This series, though, hasn't been similar. Although the pitches for the Test series, which West Indies lost, had little in them for the bowlers, the surfaces for the one-dayers have been uncharacteristically spirited. There has been occasional kicking bounce, there has been turn, there's been a fair share of seam and swing. Inevitably, wickets have fallen early. And the challenge for batsmen has been to primarily to see off the new ball, and then consolidate and counterattack.

Samuels did that brilliantly today. For sure the ball was moving a bit early on, and Rana Naved-ul-Hasan was putting a shape on it that would have tested any right-handed batsman, with the ball moving away late. Samuels played and missed a lot early on, often being squared-up and being made to look a bit foolish. Importantly, though, the ball merely beat the bat, it never took the edge.

Once Naved-ul-Hasan was out of the attack, Samuels knew that the toughest bit was behind him. With the pitch easing out - the ball did not move enough but still had decent carry - the ball came nicely on to the bat and Samuels could trust himself more, hitting through the line and over the top. The early signs of this expressiveness came when Rao Iftikhar Anjum was first chopped past gully and then blitzed through cover for consecutive boundaries; the confirmation was a pulled six off the same bowler that was pelted with so much power and timing that it sailed over midwicket.

If there was one batsman in world cricket who needed a big one, it was Samuels. Perhaps not so much to reconfirm his own belief in his ability but to remind the world what he is capable of

He brought up his half-century off only 61 balls and, with the team only needing to score at a little more than four runs an over, Samuels, batting up the order, was well in line to make a big one. But for three-and-a-half years - since June 8, 2003 against Sri Lanka at Barbados , Samuels has never taken the chance. That was the last time he made it to 50. In the interim period, he was fast becoming a Mohammad Hafeez in reverse - going from a batsman who bowled a bit to a useful bowler who could contribute with the bat. When he batted low down the order you sometimes felt relieved, for a spot in the top four might have just exposed Samuels.

There was only so long that Samuels could ride on the back of that brilliant hundred against India. One international century does not make you a batsman - ask Ajit Agarkar, who has a Test hundred at Lord's. There was going to be a time when someone younger - like Lendl Simmons perhaps - came through the ranks, and the West Indies simply could not afford to carry Samuels any longer. Before this series began, Samuels had gone 22 matches without reaching 20 - to be fair to him he did bat low down the order in many of them - and in 13 of them he didn't even get to double figures.

If there was one batsman in world cricket who needed a big one, it was Samuels. Perhaps not so much to reconfirm his own belief in his ability - he said at the post-match presentation that he always knew he had it in him - but to remind the world what he is capable of. From writing off Samuels as someone who could have done so much, the conversation will now shift to just how much joy he brings with his unbelievable strokeplay - on his day.

Yup thats right, semuels would have believed it or not but I always had faith in his talent, after having the privilege to watch him bat against the mighty Australians in a series I think westindies were beaten comprihensively. But the way he batted against shane warne and having been a very young player at that time was impressive.Even inzimam struggles against the leg spinner. That was a very big proof of the talent he possesses. But By the time I think his team lost the confidence in him and more importantly he him self seemed to have lost the confidence in his abilities. Even though pakistan lost the match because of his innings but its very good to see a young gun blazzing.