|
« February 2007 |
| April 2007 »
March 27, 2007
Posted by Will Luke at
in
You’re all spectacularly misinformed, not to mention blind. Botham? Nothing more than a flat-track bully. And as for the jolly-come-latelies, well where do I start? Kallis has lost his fourth gear, if he ever had one, and is struggling to get into third. Flintoff only has first and fifth gears, and the less said about Pollock and Gilchrist the better.
Imran had it all. With the ball, he was snappy and fierce, with a silky-smooth action; with the bat, he was flexible enough to adjust to the situation. And on top of all that, he captained Pakistan better than anyone ever has, and probably ever will do. 362 Test wickets, nearly 4000 runs and six hundreds, Imran was the man. Once bored with cricket, he built a hospital – and then became a politician. He was the allrounders' allrounder.
March 14, 2007
Posted by Jon Hungin at
in
Yes, he can be massively annoying in the commentary box and yes he may have become everything he used to despise (ie he is now one of the "in-my-day" brigade) but Ian Botham is still the one for England cricket fans. Ask the majority of them who their favourite all-time player is, they will probably say Botham; ask them who they most listen to in Sky's commentary team or whose column they still read in the newspapers, they probably say Botham and ask who they'd most like to go for drink with and they will probably - at a pinch - say Botham.
And even if he is one of the in-my-day brigade, at the very least, he has the performances to back it up. Have any of the other allrounders every produced with bat and ball in the same match as often and to such devastating effect? Ok, so he should have retired in 87, but the sight of him running though the Australia middle-order one last time (and then bashing them for 50 with the bat) at the 1992 World Cup was a memory to treasure.
No cricketer has ever been able to connect with his country's supporters like Beefy and in this era when the word 'great' is bandied about left, right and centre he is the one who, in allround cricketing terms, actually defines the term.
March 2, 2007
Posted by Peter English at
in
Keith Miller was the best thing to happen to post-war cricket and his batting, bowling and personality made him a favourite throughout the world. Capable of frightening spells with the ball and punishing displays with the bat, he deserves a prominent place in any list of great allrounders.
|
