There is one scenario in which Pakistan's legal confrontation with the ICC over World Cup 2011 hosting rights could prove an intelligent move: if it forces both the ICC and Pakistan into a compromise that relocates the Pakistan-based games to Dubai and Abu Dhabi. Indeed, this may well have been the ultimate strategic outcome in the mind of the PCB officials as they planned a litigious attack on the ICC.
Deep inside, even the PCB hierarchy understands that no visiting team will feel safe in Pakistan after the calamitous events of March this year in Lahore. Pakistan as a political and social entity has to enjoy a long run of peace and stability before the prevailing mood on that situation can be expected to change. But don't expect the PCB to admit as much; as the official protector of Pakistan cricket, it cannot afford to give the appearance of surrender.
The opportunity for a legal challenge to the ICC popped up unexpectedly for the PCB. It is only understandable that with the chips down and their backs to the wall, they will pounce on it. Unlike on previous occasions, when security concerns have been discussed, it appears that this time around due process was not followed. The PCB claims that relocating World Cup matches was not on the agenda of the recent ICC meeting, and when it was brought up, the PCB chairman Ijaz Butt was caught off guard. If this is true, then the ICC has no defence. Any law firm worth its salt – and DLA Piper, the group engaged by the PCB, is certainly one such – will smell blood and go for the kill.
Granted, Mr Butt should have done his homework on this topic. Granted, he and his aides should have been able to think on their feet and propose Dubai and Abu Dhabi as proxy venues. Had he done that during the meeting, it is possible that the compromise now being hoped for could have been reached without much fuss.
But even despite this missed opportunity, the PCB is in the rare position of having a strong hand. Pakistan's recent series against Australia has shown that the stadiums in both Dubai and Abu Dhabi, with fantastic facilities and full-throated crowd support, are highly credible alternate venues. True, they are outside the boundaries of South Asia, but flying times are convenient, with a flight from Karachi to Dubai taking about only as long as a flight from Karachi to Islamabad. There is some concern that the arrangement has proved more expensive for the PCB than expected, but added expense is hardly a driving concern if you are trying to salvage World Cup hosting rights and the prestige that comes with them.
Put yourself in the PCB's shoes. It deserves some empathy. Several commentators have observed that this legal confrontation between the ICC and the PCB helps no one. Nothing could be farther from the truth, because it certainly helps Pakistan. It gives the PCB an opening that, for the first time in this atmosphere of fear and terror, could enable them to force a compromise. For if the ICC failed to follow due process, it has few options. With DLA Piper on the case, we can be sure we will get to the bottom of this.
Well said Saad. You answer over 100 comments posted by the Indians in favour of Usman Samiuddin's article posted on cricinfo four days ago. At one point I was thinking it will remain posted on Cricinfo till 2011 World Cup to give bad name to Pakistan. I think Cricinfo is dominated by Indians.
Posted by: Arvind at May 14, 2009 3:18 PM
Finally, someone took the ICC to court!!!
It is high time the ICC learnt a lesson. Leave aside all your differences and pray for an embarassing defeat for the ICC in the court.
I hope the court orders that all matches be played in Pakistan, so that all teams will refuse to go there, and every team will award points to each other, and this World Cup will then be an even bigger farce than the previous one.
What is the need to have these meaningless 50 over games anyway? Such a waste of money (floodlights, ticket charges, 5-star hotels, television and related equipment, security, etc.) in such crunch times.
Posted by: qassim dar at May 14, 2009 4:11 PM
Agreed.At last we have someone with a realistic approach.
Posted by: Sundar at May 14, 2009 4:30 PM
I don't think it will matter in the end. Even if they decide that the decision was flawed as it was not originally on the agenda, all the ICC needs to do is then put it on the agenda of the next meeting they will have and end up making the same decision again. Big deal.
Posted by: Farhan at May 14, 2009 4:38 PM
Thank you Saad for your thoughts. I only wish Osman Samiuddin would wake up and smell the same crap dished out by Monsiuers ICC/BCCI.
Posted by: Omer Admani at May 14, 2009 4:44 PM
Intuitively, it seems to me that the ICC has no defense. They argue that the PCB didn’t vote against the issue, thus that makes PCB’s case weak. The ICC is, I suppose, claiming that, at the time of the vote, PCB showed implicit consent by not voting against the removal of matches from Pakistan. However, the PCB should easily be able to argue that they abstained from the vote precisely because they didn’t agree with the idea of the vote; that the ICC didn’t follow the right protocol as the vote on the worldcup wasn’t intended to be held at that time, and thus in PCB’s view, the vote was never justified and is thus void. Equally, their abstinence makes the case stronger rather than weaker, as, had the PCB voted, they would have agreed (in the concrete) with the idea of the vote. If they had voted, the PCB would have demonstrated purpose in the vote, and the ICC could well argue that the only thing relevant after that would be the vote's result or conclusion.
Posted by: Krishna Naishadham at May 14, 2009 5:08 PM
PCB should have been professional, done their hoework for alternatives, and brought this before the ICC meeting. Even today, the current ICC Chairman ridiculed the idea of staging these matches in Dubai, and therefore, it appears that PCB will not get what they now want. Moreover, it seems like PCB will not get the support of other countries even outside Asia as the vote against Pakistan staging World Cup matches was unanimous.
Posted by: Ahmed mian at May 14, 2009 5:27 PM
Pakistan is absolutely right in taking this Indian control ICC fraud organization to court. India is controlling ICC and abusing its power for some political gains. I believe Pakistan should fight all the wayyy and fight an all out war against ICC and do everything it can to get its right to co host or move the world cup 2 some other country and if things dont work out Pakistan shouldn't go to India for world cup.
Posted by: Abas at May 14, 2009 5:28 PM
PCB has done the right thing here and i support them. They should also start collecting some evidence against BCCI and take them to court as well. Does anyone else remember how they asked the SL cricket team to not tour Pakistan and tried their best to have that Pak vs SL tour canceled? I wouldn't be surprised if they were behind the attack on the SL cricket team.
Pakistan is as "dangerous" as India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh. No cricket player or any other sports player has ever died in Pakistan. If other countries can host the matches then SO CAN WE!
Posted by: eco at May 14, 2009 5:29 PM
PCB just wants to shift the world cup as they cannot see rest of Asia hosting it. First of all they where really stupid to invite Srilanka when they very well knew the situation at home. Then after the attack they started blaming one and every one rather than thinking for a solution. How do you expect any team to go to Pakistan. They cannot compare their situation with Srilanka or India.
Posted by: question at May 14, 2009 5:32 PM
how much is the flying time from colombo or from chennai or from dhaka to dubai?
Posted by: Faisal at May 14, 2009 5:34 PM
India ditched Pakistan and divided the Asian block - Can't believe these are the two countries who went and played a match in SriLanka during the last South Asian world cup when others were boycotting it. India, given its position should have come out and played a role in keeping the block united. Pakistan's option - Well none in this case when they were pushed against the wall. Lawsuit or for that matter any option in this case was better then rolling over and playing dead. Sad, very sad indeed with how things turned up in this wonderful game of cricket.
Posted by: Wazi at May 14, 2009 5:35 PM
i think you have mentioned a good point. with all that criticism on PCB i believe its a strong point. With India being the major player throught last decade its about time someone can just challenge it.
Posted by: Wasif at May 14, 2009 5:41 PM
Its not PCB Vs ICC really....wat it comes down to is PCB Vs BCCI. This is an ideal opportunity for all the boards who depise the Indian board (and there are many even if they dont admit) to side with the PCB on this issue. Pakistan should not be taken for granted...and the way the World cup was taken leaves no doubt on how it is being treated..and by whom
Posted by: Mr.FR at May 14, 2009 5:43 PM
Amazingly stated facts and a brilliant article! Everyone can see who gets the most benefit out of the lahore attacks......
Posted by: basit at May 14, 2009 5:50 PM
very good article.. exactly my point of view. PCB has nothing to lose; if pakistan has hosting rights then should use them at a neutral venue. what exactly happened is that bcci ganged up with icc and snatched the rights for its own. just like a school bully.... abu dhabi and dubai are the best option. they are not only safer then the rest of the sub continent but are also top quality stadiums.
Posted by: Enigma at May 14, 2009 6:18 PM
Flying time from Columbo to Dubai is about 10hrs...THINK ABOUT THAT...which team will agree to fly for ten hours and play a WORLD CUP match the next day.
Posted by: Ali Vaqar Khan at May 14, 2009 6:21 PM
PCB is justified to take ICC to court. Without any valid reason ICC removed Pakistan as world cup host. If Pakistan was not safe then either India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka are not safe. Why Pakistan should risk its life by playing in these dangerous countries. Also ICC has never given Pakistan a good deal. First they took away champions trophy then deprived Pakistan of hosting world cup. ICC should have allowed a year atleast to clarify the matter. PCB did what was available to them in given circumstances. Whenever some one is being cheated then they have no option left but to seek legal help. This step PCB should have taken very earlier. ICC is doing some thing to please BCCI because they have enough money to feed them. Its time PCB must take its own decision.
Posted by: phaedrus at May 14, 2009 6:46 PM
What exactly is the meaning of "host" ? One who takes the guests to the neighbor's house for dinner?
Why dont we just declare Dubai as one of the hosts and be done with all this drama ?
Posted by: syed salim at May 14, 2009 7:08 PM
Pakistan did a good job to decide to go court of law.ICC should talk to pakistan prior to raise it in the meeting. If zimbabway was not being deprived by its Test Status until Mr. Ahsan Mani talked to their officials than why Pakistan did not get a chance. Its all discriminaton and one sided decision. ICC said that Pakistan's matches has been moved but Pakistan is still a co-host, wow, what a change in their stand after pakistan file a suit. If it is neccesary to change venue of the matches played in PAKISTAN Than you should ask PAKISTAN that do you have any alternate place because we do not want it in PAKISTAN because of these reasons but insted of that you moved it to INDIA (Most of them), why? What will happen if Pakistan in the final and PAKISTAN Government did not let Players to go INDIA because of same security reasons? Think , its not a wise decision, its biased and unnatural.
Posted by: Faz Khan at May 14, 2009 7:12 PM
Good article. I hope Mr.Shafqat is correct and that indeed what PCB is thinking is moving Pakistan's games including the finals to the UAE. It's sad that aside from Sri Lanka perhaps no other board has got Pakistan's back. From the other articles posted on Cricinfo it seems that It was disappointing to read that while NZ and Aus will happily take the 2011 Worldcup they refuse to give the rights for 2015 back to Asia. It also seems that while ICC claims Pakistan is still hosting just the matches are moved away, Pakistan will get none of the hosting fee either. I understand the situation in Pakistan is bad, and I don't think any country should be forced to play there, but at the same time it's very sad to see the lack of support for Pakistan given its past contributions to the ICC.
Posted by: Hayat Muhammad Khan at May 14, 2009 7:26 PM
This is a good move from the PCB, which shows their commitments with the game. As far as the security in Pakistan is concerned, there is no doubt, the Lahore attacks on the Sri Lankan players worsened it, but one must not forget, that the World Cup is still far away, to be decided about. If it is the case, then the world cup must be either postponed for one more year as the Champions trophy or may be given to some other countries like Australia & New Zealand or England. The situation in India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh are no different than Pakistan. The prove is IPL move from India to South Africa, though it is stated that it was due to its confrontation with Indian General Election. Bangladesh refused to host Pakistan for ONLY Five ODI's and the ICC still beleive that those countries are eligible to host the world cup. We hope this move of PCB will help Pakistan's stance regarding dual policy towards security situations in the Asian Block.
Posted by: Rashid Mahmood at May 14, 2009 8:13 PM
Well done Mr. Shafqat. Thanks for putting all cricket loving fans of pakistan's thoughts infornt of the world. I agree you can't suddenly snatch on other's right like ICC did. It would need a serious explaining by ICC in the court of law, unless both parties reach a compromise.In my view it is serious lack on insight on part of ICC by ignoring the fact that the situation is not safe even in other World cup 2011 host countries.
Thumbs up for PCB.
Posted by: badruddin savja at May 14, 2009 8:38 PM
Mr saad shafqut,
Sir you are quite right. Pakistan should fight for rights till they get the true judgement.I am sure India is definately behind this mess up,which is not easy to proove.ICC should be heavily penalised for this type of discrimination,as at present the security in India ,Srilanka and Banglades are not good and satisfactory. I sincerely pray to ALLAH, sothat Pakistan should win this fightand bring down ICC and INdia. AMEEN AMEEN AMEEN
Posted by: ICC Alternative at May 14, 2009 9:04 PM
From an outside view, I had high hopes when Lorgat became ICC chief.
Now I feel the ICC and Lorgat are in no way good enough to be charged with preserving and running the game of cricket.
The ICC is run for the benefit of its main members -India, England, SA & Aus and Lorgat is just a puppet in charge, whose job it seems is to look after these 4 members interests - which happen to be to generate as much money as possible.
West Indies and Zim are lost, Pakistan is going that way, Bangladesh are not good enough and NZ and Sri Lank could fall away very easily. What other teams are emerging as a cricket force? NONE!
SO TELL ME WHAT GLOBAL SPORT CAN SURVIVE WITH JUST 4-6 TEAMS!?
That is what will be left if the status quo continues and who will want to watch the same 4 teams play each other every game?!!
The ICC must grow up and start to preserve cricket's overall interests in the current countries and beyond, not those of a few.
Maybe if it cant do this...a breakaway federation is needed!
Posted by: lahoria at May 14, 2009 9:06 PM
very interessting article! I was actually against PCB move, because i thought they just want other teams to play in Pakistan which is at the time illogical! Thanx for showing the other direction of PCB purpose!
I just don t get it! Why is your article not on the front page of cricinfo (like osman samiuddin)!Hopefully our Indian and other friends will also take part in this healthy discussion here!
Posted by: anon at May 14, 2009 9:11 PM
Misplaced observations.
A, per the commentary earlier, PCB refrained from proposing Dubai/Abu Dhabi owing to the cost that it'd have to incur.
B, PCB, as known, is already bankrupt or nearing, could it afford such an expensive adventure to keep Pakistan as host? If they do however propose, this would be another display of senseless leadership that Pakistan Board has gotten so used to.
Instead of being pro-active and supporting the obvious (moving the tournament out of Pakistan for cricketers lives sake), PCB has gone ahead and accused India, Sri Lanka and B'desh of having as grave issues as Pakistan! Have they not been keeping up with current affairs? Doing this they've made more enemies than friends within the cricketing community.
Sad commentary by Mr Shafqat, its thinkers such as him that have put Paki cricket in the mess.
Paki Cricket needs empathy, the cricketers and Pakis are suffering for no fault of theirs, but is this the right way to earn?
Posted by: Hassan at May 14, 2009 9:14 PM
I think PCB made a big mistake by not presenting Dubai and Abu Dhabi as potential replacements. We are only talking about 14 games here or at least Pakistan home games that can be easily hosted at those two cities with both Bangladesh and Sri Lanka having barely 2-3 grounds, this would have been ideal. However, I am afraid it may be too late. I would actually prefer the 2011 World Cup to be in Australia and NZ.
Posted by: aura at May 14, 2009 10:20 PM
ICC powerfull memebers can't act like playboy. Pakistan deserve the chance to host its matches as per his choice
Posted by: ali at May 14, 2009 10:29 PM
really like ure blog Mr Shafqat. Just the time that PCB took to make this move gives the impression that they seeked proper advice beofore intiating such a move. Advice from people such as Ehsan mani. I'd say PCB has made a rare right decision..
Posted by: Nitin at May 14, 2009 10:57 PM
What is the long term cost of this confrontation? In terms of chemistry with other member boards. What if PCB looses the case? Can things get even more worse then they already are.
Posted by: Ranga at May 14, 2009 11:13 PM
What is with the statment "Put yourself in PCB shoes" - cmon, the action taken by PCB is kiddish and shows amount of immaturity. Also it looks like if I cant have then no body around me should have. that attitude is not going to gain grounds. Matches in Dubai Abu Dhabi will get crowd but will any other teams interested in playing there? What if countries just give away to points to Pak cricet team and not participate. Remeber 1996 world cup when many teams did not go to SL? So get back to your yard, clean up the mess and be patient. Would it be okay for PCB to get the hosting fees? Will that make them feel alright? Wait and watch whr FTP comes for new agenda, let us see how many countries wants to play Pak home and away series. Get your mind straight and think rationally, do not let your emotions get better of you. To Mr.Mani, take some sleeping pills, your statement that India was behind the decision ICC pulled the plug on Pak is going to get some real harsh taste lasting forever.
Posted by: Cricinfo Fan at May 14, 2009 11:33 PM
I think only the Pak games should be played in the middle east and the rest of the matches should be played where they are supposed to. Another take, for middle east matches, the participating teams should toss the coin and whoever wins the toss should get to choose middle east or their own country to play the game.
Posted by: moiz_ahmed at May 14, 2009 11:46 PM
First Time I am seeing an article which support Pakistan situation and PCB legal notice to ICC
Saad Shafqat you are the true supporter of Pakistan and You are the best reporter in the whole reporter of cricinfo
Posted by: Hammad Siddiqi at May 15, 2009 12:14 AM
Kudos Mr. Shafqat. I'm ecstatic that at least ONE Pakistani cricket journalist has the sand to actually say it like it is. After all the kowtowing from Mr. Samiuddin and Mr. Abbasi, this is a refreshing and very welcome article. Thank you for giving us some dignity back by articulating a view shared by most Pakistanis.
Posted by: sultan at May 15, 2009 1:34 AM
I think Pakistan should be able to get back the hosting rights with the venues shifting to Dubai and Abu Dhabi. The final should also take place in UAE rather than Mumbai.
Posted by: Khalid Durrani at May 15, 2009 1:58 AM
Well Written Mr.Saad Shafqat !
We hope to see that Pakistan gets back world cup hosting rights. One never knows what is going to be the security situation in South Asia in next two years. Punishing a country because that is front line state against terroism is not fair play. Our country and players need International support to remain steadfast against extremists.
ICC members should have waited for at least another year before shifting the matches from Pakistan. Taking away the rights all together is just punishing the people of Pakistan.
Thanks again for a nice and balanced writing.
Posted by: Anonymous at May 15, 2009 2:10 AM
Perhaps you havent yet read Haroon Lorgat's comments on the matter. "We used our response to clarify inaccuracies and misunderstandings in the PCB's claim, including confirmation of the fact that the agenda and the board papers for the recent ICC board meetings did very specifically raise the question of whether the 2011 World Cup matches assigned to the PCB as joint hosts should be relocated outside of Pakistan" and "The suggestion the ICC board was not empowered to decide that matches should be moved away from Pakistan and that such a decision was 'legally flawed' is also incorrect and without foundation." I suppose we are going to see the constitution disected.
Posted by: Xalman at May 15, 2009 2:33 AM
I agree Pakistan should host its matches in UAE however PCB should have come clean by adopting the stance that Pakistan team is not willing to play its world cup matches in India on the same grounds on which its players where stopped from participating in the IPL. India/Mohali is not secure, Bangladesh and SriLanka are just too far its as simple as that. Instead PCB choose to create another farcical episode. Lets see what happens.
Posted by: Logical Thinking at May 15, 2009 3:33 AM
HA!...you must be joking because if you're not, then you're also an emotionally blinded fool that doesnt see reality.
Posted by: Javed Munir Dar at May 15, 2009 4:17 AM
I fully endorse the action take by the PCB, i would strongly recommend the "BOYCOTT" of the world cup tournament if Pakistan is not given chance to hold the tournament in its country,
Javed Munir Dar
Posted by: Saud Sami at May 15, 2009 4:51 AM
Finally a logical analysis of the situation. What PCB must try to get out of this and I think that there is a very good chance that they can, is to enforce a proper professional security assessment of Pakistan by independent experts. IF not found satisfactory then the UAE venues be used instead of Pakistan. It goes without saying that all the financial benefits should be for Pakistan. Pakistan should also ensure that all the security arrangements and guarantees being demanded from it are also demanded of other hosts. In addition Pakistan should also seek an assurance from ICC that the Indian government will not create Visa problems for Pakistani players as we have seen in the IPL.
Posted by: Hassaan at May 15, 2009 4:56 AM
Very well written ... i fully support PCB's decision to go against ICC ...
Hats off to PCB
Posted by: REDNECK at May 15, 2009 5:02 AM
i think you make a good point about dubai & abu dhabi very impressive venues from what i saw on tv. i would like to add with pakistans games quota being reassigned to india where do the icc plan to have pakistan play during the world cup given the tension between the governments of pakistan and india. will they just play in bangledesh and sri lanka??? i think the icc should look at the UAE as it gives pakistan some home support and the world cup makes enough money to cover the higher costs of staging games in the emerits.
Posted by: zeeshan at May 15, 2009 5:11 AM
Saad mate,
Could you tell me how you managed to get “deep inside” the PCB hierarchy? Did the “PCB hierarchy” send you a text saying, “deep inside, we know no one’s coming to play cricket here. How are the parents?” Or were you a psychoanalyst for the “PCB hierarchy”?
What prestige can Pakistan have after being unable to host anyone and having to use another country as proxy?
PCB is a luckless, thoughtless circus run by an idiot in a suit.
Shouldn’t you be a little careful not slipping from PCB to Pakistan [as if they both meant the same thing] or trying to rouse empathy for an institution that nearly got an international team killed [not to mention got plenty of people killed] because it did not take what was going on in the country seriously?
This move is another one of PCB's mindless ideas that resemble the antics of a irritating child.
Posted by: Kaiser Mukhtar at May 15, 2009 5:22 AM
After ICC' clarification that Pcb is still host it clearly shows how competent and ill prepared Pcb officials must have een at the meeting. As hey claimed Pakistan has been stripped off its hosting rights and hosting money. It has proven once again that Pcb is being un by ill informed ,incompetent butt heads.Their move may be justified as to bring honor back but not the teams as nobody will be convinced to tour not even Bangladesh. Thanks. Pakistan zindabaad.
Posted by: Faheem Khalid at May 15, 2009 6:08 AM
Well i personally think that yes there was a mistake made by PCB that they should have been better prepared for it,
but to me its not security it is the biased attitude neing shown by ICC and other countries towards Pakistan, why ?because when other teams can go to india even with a mumbai attack, and then if australia can stay in england despite the 7-7 attacks ,why the hell cant Pakistan have its world cup here, and considering there are still 2 years to go in world cup.
Posted by: Romil Parikh at May 15, 2009 6:23 AM
I think this is a highly insensitive move by the PCB. Imagine how the Sri Lankan players and umpires who were under attack barely a few months ago feel about having to go play further matches in Pakistan. Instead of spending this time and money litigating with the ICC the PCB should spend the money investigating the GRAVE FAILURES of its security apparatus which has led to an international cricket team almost being massacred. Of course India will be blamed for this !!! Why cant they just accept there is a grave security problem in Paksitan. I think that its time the Pakistani govt and cricket board first look at how it can improve the situation within its own borders and then worry about if their pockets are being filled.
Posted by: IKKI at May 15, 2009 7:06 AM
I totally agree that Pakistan should take the ICC on n this matter. Discussing something not on the agenda and worse still making decisions on it which unfailrly affects one memeber and hugely benefits another, India, shows signs of manipulation and high-handedness. Ithink that Pakisatn should pursue the matter and exercise its right to propose the alternate venues instead of this being forced down their throats
Posted by: Adeel Sheikh at May 15, 2009 7:22 AM
I agree. There is some sympathy for Pakistan's case right now outside of India and Pakistan should rightly exploit that. Undoubtedly, the Lahore attack was a major setback but worse things have happened in history and one needs to look for solutions. Unfortunately, its India's hegemony in world cricket administration and politics seems to have crept into the whole system.
Posted by: Taufique Ahmed at May 15, 2009 7:27 AM
A well balanced and unbiased viewpoint! If games are to be shifted from Pakistan because of security concern ( and nobody is really picking an issue on that!) it should be done in an orderly manner with due regard to the established ICC policies and procedures and not in a high handed and offensive manner as Pakistan alleges. I hope the law suit initiated by PCB gets to the bottom of the matter and the so called managers of ICC have some exposure to basic managerial skills which are so starkly missing from their actions in recent years.
Posted by: Khan at May 15, 2009 7:41 AM
PCB did very good thing after a long while to initiate this legal process against bias BCCI controlled ICC. From Oval test to date ICC showed it's total bias against Pakistan .It was about time that PCB should stand up for it's rights and earn some respect.
Posted by: Karan at May 15, 2009 8:37 AM
It's not about 'surrendering' or 'empathy': it's about human life. Right now, Swat valley is currently getting bombarded and who is to say that the Sri lankan attack won't happen again? Sure, pakistan will say that they are ready, but they said that last time. Pakistan is unsafe and they shouldn't have gone to court.
Posted by: Mohd Mudasser at May 15, 2009 8:45 AM
I think it is very wrong with Pahistan to take World Cup matches from Pakistn. Not only Pakistan suffered with teerorism, but also the other three nations are suffering. There is a gap of two years to World Cup. So, I.C.C should have to think.Pakistan can also organise their matcaes in U.A.E & Dubai.
Posted by: Amim Ehsan at May 15, 2009 9:22 AM
It remains to be seen if ICC will be humbled in this court case. In any case, ICC will only have itself to blame for such a rapid response perhaps they now are caught unaware as the consequences will set a precedence for other member board to take legal action if they see fit.
Posted by: Sunil Joshi at May 15, 2009 9:36 AM
Mr Shafqat
I have gone through your full writeup as well as the one by Osman Samiuddin earlier yesterday on Cricinfo. I am referring to Osman Samiuddin as he was the one who had earlier said that the PCBs reaction was more emotional than anything else. Yesterday, he himself put up the piece which had comments by Ehteshan Mani - digression?
Point is, it is hard to understand why everyone is suddenly thinking that the PCB deserves empathy and it should at least get an option of suggesting some other venues?
This is the WC we are talking about and I feel real pride and honor is to hold it IN the country rather than suggesting venues and options.
In your effort to delineate sports from the current Pakistan scenario, please understand that the country is seen as one by the international community. You cannot disown an injured leg - remember, it WILL affect the rest of the body. Same is the case here.
It would be good if you accept the scenario and not fight it unjustifiably.
Posted by: salman hussain at May 15, 2009 9:37 AM
Cricket for Pakistanis should be viewed as more than a sport- it is one of the unifying element for the cricket crazy nation. The decision of the ICC to shift matches, while understandable has hurt each and every Pakistani even in these times where so many unpleasant and difficult things are happening around us.This coupled with ICC's silence on the fact that IPL is going without any Pakistani players participating in it has led to a strong feeling of isolation. The so called Asian block actually appears disintegrated given that India now seems to think that they can monopolise the game's governing on the sheer strength of their commercial muscle.PCB's decision to send a legal notice should also be seen in the context that it cannot have any additional negative implications for Pakistan- there aren't many left. PCB should continue to push for a compromise- neutral venues and may be even Karachi which has recently successfuly hosted Srilanka and Asis Cup.
Posted by: ram at May 15, 2009 9:37 AM
What difference does it make if Pak games are hosted in Abu Dhabi or India/Sl? Your argument that AbuDhabhi or Dubai is equivalent to hosting the games in Pak is extremly flawed.
Posted by: Amit at May 15, 2009 10:10 AM
Why do PCB deserve Empathy when they cant even provide foolproof security to visiting team? What a deluded piece of blog !
Posted by: avis at May 15, 2009 10:23 AM
I am so surprised & shocked to see so many irresponsible and shameless comments here. Such a big tragedy just happened where so many policemen were killed and an international team suffered (who supported Pakistan when nobody wanted to play there) and still they are more bothered about hosting the WC rather than taking care of the situation in the country and the mess that PCB has gone into. If BCCI is not supporting PCB then even no other country is supporting them including Bangladesh & SriLanka. It seems all the misguided information, hatred, irrational thinking has crept in where people are more bothered about WC rights than nabbing the terrorists who killed innocent people, policmen, attached friendly international team etc
Oh God ! There is no value of life anymore and PCB instead of guaranteeing security, ensuring safety and creating a peaceful atmosphere. In 2 months only! everybody has forgotten what happened & this is more scary bcos it shows how less value life has in region
Posted by: alex at May 15, 2009 10:40 AM
The article is very interesting and raises some very good points without favouring anyone. I am not from any of the south-east Asian countries in the saga but a fan of south east Asian cricket. It is depressing to see people quarrelling over there respective countries rather than addressing cricket and what the article depicts. It seems like a war between Muslims and Hindus. Lets put a scenario- imagine (God forbid) if India comes under a barrage of bomb attacks somewhere between now and the world cup. What will happen next? No place is safe from these terrorists.
The ICC definitely made a hasty decision. Decisions made on the spur of the moment is lame. As a neutral person I think Pakistan has the right to express their legal right even if they lose. I don't quite agree with proposing another venue such as Dubai. It should be in South East Asia. The concerned countries should work out some arrangement so everyone's happy. Let cricket be the winner. cheers
Posted by: Kunwar at May 15, 2009 10:50 AM
Security and not playing in Pak is no longer an issue now.
The manner, the rights, the move of Secretariat, pure derogatory manner, the Indian Cricket Council aka ICC dealt with a matter is farce.
Take the Indian Cricket Council to task, even if you lose at least they will know that economic dominance in global cricketing matters does not mean that they can walk over any one without following proper process.
Well done Ehsaan Mani!
Posted by: shabut at May 16, 2009 2:09 AM
Good article to show the other side of the coin. Go PCB!
Posted by: angs at May 16, 2009 7:53 AM
Very good point. PCB is trying to get whatever it can, and there is nothing wrong in that. At this point, they have nothing to lose.
Anyways, as an Indian I don't care if we get to host some boring 50 overs match between england and new zealand or not. Let them play in abu dhabi or honolulu or even Swat valley for that matter. who cares... 20-20 matches and test cricket are the real thing!!
Posted by: Rajput at May 16, 2009 9:43 AM
Why any player would like to play in Pakistan
after what happened in Lahore.
Friends first set your home right and then talk about other nation attitude.
Posted by: Mehwish at May 16, 2009 10:32 AM
Brilliant article, well written Saad! So, Osman Samiuddin why being an informed journalist you joined the herd(plethora of Indians here, who've been thinking from the heart rather than the mind) and ignored the bigger picture?
Posted by: Tariq Rahman at May 16, 2009 11:05 AM
Colombo/Dubai 10 hrs flight time? Enigma, if you are ignorant, than don't speculate! Would you be flying in a second world war piper with 10 different stops via India?
Flying time Colombo/Dubai is max. 3-3.5 hrs. Flying time Dhaka/Delhi or Chennai/Delhi is almost 3.5 hrs. Karachi/Dhaka is 3.5 hrs. So what's the big deal if the teams have to fly to Dubai/Abu Dhabi? They are only an hour and twenty minute from Karachi and maybe 3 hrs from Chennai or Delhi. Anyway, that should be the least of a problem. Logic should prevail and BCCI should stop meddling as always everywhere. ICC should try for once to stand up on its own and not cow down to BCCI's pressure.
Posted by: A_Cricket_Fan at May 16, 2009 8:05 PM
Alex "I don't quite agree with proposing another venue such as Dubai. It should be in South East Asia." , would you prefer Vietnam or Cambodia or Laos?
Posted by: RT at May 17, 2009 6:06 AM
Mr Shafqat's views appear to be founded more on his patriotic feelings than any reasonable analysis of the situation.
It is difficult to conceive any benefits to cricket or the world cup from PCBs lawsuit. There is no way the matches are going to be played in Pak, and the idea of world cup matches in UAE is ridiculous. Why move cricket's biggest tournament to a place where matches and atmospheres will be lifeless and soulless compared to the genuinely cricket-loving audiences of India, SL, and Bangladesh.
And to those commentors who continue to insist that India is as dangerous as Pak, consider the fact that the Ind board and govt, despite their faults, have shown plenty of evidence that they have the ability to provide top-level secutiy to teams (witness the English test tour of india) in contrast to the farcical "presidential-level" security pakistan provided to the SL team. the PCB simply does not seem to have the maturity to realize that they are to blame not the ICC or BCCI
Posted by: Asif Ahmed at May 18, 2009 10:37 AM
Fact describing article I would say! Today's cricket has become a money making business rather than a sport. The support to IPL and puting restrictin to ICL are the best examples of this. BCCI is only concerned about money and not cricket.
It was a stupid move of PCB to support BCCI on ICL issue. Pakistan is the only country who has suffered the most from ICL.
What is meant by only matches are removed but Pakistan is still the co host for 2011 WC? Is this some kind of joke? If Pakistan has still the rights as co host, they should had been consulted before taking this decision by Indian controlled ICC. As a cricket lover I fully support PCB move to take ICC to the court.
And Pakistan's matches should be moved to UAE. We all have witnessed the facilities in UAE are as good as Australia or NZ during the Pak/Aus series. C'mon BCCI show some sportsman spirit. You are the one who tried to purchase the SL board by offering them money. Arjuna removed coz of u as he opposed ur idea.
Posted by: Rauf at May 18, 2009 12:12 PM
Posted by: RT at May 17, 2009 6:06 AM
"Mr Shafqat's views appear to be founded more on his patriotic feelings than any reasonable analysis of the situation."
First of all, what's wrong with being patriotic? We are not talking about IPL but CWC which is still played between countries (thank God) so patriotism is a natural ingredient. Furthermore; the manner in which this decision was taken specially under pressure from BCCI, even an average non-patriotic Pak fan is livid. Saad has provided the best well balanced analysis of all. Don't blame the messenger if you don't agree with the message.
Lifeless cricket atmosphere in UAE? I guess you did not witness the recent Pak/Aus series. Stadiums were not sold out but they were far from being soulless... even Indian fans were present cheering Aus ofcourse.
Why is it that more Indian fans are shouting the loudest against PCB's legal case in every blog on cricinfo. Time to check your own patriotism before accusing others.
Posted by: HBK at June 7, 2009 1:23 AM
Great Post. Wonderful to see such clear thinking. Yes I am an Indian but not such a big fan of the BCCI, the new bully of world cricket.
Samir Chopra lives in Brooklyn and teaches Computer Science and Philosophy at the City University of New York; his academic interests include the philosophical foundations of artificial intelligence and the politics of technology. In his third undergraduate year, he captained Mathematics in the departmental cricket competition (and lost to Chemistry in the first round). Samir played C-grade cricket in Sydney and makes guest appearances for his old club when possible (and desirable). Samir runs the blog Eye on Cricket and the cricket page at The Faster Times.
Paul Ford is a co-founder of the New Zealand cricket supporters' cult, the Beige Brigade. He was once described by a current New Zealand cricketer as "looking spastic" even mucking about with an Excalibur and a tennis ball in the backyard. Paul bowls right-armed Nathan Astlesque "nudes", his batting would make Ewen Chatfield look elegant, and he is a committed fielder. He sometimes grows a beard to hide his double chin and inhabits a periphery of cricket that Cricinfo is proud to be glimpsing through this blog.
Stephen Gelb grew up in Cape Town, a short walk from the beautiful Newlands ground. Always a better student of the game than player, his passion for cricket survived eight years as a student in Canada, where he learned to love baseball too. He lives in Johannesburg doing economic research at The EDGE Institute and teaching at Wits University.
Mike Holmans, a database consultant by profession, has spent thirty summers (and a few winters) going to the cricket. Brought up in one and working in the other, his dearest wish is for a season to end with Yorkshire winning the county championship by beating runners-up Middlesex by one wicket with five minutes to go. If it’s also a summer when England win the Ashes, so much the better.
Born in Colombo, educated at Oxford and now living in Brisbane - Michael Jeh (Fox) is a cricket lover with a global perspective on the game. An Oxford Blue who played first-class cricket, he is a Playing Member of the MCC and still plays grade cricket. His views on cricket might best be described as those of a "modern traditionalist". Michael now works closely with elite athletes in his job as a manager at Griffith University in Queensland.
Saad Shafqat takes special pride that his cricket-watching life began during the three-month interval between Javed Miandad's debut Test in Lahore and Imran Khan's 12-wicket haul at Sydney. Although a practicing neurologist based in Karachi, cricket has never been far from his activities. He has co-authored Javed Miandad’s autobiography Cutting Edge and has been a contributor to Cricinfo since 2005. His regular column Reverse Swing appears fortnightly in Dawn, Pakistan’s leading English daily.