Cricinfo Blogs
About cricinfoblogs cricinfo.com
Beyond The Blues Beyond The Test World Different Strokes From the Editor Girls Aloud Iain O'Brien Inbox
It Figures Pak Spin Shot Selection The Buzz The Confectionery Stall The Surfer Tour Diaries

Cricinfo Blogs Home

« Postcards from Adelaide Oval | | The Anti-Hick »

December 2, 2006

Posted by Gideon Haigh on 12/02/2006 in

Whose line is it anyway?





Two can play at boredom © Cricinfo Ltd

Leg-theory in Adelaide almost triggered a riot seventy-three years ago. Today it brought a Test match almost to a standstill. You’d have gotten tasty odds before this game on the likelihood of the first English double hundred since Walter Hammond, or of England setting a new Ashes partnership record at this ground. But not perhaps as enticing as those on Shane Warne auditioning for the role of Australian wheelie-bin, with over upon over outside leg stump, not in search of rough, but of respite.

On the day that 'The Australian's trenchant Malcolm Conn announced that England had ‘unveiled its latest secret weapon to retain the Ashes – boredom’, Australia demonstrated that it is a game two can play. It is fair to say that England had the better of the détente that ensued. It isn't unfair to say that, although a draw looms as the likeliest outcome, and Australia has the batting to kill the game off, only one side can win this game: odds on that team being England would only two days ago have been astronomical.

Kevin Pietersen, moreover, has rather transfixed the Australians. It is remarkable how he seems to depopulate a field. Warne confronted him first with two on the fence, behind square leg and at mid-wicket, an exceptionally fine leg, a short mid wicket and a mid on. There was an extra cover sweeper, who was essentially a wasted man, and a mid-off three quarters of the way to the fence, not much more active. It was a plan, of sorts – but not much of one. Pietersen promptly foiled it by finding space between the bowler and mid on, then between the mid-on and short mid-wicket – majestic shots taking him to the brink of his hundred. Warne looked again as he did on Friday, that he would be happy to call it a draw, and settle for a round of golf.

The Australian default setting in such circumstances is usually to stockpile maidens. But from Warne, the leg spinner who has reinvented bowling from round the wicket as an attacking option, the psychological concession of yielding two feet outside leg stump was considerable – like an agreement to drive at 40kmh in a 100kmh zone. It wasn’t a popular strategy: Warne provoked his biggest cheer during the day when he was called for a wide for Rudi Koertzen. Nor was it as economical as Warne would have wished; he was relieved in the afternoon after a spell of 15 wicketless overs for 44. And like many an anti-social activity, it set a bad example on the impressionable young, for Michael Clarke bowled his left-arm darts from over the wicket to no conceivable end.

It was hard not to notice, too, how much more effective Warne was when he resumed bowling over the wicket after Pietersen’s dismissal, having Geraint Jones caught from a casual stroke, and again beating the outside edge. England’s batting in the Ashes of 2005 seemed to involve two different games: one when Warne was involved, one of somewhat lower intensity when he was not. In the Ashes of 2006-7, Pietersen looms as that defining figure. Has there been a taller batsman with daintier footwork? It is almost a rule of cricket that physical size and footwork are in inverse relation, Clive Lloyd and Graeme Pollock being the paradigmatic examples of the big and the still - a tall or heavy man with a long reach, of course, can achieve leverage by a tilt of the body and shift in his weight. But Pietersen’s feet are always going somewhere, usually into harm’s way, and always with positive intent.

Collingwood does his work less obtrusively. Pietersen wants to find out about his game; Collingwood already knows it, back-to-front and inside-out. His 206 was a painstaking innings but never a laboured one. He is a busy cricketer, ticking over like a cab sitting on a rank, eager for fares, ready to zoom off. He is also a valued teammate, to judge from the winding gusto with which Pietersen hugged him as his landmarks were attained.

The Australian attack was willing enough. Lee’s second over of the day was his best of the series, a catalogue of his capabilities, including a rasping riser, a withering yorker and a caught behind appeal of impressive unanimity, with only Bucknor demurring. Correctly, it would seem: sent down to forensics by Channel Nine, the evidence came back without bloodstains or power burns. Even Lee was steadily neutered by the surface. In his 30th over, his fastest bouncer was dashed against the square leg fence by Pietersen, and his slower ball sent skimming through cover by Collingwood. But he did have the energy to offer his hand when Collingwood passed his double hundred, for which he’ll probably get a ticking off from Dennis Lillee.

Stuart Clark has a smidgeon of the stocking-masked hoodlum about him, with his broad nose and close cropped hair, and he took his cosh to Collingwood in a spell of persistent but shrewd short-pitched bowling from the Cathedral End, with a catcher in place at a fine leg gully. Both men had their dander up: Collingwood bided his time, finally found a ball on the line to pull, then blasted the overpitched sequel through covers for four. Again, though, Clark was the pick of the bowlers, finally seeing Collingwood off with a nifty leg cutter, and sparing McGrath a lot of the donkey work that in days gone by would almost certainly have been his. There is a school of thought that the presence of the thrifty will extend McGrath’s career. Mind you, if it means he has to bowl on more pitches like this one, McGrath might not welcome that opportunity.

 
Feedback Feedback
Go to Comments

Comments

Posted by: Shahab Randhawa on 12/03/2006

Bowling around the wicket on the legs is not queit a bad idea in the test matches.England did it quiet brilliantly against India some years back which frustrated Sachin Tendulkar so much that he was stumped first and only time in his test career.I remember Indian media going mad on this defensive approach by Englishmen but when Sachin did that against Pakistan in first ODi in India in 2005, and took 5 wickets,everyone praised his cricketing genius and tactics.Pakisatni batsmen showed hoew to bat against that sort of deliveries in the 4th ODI by standing outside legstumps and just playing the ball in the gaps in the cover region and n the legside to take singles and doubles.I think English batsmen could have done that instead of just padding every ball.

Posted by: Eleanor on 12/03/2006

You hit the funny thing about watching Pietersen; he's huge, but horrifyingly agile. It's like watching a six-foot-four rattlesnake rather than the gorilla he could be. He reminds me of Jonah Lomu - nothing that size and shape should be able to turn that fast.

Posted by: Ray on 12/04/2006

couldn't agree more .. Warne's performance was symptomatic of a bowler (and captain) lacking ideas. Pity the same could be said of Rudi Koertzen who could have changed the pace of the game by calling a few of the early leg side lollies wide

Posted by: j on 12/04/2006

You dont know what youre talking about Jonah should not have gone to league

Posted by: Come on India on 12/04/2006

What peterson is doing now to warne . Sach did it to him in 98 when he was nuch better bowler and that too on indian wickets which have the reputation of favouring spinners.Even warne admitted that he had nightmares of sachin tendulkar:-)

Posted by: Hoss on 12/04/2006

If Warne had been an off-spin bowler, putting them a foot or two utside the off stump and bringing them back in, Pietersen would have had to use his bat. What a great idea, use your bat!!! Maybe the ICC should be consistent and drop the leg side theory that allows batsmen to kick away a ball spinning from outside leg onto their stumps.

Posted by: Luiboy on 12/05/2006

Ray,
Did you say that Warnie was lacking in ideas??

Haha, welcome to Test cricket!

Posted by: Mike on 12/06/2006

Winners are grinners

Posted by: Jon on 12/07/2006

Warne bowling over wicket was very smart indeed. Test matches are played over 5 days and are a game of patience and momentum, as shown on Day 5. Petiersen and England had the conditions in there favour on day 1 and 2 on an absolute belter of a pitch. Warne geniously decided that if he could not get wickets, he would instead slow the momentum of england, and therefore slow there scoring rate in attempt to frustrate the batsmen, especially petiersen. Although he did not get the wicket of petiersen through this method, the momentum of game shifted towards Australia because the slower England batted, the more difficult it would be for England to force a winning result.

Petiersen should in future contiune to attack Warne, even when he comes around the wicket in future, because padding the ball away, and occupying the crease only plays into Australia hands, especially being behind in the series.

And also how was Petiersen dismissed in the second innings???? Around his legs....coincidence, i doubt it!

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:

Gideon Haigh has written sixteen books and edited six more, mainly concerned with sport and business, in twenty-three years as a journalist. He now writes mainly for the Australian current affairs magazine The Monthly. He lives in Melbourne with a cat, Trumper, and is taking time off from his cricket club, the Yarras, to cover the 2006-7 Ashes for The Guardian.
Categories
Fifth Test, SydneyFirst Test, BrisbaneFourth Test, MelbourneICCSecond Test, AdelaideThird Test, PerthTouringNotesPreparationWarne/McGrath
Recent Posts
Goodbye to all thatNo Harm doneA burning sensationA man who needs no introductionPostcards from the SCGAn eye for cricketGentlemen and PlayersRudiwatch continuedLegend statusThe Best-Laid Plans
Archives
January 2007December 2006November 2006
RSS Feeds RSS Feed
© Cricinfo 2009