One of the unexpected laughs of the week came at the expense of England, who showed the world they are still the masters of disaster with a dismal collapse to 51 in their test against the West Indies. And the reason I laugh? Every Pommie supporter has been in my ears or on Cricinfo talking up how Australia will be devastated on their trip for England. Following their ridiculous fall on the weekend, I am completely confident that we will retain our hold on the priceless urn.
England and Australia are often accused of paying too much attention to the Ashes. It is true to some respects, although Australia in its time puts a lot of priority on its duels these days with South Africa and especially India, as well as having a long standing competition with the Windies for the Frank Worrell Trophy. England, however, are clearly Ashes-obsessed. The tabloids in England are more infatuated with beating Australia than they are with Amy Winehouse's drunken exploits or what stupid comment the Gallagher brothers have summoned for the week. It's an old sore that they cannot tolerate, a colony creating its own identity and then emerging as superior in some aspects, as they have with cricket.
The hysteria surrounding 2005, when England thrillingly won to breathe life back into the contest, was a good example of how much they revere the contest, and how much it means for them to win. There were some that hadn't ever seen the urn in England's trophy cabinet following its capture in 1989 and subsequent long term possession by Australia. I don't blame them for going mad and then giving MBEs top the victorious team. They did the same for the English Union team when they won the World Cup in 2003, having knocked off, you guessed it, Australia for the title.
England were widely rumoured to be treating this tour as an 'Ashes warm-up'. How that has now backfired spectacularly. Their reliance on Kevin Pietersen is beginning to grow with every Test, especially with the continually lean showings of Alastair Cook and the spineless Ian Bell. Their bowling, apart from the luckless yet venomous 'Freddie' Flintoff, is rather frail. Stuart Broad is developing but can't hide a lack of real pace. Ryan Sidebottom is steady and accurate, but can be negotiated by a good batting line-up. He went wicketless at Kingston, and that might be playing on their minds. The less said of Harmison and Jimmy Anderson the better. Neither are the answer for England's bowling woes.
Harmy is way too inconsistent and has problems with his attitude. Now that he is on the wrong side of 30, they need to cut off from a talented but highly enigmatic bowler. Anderson is a real conundrum. He can bowl prodigious swing at a good pace at times but when he has an off day, which is quite often, he can be plundered for many runs. He was highly ineffectual in the last Ashes series, and the Australian batsmen will be licking their lips if he comes into contention for a place. Monty is certainly their best spinner. And one would hope he finds his mojo, as he can be considered a far better spin bowler than anyone Australia can muster at the present time. England needs to have a long think, and so do all you Pom supporters out there. Do you really think you can win the Ashes with this inconsistent bunch of underachievers?
my thoughts exactly brendan! they got caught up in the whole coach v captain debarcle in an ashes year! they failed to give any due respect to the west indies a team they are playing 6 tests against before the aussies even hit their shores!
Posted by: KJH at February 12, 2009 3:16 AM
There can NEVER be too much attention paid to the Ashes, it's the longest standing Test cricket contest and the most bitter of rivalries (except for India/Pakistan maybe, but for slightly different reasons) in the cricket world. We (the aussies) love beating the poms (some sort of patriotic validation) and thanks to 2005 (or rather, the untimely McGrath incident & Ponting's decision to bowl...has anyone figured that out yet? If you have, let me know) the Ashes is a much more interesting contest. I wouldn't get too far ahead of ourselves yet though. England may have been embarrassingly thrashed by the WI, but their bowling attack is a different force at home. Anderson (yes, on a good day) can be as unplayable as Jones was in 2005 and Flintoff is one of the best going around and is always dangerous. Having recently seen McGain though, Panesar isn't better. His control is excellent, even at 86 years of age or whatever he is! Can't wait.
Posted by: CBS at February 18, 2009 12:28 PM
Very rightly said. Living in London and being an Indian it becomes irratic at times to see pommie obsession to be thrashed by Aussies.
I can imagine the Aussies waiting for Ashes but why are these people here so proud of lossing. Every match is prep for Ashes and Every team is a build up for Ashes... Nothing to do with job in hand.... That is why they are no where in the top league.... One off success against Newzealand is worth no count....
Posted by: HC at February 21, 2009 2:02 AM
If England's bowling attack is frail what can be said of the Australian attack? The one test they did win against the Saffas they still failed to get 20 wickets (Smith retired hurt first innings).
In home conditions England's bowlers are better. Dhoni said he feared England's attack more than Australia's and Smith said he felt England would win at home. Having beaten both sides in the past year, they should know.
Australia no doubt have the better batting lineup. With or without Hayden there simply isn't any comparison between the two lineups. Only KP would get into the Australian side.
Yet one of the most common reasons given for the 2005 defeat was the loss of McGrath to injury. If you couldn't win without McGrath then, what makes you think you can now? England are arguably a tad better now than in 2005 (or at least no worse). Can the same be said for Australia?
It won't be as easy as the hype suggests. But I do expect England to scrape a victory. It should be a close contest.
Post your comment
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from
ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you
hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and
you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from
our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing.
Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
RSS Feed
