Much of what you read here was written by me a month ago. I had written and put aside the article but two news items in the last fortnight made me write a post script and send it over to the editor at cricinfo.com. Read on.
It was a Sunday morning in the last week of October and the sun was rather pleasant, of the kind that you seem to get only in Bangalore. I was walking to the market rolling between thumb and forefinger the piece of paper on which my wife had written the list of things required at home. Just hundred yards away from my home is a rather large play ground where invariably a couple of teams square up against each other for intense tennis ball cricket matches during weekends. This Sunday morning was no different and even as I was striding purposefully to the market, I could see beyond the compound wall of the ground, two teams had already commenced battle. The noise emanating from the spectators aligned to the two camps was equal and I guessed that it was an even scrap. The sights and sounds of cricket are like a magnet and so I paused and told myself, okay just a few minutes of this action before I resume the expedition to the market. I put my elbows on the compound wall and peered down on a match that had just begun.
The batting seemed to be of good quality and I rather suspect that one of the batsmen was of a league cricket caliber because he played a cover drive and then unfurled a square cut of some elegance. The opening bowlers were also good – they ran in smoothly and delivered decent deliveries and not a wide bowled. But a wicket had not fallen and the captain of the fielding side with some visible impatience summoned his first change.
The new bowler sets his field elaborately, in fact rather too elaborately with much gesticulation. But we are finally ready. Aha! Seems to be a spinner, only 4 steps to the bowling crease. And what does he deliver? An entire over of extremely accurate offspin, every ball was like a dart, with the third ball he took out the ‘league cricket’ caliber batsman’s middle stump and with his sixth ball he plucked out the offstump of the completely clueless No. 3 batsman. Raucous cheers, much leaping around, high fives, lots of hugs…..
I straightened up, dusted my elbows and resumed my walk to the market. But this time my head was bowed and even from the other side of the road you could see that I was not a happy man. The reason was simple. This match winning offspinner bowled with an abominable action.
Of course tennis ball cricket bowling heroes have always been bowlers like our friend here. But these days the story of the maverick offspinner does not end in the neighbourhood maidan. Our friend already 19 or 20 years old must be bowling like this for a few years and by now displaying this brand of bowling in inter college matches too. He would be wrecking teams and may soon play a higher grade of cricket. So I muttered to myself as I continued on my way.
It was not even 24 hours later that I saw some live cricket again. This time it was on television, a match between two teams called India Blue and Green or Yellow or whatever. Both teams had an offspinner each. One of them was being spoken of very highly by the commentators, as the man to watch out for, he can put the brakes, he is a tricky customer, he is the one who will………….
This young man, Mohnish Parmar, has already played first class cricket, played for India A or equivalent teams and therefore must have passed muster with umpires in India, the national committee that reviews actions. But boy, what I saw made me rub my eyes in disbelief! Here he came on a diagonal run up as though measured and marked by Muralitharan. And then he contorts himself and delivers unbelievably copying Muralitharan. And of course he beats batsmen; he gets a wicket here, a wicket there and of the 24 deliveries that he bowled at least 16 of them were the Doosra! The pernicious Doosra is difficult enough to bowl and obviously places the maximum strain on the legality of the action. And through this entire period when this young man is bowling, the commentators make only the occasional apologetic reference to his action. If it is legal who am I argue with that? But if I say it was bloody outright ugly to watch can you deny me the right to say that? Later that evening in the same match, a rather studious looking chap named Ashwin bowled a spell of offspin for the other team – neat clean action, no Doosra, the straighter one of course and he got a wicket bowling a well-set batsman through the gate. But I don’t think he will cause as much grief to batsman as the other bowler and because we worship outcomes and not the process, I think Mohnish may well break through to national colours before the other chap. And thus we will bless, encourage and actively condone such bowling actions.
Something is badly wrong somewhere. A bowler with a dubious action in neighbourhood cricket is perfectly acceptable and in fact provides the much needed sharpness to the fielding side. It is okay so long as he knows that he will play and enjoy cricket as a pastime. But it is an altogether different matter if he is allowed to graduate to higher grades of cricket. In the long run we are doing the greatest disservice to him. Take the case of this bowler with the strange action from the Challenger series match. If he were to continue playing, he would put everything else in his life on the back burner – his studies, his office career, his family. How will he cope if just a short while later, umpires finally do what should have been done when he first began to play serious cricket? Won’t it be too late to change his action? Will he be as effective? What if all his dreams and aspirations come shattering down? Most importantly who is to blame? Why is our cricket administration turning such a blind eye to what is obviously a problem of endemic proportion. I am willing to bet that nearly every Ranji team has an offspinner with a dicey action either in the team or in the fringes of the team. And simply because our system does not have the discipline or courage to stop such bowlers and tell them to correct their actions before they bowl in a match again. I type in these words and in a not too pleasant mood file this piece away and out of sight.
I open the article because I have been compelled to write the post script. November is drawing to a close. Two news items in quick succession in the past fortnight tell us that the offspinners in our country are in trouble. Mohnish Parmar’s action has been questioned by the umpire in a Ranji Trophy match. And Sunil Rao the offspinner from Karnataka has also been told that his action is not what it should be. Why did it take so long? What the umpire spotted in Mohnish Parmar’s action must have been crying out loud for a couple of seasons. How much more difficult it would be for the young man now and how much easier it could have been if our cricket system had done its duty earlier. Legspin by the very nature of the action and delivery is impossible to be bowled with an illegitimate action but an offspinner if not careful can easily end up with an action that will bring grief to the bowler and the game. The administrators of the game in India own primary responsibility.
Nice article. But it is the last 2 lines that caught my attention and I am dusting my own article as a comment here. Warne is celebrated for his round arm action but Murali questioned many a times for his own version of the round arm? Something wrong there as well, ain't it?
Posted by: Ken at December 6, 2008 6:56 AM
I am an offspinner with the "correct" action and with much practice, can get some side spin, accuracy and drift. This I was able to do after five minutes at age 12 by throwing. It took many years of practice for me to do the same by bowling a ball. I have been appalled from day one with Murali's action. The throwing action gives the bowler unfair advantages. Throwing does give you more spin, and more pace and you see the ball later from the hand. I do not rate Murali's world record as I do Kumble's and Warne's and I consider it a tesimony to very accurate throwing and not to very accurate bowling. I also have problems with fast bowlers such as Brett Lee and Shoaib who can bowl the faster ball with actions that would have had them eliminated 30 years ago. The ICC should get back to the art of cricket and leave behind the "push the boundaries of legality" stuff that leaves a bad taste in the mouth
Posted by: Apoorv Singhal at December 6, 2008 2:26 PM
this is a problem with a lot of sub-continental spinners, and i have a feeling international umpires skip reporting them because they're afraid they'll be misinterpreted as racial in nature, and with our media, ignorant and illeterate as far as the understanding of the game is concerned, who can blame them? A problem conveniently ignored by officials.
I was dumbfounded when i joined a camp, and played alongside a spinner with a downright illegal action, while the coach looked on. As the author rightly says, this is great disservice to the bowler in question himself.
Posted by: Mahadevan Varadarajan at December 6, 2008 4:58 PM
I can't but agree.... Bishen Bedi has been going on about it for a while now... Shivlal Yadav was perhaps the last of the Indian offies to have a decent action... His record might not be spectacular, but boy was he good to watch!
Posted by: P.R.Kumar at December 6, 2008 7:22 PM
I would like to compliment Mr.Giridhar for his excellent article. What apes me is that the cricket adminstration,the process and system has to be overhauled because we have coaches and acadamies who mis guide the youngsters for their own selfish needs and they in future are spoiling the bright future of inteligent boys. Whats more alarming is the way junior cricket is handled. One player is disqualified for his action in state matches and is given leverage to bat in the next two matches and more baffling is that in the same tournament he bowls in the fourth match without his action being rectified. Strange but true. I would like to give a wake up call for all parents that do not be emotional but look at the practical angle and evaluate whether your child has the talent to be a professional athelete. Hope good and talented players are promoted for cricket which is a religion for most of us.
Posted by: Vipul Gupta at December 8, 2008 9:13 AM
Mr Giridhar a couple of years ago while passing through the Oval maidan in Bombay I came across some young cricketers in the age group of 14-18 practising and to put it absolutely bluntly the actions of some bowlers were plain illegal and I am not talking about off spinners but even left arm spinners. You will not believe it but the camp was conducted by a well known former international of great repute and who later became a national selector also. My point is when the entire world knows about Murali's action than why is he still allowed to bowl? And if Murali's action is legal than surely even Mohnish should be spared the rod. You cannot allow double standards. Something stinks horribly somewhere.
Posted by: AJAX at December 8, 2008 6:40 PM
It was a warm evening and as the last rays of the sun crept into my dungeon I lazily stretched index my finger over the left button of my computer mouse and clicked. Just a few minutes later my entire demeanor changed, alert and aghast at the most sanctimonious dribble I have read in a while. Who is to judge, I asked myself, whether an action is sufficiently beautiful to be inculcated exclusively into an entire nation's youth? Beauty is after all in the eyes of the beholder, and if the monstrosity of an unorthodox bowling action horrifies some, bamboozles others and thrills a few, is it only natural that the fear of something new should be treated with such vehemence, despite being declared legal by the ICC? Do we really want to actively discourage creativity, discard the Ajantha Mendis brand of bowler in favor of the boring but so called clean actions of Hemmings, Pat Symcox and that over rated quartet from the '60s? Lets stick to the cliches and ban them all... YES... WE CAN!
Posted by: S. Giridhar at December 9, 2008 2:03 AM
Dear Ajax,
I think you missed the point I was trying to make and since I wrote the article the onus is on me. So let me clarify:
1. I am not for stifling creativity or encouraging conformity. Therefore people like Mendis, Ramadhin, Bosanquet, Saqlain and other creative / unorthodox spinners are to be celebrated. If not for the creativity of such spinners we would not have discovered the joy of the googly or the doosra.
2. But encouraging creativity is different from encouraging illegitimate actions. Mendis whom you mention has a clean legitimate action.
3. Lastly when I espouse the sanctity of legal actions it does not mean I espouse mediocre bowlers like Symcox or Hemmings. They happen to have legal actions but are not ever mentioned when one counts the good and great spinners who have played the game.
The one place in the article where I have indulged myself s where I state that even if an action is deemed legal if I find it ugly let me say so.
Posted by: Anon at December 9, 2008 6:49 AM
Good post. I sometimes wonder how Murali and others sleep at night. They may hold plenty of records, but are they all legal? No way.
They may have been born with a bent elbow or whatever it is that the medical reports claim. If that is the case, they should go and join the team for handicapped players.
Posted by: KJH at December 9, 2008 11:11 PM
A nicely written S. Giridhar, it makes me want to visit the Bangalore markets! I find myself agreeing whole heartedly, young players with even borderline suspect actions should be identified and helped. But I think with the Muralitharan saga, people/coaches/commentators et al. are now unsure what is and what is not legal. Is it now up to 15 degrees that the arm is allowed to bend, due to Murali's natural movement? What happens if a player comes along with a natural 20 degree bend? Do the laws get changed again? Brett Lee's action was modified and is now unquestionable (to some) but Murali still divides opinions. It is a shame to see a great competitor's career blighted by controversy, but I think a stand should have been made by the ICC.
And as for those with ugly techniques...well, results are what matter these days, not everyone can bat like Martyn, Gower, or M.Waugh...so I guess Dhoni will thrash away with success for years to come.
Posted by: AJAX at December 10, 2008 9:54 AM
"And as for those with ugly techniques...well, results are what matter these days, not everyone can bat like Martyn, Gower, or M.Waugh...so I guess Dhoni will thrash away with success for years to come."
Yes, yes, people like Dhoni, Bradman and Hayden are such an eyesore, its too bad that people appreciate their statistics. Oh for a clean batting technique!
@ Giridhar
What looks clean to you might look ugly to another. Who defines what is clean, people like Daryl Hair with his "slanted" eyesight or an Arjuna Ranatunga who knows his bowlers can do no wrong? The university that conducted the tests on Muralitharan found that even Glenn McGrath's action fell outside the permissible limits of the time, you didn't see any calls for him to be banned. You want a clean action based strictly on the limits, let the ICC come up with a computerized visual recognition system, not some guy who "thinks" an action isn't clean, to the best of my knowledge no human can distinguish between 14 and 16 deg
Posted by: Pubudu at December 10, 2008 11:30 AM
You sir have no clue about the subject. Just stop spouting utter non-sense.
Posted by: waterbuffalo at December 11, 2008 1:56 AM
Cheers, Ajax, for your position of Devil's advocate. Anybody who cites Martyn, M. Waugh and Gower as examples of elegant and beautiful batting certainly knows what he's talking about.
There is one thing I agree with the author, that off-spinners, even finger spinners , are more likely to be chuckers compared to leg-spinners. I think Ajax's point is that even Chandrasekhar could have been said to have a suspect action, because his elbow was not straight throughout, and he certainly generated impressive pace which is always a sign that all is not as it should be.
I also cringe when I watch Murali bowl, but if Murali was Pakistani, we would probably have beaten the Australians in Australia and I would have been calling him my hero. Chucking is in the eye of the beholder but if the authorities have deemed it legal I say we should just let it go, we have not enough spinners in the international game as it is. BTW, Shoaib Malik is also a chucker, and he was made captain of Pakistan!
Posted by: KJH at December 12, 2008 12:23 AM
Ah, the deep cut of razor wit and rhetoric. How foolish of me gentlemen, to use such cliched & tired examples of batting purity. My deepest apologies for such ebullience. Never fear, all subsequent posts will centre solely on obscure practitioners of the cricketing arts.
For fear of further antagonisation, please tell me just whom I should reference in future conversations with cricket fans. Perhaps Chappell, Lara, & Azharuddin for the graceful? And Hussain, S.Waugh, and Chanderpaul for the ungainly yet effective? And what about bowlers?! Do I settle with Marshall juxtaposed with Tait?
Or am I going about this all wrong? Is there a specific time period after which I am not supposed to discuss player attributes for fear of appearing the uninitiated cultural buffoon? This quandary knows no bounds, I fear I will need to research increasingly vague players of yesteryear. Recalling a solitary cover drive that looked sort of ok at first glance should just about do it.
Posted by: Eddie at December 17, 2008 10:20 AM
I believe that you don't have to be unorthodox to take wickets and bowl well as a spinner just look at Daniel Vettori he has one of the most beautiful actions but he is underrated as a spinner which shows how Murali and co have left the state of thought in cricket
Posted by: Isaac at December 18, 2008 10:19 AM
What about Mitchell Johnson's action. Don't you think he slings the ball with a sideways action. To me it almost appears like a sideways throw.
Posted by: Mansoor Mian at December 28, 2008 12:35 PM
While you folks dissect every single off spinner's action (who has ever played) and call many 'Chuckers' or one's with illegal actions...how can you all be so naiive, while being from India, and not talk about Mr. Javelin Thrower AKA Mr. Chuckbhajan?
If he was a javelin thrower, his action would be perfectly legit...but unfortunately he is a cricketer!
Posted by: acha at January 9, 2009 10:50 AM
the icc was forced to underhandedly change the rules on chucking when it unwittingly found out that the vast majority of international bowlers were "chuckers" based on its old laws. (if i recall correctly, sarwan was the only spinner analysed who had a "clean" action).
why should we discriminate against one particular type of bowler only? as far as i am concerned, i would much rather watch murali bowl than just about any other spinner in the world. he has developed a unique style of offspin bowling, and he should be allowed to reap the benefits of his creativity. remember, when the great pakistani fast bowlers pioneered reverse swing in the 80's,the cricket establishment reacted violently with accusations of cheating and ball tampering. yet now, virtually all fast bowlers try to reverse swing the ball. murali's action is just another evolutionary change for cricket.
i think mohnish should be actively encouraged to develop his game, and one day play test cricket for india....
Posted by: mark at May 17, 2009 6:53 AM
there may be a case for revisisting the regulations - it has always been a batsmans game and many of the evolutions of the game have been based on increasing runs scored, speed of execution and strike rate etc.... I hate chuckers and agree there are some abhorrent actions which will impinge peoples progression and the fairness of the game - zero tolerance is the answer - this is cricket! not baseball!!
Post your comment
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from
ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you
hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and
you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from
our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing.
Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)