Cricinfo Blogs
cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home
Inbox From our readers

« A pointless Olympic dream | | Test cricket is 'total cricket' »

Being unfair to Pakistan

Posted by Cricinfo - on 08/22/2008

From Maha Hussain, Pakistan

So we are back to the beginning, with the debate about where the Champions Trophy will be held and the concerns of various players and teams. I thought it had already been decided the event would proceed in Pakistan, but here we go again. It may or may not make a difference to anyone, but I am writing as a sixteen-year-old, Pakistani cricket fan who feels she should voice her opinion since nobody else is doing anything to help Pakistan's chances.

This piece may be strongly worded and possibly offensive to some, but writing is my way of venting my feelings of anger and frustration, and I shall do so without hesitation. I want to ask all the players from all the countries who have problems with Pakistan: Do you seriously think terrorists are interested in bombing you up? You are not willing to tour Pakistan for the reason that you are afraid of your safety among terrorist attacks and political violence. Ironically, when seventeen blasts went off in the Indian cities of Bangalore and Ahmadabad, I never once heard of any reluctance of the part of the Australians or the English about touring the country later this year. So is this what cricket has come to?

Blind love for money and disdain for a country at odds with itself and facing enough grief already? Alright, you can go ahead and refuse to tour. There is probably just enough time, difficult and costly though it may be, to move the tournament to Sri Lanka, a much, much safer and more peaceful place to play cricket in, don't you think?

If you had already made up your minds to boycott the event in Pakistan, why on earth did you wait until three weeks before the start to listen to security briefings, only to stubbornly shake your heads and say you have not been convinced? You have caused immense trouble for the ICC, as if the numerous problems it is already encountering were not enough. Geoff Lawson flew down to the Southern Hemisphere for the sake of persuading the Australian and New Zealand cricketers to agree to come, because he lives in Pakistan and he feels safe. He lives in Lahore, one of the largest cities in the country, and possibly very susceptible to attacks of violence and terror.

Is he not Australian? Does he not spend his days without fear in the country you all are so afraid to enter? Terrorism plagues parts of Pakistan, but we are not alone; several other countries experience such situations. Have you forgotten the blasts in London days before the start of the 2005 Ashes? Or the repeated attacks in Sri Lanka? Or the bombs in Jaipur earlier this year, during the IPL? Did you all rush out of India fearing for your lives? No, you stayed and played. The captain of one of the national teams continued to play in the very city it all happened in. What motivated you to continue playing there, but prevents you from coming to Pakistan?

Is it because you are showered with money, or glory, or whatever it is you want, when you take part in such lucrative events, but Pakistan has not much to offer you and the Champions Trophy has little significance for you? I feel you all owe an explanation to the people of Pakistan: why are we being singled out? Why are we the only nation to be treated like this, to be isolated from good competitive cricket, despite the fact that foreign cricketers here are respected and honoured a dozen times more than they are in their own countries?

Pakistan is terribly unfortunate to be caught in this web of political turmoil, a mess not in the slightest being helped by the idea that four countries are refusing to tour for a cricket tournament. The arrogance and disdain with which you view the situation in Pakistan has aggrieved many, many people desperate for some good games of cricket to look forward to, a positive light in a time of darkness and difficulty for our country. Terrorists and suicide attackers do not want to target sporting teams, and with the amount of security being arranged for you it is hard to see what your problem is.

Politics and sports do not mix, as countless influential Pakistanis have repeatedly mentioned. Your lives are by no means being taken lightly; every effort is being made to ensure a risk-free tournament, but it still doesn't seem to be enough to convince you. In truth, your safety cannot be guaranteed anywhere in the world. You, and your families, may well be afraid for your safety, but just take another, less biased, look at the things being done to satisfy you. Some of you feel that the security plans are brilliant but implementing them would be difficult for a country experiencing political trouble. Why, I ask you, would such complex plans be made if they could not be implemented? I'm positive we have the means to arrange everything perfectly, it is just your condescending attitude towards us that makes you feel Pakistan does not have the resources to provide you sufficient security.

Go ahead and say you will not tour, have the Champions Trophy moves to wherever you like, and enjoy playing in that risk-free new environment with the satisfaction that, in the end, you had your way with the ICC.

After all, it hardly matters that because of your stubborn and uncompromising attitude, so many millions of people, who were hopeful of a fortnight of vigorous cricket action in their country, will have their expectations ground into dust. It really doesn't matter, does it, because your problem has been solved. It really makes no difference to you what becomes of cricket in a nation with such a glorious history in the game. It makes no difference at all, in the end, because you are safe. Because you feel safe. And that is the way of this new cricketing world.

 
Feedback Feedback
Comments Submit your piece >>

Posted by: Brendanvio at August 22, 2008 2:54 AM

I really do sympathise with Pakistan's plight, they need the money and exposure from this tournament badly. But I think you aren't really appreciating the other side of the coin, although I mention that more from the players' point of view than the respective boards.

Pakistan is wracked by a problematic politcal landscape at the moment, particularly with the bad timing of Musharraf's resignation.

'The arrogance and disdain with which you view the situation in Pakistan has aggrieved many'
I don't feel that is fully justified, just because they feel unsafe doesn't mean they are treating Pakistan itself or its cricket with disdain.

I completely understand where you come from on this and I do sympathise from the point of a spectator, I do think the boards are being too conservative here. But keep in mind that the political landscape is, through no fault of the public or the cricket team, slightly undesirable.

Posted by: Zish Baloch at August 22, 2008 4:27 AM

Well said. If it was IPL's Champions Trophy and not ICC Champions Trophy, Andrew Symonds or Graeme Smith would have come to Pakistan without any hesitation, after all money matters to ‘Endangered Nations’. Security is just a lame excuse, no where in the world they will ever get President level security but yet they have 'concerns'. The truth is that Pakistan is just too boring country to visit, there is not much off field 'activity' for booze addicts, that’s why Australia has not been here for almost a decade. ICC should stick to Pakistan and penalize those boards who eventually pull out, and if tournament is moved to somewhere else then Pakistan and India (if possible) should boycott the tournament.

Posted by: Nathan at August 22, 2008 4:32 AM

Why are you taking the unwillingness of teams to tour pakistan as some sort of personal affront? This piece seems to echo the thoughts of many pakistanis, who overlook the fact that thousands of their counrymen are being murdered every year and instead dwell on the subject as if Australia etc are intentionally trying to insult pakistan.

Your comparison with the London situation is ridiculous and highlights that you are not being at all rational. An isolated incident with a few dozen dead is tragic, but there is no analogy with this and the weekly bombings and thousands of deaths from terrorist attacks as occurs in pakistan. I think you need to debate this issue using a basis of reality, not emotion.

Its also ridiculous to claim that the belief that players may not be able to be protected is condescending. You cannot protect your own politicians and high ranking officials, why should anyone in the west be expected to believe that players can be protected?!

Posted by: Nathan at August 22, 2008 4:47 AM

Further to my previous point, are you seriously suggestng that pakistan is a safe destination? Weren't 50 or more people killed in an attack just yesterday? This is completely abnormal to an Australian. The team does not want to risk their lives just to play sport, and I don't see how any reasonable person can argue that they should.

Your comparisons with other countries are just not valid because the number and nature of the attacks are just not comparable with the ongoing carnage that is being reported from pakistan.

I think you need to step back and consider the situation more realistically and less emotionally. If you wish to be insulting and vitriolic towards the teams that don't want to play in a danger zone, that is your perogative, but it is not a very mature attitude to have and does not aid your argument.

Posted by: AJAX at August 22, 2008 8:35 AM

Yeah go ahead, rant all you want but first lets just see what really is upsetting the millions in Pakistan. How many spectators were there for matches in the Asia Cup that did not include Pakistan? How many were there for the Pak Vs HK match? How about attendances for test matches? It would appear that it is not being deprived of cricket that upsets you as much as teams deciding not to visit you. AND WHY NOT?
Forget the safety of the players, how about the inconvenience to Pakistan, a country unable to stop continuous strings of attacks, but going out of its way to host a cricket tournament. That makes no sense. The security arrangements will directly affect the common man in the country, and lets not forget the majority spectators at recent tournaments have been security personnel.
Can someone please tell me how everyone is so sure some nut with a missile launcher will not be able to do huge damage? Munich 73 terrorists mixed sports and politics, what guarantee this will not repeat?

Posted by: Cricketer at August 22, 2008 9:37 AM

Nathan you are just being rude and unfair to a young girl like your coutrymen. Maha's concern is cricket notpolitics. The fact that our leader was killed has got nothing to do with this. Our leader's killing was an international conspiracy and she was not given enough security on purpose. Yesterday's bomb blast was targeted at the army because of it's support to kill innocent people in our tribal areas on America's behest. No one will be killed in Pakistan if the west stops interfering in our country. You are living peacefully thats why its easy to just point fingers, we are human beings and live in Pakistan and carry our daily routine the way you guys do.I met Simon Tauffel in an open shopping area of Karachi buying leather jackets.He was walking without any security and looked relaxed.Arrogance has no cure thats all we can say.

Posted by: Ashok at August 22, 2008 9:44 AM

While I can understand the feeling of hurt that Pakistani fans would feel, I also think there's another aspect to the whole thing: political stability. The UK (London underground), Spain (Madrid) and India (too many blasts to be named) are politically stable countries, while Pakistan has been politically unstable and controlled by military dictators for most of its history- quite apart from having the unique problems of warring tribes that no military can control and none has ever managed to supress.

Its quite possible that the security concerns could be over-stated (being from India myself, I have perhaps a better appreciation of the security situation), but Pakistan would also have to admit that it has some unique problems that do not exist in other test playing nations.

Posted by: Sami at August 22, 2008 10:29 AM

Nathan... well I agree... you are write... the nature of attacks is not comparable... because in Pakistan they are not really biased towards sport.

Call me skeptical or whatever, but this is an absolutely rational logic. May I ask how many times have you actually been to the country?

Posted by: saba at August 22, 2008 10:40 AM

as much as i would like the champions trophy to go ahead in pakistan, i think at this point the best thing is to relocate to sri lanka.

although i think the australians and co are being a bit hypocritical in not touring pakistan but willingly going to neighbouring india which also has frequent terrorist attacks, and sri lanka which has its own problems with the tamil tigers, they obviously dont want to come and they shouldnt be forced.

its sad for pakistani cricket and for pakistani people, but then this is just a reflection of the mess the whole nation is in. if pakistanis are so upset at the impending loss of the champions trophy, then maybe as a country we need to sort out our problems and at the very least protect our citizens from attack. then maybe we can talk about attracting the top teams to pakistan.

pakistan isnt much of a destination to the england, australian players anyway. in fact pakistan has great tourist potential, but we cant market ourselves in that either.

Posted by: Anwer at August 22, 2008 11:07 AM

Despite your intention, the attitude and emotions embodied in your posts are adding fuel to the fire and are no less insulting, condescending, or even prejudiced than the object of your claims.

In this sporting day and age, where players are considered ambassadors and put upon such a pedestal, it is hard to forget that after all it is only a game, the players are fearful human beings, and that there is life (the dearest thing of all) outside of it. Do not get me wrong, I am all for the passion this game creates or how it can imitate life (much like art), yet at the end of the day I would not expect anyone to endanger themselves or their family, regardless of how remote the danger, over a game of cricket.

By no means am I excusing the very well possible prejudice within the minds of these cricketers and I do sympathize with you in that regard, however, I disagree with your methods. Tolerance and patience are the key in such matters, as is it just as much our responsibility to

Posted by: Anwer at August 22, 2008 11:25 AM

recognize the rights of these crickets as human beings, as much as it is theirs to look past stereotypes and recognize us as human beings as well.

While I do agree that the concept of "perception belying reality" applies to our situation and that the fears of these cricketers might be unreasonably heightened, I also believe that we are deluding ourself with our own perception of normalcy within the country, as well as our belief that cricket and politics are mutually independent. Sport in the last few decades has been repeatedly compromised by politics (The rebel tours and apartheid in South Africa, Beijing Boycotts, and more recently the Zimbabwe situation come to mind). I am sure that our excessive idol worship of these sportsmen (and celebrities) plays a big part in this. They are not merely entertainers anymore but symbols of righteousness for the masses. I digress, but although the Pakistani people might want normalcy, I am not sure whether they need such an illusion.

Posted by: Maha Hussain at August 22, 2008 11:39 AM

Nathan, I said earlier that I do not care if my writing seems offensive to anyone, and it really shouldn't, unless you're one of the people desperately trying to defend the teams not willing to tour. Sure, there are blasts, there's terrorism, but why do umpires and referees have no trouble coming over? Taufel? Procter? Chris Broad? They've been to Pakistan many times this year. And yes, players like Shane Watson and Graeme Swann, the ones who are willing to tour, haven't cemented their places in the side. But if they were really concerned about their safety, would they risk their lives just to be a part of the touring squad? I think not. As for me being immature, I'll repeat this: I'm 16. And I still think I'm far more mature than you are.

Posted by: Maha Hussain at August 22, 2008 11:46 AM

AJAX, can YOU please tell me how you can be sure some nut with a missile won't arrive where you are right now and do some damage? And is playing against HK the same as Australia or SA? It's Asian teams that keep coming, but people want the others. and do you seriously think the money being put into security arrangements, if not spent on them, would go for the benefit of "the common man"? Get real, mister. You are a terribly over-reactive person, and it should make no difference to you what the majority of spectators is. And what has Munich got to do with Pakistan? It's not the same thing, get that into your cranium. Be adamant if you want, lash out at a teenager for expressing her views, but that doesn't build a very good impression of you as a smart person. It just makes you come across as a babbling fool listing random facts you managed to pick up over the internet and TV to support your argument.

Posted by: Kamran Ali at August 22, 2008 1:23 PM

Nathan and Ajax, I am a Pakistani born US Citizen. I live in the USA but travel to Pakistan frequently. I have never felt myself to be unsafe when I am in Pakistan. Even my kids, who were born and raised in USA and spend all their lives in USA, are always llking forwrad to visiting their extended family in Pakistan. They have never felt threatened. The terrorist attacks in London were specifically targeted against countries/people whao are involved in the war against terror. Therefore, there was a greater likelihood of English/Australian teams being made a target in England because of the lower levels of sceurity provided to cricket teams in those countries. Terrorist attacks in Pakistan are targeted against army, government, politicians etc. not against internastional sportsmen. Most importantly, Pakistan is a frontline state in the war on terror. Pakistan's government, rightly or worngly, is supporting the Western powers wholeheartedly in the war against terror.

Posted by: Sreedhar at August 22, 2008 2:30 PM

Any cricketer who has a family and who feels that his life is under threat in Pakistan should not be forced to go. Only a country like China would force decisions of this level on its sportsmen.

As for people playing in the IPL despite the Jaipur blasts, that just further shows how bad the conditions must be in Pakistan today if the same people who played on in Jaipur fear for their lives.

And as to whether some people would risk their lives for money, that's a personal choice. Bottom line is the players should not be forced to go.

Posted by: AJAX at August 22, 2008 2:57 PM

Ok first of all, its not all money when I say security arrangements affect the common man, I'm talking about inconveniencing transport, disrupting normal life and unnecessarily deploying thousands of policeman all for the sake of setting up this pseudo safe environment. For what, a cricket tournament? In the last few weeks and months far more serious issues have hit Pakistan, shouldn't those be given higher priority? So you're sick of watching Asian teams, you want Aus, SA, Eng and NZ (just happen to be the four teams that don't want to tour) but what about Test Matches, why are they so poorly attended? The fact is the whole North Western Frontier is lawless, it wouldn't be hard for militants from there to target cricketers for maximum publicity. Finally, I'm not here to sound smart or create a good impression, but I'm also not here to whine about being a teenager who's being picked on. Grow up. The world doesn't hate Pakistan as much you want to think they do.

Posted by: Manto at August 22, 2008 3:14 PM

As a Pakistani I am fine with people not coming if they don't feel safe (that those same people belong to countries that have a big hand in developments that have made it so unsafe in this region in the last 5-6 years is ironic but besides the point). What really does annoy me is this charade that we have to through every time with security teams and what not - decision deadlines etc. Everyone knew those teams would not tour but instead of being upfront about it they have to pretend they are considering it (and hope they are bailed out by some expert advice). That is plain deceitful and I do find that reprehnsible.

Posted by: Nash Sunny at August 22, 2008 3:39 PM

Maha, i agree to all you said. Being a Pakistani, i can feel the pain. The "danger" is more hypothetical than real. Only a fear mongering freak would try to justify the security threats by the fact that some nut with a missile launcher could still perpetrate some damage. It kind of reflects the mentality of the WEST as a whole: frightful people, who like to make mountain out of a mole and who consider white skin much more valuable then any other color.
My point, however, is that ultimately its Pakistan as a nation where the blame rests. As it is ironically us who second the West in their superior view of a "white life". I wont care if Aussies or South Africans dont visit Pakistan. I would care even less if Kiwis or English dont come as they are unimportant teams anyways and are just trying to build an aura of competency by creating this hype. I care more for the families of innocent people who died in the blasts in Wah.

Posted by: T Ali at August 22, 2008 6:01 PM

The Sunday telephone conference only means one thing. The event will be moved somewhere else. But it should not end here.. Pakistan and, if possible, India must boycott it if it happens outside of Pakistan. Furthermore, Pakistan should cancel all their tours to the white countries. After all, the Pakistanis have their pride to consider. The amount of lost revenue does not come into the equation here.
And, Maha, I'm totally with you on this one. I had been making plans to catch the matches at the Pindi stadium, being an Islamabad resident. But then i heard the news that this particular stadium had been removed from the event. And I was like, fine i'll travel to lahore, or even karachi. But i was really really hoping to see some action...
Even if this means the end of pakistan as a cricketing nation, our pride is something which has no price tag. After the decision that the event will be moved, Pakistan should stand firm and declare they're not travelling.

Posted by: Anwer at August 22, 2008 6:50 PM

Some of you need to take a good look in the mirror with comments where you refer to the mentality of the west. Say hello to hypocrisy because you are not any better than those stereotyping westerners you speak of. You are not original and neither is your mentality of playing the victim of unfair prejudice. You are rather perpetuating this cycle of hate and intolerance. Blowing up a matter of personal choice regarding safety into a self-righteous discussion about insult to national pride among other things is more making an everest out of a mole hill.

Nash you are taking liberties in your assessment of Westerners and in case you don't remember it us Pakistanis and Indians that value skin color more than the westerners (in fact they want to tan and be brown and us vice versa with our fair and lovely creams). Hate to admit it but we are the more visible culprits when it comes to racism
Maha devote your adolescent angst to more positive means. Your immaturity overshadows any intelligence

Posted by: Akshay at August 22, 2008 10:45 PM

Nash Sunny it were the 'frightful' people of the west who first went to moon and who dive in the sky and swim with sharks. This is not the place for personal insults. You simply cannot force a sportsman and his family to go where he does not feel safe.

Secondly, it is funny how Pakistanis here have no qualms in berating India despite the unconditional and much needed support they have gotten from India on this issue. Bringing up the jehadi bomb blasts that happened in India recently and accusing India of providing booze and partying to attract sportsmen is just one of the other excuses of Pakistanis who are living in denial about conditions in Pakistan and have again proved that no friendly endeavor from either side is appreciated and is worth doing.

Posted by: ZUBY at August 22, 2008 10:45 PM

I would add in australia's case they havent toured in ages i dont think the situation was bad few years ago as it is now so to speak. I hear no pro aus,sa, nz supporter talk about double standards of players when it concerns bombs going off in india during ipl, but the show went on, cricket was the winner but we must not forget the money that was involved and on top of that player burnout is non existant all of a sudden.this was expected, rationalle is given whether its security issues, political or whatever.the issue was security, pcb obliged with extensive security PLANS not concepts, these player unions are saying nothing will convince them at the final stages leading pcb on for such a long time(very wrong). i think blame must be given to pcb for letting other boards walk over them in the past. pcb should be compensated as good level security was acheivable. maybe pakistan should stop war of terror and tell every1 that it needs to clean house first. allies(no) jus being used(yes)

Posted by: Awais at August 23, 2008 4:20 AM

I agree that Pakistan is not a safe country to visit right now. What I don’t agree with is the reservations/concerns all these players have. Especially after being repeatedly assured by the professional security analysts hired by the ICC that the security arrangements are satisfactory there. Also, after Asia Cup was very recently held successfully and safely. If any one was to put every thing into perspective to analyze how it will work, we will find that the reservations/concerns are nothing but fear of the unseen.
Now imagine that everyone agrees to go to Pakistan to play. The highest level of security will be provided at all times; you wouldn’t be roaming the streets or markets (like you ideally would want to) or to other uncontrollable places. So how do you think you will be targeted? Terrorists are not known to have Fighter Jets or Rocket Launchers; their only weapon is human bomb (suicide bombing). You are being rest assured that the top level of security will be available to y

Posted by: Gokul at August 23, 2008 5:25 PM

What surprises me is why the Indian players haven't raised any issues with the BCCI saying they will send the Indian team. Do we really want to risk the lives of our national ODI squad just to please a fellow-board in the Asian-ICC-political block? I wonder what guys like Dhoni or Yuvraj feel about this. Indian players would be a much more interesting target for any potential terrorists waiting to target the sport event should it go ahead as planned.

Posted by: Ibrahim at August 24, 2008 4:26 PM

I originally sent this to Inbox as an article but they haven't published it as yet (how long did they take to publish yours?) so I might as well write it here:
Well here we go again. A reader summons up the guts to defend Pakistan's place in the CT, and in come mails telling her--a resident of Pakistan, mind you, who not only sees the situation everyday but lives it--not to take it personally and reminding her--a resident of Pakistan, mind you--that Pakistan is an unsafe country.
What, I wonder, will it take to convince you people? For the past seven years Pakistan has been taking this sort of treatment at the hands of other boards. First the West Indies' tour was shifted to Sharjah. Understandable, considering it was right in the wake of 9/11 and there was a bit of uncertainty as to safety. Then New Zealand pulled out of an unfinished tour--again understandable, considering the bomb blasts near their hotel. Then, of course, it was Australia's turn, as what were originally supposed

Posted by: Aniruddha at August 25, 2008 1:06 PM

Your frustation is well placed. Frustation however cannot be a smoke screen to hide the reality. It is a fact that PCB has done all it could and thumbs up to them. Presidential security has been promised but the same level of security was not good enough to save Benazir Bhutto. Bombs went off in London and Jaipur, the common thread being the plans were hatched in Pakistan. You say a bomb is a bomb and it can happen anywhere. I agree but the Pakistan government has to do a lot more before the world sees Pakistani people as victims of terrorism rather than the ones breeding them. During the aisa cup the so called Pakistani fans did not bother to come and watch there team play. I ask who would come to watch the current Pakistan team? Are the players missing anything by not playing there? Well no. Theres no Wasim, Waqar or Inzi. So why bother? International players answerable to Pakistani fans? Wake up. This is a professional world.

Posted by: Aniruddha at August 25, 2008 1:11 PM

What has Pakistan got to offer as a tourist attraction? No pubs/nigh clubs, boos. Isnt UAE a muslim country? Do they not ensure the same for the tourists? Does your government even bother about tourists? Do you expect people to be forced to live the way you do? Should cricketers come and play only if all this is available? Answer is NO. However cricketers anr soldiers, they are successful people and they will expect basic amenities. Finally a very very well written article straight from the heart but then the heart doesnt change the reality, else the terrorists would have won by now.

Posted by: ibtsam at September 5, 2008 9:44 AM

Akshay, You are crying that Pakistan the writer of this blog criticized India. Open you eyes and read the blog once again, the criticism was at the westerners who went to play IPL in India and continued to do so by staying there when there were bomb blasts in Jaipur because they were getting attractive sums. We value India because they were the ones to stand by Pakistan for CT to be played in Pak. Change your mentality bro.
Aniruddha, UAE being a muslim country is offering many things that they musnt. They arent after tourist, just money. Atleast Pak is better in that regards.
The CT is postponed due to ICC's ineptness. Had they issued a verdict of all the boards skipping the tournament being fined, i would love to see how the lovely aussies wudnt send their team.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines >>
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left
About this blog
'Inbox' will feature submissions from you with us playing gatekeeper as we do with the rest of the site. We will set no rules apart from ensuring a certain quality that you have come to associate with Cricinfo. You may write on the aspects of the game that you hold dear; about matters that rile you; about players, teams and trends; you may share your memories and views, and you may so do so in 100 words or 500. The only tip we will give you is to repeat a line from our style sheet: Brevity is not just the soul of wit, it is the heart of all writing. Welcome. (Editor, Cricinfo)
Submit your piece >>
Categories
About American cricket Ashes Australian Cricket Bangla cricket Batting Bowling Cricket through the decades Cricket videogames Crowds English cricket Extras Fans Fielding IPL Indian cricket League cricket New Zealand cricket Pakistan cricket Pitches Rankings Rules Selection T20 World Cup Twenty20 Umpiring West Indies Cricket World cricket
Recent Posts
Making sense of strange omissions Cricket and generation Xbox Restructure the game around Twenty20 A cricketing renaissance Grandmasters of cricket Where are my slippers? The genesis of a cricket nut Mystery and Magic: Iverson, Ramadhin, Gleeson and Mendis Mystery of the missing wrist-spinners Finetuning D/L method for Twenty20s
Archives
November 2009October 2009September 2009August 2009July 2009June 2009May 2009April 2009March 2009February 2009January 2009December 2008November 2008October 2008September 2008August 2008
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009