cricinfo.com About cricinfoblogs
Blogs home
Beyond The Test World Blues Brothers Different Strokes Fantasy Post First Class, First Person Gary's Diary Girls Aloud
It Figures On The Circuit Pak Spin Rob's Lobs The Surfer Tour Diaries What's New

Cricinfo Blogs Home

Beyond the Test world

« Cricket in Falklands schools | | South Atlantic Ashes set to start »

US clubs approve new constitution

Posted on 01/11/2008 in USA

Cricinfo has learned that the new USA Cricket Association constitution has been approved by 74% of clubs which voted, although the turnout was disappointingly small.

Only 180 of the 677 clubs who could have voted did so, despite the deadline being extended. Of the votes received, more than a quarter, surprisingly high number, were rejected for a variety of technicalities. Of the ballots accepted, 97 voted yes and 34 no.


This now means that fresh elections have to be held within 30 days, although critics of the board are certain to be unhappy with way that the USACA has handled the process, especially the inordinate delay in announcing the results of a poll of less than 200 votes. Oddly, although Dehring released the results to the USACA, they were not immediately announced, as he requested, because Paul DaSilva, the secretary, wanted approval from his executive before he released them.

The news means that Chris Dehring, appointed by the ICC as an independent third party, has been able to hand over a democratically-approved constitution which will provide the basis of a new platform for the USACA to operate under. No more could have been asked of him.

It is, however, unlikely to be the end of the bitter rows which have blighted US cricket for several years. The low turnout will be used by critics of the current board to show the level of apathy among stakeholders and that, in effect, the approval came from less than 14% of the total clubs.

Comments

Posted by: John Gowan at January 11, 2008 11:27 PM

I would like USACA to release the following items: List of All Clubs who could have voted, List of Clubs that did Vote, List of Clubs whose vote was rejected, List of Clubs that voted for the "New" Constitution, and List of Clubs that voted against the "New" Constitution. Of course I do not believe USACA, Dainty, DaSilva or Dehring to do so. It would be out of character if they did.

Posted by: Some Old at January 12, 2008 7:14 PM

It takes 12 days to count 180 votes? I guess the USACA had to call round to get their mates to send in ballots to try and make the numbers look better. This is a joke and the elections that will follow are sure to be even more absurd and undemocratic.

Posted by: Chris S at January 12, 2008 7:20 PM

That's asking for a bit much. What is the point of secret ballot in a supposedly democratic system if the results are laid out in detail afterward? May as well have open voting. A list of all clubs which could have voted and possibly a list of clubs that did actually vote and whose vote was rejected seems fair enough though. These results do show however that the clubs (and the club members) throughout America have nobody to really blame but themselves. If they really did want change and didn't like the new constitution then should have voted and voted "no". By doing nothing they have assented to whatever follows.

  Post your comment
Posting Guidelines
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left

By Martin Williamson and Will Luke
Email us with news and photos

Categories
ACC Trophy 2006 (6) ACC news (8) Afghanistan (30) Africa (3) Argentina (29) Associates (25) Australia (3) Bahamas (9) Bahrain (6) Belgium (5) Belize (5) Bermuda (109) Botswana (12) Brazil (10) Brunei (5) Bulgaria (6) Cameroon (4) Canada (71) Cayman Islands (17) Chile (12) China (29) Costa Rica (5) Cricket Sixes (4) Croatia (5) Cuba (8) Cyprus (6) Denmark (20) Dubai (9) El Salvador (3) England (2) Estonia (3) Europe (9) European Championships (5) European Indoor Championship (2) Falkland Islands (6) Fiji (18) Finland (7) France (11) General (6) Germany (14) Ghana (6) Gibraltar (6) Greece (9) Guernsey (14) Hong Kong (29) Hungary (3) ICC (4) ICC Americas (12) ICC Intercontinental Cup (15) Indonesia (5) Iran (5) Ireland (54) Israel (14) Italy (13) Japan (15) Jersey (21) Kenya (101) Kuwait (6) Latvia (3) Malaysia (17) Maldives (7) Mali (4) Malta (7) Mexico (7) Misc (3) Morocco (4) Namibia (15) Nepal (39) Netherlands (42) New Caledonia (4) Nigeria (15) Norway (12) Oman (11) Pakistan (1) Panama (2) Papua New Guinea (13) Peru (6) Philippines (2) Phuket (4) Qatar (7) Russia (4) Rwanda (11) Samoa (7) Saudi Arabia (6) Scotland (53) Sierra Leone (3) Singapore (9) Spain (5) Swaziland (10) Sweden (4) Switzerland (3) Tanzania (15) Thailand (18) Turkey (2) Turks and Caicos Islands (5) UAE (30) USA (120) Uganda (64) Under-19s (10) Vanuatu (16) Vietnam (3) West Indies (3) Women's cricket (7) World Cricket League (38) World Cricket League Americas Division (8) World Cup (17) Zambia (1)
Recent Posts
Third Associate to replace Zimbabwe in Twenty20 Guernsey granted Associate status Inamdar wins election to head Affiliates/Associates Thailand season draws to a close Uganda off to a flying start Vora appointed NPCA chairman Future bright beyond the Test world Kenya's elite fail to inspire Rwanda frustrated by exams Morgan pulls out of tri-series
Archives
July 2008 (6)June 2008 (30)May 2008 (44)April 2008 (60)March 2008 (58)February 2008 (50)January 2008 (28)December 2007 (30)November 2007 (47)October 2007 (30)September 2007 (36)August 2007 (30)July 2007 (20)June 2007 (30)May 2007 (40)April 2007 (25)March 2007 (19)February 2007 (16)January 2007 (29)December 2006 (24)November 2006 (18)October 2006 (19)September 2006 (15)August 2006 (24)July 2006 (12)June 2006 (14)May 2006 (15)April 2006 (16)March 2006 (17)February 2006 (13)January 2006 (22)December 2005 (26)November 2005 (5)
Web Feeds
© Cricinfo 2008
hit counter