Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« A bowler's Powerplay? | | How much is too much? »

Fab four then and now

Posted by Cricinfo - on 10/27/2008

From S. Giridhar, India

There is something extremely seedy about the way the inexorable finish to the glittering careers of India’s finest ever quartet of middle order batsmen is being dissected with complete insensitivity. Compare this to the times when we peacefully bid adieu to the other 'Fab four' nearly 30 years ago, the incomparable and finest ever quartet of spinners.

Ah but those were different times! The mind goes back to the 60s and 70s - the era of this unmatchable spin quartet. No live TV coverage for almost the entire part of their career, those were the days when the fruity voice of Pearson Surita and the nasal drone of Ananda Rao in India, and the vivid description of John Arlott in England and Alan McGilvray in Australia brought them into our lives. Remember Arlott in the summer of 1971 describe Venkat and Chandra....”Here comes Venkat, tall, slightly flat-footed, 5 languid steps, left hand reaching for the sky…” and “Chandra, shirt tail flapping in the breeze, sleeves buttoned down, turns, begins his run, 1,2, 3….11, 12 past Umpire Eliot…”

Yes, very romantic times those…..we won a match or two now and then and were happy to hug those memories. And then we won some more and we realized that these four magicians were in fact setting up opportunities for victories more frequently than ever before. And so this quartet was forged over 15 long years. Prasanna the eldest came into the Indian side in 1960, Chandra in 1964, Venkat in 1965 and Bedi in 1966. Each of them made their debut at age 20 or earlier, for their entire careers four spinners, brothers in arms, but fighting forever for three places in the team.

Each was poetry in motion…..fluid, smooth, economical of action and with unending guile. Bedi the supreme artist, warm-hearted, always the first to applaud the sixer from the batsman but owner of the best arm ball in cricket history; Chandra the least demonstrative, quiet, magical, unplayable destroyer; Prasanna, cunning, cocky, plotting all the time to make a fool of the batsman; Venkat, of fierce tigerish resolve, almost a fast bowler’s temperament to complement his spinner’s brain, bowling for the team than for his own ego.

By the time the Indian team went to Pakistan in 1978 – to resume cricket ties after 18 long years – it seemed that these four icons had been playing forever. Prasanna was 38, Venkat and Chandra 33 and Bedi just a year younger. And between them they seemed to have bowled a million overs! They had bamboozled Sobers and Lloyd, lulled Chappell and Walters to doom; toyed with Fletcher and Edrich….they seemed to have taken every wicket for India in the last 15 years! But 15 years is a long time and these intelligent men knew that they were approaching the end of wonderfully illustrious careers.

What they did not know was that in a matter of weeks, just three Test matches to be precise, the quartet would hurtle from the twilight of their careers to oblivion. What these maestros received in Pakistan was a hiding of soul-searing proportions from Miandad and Zaheer, Asif Iqbal and Majid Khan. No newspaper devoted columns to discuss the imminent demise of the quartet. The end was almost instantaneous for three of the four spinners. Prasanna never played again after returning from Pakistan. Bedi and Chandra made a token appearance in a couple of Tests and were dropped. Venkat, the warrior kept plugging away for a few more years but must have been a lonely man missing his three comrades till he too faded away.

There is perhaps a lesson for us here from the way the spin quartet went out of our lives. None of the 'Fab four' spinners ever announced their retirement from Test cricket. They were fearless samurai, when the time came for them to be dropped they accepted this with dignity and the press gave them the space and the respect that they deserved. When 4 great spinners with 900 wickets between them could go with grace and dignity, is it too much to ask that 4 great batsmen with 35000 runs between them also go the same way? I agree we live in noisy strident TRP times but surely we can lower our tones, stand aside, and salute them as they go back to the pavilion one last time. Tendulkar, Dravid, Ganguly and Laxman, rare gems all and for all four to be playing at the same time for India. We will never know how blessed our country was till they are all gone.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: T.R.Sridharan at October 28, 2008 4:29 AM

What a nice piece by Gridhar, the brilliant efforts of our spin quartet; Including the eloquence of the commentators particularly John Arlott, Alan McGilvary and also to add VM Charkrapani and Christopher Martin Jenkins; Also due to the excellent close in fielders, like Solkar, Abid Ali, Wadekar and Venkat.

For the current fab four (batting department)to get the same farewell is unlikely, given the exposure due to technological advancement and higher expectations from media and the cricket lovers alike.

Yes; we are lucky to witness these spinning and batting quartet.

Posted by: Anjo at October 28, 2008 5:15 AM

This is among the best blogs I've ever read. Not one who's usually taken in by eloquent depictions of nostalgia, this article makes me wish I could grab a couple of audio recordings of that radio commentary, anything to experience what it was like to have three world class spinners bowling in tandem.
Perhaps to some degree it also depends on the character of the person, how quietly and with how much dignity he choses to leave. And you're right, they should be given that space.

Posted by: Kartik at October 28, 2008 5:26 AM

Why is everyone lumping Laxman in with the others? He is a couple of years younger than them, and has not underperformed in recent series' in Australia and SL.

Kumble should be in the quartet, not Laxman. Laxman has 2 more good years left in him.

Posted by: Ali Anwer at October 28, 2008 6:09 AM

Times have changed... there is too much fan-following, money and thus attention on Indian cricket n cricketers. The 4 spinners never endorsed products, so another angle is different.

The heart yearns for the more innocent times but the head says that it is just not possible.

Posted by: Karthik at October 28, 2008 6:57 AM

Very nicely written. Though the eras are not comparable, it should serve as a reminder to most of us fans that while our cricketers never interfere and decide for our own careers and lives, who are we to do that for them. Well, I guess stardom has a price to pay indeed.

Posted by: Farce Follower at October 28, 2008 9:18 AM

A very nice post...and a wonderful way of weaving nostalgia with the contemporary. I fear VVS would be the Venkat of the Fab Four, taking the flak for failure and being compared with the Gen Next. While everyone compare's VVS' fielding and running between wickets with Gen Next, no one compares composure, strokeplay and match-saving innings between them.
Of the batting Fab Four, two were selfless and two were selfish. Readers can make their choice.

Posted by: Anand at October 28, 2008 10:00 AM

Venkat went on to be a successful umpire. Bedi keeps saying something or the other every now and then about Murali that shows up in the press, but whatever happened to Chandra and Prasanna?
I grew up watching them and listening to these commentators. I also had the honour of meeting Chakrapani and Joga Rao. Venkat, Bedi and Underwood are still the most elegant spin bowlers I have ever had the honour to watch.

Posted by: Ruschil at October 28, 2008 11:50 AM

Thoroughly agree with you - Farce Follower.
No doubt, the two batsmen who have grabbed the most news print in the 1st two tests, have played more for their own records

Posted by: ICF_Lurker at October 28, 2008 12:19 PM

Beautiful piece of writing. Straight from the heart and yet not merely emotional but also substantive.

Posted by: Charindra at October 28, 2008 12:53 PM

This article made me appreciate the beauty of radio commentary. I started following cricket in the early to mid 90's, so never really felt the need for the radio. And I never understood how some people could wake up at 5am (The time the Ashes starts when it's played in Australia) just to LISTEN to commentaries! Thank you for enlightening me!

Posted by: Atul at October 28, 2008 2:09 PM

"we can lower our tones, stand aside, and salute them as they go back to the pavilion one last time. Tendulkar, Dravid, Ganguly and Laxman, rare gems all and for all four to be playing at the same time for India. We will never know how blessed our country was till they are all gone."

I read this at least 5 times....I must say one of the best cricket articles ever.

Posted by: RAJESH at October 28, 2008 3:35 PM

Dear All ,
An extremely good writeup from Mr.Giridhar.Memories of a running radio commentary brings about very nostalgic feelings about cricket and the early days.We just are being the very ARGUMENTATIVE INDIANS in criticizing the present FAB FOUR.Let us all stand up countrymen and salute these gems who have put us right at the top.Cmon guys we should be proud of them.
Let Indian cricket be blessed with many more fabulous sportsmen without whom the joy of watching cricket would simply fade away.

Posted by: Ravi at October 28, 2008 4:16 PM

That is the way with sports and entertainment in general. Some performers touch you in some way, whether it is their positives or negatives. These days fans in general are living in a more priveleged era and they feel they own it all. They overreact to little things when it is just a game. These are trivial and India has far bigger issues to deal with.

Posted by: S S at October 28, 2008 4:42 PM

This makes me feel nostalgic about the mid to late 70s when the cricket fever grabbed me as a kid growing up in Colombo and it still hasn't left me. Radio was my window into cricket. Chappel brothers, Gavaskar, Lillee, Thompson, Walters, Richards, Lloyd, Botham, Boycott, Zaheer, Holding, Roberts, Garner and Croft all became magical figures through it.

Posted by: AB at October 28, 2008 5:24 PM

The problem with good writers is that they get away with murder. We take good prose to imply good logic and We are Caeser's burial and Caeser isnt dead yet. The poor guy is on the battlefield fighting, winning wars but we are ready with the eulogy. Why should Tendulkar at 36/37 care for what Bedi and Prasanna had to undergo in Pakistan? India in Australia, Australia in India - take your pick - he (and others from the fab 4) is amongst the stat leaders. The two innings to win Trination in Australia will be amongst the highlights of his career. He will leave when he feels like or should leave when he no longer merits a place in the team. For that to happen, we need 3 more Gambhirs - Yuvraj, Kaifs, and Rohits will not cut - at least not yet. The Fab Four had a terrible Sri Lankan series but no one had a good series there. Karthik and Patel finished with averages below 10. Tendulkar scored an unheard of by a visiting team - 500 runs in 4 test matches in Australia (against 140 runs by Dhoni

Posted by: AB at October 28, 2008 5:38 PM

To continue to further: The bowling Fab Four that Giridhar so eloquently refers to had ZERO series victories in Aus, WI, Pak, Eng in the 60s and 70s outside of that one beautiful Gavaskar summer in 70/71. This Fab 4 is different. With them India competes in every series - home or away. Tendulkar and Dravid will make an all time India 11 and as Lara, Jayasurya, Gavaskar - several others have shown age is no barrier to performance. Gavaskar's best 1 day series was his last and one of his best test performances (my favorite for sure) was the fighting 96 against Pakistan in his last test inning. He was 40+ then. It is tough enough playing on the field - we should cut the guys a break - look at their game and not the age.

Certainly every person, sportsman or otherwise, deserves a fair shot at making the best of their chosen mode of living - burying one on the presumption of what happened 30 years ago does a disservice to us all.

Posted by: Ravisundar at October 28, 2008 6:20 PM

Nostalgic memories of Radio commentary!. We used to get up at 04 am for NZ matches. WI matches would be aired in split timings, the second half recorded from 0530 am. Funnily recollecting, the famous Port of Spain test we won (chasing 400+ in last innings) was announced at 6 am AIR news first, while our friends were stilllistening to a recorded commentary.

We used to shunt between stations in short wave 2 and 3 (11, 13, 16, 25 and 31 mtrs) for BBC and ABC commentaries. Not all matches were aired by AIR. And AIR had their own English / Hindi crew !!.

The last I remember a good commentary of a match was how Martin Jenkings(?) described the Calcutta final crowd watching the England-Australia 1887 World Cup Final in India.

Posted by: traugustin at October 28, 2008 7:33 PM

I had the privilege of watching the Fab four spinners in action at Sabina Park in Jamaica bamboozle all the West Indian batsmen save Viv Richards who played them with nonchalant ease and grace befitting of the best modern day batsman that he subsequently became.To me Chandra was the most mystical of the four.Personalities like the fab four spinners have left an indelible mark in my mind and I think is characters like these could keep test cricket alive.

Posted by: Kartik at October 28, 2008 7:40 PM

"The 4 spinners never endorsed products, so another angle is different. "

Yes, sad for them, because in the 1960s and 70s :

India had no television, and a closed economy, so no consumer products.
India was a dirt-poor country, even poorer than most of Africa, at the time.
Due to no TV, most people didn't know what the players looked like, so they didn't have girls swarming over them in those days (society was ultra-prudish then too).

So the spin quartet literally earned about 1/100th of what the modern batting quartet earns, even after adjusting for inflation.

It shows how terrible life in India was in those days.

Posted by: Night-watchman at October 28, 2008 7:43 PM

Eloquent writing, evoked nostalgia, but facts are totally different. Prasanna, when dropped, announced his retirement in a huff. He later wrote a lot in his "One More Over" about feeling letdown. Bedi kicked and screamed at being dropped. Chandrashekhar kept playing in Ranji and played his final match against Kerala and when he couldn't clean them up in a day like he used to and even two days, he decided that was it. Venkat soldiered on, in his later years, he was a pale comparison to what he was.

Posted by: Somo Banerjee at October 28, 2008 7:55 PM

Love it, love it, love it!!!
What an article!
Mr. Sridhar, thank you for putting this into words....hope they come true.

Posted by: Rahul Oak at October 28, 2008 9:09 PM

I agree with one of the readers that Laxman should not be in this, but for different reasons. He is *not* in the same league as the others - nowhere near it. He has a couple of memorable innings to note, but that's about it. Not even 2-3 swallows would make anyone's summer. Talk about greatness being being thrust upon someone. It's a shame really that we tend to use the word 'great' that often. If everyone were great, no one would be.

Posted by: Looch at October 28, 2008 11:45 PM

I think this may be my favourite article I've ever read on cricinfo! Thank you S. Giridhar, I believe you have reminded everyone what a wonderful sport we have in cricket. Just for the record, radio commentary will always be better than what is offered to us on the telly!

Posted by: Kartik at October 29, 2008 1:16 AM

"Not even 2-3 swallows would make anyone's summer. "

Laxman's test career matches or exceeds that of Ganguly.

It is true that neither Ganguly nor Laxman should be compared to Tendulkar/Dravid in tests.

But in Tests, Laxman and Ganguly are equals.

Posted by: R.Sankar at October 29, 2008 4:25 AM

Quite a remarkable quartet, that. Lovely actions, all four of them, with Venkat's being my pick: classically side-on, and high arm. I watched so much of him as I did Pras and Chandra in Ranji matches of yore. The article invoked wonderful, nostalgic memories.

Posted by: R.Sankar at October 29, 2008 4:30 AM

What's more, they never over-appealed (indeed, I can hardly remember Venkat appealing! It was more a polite enquiry of the umpire), did not prance around, pump theri fists or give batsmen send-offs. It was a pat on the back of the fielder, or a handshake and a dutiful return to the bowling mark to await the next batsman. How the game has changed!

Posted by: Mahesh at October 29, 2008 5:32 AM

Quote:
"Tendulkar, Dravid, Ganguly and Laxman, rare gems all and for all four to be playing at the same time for India. We will never know how blessed our country was till they are all gone."

In a sense, we WILL know the value of the combine when they leave. But surprisingly, in the One-days, where the FAB 4 ruled for a decade together too, we seem not to miss them much. India's MIB have become more tougher to beat after the fab 4(-1) were dropped! And In the instances when Tendulkar had to sit out, we haven't missed him much either: Sehwag-Gambhir combine has thrashed the attacks world over!

Posted by: Anna at October 29, 2008 1:33 PM

Excellent article! Keep writing on cricket every week! It takes me to the 1960's when we used to hear the radio commentary on BBC and Radio Australia. Congrats and hats off!

Posted by: kingshuk nag at October 29, 2008 1:49 PM

I feel the concept of Fab Four has been denoted by the media and VVS Laxman recently got an entry after The Term "Trimuti" or "Triumvirate" was applicable for Sachin,Sourav and Rahul.However its very sad that Sourav who has an average of 72 which is the highest batting at no 4 with an minimum qualification of 1000 runs, never got an oppurtunity to pile up runs as much as Sachin or Dravid due to his constant Shifting of Batting Position.I think Ganguly is the only player who has played at 4 different positions and got 1000 plus test runs..My Sadness lies that Ganguly could have easily scored 10000 test runs which would have made the "Triumvirate"The greatest Trio of all time..Not to miss out on the vagaries of captaincy.

Posted by: shankar at October 30, 2008 3:38 AM

A brilliant article. I would request Circinfo to host the audio commentaries of the great matches oflore and the great artists who were Sanjay to the world of Dritharastras.

Posted by: usha at October 30, 2008 5:13 AM

What a nice article!
Having been brot up on a steady diet of cricket from the 70s by a cricket crazy dad and brother, I cud relate to what Mr.Girdar was saying. The 70s were years of innocence, shaky confidece.. Thank you Mr.Giridhar for reminding us about how "Fab" they were.

But then perhaps, 15 years hence, my kids would be saying something similar about what is happening now.

Usha

Posted by: G_Arun at November 3, 2008 9:57 AM

When one reads the comments of people like Farce Follower and Ruschil , one realises that they have completely missed the point of this well written article . But then ingratitude normally marches hand in hand with obtuseness .

Posted by: K Venkataraman at November 5, 2008 11:15 PM

Good article Mr Giridhar,
This has taken me to 1960s, when we heard the sweet voices in radio. waking up early for matches in australia delaying the sleep till midnight for the england matches and listen to west indies matches in the midnight at regular intervals and early morning for Newzeland matches. As you said the 4 spinners had the guts and willpower to accept the happening. But that was a different era. Not much of media coverage as it is now. All the fuss reg the fab four is because of media and the involvement of the cricket loving public. Just like the commercial aspect of the game has changed since then, the attitude of the players and the public also changed dramtically. In our families, just like we call generation gap for the attitude of elders and youngesters, the same logic applies here too.
Once again thank you for giving a good article.

Posted by: Anadi Sharma at November 13, 2008 12:13 PM

A very nice & nostalgic article Mr. Gridhar,

I came to knwo about these fab four during my childhood courtesy my father. He is no more. My memory is very much refresh with his tireless appreciation for these four especially of Chandra.

Now a days we are fortunate to have Star soprts presenting some rare test match footages of their era (courtesy BBC)

Thanks

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009