The elder amongst us has watched left handers from the days of the incomparable Neil Harvey and was a first division left hand batsman in Chennai and Mumbai. The other can recall the magic of Sobers whom he saw more than 43 years ago and has bowled leg breaks without much success to left handers of even minor league quality. We argued, debated and traded anecdotes to compile a list of what we believe are the most sublime of left handers. The dictionary defines sublime as something that is characterized by feelings of grandeur, nobility, awe, magnificence and something that is ennobling. Going by this definition, we let our memories guide us in our quest of pulling out 12 gems. Here they are in order of their appearance in test cricket:
Frank Woolley of England, Neil Harvey of Australia, Garfield Sobers of West Indies, Graeme Pollock of South Africa, Alvin Kallicharan of West Indies, David Gower of England, Brian Lara of West Indies, Sanath Jayasuriya of Sri Lanka, Saurav Ganguly of India, Adam Gilchrist of Australia, Kumara Sangakara of Sri Lanka and Gautam Gambhir of India.
The argument as usual may be over a couple of names. Should Mike Hussey and Stephen Fleming not come in? Was Fredericks not a uniquely thrilling batsman? Should Gambhir be included merely because he has been so effulgent over the past few months? Surely Saeed Anwar of Pakistan has given viewers more than enough pleasure to be counted. And just because Hayden smote the ball powerfully does it make him less sublime? Readers may express their opinion of who they think ought to be in this pantheon of twelve.
Ranking these batsmen is something we do not want to do – it would be meaningless and insulting to their genius. Mount Everest has enough space for all of them.
What makes the left hander so special? For one the rarity because we still get to see only two or at best three in a team. Among batsmen who have scored over 2000 runs in Test cricket there is only one left hander for every three right hand batsmen. And then there are these advantages:
- Bowlers find it difficult to switch their line and the left hander is given opportunities on the leg stump and outside to score from.
- The normal incoming ball from outside a right hander’s off stump cannot get the leftie LBW since it pitches outside leg-stump of the left hander.
- Wicket keepers find the left side difficult and are prone to be clumsy keeping to left handers.
- Since the field has to change and the bowler has to switch line every time a single is taken - when batting with a right hander – the leftie irritates and disturbs their rhythm by his very presence. If there are enough left handers in the team, it makes sense to keep the batting order flexible to ensure a left-right combination at the crease as far as possible.
- Bowlers find it difficult to bowl from round the wicket even though it is an important option against the leftie. Spinners tend to bowl from wide of the crease while faster bowlers are always conscious of not running on to the pitch on their follow through.
Just as the right hander’s on drive is the touchstone of his prowess, so is the cover drive for the left hander. Does it have anything to do with the batsman’s stance? Neil Harvey was a hero to many when he burst on the scene and such was his footwork, grace and artistry that even 50 years later there are many who swear that he cannot be surpassed.
Of Sobers and his unlimited magic so much has been told that we just share one incident – when Benaud in the 1960-61 Test in Australia thought he had beaten Sobers with the googly, that magician changed stroke even as the ball was sneaking past him and whipped it back to the sight screen. Till date no one has remotely matched the insouciant grace and lissomness that Sobers brought to the ground.
Following Harvey and Sobers, was Graeme Pollock who perhaps could have ended up as the best of them all. Could he have sustained his initial tempo? Would he have been equally good when confronted by the best spinners from India and Pakistan? The jury will forever be out on that. Meanwhile West Indies unleashed a line of great left handers. From the 1960s till 2000 they produced a string of pearls – Lloyd, Kallicharan, Fredericks, Lara and Gayle. Lara did enough in a magnificent career to keep the debate going permanently as to who is the best batsman after Bradman. Has there been anyone with as much magic in the high backlift as Lara? Has there been a batsman who played as late as Lara – so much so that to mere mortals he looked supernatural as he seemed to have a choice of three shots for every ball. No one has ever faced Murali better than Lara and remember that for much of his career he carried a limp West Indian batting line up on his colossus like shoulders.
Grace – the most often used expression to describe left handers sits most aptly on Gower. None better than this worthy could conjure up the most sumptuous fare with the lightest of brush strokes - he would wave the ball away from him between point and cover and if you put a fielder to plug that gap then between them as well.
Aha, we are getting into hot water here – we are talking of batsmen splitting the offside and we have not said a word about Ganguly? But everything about his ethereal timing through the offside has been said by Dravid in his famous offside and God quote. However no less awesome was the shimmy to the left arm spinner to hoist him over long on and long off. Ganguly like many modern cricketers used a heavy bat but we guess he would have played those gorgeous square drives even with grand pa’s walking stick.
The first great left hander to grace cricket was Frank Woolley of Kent and England. Clem Hill was an effective but ungainly left hander in those early days. There were few left handed batsmen those days. All the great batsmen - Trumper, Hobbs, Sutcliffe, McCartney, Jackson, Foster, Mclaren, Fry and Ranji were right-handers. Till 1950 and the advent of Harvey, while one could reel of names of prolific right handers the left handers’ club could hardly conjure the odd name or two. England had only Chapman, Paynter and Leyland against big names like Hobbs, Sutcliffe, Hammond, Hutton and others. Down under against names like Bradman, Ponsford, McCartney and McCabe we have to dig deep to come up with merely Warren Bardsley - a dour slow accumulator.
India was even more bereft of left handers. Imagine, till the fifties - C K Nayudu, Lala Amarnath, Merchant, Mushtaq, Pataudi, Hazare, Umrigar, Manjrekar, Roy and not a single left hander amongst them. The first left hander who broke through was Deepak Shodhan who scored a hundred on debut against Pakistan in 1952 and immediately sank without trace thereafter. Nari Contractor, a determined and not inelegant left hander could have played longer for India but his Test career was cruelly finished by a near fatal bouncer from Griffith in West Indies. The most graceful of the Indians was undoubtedly Salim Durrani - a genius who could be wonderful when in the mood, had so much time to play the ball and such silken grace in everything he did. Many years after the languid but enigmatic Wadekar and the wasted talent of Surinder Amarnath, there was Vinod Kambli who made two double hundreds and a chockfull of runs in a couple of home series before fading away. The jinx on left hand batsmen in India was only broken by Ganguly, the most enduring and graceful of them all.
Was batting the other way round discouraged for some reason in those days? It certainly seems to have been discouraged in India. After all, the right hand is the one used for eating, writing, greeting and benediction while the lowly left hand was for well ... other less dignified tasks. In fact India contributes just three names to the list of 68 left handed batsmen who have scored over 2000 Test runs – Ganguly, Gambhir and Wadekar.
But the changes sweeping society can be felt - parents these days do not discourage children using their left hand for various tasks from writing to batting if they are naturally left handed. And India in fact has Yuvraj, Raina, Gambhir, and Irfan Pathan all in the ODI team.
One Day Cricket has its own strong contribution. No example could be more powerful than that of Sanath Jayasuriya. For five years after making his Test debut Jayasuriya was just an innocuous journeyman - till he was asked to open in ODI in 1195-96 by his captain Ranatunga. And the genius that had been bottled up announced itself to the world and then strode it like a colossus. Gambhir is another example. Adam Gilchrist made the No. 7 batting position the most feared one in Test cricket because he turned matches on their heads from this position. India’s Yuvraj Singh gets his chances in Tests because he is such a brilliant one day cricketer. Test cricket is seeing changes – run rates are increasing, fewer Tests are ending up as draws and there is place for the aggressive genius and therefore for the maverick leftie too.
By worshipping these dozen artists we are not in anyway being disrespectful to the others. If we wanted a left hander to bat us safely through two days of tsunami we would always want Allan Border and Shiv Chanderpaul in our middle order; or Andy Flower who for Zimbabwe was like Horatio on the bridge; if we wanted to take a tilt at the most daunting of targets we would want the pugnacious Smith to open the batting for us; to put fear into the opposition we want the oak like Hayden up front and the towering presence of Lloyd in the middle of our line up. All these stalwarts have averages that are superior to some of the players in our sublime list. But because they give the ball a mighty thump with the bat as opposed to the satin like touch of the sublime artists they perhaps qualify for a separate article that could be titled the “Mighty Left Handers”!
I am sorry I do not agree with you including Gambhir. In a few years maybe, yes we are talking about grace, so even Ganguly would not fit in here, not if he was facing short pitched deliveries. He was good against spin, but against genuine pace he struggled. I would definitely include Saeed Anwar, he was sublime with his wrist play, and he played pace as well as spin and he looked good while doing it, unlike Ganguly who looked distinctly pedestrian against pace. Stephen Fleming was another I would include ahead of Ganguly and Gambhir.
Posted by: Muthu at April 14, 2009 4:35 AM
From my experience of watching old videos, I would say "Gower" is by far the best left hander you see in your lifetime. Only Issue everyone had with him is he will surely get out when u expect him to fire. I still remember his last century against India in 1990's tour to save the match, which is all grace no power...
Posted by: Brendan Layton at April 14, 2009 5:27 AM
Top article guys, puts mine to shame.
Lara is by far the best left-hander I have ever seen, though I'm pretty sure Graeme Pollock and Garry Sobers can lay claim to the numero uno title.
Posted by: Rony at April 14, 2009 5:42 AM
I would have to question Gambhir's selection ahead of the great Saeed Anwar; an artist with the ambition to knuckle down if required. Flemming was also in the Gower class when on song and is a notable omission. There can be no doubts about Wolley and Lara; two of the greatest of their time; and the way Lara played Murali in his prime on the minefields of Sri Lanka in ultimately a losing cause recalls as you put it; a supernatural force with three strokes for every ball.
Posted by: Brendan Layton at April 14, 2009 5:47 AM
And hopefully Philip Hughes will be added to that list in the future. While he isn't exactly graceful, it's rare to see a batsman with such a hunger for runs.
Posted by: Atul Bhogle at April 14, 2009 5:59 AM
The list keeps degrading - Jayasuriya and Gambhir certainly do not qualify for me. Ganguly can remain, I wouldnt call Gilchrist sublime either. As Shafqat said, Anwar can make the cut. JP Duminy looks good from whatever I have seen so far, but of course he cannot be included on the basis of 6 test matches.
Posted by: shankar at April 14, 2009 6:04 AM
If this was indeed an exhaustive article on left handers (sublime can come later), I am quite disappointed. I rubbed my eyes in disbelief for there is no mention of Allan Robert Border! Quite unpardonable. Also, there is no mention of Wasim Raja, Sadiq Mohammed, Andrew Strauss, Mark Butcher to name a few.
Even if we put sublime as the first filter, how can these writers forget Alistair Campbell of Zimbabwe. He was universally acknowledged the next Gower!
I would sincerely urge cricinfo to check the level of knowledge of the writers before putting such articles on the site. It clearly downgrades Crincinfo....bigtime!
Posted by: Roscoe at April 14, 2009 6:38 AM
Was this a list of power or of grace? If batsmen qualify for their apparent effortlessness, yes to Woolley, Harvey, Sobers, Gower, Lara, Gilchrist. Even Ganguly isn't disgraced among them, what wonderful timing he had! Shame Bert Sutcliffe isn't included, he should be right near the top of the list; Fleming could be a joy to watch but wasn't top drawer any more than Kallicharran. As for the power hitters, Pollock & Jayasuriya are more in that category, then you could include Lloyd & Hayden, maybe Anwar too, for some of the others. Sanggakara, maybe; Gambhir, too soon to tell.
Posted by: SanjayN at April 14, 2009 8:00 AM
Not convinced of Pollock. Heavy bat user, was more a slugger than a graceful player. Didn't look too graceful or clever against Sylvester Clarke during those rebel tours altho admittedly he was well past his best by then. I wouldn't have Jayasuriya in there either, there's nothing graceful about his batting, it's all brute force. Perhaps, the pickup off his legs can be classified as graceful but his offside play is generally slashes, esp. thru the gully area. I suspect there's very few all-round graceful players in your list if you hold them to a strict criteria. Kallicharan meets and exceeds a strict criteria. He couldn't be brute and ugly if he tried. What a wonderful, wonderful player.
Posted by: Nagesh at April 14, 2009 9:36 AM
Giri and Raghu,
This is cricket-writing at its best! Keep it up! It is amazing that there are folks like you who can conjure such interesting information about each facet of cricket.
I have an observation - Your list of twelve includes seven who are either from the West Indies or from the Indian Subcontinent.
Posted by: apurva harsh at April 14, 2009 11:23 AM
the writers claim to exclude hayden and lloyd as they want to separate power from elegance. yet, they have no qualms about including jayasuriya and gambhir. jayasuriya is as elegant as a rampaging bull while gambhir is one of those players whose effectiveness exceeds their elegance. saeed anwar is definitely an unpardonable omission as his silken touches and magical wrists could easily weave an entralling tale of gossamer.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 14, 2009 12:03 PM
Nice folk about left arm batsmen.
Who is the best left arm for which we have to know who has the greatest one. For greatness, records are first thing, elegant batsman and also technically correct (although not necessary because some are unorthodox).
Beside records it is also necessary that what they had done when team required them to score and take pressure of the game.
For all left arm name, I think Brian Lara is the best according to me. His records are marvellous, he played innings in his team favour like 80 runs against Sri Lanka and match turned in his team favour and also they won test series. 213 and 153 not out against Australia and series turned to 2-2. Also his 277 against Australia at that time when they were 1-0, and they were loosing control in second match as well but due to his 277 match drawn and after that they won the series 2-1. If they lost second match then they would never come back in series
Beside these he is one of elegant batsmen we have ever seen
Posted by: V.J.Raghunath at April 14, 2009 2:18 PM
omitting Bert Sutcliffe of NZ was unpardonable.Most of the others like Anwar,Border have been mentioned.I take the points raised about Jayasuriya and Gilchrist not being exactly elegant and graceful.Perhaps Gambhir's inclusion is premature.Why is nobody mentioning Justin Langer,I wonder-thought he was a wonderful test batsman
Posted by: Ronnie at April 14, 2009 2:33 PM
There was an article a while back on cricinfo itself .
Something regarding the "MYTH of the elegant left hander".
Effectively debunks your thesis.
Posted by: Rob at April 14, 2009 3:24 PM
Pollock would have definitely been up there. The article says who knows if he would have kept up his career average of 60 if SA had continued in test cricket. But of about 20 rebel "tests" during the rebel tours by England, West Indies, Sri Lanka and Australia from 1980 to 1986 when allegedly "past his best", Pollock's average was still above 60. Admittedly, it wasn't the West Indies of Holding etc, but there were some quality fast bowlers on those tours. Overall, though, I'd have to give the title to Lara.
Posted by: crofty at April 14, 2009 4:29 PM
what about shiv chanderpaul. in all of his cricket, he has been more consistent than lara
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed at April 14, 2009 7:46 PM
Another nice article showing the hard working and knowledge of both of you.
Suppose if we maintain records according to left arm batsmen only then see some facts about Brian Lara
1. Highest runs maker in test 11953 runs
2. Highest innings in test as well as in first class
3. +150 or more highest innings in test that are 19
4. Only one with two quadruple in first class, Pollock never managed even triple century in first class
5. One quintuple in first class
6. Five times 1000 or more in calender year, also Hayden did.
7. Highest no. century maker in test that are 34.
8. Nine double hundreds only one.
9. 5889 runs with the help of centuries, another record.
10. More than 9000 runs with the help of 50 or 50 plus scores in test, another record.
11. Lara is the first man who had scored seven centuries in eight first-class innings, the first one is the ex-record 375 against England and the last one is also the record 501 not out.
I think he matchless and peerless and the best among all.
Posted by: Youvi at April 14, 2009 11:59 PM
I recall an occasion when Karsan Ghavri the left arm Indian medium pacer had a right-handed English batsman (whose name I forget)caught out. The delivery was slightly short of length and angled to move away form the batsman who succumbed to it. In walks David Gower and he dispatches the first ball from Ghavri, a similar delivery, to the boundary ! What I remember is Gower's seemingly effortless elegance. There has been some debate recently about left-handeded batting and its correlation with elegance. Myth or not, elegance is hard to define and you know it when you see it.
Posted by: prem at April 15, 2009 1:54 AM
What about Kambli?he was very good left handed batsman who played for India..He had'nt much luck ,otherwise he would have played more for India.Once according to Sachin , he was the most talented batsman in India.
Posted by: Shri at April 15, 2009 3:42 AM
In my opinion there is no batsman in (or out of) this list greater than Graeme Pollock. As Don Bradman himself said, Pollock was the finest left hander of them all. Having watched his innings at Trent Bridge (1965) on video, I can only imagine what he would have done on the international stage had SA not spent those 22 years in isolation. He was only 21 when he played that gem of an innings against a strong English seam attack on a dreadful wicket. He only played 4 tests after his 26th birthday. He actually scored an unbeaten double hundred (222 no) in a "List A" one-day game in South Africa. He did not open, but came in to bat in the 12th over of a 60-over game. When asked by Ian Chappell how he made those runs, he merely replied that the opposing captain made a miscalculation and ran out of regular bowlers for the last 4 overs of the innings - from which Pollock flayed 74 runs!!!!!
Posted by: Giridhar at April 15, 2009 3:50 AM
We appreciate the various points because Raghu and I too agonized over these (some of which we have ourselves expressed).I think one clear error is to have left Saeed Anwar out of the list. Sorry. And somehow in our mind's eye Jayasuriya and Gilchrist's batting did not evoke the brute force image of say Hayden or Lloyd. Not mentioning Bert Sutcliffe was very unfair - he too like Andy Flower for Zimbabwe carried NZ on his shoulders. I remember watching him make a valiant 80 in 1965 against India, aged 43 while the rest were gobbled up by Venkat.
Posted by: Looch at April 15, 2009 4:21 AM
Once again a delightful article, but I would not have included Ganguly. He would have to be one of the most overrated players of modern times and Bert Sutcliffe of New Zealand is a far more appropriate choice in the context of the article.
Posted by: Zeeshan at April 15, 2009 5:14 AM
Nice artticle about left arm batsmen. Praise for both of you.
They are normally more elegant than right arm. I think Gower is the most elegant batsman.
Yes this is right that Pollock batting average is mor than 60 in test but when you are playing only 30 to 50 test matches it is easy to maintain better average and if teams are two or three, it becomes easy to do it. Lara also maintained batting average more than 60 in his first 33 test matches and then declined. Whenever anyone played on 45-50 different grounds with 40-50 bowlers took 100 wicket or more in other attacks, the average automatically declines. Lara maintained 12-15 record at a time, now he lost few records but still he has too many records. Beside it, he is one of most elegant and also technically correct batsman with high backlift as well. Beside it he had an ability to take pressure of game or you may say that aoccrding to sitaution.
He was aggresvie and also sometimes defensive as well like 120 against India 2006
Posted by: V.J.Raghunath at April 15, 2009 8:43 AM
Shankar
the list is by no means exhaustive-we talked about some who gave us pleasure-in the case of Woolley,through the writings of Cardus,Thomson,Arlott and others.We have not included Sutcliffe and Donnolley of NZ,Morris,Cowper,Langer of Australia and John Edrich of England besides a host of others.Border has been mentioned.Elegance and Grace are subjective and different people have different yardsticks to measure them.Wasim Raja and Mark Butcher were definitely not amongst the top left-handed batsmen.Alistair Campbell was graceful,no doubt but like Carl Hooper,never played to potential.You may have your opinion-just as we have ours.The last two lines were uncalled for and in bad taste.
Posted by: steve cartledge at April 15, 2009 1:11 PM
I don't think the word sublime and Ganguly or Chanderpaul would co-exist, effective and very successful would be apt. Sobers, Gower and Lara now that's exquisite.
Posted by: Ashley Hornsey at April 15, 2009 1:20 PM
Bradman may have been correct about Graeme Pollock. As a youngster I saw him make 175 against Australia in Adelaide in 1963-64. he was a big man who used his strength to full advantage. But for sheer beauty, I found it hard to go past David Gower, who I agree, too often disappointed by getting out when you were hungry for much more.
Posted by: Kerwin Jn.phillip at April 15, 2009 3:58 PM
Is it me or has the recent success by this current Indian team caused statisticians and cricket writers alike to go completely bonkers. Granted Gambir has scored plenty of runs in the recent months; but has he really and truly proven himself? I mean , he has not played on most of world's cricket's pitches and so in my humble opinion cannot be considered one of the most sublime left handers OF ALL TIME. Who's to say that on a really pacy wicket(which I still believe he hasn't played on) Gambir will not look as awkward and less graceful as a cat on skates. In addition , the slowness of pitches and the lack of good quality bowlers around the cricketing world today, have made even the less sublime batsmen look like gods. It's is for these reasons why I believe that left handers such as Anwar and yes, even Chanderpaul( for the effortlessness for which he pierces fields)should have been on that list before a Gambir , who has JUST started his international career.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 15, 2009 8:22 PM
I totally disagree with Shankar comments. In my opinion both of you have managed first leg spinners' articles so excellently and then now folk of left arm batsmen with elegance and grace also excellent.
I think the only one left arm all rounder fulfilling the requirement of 3000 or more runs and 300 or more wickets in test career is Chaminda Vaas.
Overall no doubt, the best all rounder is Gary Sobers with fulfilling the requirement of 2000 or more runs with 200 or more wickets in test matches.
The most elegant left arm batsman is David Gower and then others like Lara, Sobers and Pollock.
Overall fulfilling the all requirements for left arm batting is Brian Lara with highest no. of records, with elegance, with mostly turning matches in team favor, with correct batting technique and also according to situation of match (aggressive and also defensive, both quality at a time)
Has any batsman in the world who possessed at any time in his career 10-12 records at a time except Lara.
Posted by: S Raghunath at April 16, 2009 12:03 PM
Nice article although I wouldn't have included Gambhir but then again sublime by definition is a subjective word so each to his own. Zeeshan - I think the other left-handed allrounder who is pretty close to the 3,000 run mark is Wasim Akram. Regardless of the fact that he didn't hit the 3,000 run mark, WA was devastating as a batsman when he got his eye in and simply mind-blowing as a bowler. Vaas is very under-rated too given that for years he rarely had support on the pace-bowling front although Murali made up for that in other ways. Akram had Waqar bowling in tandem for a fair bit of his career and that was an awesome sight. I'm sure I'm missing a few, but the true left-handed all rounders are possibly Sobers, Alan Davidson of Australia, Akram Vettori and Vaas. Again, this is just off the top of my head but there might be others like Goddard and Wooley who were pretty good although they were way before my time. I never saw Alan Davidson play but oozed class based on what I've read
Posted by: Zeeshan at April 16, 2009 5:25 PM
Dear Raghunath, yes this is right that Wasim is near one.
As I mentioned only that the only man who completed this formality of 3000 runs or more plus 300 or more wickets is Vaas.
I think If we will consider any best left arm bowling all rounder, it is Wasim Akram.
As we both know that formality is something else and quality is something else. Vaas batting average is near to 25, it means he has a potential of batting as well although Wasim is better (King of swing and also had a quality of seam).
If we will minus Sobers bowling average from his batting average it is 57.78 - 34.03 = approx. 24 but I think this formula is never in favor of bowling all rounder like Imran Khan 37.69 - 22.81 = 14.88. There is no left arm bowling all rounder with the figure's match to Imran Khan
Just see the case of Vettori, he will fulfill soon the requirement and become second one with the formality of Vaas.
I think positive discussion is one way to seek further knowledge about cricket.
Posted by: Zeeshan at April 17, 2009 4:31 AM
It is not an easy task to maintain the articles on different topics. When we are going to do something, there is always a chance of some error in it that's why I am praising your different articles with too much knowledge on different topics. This one is also excellent.
As I think left arm batsmen is mosly more elegant than right arm and batting technique wise I think so right arm is mostly better than left arm.
Dear Raghunath, please see some facts regading all rounders with minimum batting average 20 plus 200 or more wickets in test. Only four out of sixteen are left arm that are Wasim, Vaas, Vettori and Sir Sobers.
From Pakistan Wasim Akram and Imran Khan
From India Kapil Dev
From Sri Lanka Chaminda Vaas
From Africa Kallis and Pollock
From Zimbabwe Heath Streak
From New Zeeland Richard Hadlee, Vettori and Cairns
From West Indies Great Sobers
From England Botham and Flintoff
From Austrailia Bret Lee, Benaud and Lindwall
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 18, 2009 11:08 AM
Dear Raghunath, please see some more research for left hand allrounders
Criteria: 1000 or more runs in test matches with at least 20 batting average + 100 or more wickets in test.
Four from Pakistan Intikhab Alam, Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, , and Abdul Razzaq
Four from India Mankad, Kapil Dev, Shastri and Irfan
One from Sri Lanka Chaminda Vaas
Four from Africa Goddard, Pollock, Kallis and Boje
One from Zimbabwe Heath Streak
Four from New Zeeland Richard Hadlee, Bracewell, Cairns and Vettori
Two from West Indies Great Sobers and Hooper
Ten from England Rhodes, Tate, Bailey, Titmus, Illingworth, Greig, Botham, Emburey, Giles and Flintoff
Seven from Australia Giffen, Noble, Lindwall, Miller, Benaud, Davidson and B Lee
Eight are left arm Goddard, Sobers, Davisdson, Wasim, Vettori, Vaas, Boje and Irfan
One is Left Arm Batting with Right Hand Bowling Hadlee
Four are Left Arm Bowling with Right Hand Batting Rhodes, Mankad, Shastri and Giles
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 20, 2009 7:46 AM
Dear Raghunath, if we will changed the criteria to following then
Criteria: 1000 or more runs in test matches with at least 20 batting average + 100 or more wickets in test with bowling average less than 40.
Four from Pakistan Intikhab Alam, Imran Khan, Wasim Akram, , and Abdul Razzaq
Three from India Mankad, Kapil Dev, and Irfan
One from Sri Lanka Chaminda Vaas
Three from Africa Goddard, Pollock and Kallis
One from Zimbabwe Heath Streak
Four from New Zeeland Richard Hadlee, Bracewell, Cairns and Vettori
One from West Indies Great Sobers
Nine from England Rhodes, Tate, Bailey, Titmus, Illingworth, Greig, Botham, Emburey, and Flintoff
Seven from Australia Giffen, Noble, Lindwall, Miller, Benaud, Davidson and B Lee
Seven Left Arm Goddard, Sobers, Davisdson, Wasim, Vaas, Vettori and Irfan
One Left Arm Batting with Right Hand Bowling Hadlee,
Two are Left Arm Bowling with Right Hand Batting Rhodes and Mankad
Now I think that this criteria is minimum for allrounders.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed at April 21, 2009 5:47 AM
Dear Raghunath, I think whatever the criteria is for all-rounders
Great Sobers, Imran, Miller and Kallis will remain in it. Even for 35 batting and bowling average. These all four will qualify easily.
I think statistic plays an important role in cricket, although it is not the only criteria.
If we will change it to the following then
Criteria: 1000 or more runs in test matches with at least 25 batting average + 100 or more wickets in test with bowling average less than 40.
Two from Pakistan Imran Khan and Abdul Razzaq
Three from India Mankad, Kapil Dev and Irfan
Three from Africa Goddard, Pollock and Kallis
Three from New Zeeland Richard Hadlee, Cairns and Vettori
One from West Indies Great Sobers
Six from England Rhodes, Tate, Bailey, Greig, Botham and Flintoff
Two from Australia Noble and Miller
Four Left Arm Goddard, Sobers, Vettori and Irfan
One Left Arm Batting with Right Hand Bowling Hadlee
Two are Left Arm Bowling with Right Hand Batting Rhodes and Mank
Posted by: V S Mahesh at April 21, 2009 12:07 PM
Raghu, I enjoyed your piece on left handers immensely. My only surprises were exclusion of Bert Suctliff and inclusion of Gambhir. I believe there is a case for pruning the list to just six: Harvey, Suctliff, Lara, Sobers, Pollock and Gower.
Four of the others, Kallicharan, Jayasurya, Gilckrist and Sangakkara do not merit being bracketted with the top six. There will always be arguments about including run gatherers like Border, the heavy weights like Hayden and old stalwarts like Leyland and Morris along with them.
As for Ganguly, I think he is one of a kind. The sheer elegance of his off side strokes, especially the drives have provided me with such pleasure over the years that I would be loath not to include him in any list that has "grace" as a qualification.
And, for Shanker, your comments about credentials of the authors are quite unwarranted and in bad taste. Did you read the authors' analysis of leg spinners? Please do. These guys know their cricket alright.
Posted by: M. Omair at April 21, 2009 6:16 PM
Nice article for left arm batsmen for elegance and grace.
I think Lara is no. 1, reason is that he maintained quintuple in first class with one quadruple as well. Sobers did not have any quadruple in first class and Pollock with no triple century in first class.
Lara always played in pressure cooker situation because he always in these situations like 51 / 3 or 78 / 4. He was not only run accumulator but also taking the pressure of the game as well. Due to his abilities, player on the other side always felt relax because he was always facing main strikers. There are also other batsmen which are his contemporaries and they can accumulate runs but cannot take the pressure of the game. It means they are only runs accumulator. There is a big difference between him and others.
He also had an ability to score big knocks. 19 times 150 or more is something to write in a golden words in history of test with nine double hundreds.
I think he is best of the best among all test batsmen.
Posted by: Zeeshan at April 21, 2009 6:35 PM
Dear Raghunath, keep on sending more articles on blogs.
I think the following criteria is the BEST ONE for the all rounders in test history
I will prefer specialist batsmen or bowler on the all rounder with batting average 25-30 and bowling average 30-35.
Criteria: 1000 or plus runs in test matches with at least 25 batting average + 100 or more wickets in test with bowling average 35 or less.
One from Pakistan Imran Khan
Three from India Mankad, Kapil Dev and Irfan
Three from Africa Goddard, Pollock and Kallis
Three from New Zeeland Richard Hadlee, Cairns and Vettori
One from West Indies Great Sobers
Six from England Rhodes, Tate, Bailey, Greig, Botham and Flintoff
Two from Australia Noble and Miller
Four Left Arm Goddard, Sobers, Vettori and Irfan
One Left Arm Batting with Right Hand Bowling Hadlee
Two are Left Arm Bowling with Right Hand Batting Rhodes and Mankad
From Diet: For avoiding breast cancer, women should use cabbage like Chinese women in their diet.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 22, 2009 5:02 AM
Yes this is right that left arm is more elegant than right arm batsmen.
Overall fulfilling the all requirements for left arm batting is Brian Lara. Please see all reasons.
1. With highest numbers of records in test and also some records in first class too.
2. With elegant (stylish) batting
3. With mostly turning matches in team's favor
4. Ability to turn match from worst situation to his team's favour.
5. With correct batting technique with high backlift although Tendulkar has better technique.
6. Ability to play according to situation of match (aggressive and also defensive, both qualities at a time)
7. Tackle the pressure of main strikers. Never tried to avoid them, always scored against main strikers (bowler) of other teams.
8. He scored every corner of the world as he scored centuries against all test playing nations and in every continent like 132 at Perth against Australia.
9. Batting average is more than 50.
10. 164 catches in test means also excellent fielder.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 22, 2009 8:06 AM
From Previous:
11. Quality to dominate spinners like complete domination on Murlithran, remember his 688 runs in 6 innings.
12. Same quality to dominate fast bowlers as well although Lara lost his wicket so many times against McGrath but his batting average is 50 against Australia with nine hundreds (three are double centuries) and eleven fifties.
13. When he was in form, no attack had no meaning against him. He could destroy any attack.
14. He is consistent batsman as he converted 82 50 + innings to 34 hundreds and then 19 150 or plus and then nine double hundreds.
15. He scored 9301 runs with the help of his 50 or plus scores. It means 9301 / 232 = 40.09 runs per inning. Overall runs per inning is 51.52. This is not the case of Tendulkar and Ponting.
So many people says he was inconsistent, if he was inconsistent how he managed 11953 runs in 131 test matches only. It means 91.25 runs per match.
I think the above is enough to prove himself best left arm batsman of histoy
Posted by: Amogh at April 22, 2009 9:49 AM
ODI's: Don't forget Michael Bevan and Lance Klusener who were so good at the climactic phases perhaps, because they were lefthanders.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 22, 2009 10:06 AM
Dear Giridhar and Raghunath
Amazing! Irfan Pathan can qualify the following criteria as well. I think he has dual qualities.
Criteria: 1000 or plus runs in test matches with at least 30 batting average + 100 or more wickets in test with bowling average 35 or less.
One from Pakistan Imran Khan
Three from India Mankad, Kapil Dev and Irfan
Three from Africa Goddard, Pollock and Kallis
One from New Zeeland Cairns
One from West Indies Great Sobers
Four from England Rhodes, Greig, Botham and Flintoff
Two from Australia Noble and Miller
Three Left Arm Goddard, Sobers and Irfan
Two are Left Arm Bowling with Right Hand Batting Rhodes and Mankad
I think ovrall best allrounders are Imran Khan and Great Sobers.
They both have a qualification for batting, bowling, fielding and captain of the team as well.
Posted by: Jahan Zada Buneri at April 23, 2009 11:05 AM
Dear Giridhar and Raghunath
Nice article, but you missed Bert Suctliff of New Zealand. For elegance and grace I think no. 1 is Brian Lara.
Dear Amogh Bevan and Klucsencer are not fulfilling the criteria that they include in the list of great left arm batsmen in my opinion.
Dear Zeeshan you have written too much about Lara but missed one fact that his batting skills against two strongest opponents. His batting average is more than 50 against Australia and also against S. Africa more than 50 or near to it. In India neither Tendulkar nor Dravid average is more than even 39 against S. Africa.
Inzamam and Yusuf both were proved not very good against these teams.
One fact about Yusuf is that his batting average against England is 70, against Zimbabwe 68.44, Bangladesh 251.5, West Indies 101.16 and New Zealand 64.62. If we will combine all these countries only his average becomes 83.33 with runs scored 4250 with the help of 18 centuries in 59 innings.
Posted by: R Sivasubramaniam at April 23, 2009 1:26 PM
If we are talking of Grace - go no furher than the Prince - Brian Lara. In his day, the fielders were there to 'fetch and carry' and the poor bowlers toiled. Ask Murali - who is genuine in his praise of Lara - one Great admiring another.
Siva from Singapore
Posted by: M. Shariq at April 23, 2009 6:28 PM
Dear Giridhar and Raghunath
Excellent article, but you missed Suctliff of New Zealand. For elegance and grace who is no. 1.
Dear Sivasubramaniam
Please find below the criteria for the best one in test including all.
Technically correct batsman, elegant (Stylish batting, many Records at a time, situational or ability to turn matches, better average against strongest opponents, scored in every corner of the world and strongest again spinners and also fast bowlers as well.
For above criteria, Lara is no doubt no. 1 with elegance and grace. He is matchless and also king of king. He is the only complete man who can fulfill all components at a time.
Suppose if batsman is not elegant then whatever his batting average is, he is not the best one.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 24, 2009 8:27 AM
Dear Jahan Zada, yes you are right that I missed one fact that performacne against two strongest teams is also necessary. In case of Inzamam and also Dravid, they both are not too good against them. Then performance against strongest opponents' home grounds is also necessary. Lara runs per inning in Australia is 41.97 and in Africa 46.72.
One more thing is also that batting average continents wise should be excellent. In case of Lara, his batting average is near to or more than 50 in all continents except Oceania that is 40.76.
I think he is fullfiling all criterias at a time which is more than any other test batsmen including all.
Record wise, elegant, technical, situational, attack on main strikers, ability to tackle spinners as well as fast bowlers too.
It means he comprises of each and every components. In case of others so many things are lacking.
He is not only best left arm batsman but also the finest batsman the history of cricket ever produced with matchless abilities.
Posted by: Sayan at April 25, 2009 3:30 PM
Looch my dear,
Ganguly is overrrated !!!! Man he has got 19 thousand runs in international cricket . How many eng/aus guys have it? Once Boycott said he is better than Gower and I have no intention to disagree with that. Yeah Ganguly was definitely bettre than Gower in termas of power ( which he used willfully when needed) and sometimes even with the grace itself.
I really missed Saeed Anwar here. Kalicharan , well we could replace him with Anwar.
Posted by: sushant singh at April 27, 2009 9:34 AM
LARA is the greatest . NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT. although wolley , gower , sobers , sutcliffe, pollock might come close to him in term of elegance but overall he is the best.
Looch is right . ganguly is overrated look at his record in aus , sa , nz .Anwar is far better than ganguly
Posted by: sushant singh at April 27, 2009 9:34 AM
LARA is the greatest . NO DOUBT ABOUT THAT. although wolley , gower , sobers , sutcliffe, pollock might come close to him in term of elegance but overall he is the best.
Looch is right . ganguly is overrated look at his record in aus , sa , nz .Anwar is far better than ganguly
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 27, 2009 7:16 PM
Excellent Article again.
Dear Sushant Singh, yes this is right that he is the greatest one although he is unorthodox.
He is comprises of each and every thing like technique, elegant, records holder, big knocks, tackling of pressure of game, scored against main strikers and then he arranged 11953 runs totally in test, quality to play spinners as well as fast bowlers, runs in every continents, ability to create master piece innings as well like 400, 375, 277, 226, 221+130, 213 and 153.
If someone is gone through all 48 comments then he can easily get too much knowledge about LARA.
In my opinion he is better than Don Bradman as he played cricket in 45-50 grounds and 45-50 bowlers took 100 or more wickets in five continents whereas in Bradman case only six bowers took 100 or more with ten grounds in two continents only. One more fact about Bradman is that he is not an elegant batsman. Due to this reason I always said that he is not the no. 1 batsman of the world but he is legend.
Posted by: Deepak at April 28, 2009 9:13 AM
Sir Excellent article upfront. appreciate ur keen observations. absolutely fantastic write on the most elegant ones.
But i fail to see the lack of name called Greame Smith the South African Captain. really an elegant nd delightful strokemaker par excellence. probably tht ll be the only inclusion from my end. As all say Gambhir too early to judge. Anyday the rest would fill the list.
cheers for the article!!
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at April 29, 2009 7:24 AM
Excellent article for left arm batsmen.
If we will manage left arm batsmen according to their runs then list is as below
1. Lara 11953 2. Allan Border 11174 3. Hayden 8625
4. Chandurpaul 8502 5. Gower 8231
6. Great Sobers 8032 7. Langer 7696 8. Taylor 7525
9. Kirsten 7289 10. Ganguly 7212
If we will manage left arm batsmen according to centuries
1. Lara 34 2. Hayden 30 3. Border 27 4. Sober 26 5. Langer 23 6. Harvey 21 7. Kirsten
8. Chandurpaul 21 9. Taylor 19 and no. 10 is Kumar Chokshanada Sangakkara with 18 centuries
According to Double centuries for at least three double hundred
1. Lara with nine, 2. Sangakara with six
3. Smith with four 4. Kirsten with three
5. Langer with three 6. Jayasuriya with three
7. Fleming with three
In all three cases, Lara is on top, if he was inconsistent how he managed so many records at a time. Even if we will manage another list with 150 or more scores then again he in on top with nineteen scores.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed at April 30, 2009 10:32 AM
Even if we will manage another list for top ten with 150 or more scores with minimum qualification is 5000 runs in test by any left arm batsmen then again Lara is on top with nineteen scores. Pleas find below the list
1. Lara with nineteen 2. Sangakara with eleven
3. Sobers with eleven 4. Harvey with nine
5. Kirsten with eight 6. Gower with eight
7. Border with eight 8. Smith with seven
9. Langer with seven 10. Trescothik and Jayasuria with six each.
This is the forth case that Lara is again on top with 19 big knocks.
In my opinion, at least 150 is enough score for big knock instead of double centuries (that is already a very big inning).
From Diet: Take 250 ml light hot milk with two tea spoon of honey in it in night. You can use it as a natural tranquilizer. You are soon on your bed with good sleep.
Posted by: Zeeshan Siddiqui at April 30, 2009 8:07 PM
Excellent Article for left arm batsmen.
There are so many batsmen that are left arm batsmen but right hand bowlers like Wright from New Zealand and many others
If we will manage 50 or plus innings for left arm batsmen then
1. Border 27+63 = 90 2. Lara 34+48 = 82
3. Chandurpaul 21+52= 73 4. Hayden 30+29 = 59
5. Taylor 19+40= 59 6. Gower 18+39= 57
7. Sobers 26+30 = 56 8. Kirsten 21+34 = 55
9. Thorpe 16+39 = 55 10. Fleming 9+46 = 55
For the fifth criteria Border is on top with Lara is at no. 2. Although LARA scored 9301 in 50 or plus innings whereas Border scored 7919 runs only in 50 or plus innings. It means Lara runs per 50 or plus innings is 113.43, 9301 / 82 = 113.43 and Border only 87.98 that is 7919 / 90 = 87.98
I think whatever the criteria is, Lara remains on top or very near to it. Only complete man in history of cricket with elegance and grace
From Diet: After eating too much meat, please eat papaya. It will digest the meat easily but this tip is not for pregnant women.
Posted by: Zeeshan at May 1, 2009 2:09 PM
Left arm batting means style and many people like to watch them with more interest as compare to watch right hand batsmen.
Even if we will manage another list for top ten with 170 or more scores in test by any left arm batsmen then again Lara is on top with fifteen scores. Pleas find below the list
This is the fifth case that Lara is again on top with 15 big knocks.
In my opinion, 170 is an excellent score for big knocks as compare to double centuries (that is already a very big one).
From Diet: Use green tea for reducing fats or loosing weight from your body.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed Siddiqui at May 2, 2009 10:32 AM
Whatever the criteria is Lara remains on top or very near to it.
For the following criteria, Lara is again on top.
If we will manage another list for top ten left arm batsmen with 180 or plus scores in test. Please find below the list
1. Lara 12 2. Sangakara 8 (3)Jayasuria 5
(4) Kirsten, Threscothik, Fleming, Smith and Langer 4 each and then Border, Harvey, Sobers and Hayden 3 each.
You can see the sequence in case of Lara like when we talked about 150 or plus it is nineteen in Lara case and in case of Sobers eleven but when we see 180 or plus scores, in case of Lara it is 12 and in case of him only three. For double centuries Lara's case is nine and Sobers only two.
In case of Lara 82 50 or plus converted in 34 hundreds then 150 or plus scored 19 then 170 or plus 15 then 180 or plus 12 then nine double hundreds then two triple and one quadruple.
It means in left arm batsmen he had the greatest tendency to convert big knocks into further big innings.
Posted by: Zeeshan at May 3, 2009 6:13 PM
There are so many left arm batsmen but very few are able to prove themselves
Please find below another list for left arm runs in test with the help of centuries for top ten only. Once again Lara is on top
1. Lara 5889 2. Hayden 4092 3. Sobers 3918
4. Border 3580 5. Langer 3293
6. Sangakkara 3142 7. Kirsten 3046 8. Harvey 2975
9. Smith 2820 and no. 10 Taylor 2702
Lara is again on top in this criteria as well. I think he is the best among all.
From Diet: Use grapefruit juice for reducing fats or loosing weight from your body.
Posted by: Zeeshan Ahmed at May 4, 2009 11:10 AM
It seems very good to watch left arm elegant batsmen.
Please find below another list for left arm runs scored in test with the help of 50 or plus innings for top ten only. Once again Lara is on top
1. Lara 9301 2. Border 7919 3. Chandurpaul 6270
4. Hayden 6206 5. Sobers 5927 6. Taylor 5350
7. Kirsten 5336 8. Langer 5312 9. Gower 5249
10. Sangakkara 5188
I think Lara is consistent so that he had managed so many records at a time that any other test batsmen can only think about it.
From Diet: Use light hot water of 250 ml with two tea spoon of honey in it or squeeze half lemon in it, drink it for ten to fifteen or more days, you will reduce fats from your body very quickly.
Posted by: R.Viswanathan at May 19, 2009 7:14 PM
Excellent article Raghu (and Giridhar, who I don't know). I know how much you worshipped Harvey but you have shown fairness in this article !! As a footnote: I think it was 1969 - I watched a partnership of over a 100 between Pollock and Sobers in England (England vs Rest of the world , I think)and it was fantastic. Poetry in motion and it was in double quick time. Granted the English attack was not highly potent but these two made it look very pedestrian indeed.
Posted by: Argha Banerjee............ at October 12, 2009 1:03 PM
Guys.........dis iz for those who quuestion this team.There are several left handers who have fared well in world cricket.Some for grace while power was the forte of the others.Exept for the selection of Gautam alls pretty well arranged.Lara,Sobers,Pollock,Harver,Gower are mandatory.......as for Ganguly if elegace nd grace cant be associated with him...it cant be with any 1 even a gentle touch resulted in boundaries for him, and the short ball probs he had overcomed it quit a bit after his come back.so the selection is 99% correct if not 100%
Post your comment
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from
ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you
hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and
you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from
our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing.
Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)