Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« Who's Yuvraj? | | Time for Cricket 2.0 »

'Third world' facilities

Posted by Cricinfo - on 11/21/2008

From Shishir Dwivedi, India

Although one might be led to believe Matthew Hayden's comments on India being a "third world" country have become more of a norm these days between enemy camps; more so if the camps concerned are those of India and Australia. With the Aussies, it has always been sort of a tradition to take a dig at the opposition before the start of an important series. Be it a Glenn McGrath singling out his bunny-to-be, or predicting a 3-0 or 5-0 scoreline,or a Steve Waugh playing mental disintegration tactics, or a Ricky Ponting boasting about their "New Age Cricket". But more recently (and quite surprisingly). India have taken a leaf out of the Aussie book and have started giving them back as good as they get.

It all started back in 2001 when Sourav Ganguly got to Steve Waugh's nerves. His simple but effective ways of irritating Waugh (by turning up for the toss late, or wearing the track suit instead of the team blazer for the same) really frustrated Waugh to no end. And by the end of that series Waugh admitted that Ganguly was a tough nut to crack. The foundations for a great rivalry, on and off the field, were laid. Since then each BG series has produced not just fascinating cricket to watch but also quotable quotes to quote and listen to. But while these verbal (or mental) battles were healthy for a brief period of time, the acrimonious Sydney test at the start of this year changed it all.

Since then the remarks from both sides have been either sarcastic, or satiric or clearly insinuating. Kumble quoting a famous quote first uttered by an Australian captain - Bill Woodfull- "There were two teams out there today and one of them was trying to play cricket", after the Sydney test definitely irked the Aussies so much that they were itching to get back at the Indians. Hayden first called Bhajji an "Obnoxious Little Weed" and later apologised. When the Aussies touched Indian shores for the latest series, Ponting was quick to point out that Indians played an outdated version of Test cricket. But the Indians were not going to stay quite either. Sehwag first accused the Aussies of "cheating" in Sydney. Zaheer and even the usually diplomatic Laxman took a dig each at the Aussies' negative approach.

Meanwhile, Gilchrist lambasted Sachin in his autobiography. Symonds did the same to Bhajji in his book. And the most arrogant of them all, Mr Ricky T. Ponting, whose book is the latest to have hit the stands, pulled even Sunny Gavaskar into the murky waters. His arrogance is so profound that he even failed to acknowledge India's gradual ascent in world cricket and labeled Dhoni's men "fit only for T20". Well, maybe, as rightly pointed out by Harbhajan, while Ponting and his men were busy writing their books, Dhoni's men were busy preparing for the upcoming series. The result is there for everyone to see.

I understand its difficult to acknowledge that you are not the best anymore. Especially after being at the summit for such a long period of time as the Aussies have. But comments like "There is so much luck involved in this shortened form of the game; it's not always going to be the best team that wins" or "Teams that are outclassed in five-day matches and even 50-over games are much more competitive in Twenty20. India offer a good example of this", only highlight his arrogance and refusal to admit the truth.

Clearly (and fairly by all means), it was Ponting's team that was thoroughly outclassed in the recent series. And they were also defeated in the 50 over format VB series earlier this year. But Ponting is not the only proud man. Matthew Hayden, as soon as returning to the safe haven Down Under, blamed his team's defeat and failure to meet the over rates on the poor facilities and various distractions caused during games because of India being a third world country. It was no surprise that the remarks generated strongest of reactions from the Indian captain, BCCI personnel and others but none so more than those by Wasim Akram who retorted by terming Australia as being "no more than a village" and India being "hundreds of years ahead of Australia".

Hayden, although, has since clarified that he didn't mean to disrespect the nation and everything. But it made me ponder. Isn't what he said is actually true?

We are a prestigious nation. And we are proud of it. But that doesn't change the fact that we ARE a third world country. A majority of us still live below the poverty line. We are a non-aligned country. And our economy is still developing. But, this is in the literal sense. What about the cricketing sense? Well, we are a third world country even from that perspective. Ironic, isn't it? Considering that the BCCI perhaps has more money than all the other major cricket boards put together. And that is because India is still underdeveloped in terms of cricketing infrastructure.

Hayden had a point when he said that there were invariably, delays and stoppages because people kept moving in front of the sight screens. In this age when even Zimbabwe and Bangladesh have moved to electronically controlled sight screens and score boards, India still persists with manual labor. And that's not it. Even the rollers and pitch covers are pulled on to the ground with six men at tow when mechanical machines are used for the same in the rest of the world. Forget super-soppers, in case of rains, we have numerous children running on to the ground with buckets and sponges in hand to dry the field. The media boxes at most of the venues are pathetic.

I've lost the count of the number of times the television broadcasters have complained to the BCCI about heir expensive equipment getting damaged due to poor facilities at the venues. The venues themselves paint a very sorry picture. The Green Park at Kanpur is a classic example. It looks more like a playground for children rather than a Test centre. The entrance walls are plastered with posters of local political leaders or cheap bhojpuri films. And the street that leads to the stadium smells like cattle feed. And the major venues are no better.

The Chinnaswamy at Bangalore is a sore to the eye with plastic chairs strewn all around at the end of a game. It needs a serious renovation. The Wankhede was a similar case till not too long ago and thankfully its being taken care of now. Most of the venues get ready for a game just hours before the start with some quick stop gap arrangements. Contrast this with the stadia in Australia or England or South Africa and you would have to think that Hayden is right.

Fortunately, there's a silver lining in the form of stadia like the PCA Mohali, or the Eden Gardens, or the brand new stadia at Nagpur and Hyderabad that are truly world class. Even the Motera in Ahmedabad has improved significantly in recent years and is now rated amongst the best in India. The FerozeShah Kotla has been renovated and the Wankhede is undergoing renovation. This shows that the BCCI is at least addressing the issue. But the ODI venues strewn all across the country are still substandard.

Unless the above mentioned problems are addressed at the earliest and sorted out, India will, unfortunately, remain a third world country.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: Raghu at November 21, 2008 3:44 AM

Yeah right!! India is actually a 4th world country but 1st grade compared to Australia.Look at their history.if being aggressive and being all over the place is being proud, then let australia be in the first/second world. I have been closely following the comments. Either australians are sour/sore losers or may be they have lost mind and dignity while winning. all are 30+ yrs blokes but behave as though they are from primary school. Whatever India did to them during last 10 yrs should be done by every other team so that aussies be in second world.Yes there are problems in india and we are not proud of it either, atleast we dont go speak about pedalo rides, fishing detours or entertain our kith/kin on somebody's lap.

Posted by: R. Jagannathan at November 21, 2008 7:18 AM

Yes, I accept India is a third world country. But I wonder why should Mathew Hayden come to India for earning money. If the organisers and franchisees of IPL have an iota of self respect & patriotism, they should cancel Hayden's contract and let him not play IPL.

Posted by: Shenbaga at November 21, 2008 10:57 AM

Thats quite an outstanding piece of article by Shishir Dwivedi. India, with its huge cricket fans and a rich BCCI, should look forward to provide facilities and grounds that are par to grounds in other countries. Most of the grounds in india are miniscule 64 metres with lightning fast outfields that bowlers might bowl a ball and tear their hair apart. The IPL and Champions league are good ideas, but can't imagine these matches in miniscule grounds...it would be a lottery, then. I watch cricket!

Posted by: Ashwin at November 24, 2008 4:57 AM

Ahem. Oz were fined again at the Gabba- Haydens home ground.Using Hayden's logic, does he consider Brisbane to have 3rd world facilities too??? The last time round he was trying to hide the fact that they were slow by blaming Indian Batsmen who took time off to adjust the manual sight screens....Who is he going to blame now...Sore Losers

Posted by: Denzil Rodrigues at November 25, 2008 9:39 AM

Responding to Shenbaga, not sure where you have watched cricket, please be aware that there are cricket grounds in the world which are smaller than the ones in India just to quote a few TurnBridge Wells in England remember where Kapil Dev scored a 175 not out, Eden Park in Auckland, McLean Park in Napier, another one is Taunton where India palyed Sri Lanka in the 2003 World Cup. As per the ICC standards Playing area should minimum 140 yards (130 m) from boundary to boundary square of the pitch. Pitch should be minimum 60 yards (55 m) from one boundary square of the pitch. When this minimum distance is used the pitch has to be minimum 80 yards (73 m) from the opposite square boundary. The straight boundary at both ends of the pitch shall be minimum 60 yards (55 m) from the center of the pitch. So if you watch cricket it might help if you get your facts right it will help you enjoy the game better. As a bonus you will not have to think about it being a lottery.

Posted by: R SAHOTA at November 26, 2008 2:30 AM

Is it not wonderful that despite the poor infrastructure, the Indians are coming leaps and bounds as far as team performance is concerned. The author displays signs of inferiority complex. The infrastructure is third world because the grounds are not reserved for exclusive cricket use. In a country of 100 billion people where majority of population is classified poor by international norms, it is a wellcome relief to see employement (for unskilled labourers) coming in form of pulling covers on to pitch and manual adjustments of scoreboard. In a way it retains the charm of traditional cricket. The pace may be slow but things are changing. I am sure the author will understand the time & resources it takes to go from vedi to dwivedi to trivedi and finally to chaturvedi.

Posted by: Shishir Dwivedi at December 1, 2008 11:28 PM

@ Mr Sahota
If the richest board in world cricket takes an awful lot of time in raising it's standards, i'm afraid its not an inferiority complex to admit the fact that we are behind. Its plain truth. The same peolpe who you mentioned getting employment can get the same by operating on the machines mentioned in the article. I'm sure you don't know that most of them are volunteers and not paid anything. If you are trying to suggest that we should live in the past and be happy with it at the same time, well.... good luck to you.
And perhaps you failed to notice that even i admitted in the article that things are improving for the good.
I'm jus tired of wishing since years that kaash aisa hota, ya waisa hota, ab hota ya tab hota, hota ki nahin hota, aur jo bhi hota, Achcha SA-HOTA.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009