Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« Going soon | | Bowlers should welcome referrals »

Technically speaking

Posted by Cricinfo - on 08/02/2008

From Varun Dhyani, United Kingdom

I am a technical man and view the entire game on technical ground. Not that the game does not interest me. There has been lot of discussion on sustaining and expanding cricket's popularity. Particularly in context with Test Cricket which is really threatened due to lack of public interest. I have a suggestion here to keep the people's interest glued to the game.

Cricket revolves, technically, around ball, bat and pitch. If 'variable' component is introduced in pitch or bat or ball, game would become interesting. Say for example, use of new, 30 overs and 60 overs ball on certain conditions and rules. Imagine a match where the opening batsman has got right to tell umpire to start with 30 over ball.

Or when bowler takes a wicket he given the opportunity to decide what age of ball to be used. And if both the batsman score 50 runs between them without loosing wicket, they given chance to say which ball they want further.

Another way is letting both sides allow play as much innings they want in a 5 day Test Cricket Period. At the end of 5th day, the average per innings would decide who won the match.

There are many ways where some twist and turns could be brought in ball (different weight), innings(more innings) and number of players(more players allowed). It would bring lot of interest in the game to the crowd who are already watching cricket and also among those who never watched and have conventional image of the Test Cricket

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: Bob at August 2, 2008 12:34 PM

But there would be too many changes to the original game. If we were to change the game as much as you suggested, we might as well rename the game!

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009