Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« Cricket on drugs | | UAE, Vanuatu or subcontinent? »

Australia minus the arrogance

Posted by Cricinfo - on 09/29/2008

From Anand Kumar, India

There is something different about this Australian side which has landed in India. I am not speaking about the composition of the team or the skill of its players. I am referring to the attitude with which it has left its shores.

There is nothing new about new untested players in Australian squad. Ever since Damien Martyn retired, Australia has been dealing with a slow exodus of its colossus players and dealing very well. It is no stranger to seeing new players in their team trying to fill up big boots. The likes of Damien Martyn, Justin Langer, Glenn Mcgrath, Shane Warne, Jason Gillespie, Brad Hogg, Stuart Macgill and Micheal Kasperowicz have gone out of reckoning in these last two years, some on their own terms and a few on selector's terms. And prior to that we of course had the Waugh brothers, Andrew Bichell, Paul Reifell and some more.

There has been a steady exodus happening in Australian cricket since the turn of this decade which has come to characterise them. In last 2 years, this exodus was massive but what happened along side was that every loss was equalled by some one else who came up and grabbed the opportunity. I am not trying to say that now there is panic in Australian dressing room and they have lost their sleep. But something is different.

Have a look at the things they have said in last few weeks. Micheal Hussey said Australian team is not yet settled for India (that was two weeks back). Any Australian would not have said anything like this even a year back. Matthew Hayden has said that he believes he will be the target and even went as far as to admitting that Harbhajan Singh will be quite a threat in the upcoming series. Even a year back, any Australian would have instead gone ahead and said that they will dominate the opponents lynch pin. Ricky Ponting while trying to egg on Jason Krejza could not muster anything more than saying that he spins the ball a long way. Does he spin it more than Murali, I am sure not and if spins even close to him, why didn't we hear more about him before? Uni-dimensional spin alone is not going to pose any problem for Indians. What has caused this uncertainty in Australian minds? Challenges are not new to them. Well, we will never know. It can be anything.

May be they have hard done by the sudden departure of both Brad Hogg and Stuart McGill. A trip to India with spinners even they have heard less about would have been a humbling experience. Probably, they understand that there has not been one really exciting player they have produced in two years or so and that is worrying. Or perhaps, all that happened in last summer down under has actually shook them.

The captain had been one of those hit the hardest. But most unsettling must have been Symonds' absece from the team. He was a vital cog and is out of the team for non-cricketing, non-fitness and non-doping issues. This might be commonplace in Pakistan but not in Australia. What is clear to me is that this team has come with an undercurrent which is very un-Australian. They are not missing 'Australian ability' as much as they are missing 'Australian arrogance'. And that in the end may be their undoing.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: KJH at September 30, 2008 2:42 AM

I think most cricket fans confuse Australian confidence with arrogance. I am sure the brusque, straight-forward manner that somewhat characterises the Australian persona rubs some the wrong way, and is thus easily mistaken for just plain arrogance. For example, the Indian character has largely been typified as mild and passive, and only in recent years has the Indian cricket team overtly tried to dissuade others from this perception(think Sreesanth). In the past we've had McGrath declaring his bunnies and who can forget Shane Warne's psychological defeat of England in Adelaide. The Aus side has been the most stable in cricket for a decade and so it can't be said that Hussey's declaration is an indication of anything other than what it is, the truth.
Without doubt the Sydney test has forced the Australian side to tone down their confidence, but don't forget that confidence was hard won and is well deserved.

Posted by: Hammond at September 30, 2008 11:45 AM

I think that you cannot confuse hard won confidence with the pure unadulterated arrogance that pervades the current Australian cricket team. No-one I know speaks of the current team or it's captain with any affection, indeed it feels like there is a certain pity for the young blokes introduced to the mouthy trash talking culture in the side. Thinking back to the quiet dignity of Mark Taylor, it is quite easy to gauge how far this team has fallen in relation to sportsmanship and respect from it's cricketing peers. We used to play the game hard but far, but under Waugh and Ponting it just became hard and fair went out the window. The day when mouths like Ponting, Hayden & Symonds disappear is (hopefully) the day when we see the return of the true Australian sporting cricketer. Until then we are unfortunately stuck with louts with big mouths.

Posted by: Max at September 30, 2008 2:19 PM

Cannot put it better KJH, confidence hard won is deserved, but, after the Sydney test, India cried foul play and now that the world is turning around the BCCI, the issue was magnified. Why do people say its arrogance? Hammond? Is this because every test match Australia enters we plan to win it? Would you like us to be like England possibly? "oh it's alright chaps, we will try hard but if we cannot win, then we will swap a couple of players and then see how we go, no worries!". There is a worry, that hard and fair is going out the window, don't try to dampen hard and fair now by saying its merely arrogance. Any team in the world would love the confidence that they know they have the best chance in winning the test match, therefore its expected. Why were the West Indies team so good in the 80's? confidence. Why was the English team so powerful early in the century? Confidence. Why will Australia possibly not win in India? Because the BCCI has banished and burnt the Aussies confidence.

Posted by: AN at September 30, 2008 2:55 PM

The Aussies are one good cricket team. No doubt about that, they have been for as long as I have watched the game. But what a bunch of self righteous fools they are. Glen McGrath pulled every little dirty trick in the book. Lehman got banned for racial abuse. Ponting claimed a grassed catch. The whole team pretended that 13 decisions didn't go against India in Sydney. The list is endless. Oh and another thing. Everyone should stop whining about India's financial muscle. This is going to be an Asian century and this is only a sign of things to come. Deal with it or quit playing. Those who give should also be man enough to take.

Posted by: douglaboy_windies at September 30, 2008 6:29 PM

why has this become a racial thing AN
The Aussies are good, but can act like spoilt brats. And you cannot say the asian teams are being discriminated against. The BCCI practically own the cricketing world. People have forgoten that cricket is merely a sport, it has nothing to do with life and death. we have to remember that, a hopefully that will cut out these trivial issues

Posted by: KJH at September 30, 2008 11:49 PM

Hammond, who was captain before Mark Taylor? Mr Hard-as-nails Allen Border. Cricket has forever been made up of heroes&villains. Jardine, WG, and Bradman were certainly no saints. I for one would rather see aggressive passion than the insipid defeatist attitude portrayed by some teams. Ponting may not be as loved as Taylor or as respected as Waugh, but he is certainly respected for his great talent and for the competitive spirit he inherited from Waugh. I don't see the need for sportsmen & women to act like saints or pillars of the community. Ponting's talent is undisputed and Hayden will go down as one of the greatest opening batsmen of all time, who cares if they make you feel warm inside or not, at least we got to see them play.
And AN,the Aus team didn't pretend the mistakes didn't happen. They just realise that mistakes are made in every series and accepted it like the adults they are rather than crying and threatening a boycott. "Deal with it or quit playing"? Good idea.

Posted by: Hammond at October 1, 2008 6:12 AM

Trouble is that the "win at all costs" attitude filters down to the grass roots of cricket. If a young bloke grows up watching Ponting as captain rather than say Taylor then that nastiness pervades ALL the grades of cricket. People in the Australian cricket team should realise that they don't exist in a bubble but are in every way role models for whole generations of future cricketers. And this current team has failed in that dismally. Just can't see a father watching Ponting mouth off at umpires and opposition captains alike and saying to his son "see mate that is the way to be a true Australian sportsman". I think defeat against England & India in the next 12 months will be good for the side.

Posted by: KJH at October 2, 2008 12:05 AM

I grew up watching Allen Border swear on TV, throwing balls at the ground in disgust, seeing Waugh&Ambrose go nose to nose, and saw many times the footage of Lillee kicking Miandad in the behind. Never have I abused a fellow player or team mate. Modern payers are all too aware of the public focus they are in and I think the media should show some restraint in the reporting of these events. What happens on the field stays on the field (except for racial abuse). I don't think this team has failed in their public relations; Hussey, Lee, Clark, Gilly, Johnson, Jacques have behaved above reproach. To tar the whole team by the actions of a few is unfair considering actions in other parts of the world: drugs in Pakistan & WI, jelly beans & alcohol in England, slapping in India.
Irrespsective, I think you are right, defeat against Eng&Ind would be good for world cricket not just Aus. I don't think it will happen though :) Both series will be close draws

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009