From Ashok Sridharan, India
Let me clarify at the outset that these are no more than random reflections on the ICL. I find it strange that the Indian Cricket League (ICL) is being branded everywhere as a 'rebel' league, since it was setup with the avowed intention of locating new talent for India. It was the BCCI, quaking in its boots at the very prospect of competition, that not just outlawed the ICL, but also branded it as a 'rebel' league. One wonders why the press too has zealously toed the line.
From the little I've seen of it, the quality of cricket on display at the ICL is top class - not too often does one get to see cricket of that quality at the international level. With a host of retired players, mostly stars from the late 90s, I find frequently find myself transported back in time to my teenage years. Names like Heath Streak, Cairns, Murray Goodwin, Saqlain Mushtaq, Klusener or Bevan, to name a few, may mean little (if at all) to today's generation but these were stars in the late 90s when I grew up. ICL rocks for nostalgia buffs!
the ICL/IPL row is the equivilent of sporting rows between rival leagues(ie NFL/AFL)in the USA. the tactics are the same as well. the outcome will probably be the same as well. unless the ICL collapses the BCCI Will have to negociate at some point soon. furthermore if the demand for T20 grows the IPL will require more franchaises. not only in India but in the rest of the sub continent as well.
What if the TATAs, Reliance, DLF and other big business houses in India with all the money that thy have decide to start their own league! Imagine Sachin, Sourav, Laxman, Dravid, Dhoni play in different leagues, leave alone different clubs of the same league! It is just not good for cricket.