Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis | | Where are my slippers? »

The genesis of a cricket nut

Posted by Cricinfo - 3 weeks ago

From Gopal Rangachary, India


The late 70s was a good time in India to become a cricket fan © Getty Images
 


Are you born a cricket nut or do you become one? At least in my case, that is the one thing I can’t blame my genes for (I have successfully blamed them for a variety of character flaws from being disorganised to having ghastly handwriting). My father was apparently anti-cricket - thought it was a waste of time – and if he had lived long enough to see me through my teenage, the world of cricket nuttiness’ would have lost me.

I have impeccable pedigree though for a cricket nut. I was born near the home of cricket (no, not in the Lord’s pavilion. It would have been impossible to have done so, as women weren’t allowed in at the time). Actually I was probably born closer to Edgbaston than to Lord’s, but at least in the country that invented cricket – and when I was seven moved to the new spiritual home of cricket, India. My primary school was at Bramall Lane in Sheffield, which is the only inactive Test venue in England today. I understand there was a turgid Test played out there about 100 years ago, where England lost to Australia.

My early recollections of sport in England are patchy. I vaguely remember kicking (or given my motor skills, missing) a football a few times, and playing one game of cricket in the street. My duties were vaguely described to me as “fielding”, and I remember being positioned at what would be a very deep long-on at the Adelaide Oval, and probably at the back of the bar on most Test grounds nowadays. Needless to say, it didn’t capture the imagination too much.

The first cricket moment I can recall was in early 1978, a few months after we came back to India. Watching a few games of backyard cricket had given me some rudimentary knowledge of the game. You needed to hit the ball as far as you could, and run back and forth as many times as possible, is as far as I had got.

Armed with this deep insight, I sat in front of a television to watch what I later realised was the first-ever series telecast live on Indian TV( India vs Pakistan in Pakistan). Indian TV, in those days, and for about 15 years thereafter meant those who were affluent enough to afford a television could watch a few hours of sanitised fare offered by the state broadcaster, Doordarshan.

The match was apparently headed for a tight finish. Pakistan needed about 150 runs in an hour and a half, and one of my cousins bet a sum of 10 paisa (the equivalent of a one quarter of one US cent), that India would lose the match. Doing some shrewd calculation, I figured that it would be impossible to run back and forth a 150 times in an hour and a half, and therefore challenged him. Unfortunately, I hadn’t been told about the existence of fours and sixes (and of some distinctly unchallenging India bowling), and India promptly went on to lose. I don’t actually recall paying up though.

The loss was followed by the inevitable soul searching and recrimination, a process which was to create a lifelong impression on me. The conversation went like this:

Me: Who is our captain?
Cousin: A chap called Bedi.
Me: How many runs did he score?
Cousin: Zero.
Me: Our captain himself scored zero. Are we such a bad team?
Cousin: No. We have one great player called Gavaskar.
Me: How much did Gavaskar score?
Cousin: He scored 97, and would have scored more if the umpire didn’t give him out wrongly.

At the end of that conversation, I was a Gavaskar fan, a Bedi detractor and a lifelong believer in the injustice of Pakistani umpiring. Rarely can impressions formed on such rickety foundations prove so long lasting. Gavaskar is still the greatest opening batsman of all time, and the greatest Indian batsman I have seen.In the late 70s being a Gavaskar fan, obviously meant being anti-Viswanath, the cricketing equivalent of George W Bush’s “If you ain’t with us, you are against us” philosophy. So I must admit that I found Vishy’s double-hundred against England at Madras excruciating, and silently revelled in his misery in Pakistan. Now I scour YouTube in vain for the occasional clip of that famed square cut!

Nor did I enjoy Gavaskar’s batting too much. Most of the time I spent biting my nails, and indulging in various superstitions, of sitting in particular positions while watching him, petrified that he’d make a mistake and I would have to face the taunts of the Viswanath camp.

The late 70s was a good time in India to become a cricket fan. Even by today’s breakneck pace of international scheduling, it was a busy time for Indian cricket. In the space of a couple of years, India had home series against West Indies, Australia and Pakistan and sandwiched between that was a tour of England and the World Cup (Maybe I can now expect a stern letter from the ICC for not calling it the 1979 ICC Cricket World Cup, or an equally ridiculous name that they have retroactively come up with).

Looking back at this period, I am amazed at how I progressed from a very sketchy knowledge of the game at the start of that West Indies series in 1978, to a frenzied spectator at Madras’ Chepauk stadium towards the end of the India-Pakistan series in Jan 1980.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: Deepak Poornachandra at October 30, 2009 1:02 PM

Hello Gopal,
I really enjoyed reading this article of yours. However,I can relate myself to this in the early 90's when I was exposed to cricket. Looking forward to reading more articles from you.

Posted by: Ayush at October 30, 2009 1:12 PM

Excellently written, love the humour.

Posted by: Hasham Khan at October 30, 2009 4:40 PM

Born a cricket nut and shall remain one for life. Excellent article Gopal!

Posted by: ahmad at October 30, 2009 5:31 PM

a good read, you didnt say how much money your cousin made?

Posted by: Sidhanta Patnaik at October 31, 2009 1:42 AM

Hi,
Well the chain started in 1970.Incidentally I am now in Sheffield!

Posted by: Mohamed Z. Rahaman at October 31, 2009 11:58 PM

Always glad to read these stories. We all have them. I am West Indian and Muslim and my ancestry is Indian, so naturally I root for New Zealand. :-) Actually I root shamelessly for West Indies. I am one of those fortunate ones to see India win the Prudential World Cup at Lords. A trip that I planned 3 years ahead of time. India of course upset my beloved WI. A victory that had its origins in Berbice, Guyana (my home country).
Cricket for me is always going to numero uno. I enjoyed Vishy, Gavaskar.."who was like a brick wall, we couldn't out him at all", Bedi, Chandra, E. Parsanna, Zaheer Abass, Imran, Majid Khan, Wasim, Waqar, Lillie, Thommo, the Chappells, John Snow, Tony Grieg, etc. I enjoyed them all. Now, we have the Tendulkars, Laras, Afridis, etc. to enjoy.

Posted by: Dunga at November 1, 2009 2:04 AM

I have the same way with many things. My dad imparted an extreme love for a lot of players when I was young, especially Laxman, and a hatred of Ponting. If I'm being completely honest, I enjoy watching them both pretty much the same - I'm not fussed if it's a good game. But somehow, I hate Ponting, and love laxman. It's the same with teams and so on, because of how big the influence at that age comes through

Posted by: monty at November 1, 2009 5:31 PM

I really enjoyed reading this article as only a true "cricket-nut" can. I grew up in a household of "cricket-nuts" with my grandmother being the nuttiest:She even named my cousin Imran, after Imran Khan, and we are West Indians.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009