Different Strokes
 
 

| A googly for Murali »

« Twinge For Alien Game (7)

Posted by Lahar Appaiah on 12/23/2005 in Miscellaneous

Twinge For Alien Game (7)

There was an interesting article in The Guardian, by their crossword editor, Hugh Stephenson, on cryptic crosswords. The full article is here, but what set me thinking was this quote:-

"cryptic crosswords are like cricket. Playing the game is more important than the result. Hours, days even, can end in a draw, with everyone still happy. Perhaps it is no accident that the flowering of the cryptic crossword in the past 50 years has been in the English-speaking, cricket-playing world. It has never taken hold in the US..."

Interesting, most interesting. I love cricket, I love cryptic crosswords, and I do know enough people who share the same noble interests. And yes, we all know that those Americans think cricket is a character in a Disney movie. As for their crosswords, anyone who has been brought up on stuff like The Hindu or the Guardian crosswords would recoil with horror on seeing the New York Times Crossword. Think about it- Dog (4) is ASTA, and Medieval Slave (4) is ESNE. Straightforward, direct, and soulless.

I ran a quick Google search for cryptic crosswords, which turned up some rather interesting results- most of the first few entries were British or Australian websites. India starts to come in around Page 2 or 3... and what sport do England, Australia and India all play?

Of course, there isn't enough hard evidence (which, in this case, would mean Google) to show a direct link between cryptic crosswords and cricket, but a minute of intellectual circumambulation and you can come up with enough reasons to link the two. Of course, most would be contrived, but does that really matter? One of my favorite academic theses of all time is this masterpiece which links that Bruce Willis classic, Die Hard, with classical music. It's even called, rather grandiloquently, "Collage and Subversion in the Score of Die Hard". And it's a lovely read.

Back, however, to the job at hand. Take Mr. Stephenson's premise, i.e. "playing the game is more important than the result". Half the fun in cryptic crosswords DOES lie in participation, not in finally completing it. Yes, the satisfaction of seeing a fully completed crossword is something else again. But, so is victory in a cricket match, isn't it? The fun here doesn't come from knowing that the match has been won- it comes from watching the match, from the emotional involvement that comes from seeing the ups and downs, the insurmountable obstacles, the sudden flash of inspiration, the brilliant breakthrough, that old cliche about the journey being more important than the destination- extrapolate all this to crosswords, and you would start to understand what I mean.

Of course, you can argue that this is airy fluff, and you would have a point. So, lets get our hands dirty.

It's, for one, about the layers. Cricket as a game is infinitely multi-layered, and understanding and appreciating it would mean delving into each layer, getting to know it intimately, and then moving on to the next. Which is just what we do with crosswords, isnt it? Understanding the nuances, the complexities, the layers, and mastering them...

And it's all about working, working, working on cracking that next one. Getting closer and closer, each time, getting that little bit nearer the target. Just like cricket- watch Kumble, for example. Watch him working on the batsman, one lazily floating through the air, another hacking through it, a third skidding uncomfortably. Watch him push fielders around, push them around like so many letters as you struggle on that anagram, watch him experiment, try new things, try old things, hoping they will work. Watch the anticipation, the sense of everything being almost-there-but-not-quite. Then, watch as one suddenly hurries through, as the batsman thrusts his bat forward, ball thuds into pad, jumps, brushes past bat on the way out, and drops into the waiting hands of silly point. All the waiting, all the thinking, all the myriad combinations that have been tried in that quest for the solution, above all, the immense SATISFACTION that comes from cracking it- the similarities are uncanny.

Neither cricket nor cryptic crosswords are fast-food pastimes. Both require long hours (preferably with favorite beverage), lots of leisure time to languidly savour it all, and lots and lots of mental gymnastics as permutations, combinations and results fly thick and fast inside your head. Both, above all, are filled with " What-Might-Be's", as you try and play Soothsayer and participant at the same time. Should Australia have accepted the light that early in the final Ashes Test, or just have played on, desperate for that win? Does that word end with " ING" or " ION" ? If it ends with ION, then the last unsolved clue has "N" as the fifth letter; if not, the fifth letter is " G". Delicious Agony, never finally resolved until the end. No McCrosswords for me, thank you very much.

Both also require more than just a functional knowledge of the game. I might sound like a pompous ass or even an elitist snob, but the intellectual stimulation that solving a good crossword or watching an enthralling game of cricket gives you is, as mentioned elsewhere, unsurpassed. Chances are, if you like cryptic crosswords, you should love cricket. In fact, think of it- keep a good newspaper ready before the next match, and work on the crossword between overs, or even when the game starts to slow down a bit!

One last point- most people would agree that Chennai has some of the most erudite and knowledgeable fans of cricket in India, people who still talk about Vishwanath's famous 97 against West Indies 30 years back, people who stood up to applaud the Pakistan team after they defeated India in a Test match. Is it a coincidence that Chennai is also home to India's most popular cryptic crossword, from The Hindu?

Lahar

PS- For those baffled by the heading, 'twinge' is 'crick'; 'alien' is 'ET', from extra-terrestrial. crick + ET gives you the Game..

Comments

what's indian team?

Posted by: dvijandarp at December 23, 2005 10:03 AM

Wow that Die hard link was something - almost as good as Lahar's post! I never realised so many things when I allowed the movie to be the only one ever that I saw on consecutive days at the theatres; this may force me to watch the movie with more reverence in the future. [Hope it does not make me miss the non-negotiable one-liners.]

Meanwhile Lahar, your description of Kumble's craft reminded me of cricinfo's description of Navjot Sidhu. He blocked, blocked, blocked and then - http://content-ind.cricinfo.com/ci/content/story/149688.html

Posted by: Angshuman Hazra at December 23, 2005 11:46 AM

If there is ever a doubt that test cricket and cricket is on the decline in india as outlined in blogs in this site - the persistence of The Hindu publishing cryptic crosswords would counterthrust all the other arguments that have been proposed in this site to the cutting of the 5day game for the ODI. This post is the exact reason why the game will stay, must stay firmly rooted in it's adopted home of India.

Posted by: sean at December 28, 2005 11:52 AM

Lahar, I think you write brilliantly! While your premise is very interesting (even to impatient twats like me who hate cryptic crosswords), I really loved your use of the language.
Maybe you should go through that inspired paragraph on Kumble again and realize why any cricket lover would just fall in love with the game all over again.
Wonderful stuff.

Posted by: recluse at January 10, 2006 4:33 PM

Drawing parallels between cricket and cryptic crosswrds is indeed a novelty. Above all, your language was exceptionally good. That example describing kumble's assiduous efforts was exciting and vicarious to boot. Not to forget is the heading, i didnt see that coming :)

Posted by: Pradeep at March 8, 2006 7:49 AM

Post your comment:




   
Cricinfo.com
  Live Coverage
Fixtures and results
Match/series Archive
News Index
Photo Index
Stats Guru
Players/Officials
Grounds
Records
About Us
Web Feeds
   
Blogs Home
   
  Different Strokes is a group blog written by selected Cricinfo readers. None of the content here represents the views of Cricinfo. Click here for more.
  Anantha
Angshuman Hazra
Arun Kumar
Chandrahas Choudhury
Chris Fogarty
Gaurav Sabnis
Jai Arjun Singh
Ken Tinker
Krishna Kumar
Lahar Appaiah
Scott Wickstein
Zainub Razvi
  2007 World Cup
About Different Strokes
Ashes Series 2006/07
Australia
Bangladesh
Bowling
Commentary
England
ICC
India
India-Pakistan
International Cricket Council
Live commentary
Miscellaneous
New Zealand
Pakistan
Players' Hairstyles
Socio-Cricket Issues
Sri Lanka
The Players
Mavericks
Umpires
West Indies
  I broke Marcus Trescothick
Wanted: batting strike rates on players' stats
It's not what you say...
Swinging in confusion
A nice celebration for a 1st anniversary
Nehra and Mongia - A case of incongruous pragmatism?
As the Crowe flies in the wrong direction...
Cricket World Cup ‘07: An early set of predictions
The Lankan Leap
The 6-6-6 men for Australian batsmen
  Beyond the Test world
The Surfer
Wicket to Wicket
  November 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
December 2008

Sun

Mon

Tue

Wed

Thu

Fri

Sat

  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
   
 
 

'Cricket should talk'

Anil Kumble on what it's like to be India's Test captain


'I didn't go out and bat as captain'

Talking Cricket - 2: Mark Taylor on Allan Border's legacy


Beware the football threat

Jayaditya Gupta on the IPL v EPL battle


'Why would you want to play five days for a draw?'

Talking Cricket: Mark Taylor on the art of captaincy


Rearguard to the rescue

The Numbers Game looks at the best lower-order pairs



 
  The Guardian
The Daily Telegraph
The Times
The Independent
The Age
Sydney Morning Herald
cricket20
The Australian
NZ Herald
SuperSport
BBC
Rediff