Pakistan 2 times. Sri Lanka and South Africa lead with 4 wins each.

Big wins in ODI matches : Batting first

No. MtId Year WonBy Score       RpO  Vs  Score         RpO  RpO   Result
                                                            Diff  Won by

 1. 2537 2007 SAF 353/ 3 (40.0) 8.82 Hol 132/ 9 (40.0) 3.30 5.53 221 runs
 2. 2542 2007 IND 413/ 5 (50.0) 8.26 Ber 156/10 (43.1) 3.61 4.65 257 runs
 3. 2716 2008 IND 374/ 4 (50.0) 7.48 Hkg 118/10 (36.5) 3.20 4.28 256 runs
 4. 2272 2005 NZL 397/ 5 (44.0) 9.02 Zim 205/10 (43.0) 4.77 4.26 192 runs
 5. 2727 2008 NZL 402/ 2 (50.0) 8.04 Ire 112/10 (28.4) 3.91 4.13 290 runs
 6. 1652 2000 SLK 299/ 5 (50.0) 5.98 Ind  54/10 (26.3) 2.04 3.94 245 runs
 7. 0297 1985 AUS 323/ 2 (50.0) 6.46 Slk  91/10 (35.5) 2.54 3.92 232 runs
 8. 2376 2006 ZIM 338/ 7 (50.0) 6.76 Ber 144/ 7 (50.0) 2.88 3.88 194 runs
 9. 1763 2001 SAF 354/ 3 (50.0) 7.08 Ken 146/10 (45.3) 3.21 3.87 208 runs
10. 1599 2000 PAK 320/ 3 (50.0) 6.40 Bng  87/10 (34.2) 2.53 3.87 233 runs
11. 0531 1988 PAK 284/ 3 (45.0) 6.31 Bng 111/ 6 (45.0) 2.47 3.84 173 runs
12. 0457 1987 WIN 360/ 4 (50.0) 7.20 Slk 169/ 4 (50.0) 3.38 3.82 191 runs
13. 2390 2006 SLK 443/ 9 (50.0) 8.86 Hol 248/10 (48.3) 5.11 3.75 195 runs
14. 0951 1994 SLK 296/ 4 (50.0) 5.92 Zim 105/10 (48.1) 2.18 3.74 191 runs
15. 2169 2004 NZL 347/ 4 (50.0) 6.94 Usa 137/10 (42.4) 3.21 3.73 210 runs
16. 1764 2001 IND 351/ 3 (50.0) 7.02 Ken 165/ 5 (50.0) 3.30 3.72 186 runs
17. 1868 2002 AUS 332/ 5 (50.0) 6.64 Pak 108/10 (36.0) 3.00 3.64 224 runs
18. 0405 1986 WIN 248/ 5 (45.0) 5.51 Slk  55/10 (28.3) 1.93 3.58 193 runs
19. 2420 2006 SAF 418/ 5 (50.0) 8.36 Zim 247/ 4 (50.0) 4.94 3.42 171 runs
20. 2532 2007 AUS 334/ 6 (50.0) 6.68 Sco 131/10 (40.1) 3.26 3.42 203 runs
It is necessary to understand the reason why South Africa's win over Holland (by 221 runs) is placed ahead of India's win over Bermuda (by 257 runs). The first was over 40 overs while the second was over 50 overs. New Zealand's win by 290 runs over Ireland has an RpO differential of only 4.13 since Ireland scored quite freely.

India has two of the most comprehensive wins in the top 5 while New Zealand also has two. But all these 5 matches are against the minnows.

The most comprehensive "relevant" win was Sri Lanka's 245 run win over India. Jayasuriya and Vaas contributed to this demolition job.

Five of the losses have been sustained by the top teams, Sri Lanka sustaining such heavy defeats thrice, all during mid-1980s. Quite a few teams, including Sri Lanka have done this thrice in the top-20 table.

 
Feedback Feedback

Comments

Posted by: vinoth at January 2, 2009 1:56 PM

please prepare an analysis for the best test batsmen as you did for the odi's ............you can reduce workload by seperating cricket into post & pre the odi world cups as obviosly bradman is the best in the pre-world cup time.this is one my kind request. i am waiting for it ............so please please..............
[[
Will do do.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: Adhil at January 2, 2009 2:59 PM

Brendon is the most dangerous wktkeeper/batsman in the world.people speak of dhoni,but what has he done spectacular besides improving his awful hairstyle.brendon is world class in both departments.bat & keep.thats why his adored by his loyal fans like me

Posted by: Steve at January 2, 2009 6:27 PM

@Adhil
Dhoni has won matches for India, trimmed down his aggression to suit match situations, learnt to read pitches brilliantly, put Australia on the backfoot, etc etc.
And Anantha, sir, all of us are waiting for the test batsmen analysis. I imagine Sehwag be near the top? Lol...waiting to see!

Posted by: mahendra at January 2, 2009 7:56 PM

adhil , jelousy gets u nowhere.thats sad for u as india are going to dominate the world in the near future. go & live in another planet.
[[
Readers, don't miss the essence of the article. This table is headed by McCullum, an outstanding player in an otherwise ordinary team. Appreciate his efforts instead of arguing about Dhoni. These comments apply to Adhil as well.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: John at January 2, 2009 8:26 PM

"Imagine a team bats first and scores 200 in 40 overs. The chasing team bats very carefully and wins, say, in 45 overs by 10 wickets. This is certainly not a very comprehensive a win."

I don't think there are many teams who would feel that bowling the opposition out for 200, and then reaching their target with 5 overs to spare and without losing any wickets wasn't a comprehensive win.

Posted by: omar at January 2, 2009 8:31 PM

dhonis WAS the most attacking wicket keeper batsman until he became the captain and became the most negative batsman in the world.
when he started out his 6 per match was better than afridi. and strike rate almost as good. i almost had a heart attack when he hit 183 against sri lanka cuz he got so close to saeed anwar's world record.

Posted by: David at January 3, 2009 12:18 AM

I would be interested if the above tables could exclude minnows (meaning also SL in the mid-80's, Zim in the early 90's and the years since the exile of their best players, and Bang until a few years ago). It's always much more juicy to contemplate which proud cricketing nations got walloped when!

Posted by: Balaji at January 3, 2009 2:36 AM

@John - i think the article aims to capture instances where least resources are used to win matches. the case you have highlighted might be a comprehensive win for say, Bangladesh v SA, but not for SA v Bangladesh.
@ all Dhoni fans and detractors - not sure why you keep dragging him and the Indian team in comments for other posts - it seems totally irrelevant :)
Mr. Ananth - is it possible to create a small matrix of test tours (home and away) since 1990 for all teams? It would be interesting to see if there is any difference between tour schedules before and after the FTP was created. Also nowadays, it looks like the same teams play each other immediately at home and away - for eg England v NZ last year and England v WI this year. This does not seem to be correct and there should be a gap of at least one year and max 3 years between a test series between two teams. I think India have not hosted Bangladesh at all, your analysis might throw light on other such instances. thanks!
[[
Balaji,
While John is correct in his interpretation, thanks for bringing out the idea of resource utilization variance.
I have completed a major summary of all Test series in preparation of the Test Captain analysis and I can do what you want quite easily. Only problem is that there so many good ideas in the pipeline and scheduling these is becoming a problem.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: batmanrobin at January 3, 2009 3:26 AM

Boy..Come on...Remove these minnows n bring on the real nations. This article , though appreciable, does not make sense.

Posted by: Jazz at January 3, 2009 4:42 AM

Why the negitive comment on Dhoni?
He is by far the best wkt keeper batsmen. The captaincy has helped him mature into the top odi batsmen.
If there is anything in cricket that disappoints me, it has to be Mccullum, ever since his consistence performances from 2006-2007 in the shorter formats of the game he has fell away.
[[
McCullum is a top class player in an ordinary team. Unfortunately he has not been able to blossom possibly necause of lack of support.
Dhoni is an equal (or better) wicket-keeper-batsman who has the huge advantage of having as his compatriots a host of world class batsmen and bowlers.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: Ross at January 3, 2009 5:39 AM

As a strong BlackCaps supporter, I disagree with your comment on McCullum not having enough support. Frequently he is one of the lack of support crew, like in today's nick to Ramdin. Normally the BlackCaps have to bat around him and wait for him to fire. His last big score was 84 no versus Australia in a lost test! While his last (and only) ODI century was against Ireland! We know McCullum's batting abilities from the IPL, I think this more accurately describes Bangladesh's toothless attack at the time. Also don't forget the other batsmen in the runchase, it was Jamie How 7no. (One of the lack of supports in the BlackCaps team... I expect him to be dropped fairly soon)
[[
Ross,
The point I made and still maintain is that, notwithstanding McCullum's current poor form, as a wicket-keeper he cannot be expected to be the fulcrum. He is not the right person to do that. He is one of the supporting cast, an attacking one and if the top order of New Zealand had been consistent maybe he would have added his bit.
As a distant supporter of the Black Cats I hope that Vettori is able to get a strong top-order going over the next year. As an aside, also that the New Zealand cricket authoritiies stand for their rights and select Bond.
Incidentally the Bangladeshi attack in this match was, by their standards, a good one, Mashrafe Mortaza, Shahdat, Saqib-ul-hassan and Abdul Razzak (pre-ban).
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: Ross at January 3, 2009 5:41 AM

To all the Dhoni fans, watch the series against New Zealand, you may be surprised, I will be.

Posted by: David at January 3, 2009 5:44 AM

@Jazz and others. Why the comment on Dhoni at all? The article was about McCullum and his extraordinary innings against Bangladesh. I don't recall Dhoni being an invitational player for either team in that match, so his presence in the comments here is a tiresome irrelevance. Let's get back to the topic!

Posted by: Andy at January 5, 2009 11:37 AM

Two differing topics, hence two comments.
The first is on McCullum. He is a very good player and would have done much better in a strong team. Dhoni has jad the cushion of an outstanding batting line-up, barring Srilankan tour. It is unfair to assign McCullum the role of a senior batsman. He is an attacking suport batsman. Used in that way, he would certainly deliver.

Posted by: Andy at January 5, 2009 11:43 AM

The second comment is that, barring the completely way-out McCullum match, the RPO differentials are comparable. So it seems as if it does not matter whether one bats first or second, at least as far as this RPO differential is concerned.
One more thing. The most amazing match in this collection is not the NZL-BNG match but the SLK-IND match. For a full strength Indian team to lose by nearly 5 runs per over is the most amazing match ever played.
[[
I agree with you. It is my personal belief that, barring none, that defeat of India by Sri Lanka is the most devastating one in ODI history.
The top five Indian batsmen were Ganguly, Tendulkar, Yuvraj, Kambli and Badani. Perhaps only Kambli paid the price for being in that batting line-up. He never played for India again.
Also the RpO difference is nearly 4, not nearly 5. But the real impact is probably nearly 5.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: Dr Manish Agrawal at January 9, 2009 8:19 PM

It would be really nice if there could be a link to each of the match ids, so that we an see the scoreboard directly from here
[[
Manish, good idea. I will request Rajesh to always provide the link whenever there is a reference to a match. I would do it myself. However I am not sure of the Cricinfo URL.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: Matt at January 9, 2009 10:10 PM

I watched this game, it was pretty amazing to watch. It was on New Years eve in Queenstown, and i have heard (from a player) that McCullum wanted to go and play a round of golf after the match,so he finished it off quickly and then went out for a round of golf.

Posted by: Cam at January 10, 2009 6:02 AM

I think we need to realise that dhoni has some great batsman in his team like tendulkar and sehwag. In New Zealand Mccullum is the most senior batsman in the top 6 apart from Oram(and thats if he's fit). I think theres not much between them both they are big hitters with the quickest hands in the modern game. I have to say that Mccullum is on his day is the most dangerous keeper/batsman. But Dhoni has seem to take his game to the next t level and is a very mature player. If Mccullum becomes more consistant he will be the better of the two. We also need to remember that batting is only half the job and that we need to take in account in their keeping. i know that mccullum is one of the most energetic keepers ive seen.

Posted by: Dean at January 10, 2009 12:06 PM

Regarding Brendan McCullum's demolition of Bangladesh at Queenstown in so few overs. Bangladesh were all out well before their alloted time was up, so New Zealand had to bat for eight overs or so before lunch. McCullum was keen on the idea of having a round of golf instead that afternoon, so set his mind on getting to the target in the few available pre-lunch overs, or so his batting partner that game advised while commenting a recent ODI between the West Indies and New Zealand, something he spetacularly achieved.

Posted by: paulus at January 10, 2009 12:29 PM

Ok...so everyones on about dhoni......totally irrelavant to the topic bt since everyones on about WK/Batsman....hv u 4gotten Kuemar Sangakkara???
Technique wise he is miles ahead of Dhoni and McCulum...though he is not a test wk he is the regular ODI keeper isnt he??

Posted by: D.V.C. at January 19, 2009 6:20 PM

Anantha, If you are really interested in ranking the greatest wins in ODIs by resources remaining I suggest reading 'Estimation of the Magnitude of Victory in One-day Cricket' by de Silva et al. (http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/118994627/abstract?CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0). They use a modification of the Duckworth-Lewis Method. I would be most interested to see the results of such an analysis.
[[
Daniel, my effort was only to show the variation between the scoring rates whether a team won batting first or second. There was no attempt to bring in all the resources into the picture.
Incidentally I am unable to open the link however much I tried. T tried two browsers, changed the options and did not succeed.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: D.V.C. at January 20, 2009 9:47 AM

Anantha,

I realise your original post was something much simpler. It's an interesting article by itself. I just thought the resources based analysis might go a step further. You will need a subscription to view the journal. I have such a subscription, so I could email you the pdf. If you'd like me to then email me your email address.

[[
Thanks, Daniel. Let me look at that.
Ananth:
]]

Posted by: BJ at January 26, 2009 6:48 PM

Dhoni and McCullum are on a very even keel. Dhoni shades the batting stats on consistency but McCullum is by far the better keeper (i've seen Dhoni miss some crucial stumpings/catches in both forms of the game). McCullum is more explosive in my opinion so on their day I'd have to go watch McCullum and also pick him ahead of Dhoni.
Granted in saying that, I'd rather have the entire Indian top order for him to bat around. Cbuck in Vettori somewhere near the bottom and you're looking at 350+ :P

Posted by: Sameer at January 31, 2009 1:16 AM

Excluding McCullum's performance against the minnows, he averages a paltry 26 in ODIs and 28 in Tests. His 3 international centuries have all come against minnows. He is no newcomer either, being around for 5 years now. Hardly figures that should make anyone drool over him. A very average performer. He is no doubt an exciting talent and can be breathtaking on his day, but as the figures suggest, those days are few and far in between.
Btw
Good Analysis ananth.It would have been better though, had the minnows been excluded.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
The Contributors

Y Anantha Narayanan has over 35 years of IT background. Over the past 15 years, he has been concentrating on Cricket analysis and software development. He has been involved with StumpVision, Wisden, Hallmark Software and his own site www.thirdslip.com during this period.
David Barry
David Barry was cricket-starved when teaching English in France, and study of cricket stats was his only way to stay sane. He is now back in Brisbane, Australia, and working towards a PhD in Physics. He once played for the worst team in the G-division of Muscat's cricket league.

After doing an MBA in marketing and working in an advertising agency, S Rajesh decided that his skills might be put to better use by number-crunching on cricket. He hasn’t regretted that decision in the last six years, and edits the Numbers Game column on cricinfo.com every Friday.

Andrew Samson had his moments with bat and ball, once scoring 43 and taking 3 for 14 with his legbreaks, but he was much better at arithmetic, which explains why he is where he is today. Andrew has been keeping cricket stats since the days when it used to be done with pen and paper, and has been involved in scoring/stats for Radio and TV since 1987. He has been Cricket South Africa's official statistician since1994.
Charles Davis
A former scientist and occasional TV quiz champion, Charles Davis now works full time at sports statistics in Melbourne. His only real contribution to the Test record books came at age 4, when he formed part of the record 90,800 crowd who saw West Indies at the MCG in 1961. He has two books to his credit, and claims to be the only cricket statistician ever who has been quoted in the New York Times and in Australian Federal Parliament on the same day. Not to be confused with the West Indian batsman Charlie Davis, especially in terms of ability.
Ric Finlay
Having just taken early retirement as a Mathematics teacher in Hobart, Ric Finlay now fully devotes his time to recording cricket, both past and present, for the popular CSW cricket database, along with his colleague David Fitzgerald (www.tastats.com.au). His interest in the game is inversely proportional to his ability as a player, but he did once score a century after being dropped at 3 and running out three of his team-mates. His first memory of international cricket is the 1962-63 MCC tour of Australia, described as one of the most boring ever. Totally fascinated, he was instantly hooked, and has never looked back. Author of three books on cricket of a historical nature, he has provided statistics and scored for radio and television cricket coverage since 1983.
Categories
About (2) Allrounders (3) Batsmen v bowlers (1) Captaincy (2) Grounds (1) ODIs (3) Test cricket (4) Batting (10) Teams (1) Tests - bowling (6) Trivia (2) Trivia - batting (33) Trivia - bowling (9) Twenty20 (4) Wicketkeepers (2)
Recent Posts
Least number of absences over a long career What's a reasonable winning score in ODIs? Analysing bowlers in Test wins How far ahead is the top one - part II In a winning cause How far ahead is the top one ... Follow-up on comparing halves of players' careers Comparing the two halves of players' careers Following up on the Test batsmen peer analysis Comparing Test batsmen with their peers
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008July 2008June 2008May 2008April 2008March 2008February 2008January 2008December 2007November 2007
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009