Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« Celebrating Rahul Dravid | | Gambhir is only partly correct »

Sledging 101

Posted by Cricinfo - on 11/12/2008

From Suraj Menon, United Kingdom

This is from Chris Broad's ruling on Gambhir. Hopefully a ban will make him realise he cannot strike another player, EVER. I am not going to go into why anyone over the age of ten needs to use emphasis like that, nor into Broad's bizarre warping of the 'If you can't take it, don't give it' rule to 'If you can't take it, don't give it back'. Nope, today's moan is about why in today's world, the rules regarding behaviour of cricketers seems to primarily address Western sensitivities, and not Eastern ones.

A hypothetical rule 'Light contact between players is fine, for example, nudging, shoving, elbowing (over the belt), maybe a light slap, but under no circumstances can you insult a player's parents, EVER.' This may sound bizarre, or even funny to some, but I know many people from the subcontinent who would not find anything too wrong with that rule (except maybe that emphasis).

When the Indian team complained about an Aussie player calling them 'bastards' during 'Bhajjigate', it first seemed like a bad joke, a distasteful tit-for-tat manoeuvre. But when you think about it, any derogatory remark about parents or spouses is quite offensive to people from India, particularly when it comes from people they don't know or like. I can't imagine going to someone like Kumble and questioning his parentage without feeling like I've done something very, very bad.

But Gambhir gets suspended because he took things to 'another level'. Why should the Western definition of 'another level' be addressed but not the Eastern one? The Aussies baiting of Gambhir till something had to give reminds me of Samuel L. Jackson smirking in the movie Shaft: 'Oh there you go, you just touched me! That's assaulting a police officer. You're under arrest'. (OK, I just admitted to watching the Shaft remake but let's not go there.) So which side is right? Who is stuck up and needs to lighten up? Does it matter? I don't blame the Aussie players, they are playing by the rules. It is just that the rules suit them more than others.

I believe the ICC Code of Conduct - Spirit of Cricket-whatever thingy needs to be overhauled to represent the sensitivities of all the cultures represented in the game. But this cannot work in a one-size-fits-all manner. For example a ban on the word 'bastard' will result in the entire Aussie team being suspended. Nope, there need to be very clear cut and customized rules for what one set of people can say to another.

Here are two that I can think of, would love to see more suggestions. 1. Never call a black man a monkey, especially if you are not black. Go ahead and call an Indian one, he will probably take that to be a comparison to the god Hanuman, and will then buy you a bottle of scotch, after having hit a century/ taken a five-for. (If he looks angry, repeat to make sure he doesn't think you're talking about his mother.) 2. Never physically touch Aussie players. But feel free to discuss the sexual exploits of their wives and /or parents, just make sure they are cancer-free.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: Kaushik at November 15, 2008 10:18 AM

Brilliant, hilarious article!

Posted by: Suraj at November 16, 2008 12:13 PM

Cheers, Kaushil.
Tho the cricinfo editors have ruined the original formatting - the article is almost unreadable now!

Also, bizzarely they changed the original title - "Cultural Learnings for Make Benefit Glorious Spirit of Cricket"

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009