Different Strokes
 
 

| Check up on that notion with stats »

« Some thoughts on playing cricket at the Oval

Posted by Chandrahas Choudhury on 04/29/2006 in India

Some thoughts on playing cricket at the Oval

A few days ago I was at morning cricket nets at the Oval Maidan in Bombay, a weekly affair where we exercise our two-bit skills with high seriousness and fidelity to ritual. Not far from where we were playing a bespectacled young man, clad in a tracksuit and a cap, was conducting some summer cricket coaching with a dozen boys in whites.

Caught up in the mechanics of bowling that outswinger that looks so simple but proves so vexing, I soon became oblivious to them. But a little later, while chasing down a hit, I happened to witness a little scene - a standard fielding drill. The man had lined all his wards up, and was hitting balls towards them; they were supposed to run up one by one, field the ball and throw it back, and return to the back of the line.

Unsurprisingly it was the coach himself who seemed most enthusiastic. He hit the ball and shouted, in a tone meant to gee up the kid, "Come on, get it, it's yours!" But the boy running towards it seemed unable to turn his speed up a notch; in fact he had a struggling, striving air, like a butterfly fighting against a breeze.

And the things that was slowing him down were his shoes, which were clearly two or three sizes too big for him - perhaps hand-me-downs from an older brother or cousin. As he ran in they seemed somehow to have a life of their own, independent of the feet inside them. He stopped the ball, returned it, and ran back, a little sheepish. But no great tragedy need be read into all this. If he was slightly embarrassed, he was still enthusiastic and "switched-on", pursuing his dream, even if in shoes two sizes too big.

In about three years of going to nets now, mostly at the Oval and the more crowded Cross Maidan (where a small rectangular patch of land has a dozen pitches), I feel I've seen enough young cricketers, mostly teenagers from middle- or lower middle-class backgrounds, to grasp what cricket means to them. In fact one needs to say no more than just this: cricket means something to them.

It means something when very little else in their lives means anything, and this overpowering preeminence of cricket in their lives is not merely because of the magic of the game and the impassioned blinkers of youth (think of the boy Sachin Tendulkar, going from match to match on his coach's scooter, and of all the other boys who must have done similar things, if not to the same end) but because everything else in life is so profoundly dull and uninspiring.

Education, for instance, which serves in theory to free us, to make us more aware of ourselves and what we want to pursue, is almost everywhere in our country a bad joke, a set of dud formulae to be remembered and meaninglessly regurgitated. Where it should teach us to take an interest in the world, it renders the world opaque. Who can take any pleasure in school other than that of japes and camaraderie with friends? There is very little about school or college that allows us to dream, glimpse a way forward for our lives.

But cricket - there is a spark in it that rouses ambition and competitive spirits, that gives meaning and purpose to constrained lives. The maidan is a site of dreams. On the field one lives fully, intensely, relying on one's wits from moment to moment. In the angle of one's bowling arm, or the calculation of which ball to play and which one to leave, lies the very same maths problem that induces such sleep in school.

For this reason, even if few of these kids go on to become cricketers of any standing, cricket is good for them because it acts as a beacon in their lives. While most other fields in life lie fallow, the maidans, at least in the imagination, are always green. It seems to me that kids who play cricket seriously - it is almost immaterial whether they play badly or well - learn something about themselves and about life that many others don't.

And yet of course, as one grows older, reality checks in, and other problems and issues present themselves, cricket is usually left behind. Just as on the Oval maidan the heat is fierce and the dust flies thickly, and even shiny new balls become cracked and chapped in a few minutes of use, so the air of the city, too, overpowers people over time.

And sometimes on the train or bus one sees people who one feels must have once been those very same boys playing at Shivaji Park or the Oval, only ten years older now and disabused of the lifegiving illusions of adolescence - still with a bit of fire in the eyes, but undeniably wearied, haggard and disenchanted. Cricket is over; many other things have taken its place.

Comments

I did those same drills when I was 15; if you dropped a catch or missed a catch by 10 yards you did ten Push-ups, also, because you dropped a catch you would have more chances to make a fool of yourself, while your friends laughed and grinned at you. If the Senior player or Teacher got fed up at your incompetence he would make you run 400 Metres(if you were lucky). 2 Laps were not uncommon; surprisingly, these punitive measures had their desired effect, pretty soon you would not be dropping too many, and the jokes would stop and the grinning would cease. It only one catch at the wrong time or off the wrong player was dropped to lose a match, that was too much for my school to bear. Oh by the way the most common punishment was 20 pushups, and we rolled the pitch ourselves, there were no servants to call upon for that favour. This post is humbly dedicated to Zainub.

Posted by: Feroz Faisal Dawson at April 29, 2006 8:53 AM

beautiful post, chandrahas.
'renders the world opaque'- how well put, and how sad is that...

Posted by: shakester at May 4, 2006 8:20 AM

Post your comment:




   
Cricinfo.com
  Live Coverage
Fixtures and results
Match/series Archive
News Index
Photo Index
Stats Guru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Records
About Us
Web Feeds
   
Blogs Home
   
  Different Strokes is a group blog written by selected Cricinfo readers. None of the content here represents the views of Cricinfo. Click here for more.
  Anantha
Angshuman Hazra
Arun Kumar
Chandrahas Choudhury
Chris Fogarty
Gaurav Sabnis
Jai Arjun Singh
Ken Tinker
Krishna Kumar
Lahar Appaiah
Scott Wickstein
Zainub Razvi
  2007 World Cup
About Different Strokes
Ashes Series 2006/07
Australia
Bangladesh
Bowling
Commentary
England
ICC
India
India-Pakistan
International Cricket Council
Live commentary
Miscellaneous
New Zealand
Pakistan
Players' Hairstyles
Socio-Cricket Issues
Sri Lanka
The Players
Mavericks
Umpires
West Indies
  I broke Marcus Trescothick
Wanted: batting strike rates on players' stats
It's not what you say...
Swinging in confusion
A nice celebration for a 1st anniversary
Nehra and Mongia - A case of incongruous pragmatism?
As the Crowe flies in the wrong direction...
Cricket World Cup ‘07: An early set of predictions
The Lankan Leap
The 6-6-6 men for Australian batsmen
  Beyond the Test world
The Surfer
Wicket to Wicket
  November 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
December 2008

Sun

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
   
 
 

'Cricket should talk'

Anil Kumble on what it's like to be India's Test captain


'I didn't go out and bat as captain'

Talking Cricket - 2: Mark Taylor on Allan Border's legacy


Beware the football threat

Jayaditya Gupta on the IPL v EPL battle


'Why would you want to play five days for a draw?'

Talking Cricket: Mark Taylor on the art of captaincy


Rearguard to the rescue

The Numbers Game looks at the best lower-order pairs



 
  The Guardian
The Daily Telegraph
The Times
The Independent
The Age
Sydney Morning Herald
cricket20
The Australian
NZ Herald
SuperSport
BBC
Rediff