Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« Left-Arm Fast bowlers | | The sublime left-hand batsmen »

Hello, I'm Dirk Wellham

Posted by Cricinfo - on 04/14/2009

From James Ozerman, Australia

Does anyone remember the former Australian player and NSW/Tasmanian/Queensland player and Captain Dirk Wellham? When I was growing up in the 1980's he was my cricketer. With some players they are who you want to be as players. To me, he was who I was; a quiet, bespectacled nondescript "outsider" sitting on the fringes of teams, waiting and being overshadowed by events or other players.

Yeah, yeah yeah laugh all you want, I can hear you saying "What, are you kidding me? He was one of the worst players to ever represent Australia!". It's a comment echoed a lot apparently. I decided that I had to do my research on this to prove either he was or he wasn't one of the worst ever to represent his country as he frequently appears on worst Australian teams lists compiled by fans just like myself. What I found may or may not surprise you.

Through my research (i.e. reading of his book, old articles and internet sites such as wikipedia and Cricinfo) and in gathering statistics for this defense, he strikes me as somewhat of a controversial, enigmatic personality that didn't always fit in with the hierarchy of the team, the board, the selectors, the fans or the media. By his own admission he wasn't "gregarious or one of the boys". That didn't stop him being an above average State cricketer (he is only one of two batsmen in history to score a century on debut for state and country) and a first rate state captain (where he won two Sheffield Shields in a row including the double of the shield and the one-day competition) and is the only player in history to captain three different state sides. He played six Tests between 1981 and 1987. He seems to have unfairly taken some flak for some of his supposed actions which may have reflected negatively on his standing with the selectors and the board.

On his Test debut in 1981 where he was approaching his century he was sent a message from the captain, Kim Hughes, who had seen the sky get dark, to take his time. He was tied down by Peter Parker and Ian Botham for 25 minutes before he could get to his century. He was subsequently dropped for the next Test that Australia played. He managed to play another three Tests in 1981-82 and again subsequently disappeared from the Test team.

He didn't exactly get an extended run throughout his career as the next time he was chosen was for the sixth and final test against England in 1985, a tour that seemed very unhappily divided because of the rebel tour to South Africa. Initially, he had signed onto the rebel tour and then pulled out thanks to Kerry Packer, which upset many, both on the inside, and the outside of the team, as well as the board. He and three others, Graeme Wood, Wayne Phillips and Murray Bennett who also were to have gone to South Africa, but like Wellham, pulled out at the last minute (Bennett months before). According to Wellham (in his book) the four were interrogated by the other members of the squad as to where their loyalties were, and later a unanimous vote was taken by the squad behind their backs that basically said that they weren't wanted in the squad.

He again disappeared from the Test team after the sixth test and stayed on the fringes of international cricket with intermittent appearances in the one day side until he was chosen in a dead rubber in the fifth Test against England at Sydney in 1987. He, according to reports was chosen to be Allan Border's deputy by the selectors, but this was rejected unanimously by the board for their own reasons. It is also reported not only in his book, but in "History of Australian Cricket" (by Chris Harte) that he was the one who lead the team on the field to their only win in that series. Was AB threatened by Wellham? Possibly, if you want to look at it from the perspective that the team was underperforming, due to retirements, and the rebel tours and whilst AB's captaincy was under serious pressure, Wellham was the most successful captain at that point in time.

Personally I believe that Wellham would have made an excellent Australian captain. Despite him playing in most of the one-day matches the summer of 1986-87 and being a part of the winning fifth Test team, his international career was over after the tour of Sharjah in early 1987. It was in the same 1986-87 season when Allan Lamb took on Bruce Reid in ODI final over heroics and won by clobbering 18 of 5 balls to seal a famous, if not an improbable victory. Does anyone remember Wellham making 97 in that match? If you go to Youtube you can watch the demolition of Reid by Lamb. Try looking for Wellham's innings (or Australia's innings of the match) and it's nowhere to be found. I all too well remember sitting in the Bradman stand and feeling slightly miffed when Bill Athey took a low catch to deny Wellham a deserved century. Such was the life of a ten-year-old watch his hero trudge off without gaining what was rightfully his.

Granted cricket is about performance and his Test average is only 23.37 which is quite unremarkable compared to others who had longer to prove themselves, but given that his stop start Test career was stretched over six years I decide to compare how his average over his short six Test career stacks up against other (mostly) more established Australian Test cricketers averages (both current and former) in their first six Tests. The results are below:

1. Mike Hussey 80
2. Adam Gilchrist 69
3. Allan Border 70
4. Mark Taylor 63
5. Michael Clarke 60
5. Mark Waugh 51
6. Dean Jones/Graham Yallop 46
7. Geoff Marsh 38
8. Ricky Ponting/Greg Ritchie 33
9. David Hookes 32
10. Justin Langer 26
11. Matthew Hayden 25
12. Kim Hughes 24
13. Dirk Wellham 23
14. Mike Veletta 21
15. David Boon 18
16. Andrew Symonds 17
18. Steve Waugh 14

My conclusion, going by the statistics alone, he actually had a better average than Boon, Steve Waugh and Andrew Symonds after six Tests each and there was only 3 and 2 runs on average between himself and Hayden and Langer. Isn't that a surprise? Statistically at that point in their Test careers they were pretty much on par. But then again cricket isn't all about statistics, it's just as much about characters and personalities.

The impact that Wellham has had on Australian cricket is more than just his personal achievements but also how he influenced two of Australia's future captains, Mark Taylor and Steve Waugh. Both players have acknowledged that they gleaned insights and aspects of captaincy from his style of leadership. It is unfortunate Wellham just didn't seem to fit into the Aussie larrakin/ocker kind of player that has become synonymous with those who have played for Australia over the past 30 years. He seemed to be a generation or two too late, a product of a bygone era when it was alright to be quiet or unassuming. Those of us who appreciate that can only ponder what could have been.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: Faisal Khan, Pakistan at April 14, 2009 6:28 AM

You have done a brilliant job and I am shocked !!! He was amazing player as you described some of his records. Board is the reason of his disappearing. YOU DID A NICE JOB.

Posted by: Brendan Layton at April 14, 2009 6:36 AM

He apparently broke down in tears following that interrogation before the 1985 tour. Only Murray Bennett was sort of spared because he had changed his mind months before the rebel tour.

That moment probably led to him not playing more for Australia.

Posted by: Looch at April 14, 2009 7:29 AM

I remember Dirk Wellham very well and I think you summed it up when you said he was an above average State cricketer. I agree, but he was a below standard international cricketer.

Posted by: Vishy at April 14, 2009 7:34 AM

Beautiful article! Thanks for showing us a different picture of Welham. I think there were many other cricketers of that era who didn't get their due. I think that players who were not part of the Chappell-Lillee-Marsh camp, were those who had it tough (including Kim Hughes). These gentlemen were great legends and continued to contribute to the game after retirement, but the harm they did to the Australian dressing room in their last playing years is sad. Even today, Ian Chappell, who I admire very much, keeps undermining Steve Waugh's record as a player and as a captain, which is sad. We should be glad that Steve Waugh didn't play in the era of the Chappells, as otherwise, I am sure he would have got the same treatment as Welham, Kim Hughes and the others.

Posted by: MrKricket at April 14, 2009 8:32 AM

It's always made me wonder how some players kept (and keep) getting picked over the years without performing and others are discarded quickly seemingly nver to play again and then be thrown in the deep end for one game where, if they 'fail' again they are dumped for good. Wellham was one of these players. When you look at how many chances Symonds has been given you wonder what might have been if Wellham and others had been treated the same.

Posted by: Lawrie Colliver at April 14, 2009 9:26 AM

WTF is Peter Parker - the ex umpire. Paul Parker played in that Test (his debut and sole game) and didn't bowl.
"He was tied down by Peter Parker and Ian Botham for 25 minutes before he could get to his century." Check you facts son if you want to be taken seriously as a writer

Posted by: Devraj Mallik at April 14, 2009 9:46 AM

Yes, I can remember him as the one with spects, a right hand batsman, very busy cricketer. He played few matches against india in the 1985 series...which i saw in Tv...as I was a school boy then....An interesting cricketer indeed...but "Yes"...he was having a great potential as an all time stalwarts of the game...Hats of to you Dirk...

Posted by: igloo at April 14, 2009 10:59 AM

I don't put too much stock in stats unless they are startling. idn't Bradman praise Wellham in the same terms as he did Tendulkar? May have been the kiss of death in his case.

Posted by: john arthur at April 14, 2009 11:36 AM

I agree with Looch - but how many of our good cricketers have been undermined by Mr Better than anyone else - Ian Chappell
I f Chappell was 25% as good as he thinks he was we would have been undefeated in all those years - how did he perform against South Africa

Posted by: Greg Stephens at April 14, 2009 2:15 PM

My memories of him were pretty lucid as well, though my best memories of him were getting out in a state game and then hitting the boundary pickets in frustration. His bat then diverted off the pickets and hit a woman square in the face. Does anyone else remember that? He may have been playing for Tassie at the time....

Posted by: Geoff Marshall at April 14, 2009 6:12 PM

Re Lawrie Colliver`s comments `WTF is Peter Parker`? PAUL Parker was a brilliant point and cover fielder. Not a bowler or a test class batsman. I remember watching that game and Botham had him tied down at one end with Parker cutting off the only shots Botham was feeding him, through the positions Parker was covering. Cricket is not just a game of batsman and bowler. Bowlers and fielders often work in tandem to tie down batmen with the aim of strangling their better shots.
Have you ever played the game at any level? If you had you would know this and would not have made such a demeaning comment to the writer.
Check your facts sonny!

Posted by: Matt Gartside at April 15, 2009 12:15 AM

What an entertaining read! Particularly well-timed for me as I have just completed reading Christian Ryan's "Golden Boy" and you comments seem to match very well with the contents of his book. Unlike one poster who obviously thinks himself god's gift to cricket journalism (refer 6th comment)I envy your writing style!

Posted by: Fisher Price at April 15, 2009 12:17 AM

Agree 100 percent. Border wielded too much influence on selection just as Ponting has. The result is that mates/ boorish larrikins are given the nod unless there's no other option than selecting 'outsiders' due to injuries of weight of performance (see Simon Katich, who I suspect is seen as a threat by Ponting and his inner sanctum).

Posted by: SOHAIB AHMAD at April 15, 2009 1:28 AM

Of course I do remember Dirk Wellham, in fact he was one of my favorites (alongwith David Hookes earlier) and I desperately wanted him to be successful and consistent, but the Australian team of that era wasnt that successful and consistent either. Excellent article James and thanks for bringing Dirk to the notice of the initiated.

Posted by: George C at April 15, 2009 6:22 AM

Easy to have a pop Lawrie but YOU should have done YOUR research. Paul Parker was well known as one of the finest cover fielders of the 70s and 80s. Up there with Alan Ealham and Derek Randall.

Posted by: BRuse at April 15, 2009 7:10 AM

Interestingly Ian Chappell's average after 6 Tests is no better - 22.66 according to CricInfo stats...

Posted by: Hidiskid at April 15, 2009 8:25 AM

I also remember Dirk Wellham doing cricket coverage on the ABC radio. Very knowledgeable and interesting and could read the game well.

Posted by: Matsumoto at April 15, 2009 9:44 AM

Dirk Welham once belted me all over a park in suburban Sydney as my school tried in vain to get him out. He was 16 and already playing top grade, he scored 102 out of the teams total of 128. He was a very single minded young man, engineered our demise, shook hands with us all and went off to grade practice. He went onto a career in education, dabbled in politics and has contributed thoughtful pieces on cricket to the media over the years (although I can't recall any recent ones). As a cricketer he was as single minded as he was that day playing for his school. He was an excellent captain, a solid batsmen and maybe treated a little unfairly when he pulled out of the Rebel tour for the Packer dollar.One of those players that make great trivia questions.

Posted by: tonyp at April 15, 2009 2:36 PM

I also very much admired Dirk Welham. The mid 80's were a singularly dark time for Australian cricket. The team was ravaged by the recent spate of retirements, divided by a clash of personalities and the ongoing political situation in the sport, and hamstrung by panicky and inconsistent selection policies.

As a team Australia were pretty ordinary and it took a long time and consistent effort to turn the ship around. This is the time when I had it hammered into me that there are worse things in life than losing an occasional test match or test series, like losing just about EVERY test series.

In this environment Mr. Welham wasn't given the length of tenure or selectorial faith that we can nowadays afford to lavish on modern players & I think Australian cricket was the poorer because of that.

BTW comparing Waugh to Welham isn't fair, Waugh was a bowling all-rounder when first selected

Posted by: SCT at April 15, 2009 2:55 PM

Dirk Welham was going to be the next Don Bradman. Had amazing figures to start with in Shield cricket from memory. Century after century. If he started playing in the Australian team when they were a winning team this confidence would have rubbed off on him. They were dark days in Australian cricket history. Always thought he could have been one of Australia's great players.

Posted by: sunil at April 15, 2009 4:48 PM

For all their dominance of world cricket,more and more stories emerge of "outsiders" like Dirk Welham,and Graham Yallop,who probably didnt get along with the then "HOLY TRINITY" of Aussie cricket i.e.the Chappells and their albeit talented cronies i.e Rod Marsh,Lillee etc..the system of "Not one of Us" HAS been so apparent in Australian cricket.

Posted by: babu kalyanpur at April 15, 2009 6:34 PM


Remember Dirk Welham scoring his hundred on debut and it is still imprinted on my mind. I remember that he was graceful and had superb timing. Yes, you are right. Lesser players have got picked by the Aussie selectors and given longer runs despite repeated failures. Even experienced players have been dumped without being given a fair run. Always feel that Mark Waugh had a few years left in him before bing hastily shunted out. That was a great loss to to cricket and aesthetics of the game. Always feel that the Australian selectors behave in a high-handed manner and ready to unceremoniously sack players who have lost their utility.

Posted by: Looch at April 16, 2009 4:31 AM

Dirk Wellham was simply not good enough to get an extended stay in international cricket. That's it!
There was no conspiracy and comments from uninformed posters like Sunil and fisher price are emotion drive juvenile rantings at best.

Posted by: James Ozermann at April 16, 2009 10:50 PM

Whether Wellham was good enough (or not) to play internationally is exactly the issue. In my opinion it is harsh to say that someone isn't good enough when there are 11 innings over six years. Sometimes it's the story off the field that is more telling than what happens on it. It was why the research was done on how he compared to others.

It wasn't my intention to draw conclusions for anyone, but what I am interested in is presenting facts and letting the reader make up their own minds.

As it was Paul Parker and not Peter Parker as stated, I humbly apologize. The sentence should have read "He was tied down, by Ian Botham's bowling and Peter Parker fielding in the covers, for 25 minutes before he could get to his century." It was my fault for not checking my facts and sentences as thoroughly as I should have. Thanks to Lawrie Colliver for the correction.

Posted by: ted at April 19, 2009 4:38 AM

wellham was a good crickter.but at the time aussie was rebuilding im sure there are more crickters out there at the time with similiar stories.remarkable to be dropped after a century all the same

Posted by: Milt at June 24, 2009 8:50 AM

Where are you now Dirk Wellham? I want to include you in the Moore family tree.

Posted by: ricky at June 25, 2009 5:06 PM

Ashes is just around d corner....actually i think Ashes is much hyped series for d simple reason its been a one sided series from long time....england b4 2005 last time they won d Ashes was in 1987 so they have been on d losing side for alomost 18 yrs nd tht is a longggg time.....in 2005 england won in grand style but in 2007 when Aus won d ashes back tht victory was much much bigger...they won 5 to 0 which is an extra ordinary result they got back at england and didnt give dem a chance....Getting back to 2009 i think this series is mostly between england batsmen and australian bowlers....in 2005 when england won d ashes the bowlers were d heroes for them...in 2007 when australia won back the ashes the australian batsmen never gave a chance to english bowlers....so i think if england has to win this ashes they will have to bat well....the vetrean players like KP,COLLY,STRAUSS wll have to perform out of their skin youngsters like BOPARA,COOK,SHAH wll have to come to d party....for me th

Posted by: Dirk Wellham at November 3, 2009 11:46 AM

Paul Parker and I swapped our cricket caps after that 1981 Test, my first. Paul was a wonderful athlete and a fine man to have played against.
My mother was a Moore (Nancy).

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009