The latest conflict stemmed from suggestions that a CEO would be brought in from abroad, possibly England, with Zwart implying that was as a result of pressure being put on the KNBC by the ICC.

Those suggestions brought an immediate denial from board chairman Marc Asselbergs. He insisted that the selection process had been fair, while pointing out that as the ICC provides about 80% of the KNBC’s income, it had a right to have its views taken seriously. There are existing ICC regulations on appointments which apply to all Associates.

But the KNBC has hardly helped its own cause in this whole affair, with few media releases and an advertisement in July which was so absurd it was forced to withdraw it. It opened with the line that it was “required by ICC regulations to advertise this position once again. Hence the following advertisement” and went downhill from there, but in case anyone was still interested, the description concluded: “Attention is drawn to the fact that there is already an established candidate.”

An appointment is expected within the next week, hence the decision not to extend Zwart’s tenure. Cricket Europe reported that Zwart had expected to be made permanent, hence his unfortunate remarks when he found out he was not.

What is needed now is for a strong and credible appointment to be made. Whoever it is needs to be able and willing to work outside the boundaries of the country. The higher profiles of Warren Deutrom (Ireland), Samir Inamdar (Kenya) and Roddy Smith (Scotland) have helped boost the profiles of their countries within the ICC and among the cricket world in general.

For too long the Netherlands have been an almost anonymous Associate as far as the rest of the world is concerned, surfacing for the occasional foray at global events. The new CEO needs to embrace the ICC and the media as much as he addresses the problems facing cricket in the country.