Infuriating at the best of times, the cricket media has gone completely bananas in recent days with a series of non-stories. First, there was this controversy over whether the BCCI had broken its rules in making Narendra Hirwani a selector. Apparently, the rulebook said the selector should be a former player, retired 10 years. It seems Hirwani was playing cricket after that date. It’s a stupid rule and its breach shouldn’t really bother anyone. Yet, the cricket press went on and on as if it were the biggest infraction since Bodyline.
Second, the “betrayal” of and “secrets” being carried by Greg Chappell became news. The former Indian coach was now adviser to the Australian team and would allegedly “reveal weaknesses”. I’m no Chappell fan but to suggest he is guilty of some sort of deceit or treachery in this case is baloney.
He's a cricket professional and has a right to offer his services where he wants. If his contract with the BCCI didn't stop him from being employed elsewhere and didn't compensate him for a cooling off period, why should we blame him? In any case, what secrets could he be carrying?
Bowlers like Zaheer Khan and Anil Kumble and batsmen like Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid have been playing cricket for aeons. Footage and computer analyses of their game, their strengths and weaknesses, is easily available. True, Chappell can offer some advice – but we should stop behaving like he's got the Watergate tapes in his briefcase.
With the quantum of information, data and visual evidence now available, each cricketer's game is well known to rival teams. Even while selecting the IPL squads, the franchises took recourse to mathematical modelling (on the basis of player data) and television footage. All of it was available in the public domain or could be got from sportscasters for a price. International teams must be working even harder at such background stuff.
It's a far cry from the past and reminds me of an old story from the winter (summer in Australia) of 1980. The Indian cricket team was set to visit Australia and Dennis Lillee and Len Pascoe were confused about what to expect. They had never played a match against India, and Lillee had only bowled to one of the Indians, Sunil Gavaskar, in an Australia versus Rest of the World series in the early 1970s.
The Australian fast bowlers – captained at the time by, as it happens, Greg Chappell – sought out Ray Lindwall, who had bowled to the Indians in the 1947-48 series down under and toured the subcontinent in the 1950s. Lindwall, by then a comfortably retired florist and far from the fearsome bowler he once was, scratched his head and said all he remembered was the Indians in 1948 were a little weak against the ball moving away, outside the off-stump. He apologised that he could be of no further help.
Lillee and Pascoe went home none the wiser. As the Indian innings began on the first morning of the first test match in Sydney, Lillee ran in to bowl and, taking a chance on the basis of Lindwall's fading recollection and throwaway line, tried to get the ball to move away from off. Here's what happened: fifth ball, Gavaskar edges one outside the off stump to Rodney Marsh; India zero for one.
I hope current Australian coach Tim Nielsen's laptop can do half as well as ol' Lindwall's sense of observation!
However, one must credit the Australians for taking this series seriously. With the cancellation of the Champions' Trophy, they had time on their hands and used it well – coming to India early and giving their fairly new team a taste of the conditions here.
This brings us to media goof-up number three. Reporters have detected a conspiracy in Lalit Modi giving the Australians training facilities in Jaipur. Apparently, the rest of the BCCI is angry with him for "allowing" the opposition to prepare better. This is another of those wild theories that floats around when journalists have nothing better to report and need to invent stories.
My sources in the BCCI tell me the anger against and so-called isolation of Modi in the Board is completely exaggerated. That aside, there is something to be learnt from Ricky Ponting and Cricket Australia. When the Indian team toured Australia in 2007, the BCCI drew up an itinerary that gave Kumble's men just one practice game before the first test – this for the toughest tour of them all!
The world's richest Cricket Board was too preoccupied making its team play elsewhere and too busy to send the squad early, perhaps to a sports training facility (and Australia abounds in them). It was not a priority.
I have no idea whether the Rajasthan Cricket Association is charging the Australian team for providing pre-series practice. If they had asked, Cricket Australia would probably have paid. Getting the team ready for a big series would have been seen as more important.
Indian cricket doesn't function like that. That's why we can't understand why the Australians came here so early and why they weren't playing an ODI tournament in Malaysia instead. That's why we're convinced there's some underhand deal between Modi and the Australians, that all is not what it seems.
A cricket culture gets the administrators – and the media – it deserves.
I agree with all but one of your points. The Australians came to India early because they could. They would have had just one practice match had the Champions Trophy not been postponed, just as India had just one game before playing their first test in Melbourne last year.
And India weren't playing just another ODI Series before they left for Australia, they were playing a test series against a bitter rival they hadn't beaten at home since 1979.
Posted by: Mohammad Isam at September 28, 2008 6:34 PM
Mr Malik, this is one of the best I've read in the last one year. It was smart, incisive and very, very accurate.
Posted by: amit at September 28, 2008 7:02 PM
pakistan is not a bitter rival, india plays pakistan every year now. That series was played on flat pitches and overall was quite boring. The BCCI just wanted to fill its pockets.
I agree with the article but not with Mahek
Posted by: Anjo at September 28, 2008 7:29 PM
Well if you're the kind of person who loves tabloid journalism and needs that sensationalism you will actually take those stories seriously.
The trouble with our board is that they believe they are businessmen and not administrators of the game, they can't help bragging about how much money they've raked in. To some degree this is understandable, after all the fact that only a select brand can even contemplate getting on the board shows us where their motives lie.
And why not, this is an unregulated legal body with a vice like grip on an enormous market for the one team sport that the nation can compete in on an acceptable level.
The people who run the show have never really cared about improving the experience for everyone from the cricketers, professionals, umpires to the spectators, but themselves. But they've got better offices now haven't they? Thats what happens when you're accountable to a global organization that you virtually own and when you're satisfied with mediocrity.
Posted by: Rohit Davidson at September 28, 2008 8:49 PM
If Mr Chappell is really having some tips for the new look Australian side, then why not throw some youngsters never seen on the international circuit. I would love to see the likes of Virat Kohli, S Badrinath and Shikhar Dhawan alongside Sachin, Laxman, Sehwag and Dhoni. Lets throw at them some googlies. Who knows we might discover a new test star!!
Posted by: Andymc at September 28, 2008 8:53 PM
Which team AREN'T weak against the ball moving away outside the off stump!?
Posted by: Charu Khopkar at September 28, 2008 11:45 PM
Having followed the so-called "reporting" and noting your comments in the blog - it's absolutely clear that the Indian media (print, radio and television) has no journalistic standards of any kind. In fact to label anything it does as falling within the field of journalism is an insult to the profession. I would venture to say that it is below the level of tabloid journalism - more approaching the fantasy levels of the US National Enquirer.
Posted by: Prashant at September 28, 2008 11:48 PM
Your comments above sound reasonable for a friendly series with a lower placed test team. This is Australia you are playing, and I guess you have no idea about the media hype or administrative indecision CA would have had if the tables had turned and India were asking for the same things in Australia. There is a limit to playing a good host, I'm not saying don't provide them with the facilities, but you don't have to bend over backwards just coz it's the Aussies.
I agree with the Chappell thing, people are just giving him way too much importance; but I also think he is using his influence with RCA to gain access for the Aussie team to use these facilities, which is a wrong way to go about.
Posted by: Nathan at September 29, 2008 1:02 AM
Let's face it, in the entire history of cricket Australia have never, ever beaten India legitimately. There is always some excuse ... err, reason, for why Australia come out on top.
So it's no suprise to see the Indians taking it one step further and preparing the excuses before the series even starts.
Posted by: Paul at September 29, 2008 1:10 AM
Agree completely.
They're hillarious, the accusations of betrayal being levelled at Chappell. Did anyone on the BCCI think they were inciting betrayal when they invited a recent Australian First Class coach to join their ranks in 2005?
Posted by: Mukesh at September 29, 2008 2:16 AM
Ashok Malik article is fantastic and very true. BCCI wants to make only money at the cost of indian cricketers, that is why they have not given indian time enough time in 2007 to get accustomed to Australia. They need to learn from CA how they run the board. BCCI can boast that they are the richest board but they are thorough unprofessional. India played Australi only last year and what will be the interest for public. BCCI wants to make money from tv rights for this series. They need to learn from ECB and CA about professionalisam. It is sad that we have politicians who does not know anything about cricket. Australia is very serious about this tour. BCCI has not even selected the players as yet. It is shameful and everything they take it for granted. As one senior vetran cricketer put it "People like Gavaskar and Kapil Dev have emerged in Indian cricket not because of the system; it is 'inspite' of the system. You can see lots of criticisam about the players if they lose.
Posted by: suvendu at September 29, 2008 2:32 AM
you are spot on Mahek. I do acknowledge that BCCI has a long way to go , but Ashok Mallik is utterly wrong in not mentioning what kind of match India played before the Australian series. It is hard to digest that his article is a criticism for a certain kind of journalism.
Posted by: Tony at September 29, 2008 2:48 AM
But Marek, the Champions trophy was being held in Pakistan, better practise for an Indian pitch than the Indians had for bouncy Australian wickets that challenged the Indian line-up early in the tour.
Posted by: Jiminy at September 29, 2008 5:14 AM
A good article which has been needed in the wake of all this bizarre carry-on about Greg Chappell.
Regarding comments made by Prashant; Australia always provide touring teams with excellent facilities (hard to imagine that there are any bad facilities in Australia!) and also any number of practice matches they want.
Australians do not want to play under-prepared oppositions. We were unhappy when India came here for the previous test series that India did not play more practice matches to prepare themselves better and make for a better competition.
Prashant, I don't understand why you are unhappy that Australians in India have been provided with good facilities. It seems you do not wish this series to be competitive. Why is that?
Posted by: Theena at September 29, 2008 6:09 AM
Somebody needs to email this to the bean counters at the BCCI. Read it and weep.
Good article, Mr Malik.
Posted by: agevilius at September 29, 2008 6:14 AM
Dear Jiminy!, if you would jus pressed ur eyeballs a bit to read Prashant's comment. the picture would have been much clearer to u. wat Prashant says is not about providing poor facilities to Oz. but he says that there should be unreasonable relaxtion being made by the BCCI, for the reason that there are hosting a test match against the Oz.And, ya i totally agree that the Auss do provide excellent match facilities to the visiting teams, but that does not make them the most hospitable country to tour. As i have facts clearly to prove that the lodging facilities for the touring teams there are not as good as providd to them in India, and the luxurious treatment vented to them is not something which their Indian counterparts get while touring Australia! As the CA even charges the teams for the laundary services provided to the team, for their Test whites. So its about providing OZ tit for tat!
Posted by: Capnles at September 29, 2008 7:16 AM
Good article sir;
In response to some of the comments. Agevilius, I don't see how the point you're trying to get at refutes what Jiminy was saying. Have you been to Australia? The comments you make sound largely ill-informed, despite your supposed proof.
Touring teams are accommodated in 5-star facilities while in Australia. What evidence have you to dispute this? Maybe visiting teams get better treatment in India, but you have to realise that cricket is a much more popular sport in India and is, financially, much better able to sponsor the luxury you refer to.
The administrators, players and general public do whatever they can to ensure an enjoyable and competitive encounter when the two nations meet in Australia.
The BCCI may be money hungry, as many suggest, but they haven't always been in a positive of power.... for many years, India was the pauper of international cricket while Australia and England took all the riches. you can hardly blame them for cashing-in during good times
Posted by: Chris at September 29, 2008 7:30 AM
Agevilius, the difference between the hospitality experienced in Australia and India, with India being superior is a difference of cultures. In India, "Athithi Devo Bhavaha" or a guest is God is ingrained unlike in Australia where there is no such notion. And I am sure that the richest board can easily pay for the laundry charges of its players.
Posted by: PHILIP at September 29, 2008 7:41 AM
I think the contents of Malek's write-up has given a chance refresh our mind. Chappel's secret - our team should not give a chance to prove his secret. Allowing them to practise more is not a concerned at all, why we must worry, our team must work hard and try to win. Play a positive and natural game from the word start.
We must not try and wait as what happened with Srilankan new bowler Ajentha Mendis. No one tried play against his spin all them trying and waiting to know what kind of ball he is going to ball. Sewag did not got enough ball orelse he would have given a good piece of mind.
Anyway we want to have good game with lot of pallning and win the test and onedays' too.. Vsh all the best to all the journalists and lets us know the real fact instead....????
Posted by: Watts_his_name at September 29, 2008 8:01 AM
Dear agevilius.
"As i have facts clearly to prove that the lodging facilities for the touring teams there are not as good as providd to them in India"
What seems good to an Indian may be less than ideal to an Australian and vice versa of course. We don't have too many palaces in Australia so I guess touring teams will just have to slum it in international class hotels.
"and the luxurious treatment vented to them is not something which their Indian counterparts get while touring Australia!"
What you do in India is your business, but we don't go completely ga-ga over much at all here in Oz. When Tom Cruise was married to one of our chicks, he could go to a footy match, sit in the stands and stay unmolested by "fans". You shouldn't expect us to act like you because we aren't you.
, As the CA even charges the teams for the laundary services provided to the team, for their Test whites. So its about providing OZ tit for tat!
What can I say, Oz is a user pays kinda place
Posted by: Manoj at October 4, 2008 12:08 AM
C'mon, This (Chappell's appointment as Aussie adviser) might be the best thing to happen to India.
1. It will motivate the big 4 or big 5. No one likes Chappell and victory against him will be doubly sweet.
2. One would hope he tries out all his ultra-analysis on the Aussie players minds.
3. It will get the public fired up, even with the overkill of cricket in current times. Indian cricket loving public has not forgetten Chappell's contribution to India's ODI world cup disaster.
4. It will motivate me to read the news after we fefeat Aussies to see Chappell's reaction!! :)
Manoj
Posted by: Ullas Marar at October 22, 2008 12:22 PM
Greg Chappell spilled all the secrets of the Indian team to the Aussies. And the results are there for all to see :p
Posted by: Aditya Mookerjee at November 9, 2008 12:09 PM
What can Mr Chappell, explain to the Australians about the Indian Team? He is a coach, and is not bound by loyalties, in the sense, that he should help whomsoever he can, to improve their cricket. If, say, Anil Kumble, has a batting technique weakness, is it Mr Chappell's fault? If Mr Chappell can help everyone, it would be very good. Mr Chappell is not considered to be one of the best coaches for no reason.
Post your comment
Ashok Malik has been a journalist since 1991 and is currently senior editor at the Pioneer. His one unfulfilled journalistic ambition is to be a gossip writer in a film magazine. The cricket buff inside him is a split personality. The newsperson is convinced of IPL's potential and that, inevitably, it will gobble up the rest of cricket; the romantic dreams of a glorious day at the Elysian Oval, with Trumper scoring a century before lunch – and batting on forever.