For an Indian cricket fan, the first Test match of the series in Sri Lanka was a humbling experience. The Indian cricket community and media not being given to patience, inevitably the attack will begin – on the captain, the poor spin bowling and the ageing middle order.
Frankly, that is an issue I don’t want to touch upon for the simple reason that one Test match is too little time in which to decide that entire careers are over and wholesale changes are needed. If the rest of the series proceeds like this, then perhaps there may be long-term issues to address. Even so, that is meat for another post, another time.
The point I want to focus on today is how Sri Lanka, for the past 20 odd years and certainly since the mid-1990s, remains the most underrated and under-appreciated top quality cricket team in the world. To an attack led by a fine fast bowler and one of the greatest spinners in history, they’ve added a lethal new weapon. Their cricket system has this enviable ability to churn out a series of elegant and/or devastatingly destructive batsmen, one after the other.
How do they do it? I’m no expert on Sri Lankan cricket and its infrastructure. I can only refer to what I’ve read and heard. One story never fails to make an impression. I read it years ago, shortly after the 1996 world cup was won by Arjuna Ranatunga’s men – by the blazing opening pair of Jayasuriya and Kaluwitharana – when Rohit Brijnath wrote a piece in India Today on Sri Lanka’s cricket nursery.
I can’t recall the entire article but do remember a reference to the integrity and honesty of the Sri Lankan cricket work ethic. I think it was in Brijnath’s article that I read about the Wettimuny brothers, Sunil, Mithra and Sidath (Sri Lanka’s first test centurion). reproducing a fraying, century-old English coaching manual, page by page, painstakingly drawing the illustrations, copying the text.
It was an age before ubiquitous photocopying machines and scanners, I suppose, and being classicists, the brothers felt the young cricketers in their charge must learn cricket the right way. The romantic in me would like to believe that some of the young men in the team that smashed India on July 26 were beneficiaries of the Wettimuny way.
It is an unusual anecdote but to my mind a memorable one. The Wettimuny brothers’ act was perhaps the most moving tribute an international cricketer had ever paid to his art form, a reverential prayer to “Mother Cricket”, to borrow an expression South African coach Mickey Arthur used recently, albeit in another context.
I wish I could rattle off names of Indian cricketers who would gladly do the same to pay their dues, pass on their skills to another, less endowed generation. For me, that sentiment, that sense of obligation sums up cricket more than statistics, razzmatazz and other trivia.
I’ve never seen a cricket match in Sri Lanka – though I do want to go there for a test some day – but have visited Colombo three times. I’ve discussed cricket with auto-rickshaw and taxi drivers, government officials, hotel waiters, bookstore managers, bartenders, you name it. The Sri Lankans love their cricket, are fiercely proud of their cricket team and badly want it to win.
Yet, it’s struck me that their pride and passion is never overdone or overaggressive. It’s not as if they’re trying to tell you that not only is the Sri Lankan team good but the Indian (and every other) team is bad or otherwise less than reputable. There is no deliberate running down of the other guy. Perhaps he exists, but I’ve never met the Ugly Sri Lankan Cricket Fan. I’ve encountered his equivalent in or from India, Pakistan and Australia more often than I’d want to.
To me, the best cricket tradition is one that plays the game hard, speaks in the contemporary idiom and yet salutes cricket’s glorious, unparalleled heritage. Among the three major Asian countries, I think Sri Lanka has it just right. Indian cricket swings wildly between (usually imagined) victimhood and overweening arrogance, including telling English county clubs whom to select or drop. Pakistan’s is another cricket establishment with just too many chips on its shoulder.
Sri Lanka is different. It fights and fights fiercely when it has to. Ranatunga was the prototype of the assertive, tough-as-nails Asian captain when he defended his star bowler – accused of chucking – through a gruelling tour of Australia. He took on the umpires, the other team, the unfriendly press – because he believed in his cause, his team, his country.
Even so, Sri Lankan cricket does not believe in a permanent war theory. The past is over; the mid-1990s are dead. The team and the country have moved on. The Indian and Pakistani cricket boards, on the other hand, are continually fighting yesterday’s wars.
If you’re ever in Colombo, visit the Cricket Café – at least that’s what I think it’s called. Among other things, it serves great sea food but that’s not the only reason I have fond memories of it. In its own manner, it’s a delightful little cricket museum, with memorabilia from, well, Old Blighty to New Ceylon. It has place for Hutton and Hobbs but, equally, for Murali and Mendis.
To me, this signified a small but important lesson. Sri Lankans love their cricket team and also love cricket. They don’t see the two emotions as either synonymous or mutually exclusive. I’ve never visited an Indian restaurant with a similar sensibility. Sure, I could go to one with posters of current Indian cricket stars – but would that be a celebration of cricket? There is a difference.
Sri Lankans, as a society, understand that difference. That’s why it’s impossible to grudge them victory, even when they’ve hammered your team.
Posted by: Thomas Thurairatnam at July 27, 2008 2:50 AM
Well said Ashok! As a Sri Lankan who witnessed the Wettimuny brothers and others as schoolboy cricketers we not only enjoyed the pure magic of the wonderful game we love but also learnt win and loose with dignity and to appreciate and aplaud the opposition. Sportsmanship was spoken of everywhere and correctness of technique, and discipline were major considerations.
The nursery of Sri Lankan cricket were the school grounds in those days. I hear it has changed since! But many like me believe that it was the passion and intense competitiveness in schoolboy cricket in those days that propelled Sri Lanka to World Cup glory in 1996.
Posted by: Avid Reader at July 27, 2008 3:33 AM
Thanks for the insightful article. I think the Sri Lankan success boils down to I believe a great work ethic as well as on austerity. Just think about it, Sri Lanka is a much smaller nation with about 20-25 million people and constantly in the thick of civil/political strife and bomb explosions and still they can produce amazing match-winners.
All of their cricketers have been wonderful sportsmen. There have been no indications of match fixing, drugs, bad behaviour. Compare all this to cricket in India. Other than drugs, every thing has plagued Indian cricket - match-fixing (or hint of it), bad behaviour (Harbhajan and few others), excessive filth (money), BCCI (a monstorous money-making-sucking organizations), cricketers-turned-models, spoiled schizophrenic fans, terrible stadiums.
I believe Indian Cricket is a true image of India as a country.
Again that is a great article you wrote. Thanks.
Posted by: Alok at July 27, 2008 3:48 AM
Even though India got humiliated in the First Test, it didn't seem so bad knowing that it was inflicted by a team that seemed to do it with a grin and twinkle in the eye. Pretty much how SL plays its cricket I guess.
Posted by: Anjo at July 27, 2008 4:12 AM
Excellent article, I'm rarely in such complete agreement with an article. I doubt its going to be that popular among the sycophants drunk in their board's new found power.
Although Sri Lanka's record in the last 4 World Cups is second only to Australia and their Test cricket has been as intense and thrilling as any other side they never seem to get the same attention, hype or even the same billing as Indian, Pakistani or English sides prior to a series. This is perhaps fitting given how their crickets exude quiet confidence and fortitude and you've already touched on their work ethic (compare that to recent comments by a former Indian skipper on "fitness relating to cricket").
I have to admit that most SL cricket fans I've met mirror the description in the article and we got along really well before the recent World Cup final, even though we were supporting different teams. I'm looking forward to the second Test, even if it is another drubbing!
Posted by: Nimal at July 27, 2008 4:12 AM
First off i'd like to say that im from sri lanka. a central theme in your article that resonated with me quite well is the notion of the sri lankan cric fan and i wholeheartedly agree with you. fans in SL never go overboard in defeat or in victory. cricket is just a game and if the team plays well and wins that's reason to rejoice but in the same vein if they lose whats the big deal? life goes on right?
while we are fiercely proud of the team as mentioned in this article we know they are not invincible and frankly we dont expect them to be. while we have won this test convincingly there might be a sobering result around the corner, we'll accept both with little complaints. we know the team will perform to the best of its abilities when they play and as fans what more do you want?
Posted by: Manoj at July 27, 2008 4:13 AM
I'm glad this happened. This is what test cricket is all about. They screwed us in the 1st innings. And though we had time to think and do better in the 2nd innings, we still could not do anything. I was pretty sure the win would come for DSL on the 4th day (though I was hoping against). But thats what test cricket is so tough. Lets see what happens in the 2nd test. We simply don't have the bowlers!
Posted by: Michael Fernando at July 27, 2008 5:35 AM
(Sure there are loud-mouthed arrogant fans in any country and I've seen Sri Lankans of that characterization in these blog posts before.) I think we are taught in school-cricket that what matters is not win or lose, but how you play the game. In Sri Lanka there's also a saying people use often: "What to do!" That's not a question. It roughly means "times may be tough and things may look bleak, but there's nothing we can do about it so, let's just go with the flow."
Island folks (not just in SL, but in Caribbean too) are easy going, by nature. But, most importantly, I think the current SL captain is a guy with his feet firmly grounded and head screwed correctly on his shoulders. Cheers, Machang! Here's for a good game.
Posted by: Dilini J. at July 27, 2008 5:39 AM
Great Article....
"Yet, it’s struck me that their pride and passion is never overdone or overaggressive." - Very well written.
Feed proud myself as a Sri Lankan cricket fan!
Posted by: Michael Fernando at July 27, 2008 5:59 AM
(Sure there are loud-mouthed arrogant fans in any country and I've seen Sri Lankans of that characterization in these blog posts before.) I think we are taught in school-cricket that what matters is not win or lose, but how you play the game. In Sri Lanka there's also a saying people use often: "What to do!" That's not a question. It roughly means "times may be tough and things may look bleak, but there's nothing we can do about it so, let's just go with the flow." Island folks (not just in SL, but in Caribbean too) are easy going, by nature. But, most importantly, I think the current SL captain is a guy with his feet firmly grounded and head screwed correctly on his shoulders. Cheers, Machang! Here's for a good game.
Posted by: ram at July 27, 2008 6:08 AM
Nice Article. I think you've touched on a good point. Sri Lankans by and large do not have the fanatism associated to Indian and Pakistani fans. The reason for this could be that we are in fact a new test playing nation (in relative terms). Thus for a large part of our cricket history, especially through the 80's we were not winning many matches, and fans turned up purely for the enjoyment of the sport, rather than out of nationalistic motives. Of course the game is played hard, but we do realise that it is just a game. This is also seen by how many of the SL cricketers do not have the same cult following, the Indian or Pakistani players have. The approach and the behaviour of the SL cricket team mirrors that of the fans- hence the wins/losses are taken with a smile.
Posted by: jdgoal14 at July 27, 2008 6:43 AM
Really good Article. Have to agree that as Sri Lankan fans we do seem to be lighthearted on the outcomes of cricket matches. We are definitely passionate about cricket, we discuss it almost anywhere, from the classroom or workplaces and even while we travel by bus with strangers. If we lose we just have to come down to the fact that 'its just a game!'.
By the way, the cricket cafe is a wonderful place and the menus have some interesting names from the cricketing world!!
Posted by: Suresh at July 27, 2008 6:54 AM
With numerous reports of civilian atrocities overt the past couple of decades or so cricket has been the unifying factor in Sri Lanka. My ex-tiger room mates tell me of how they stopped fighting for a day in the Vanni (rebel controlled area) to celebrate the World cup victory in 96.
The country needs to take a leaf out of the cricket team's work ethic and unity. They all work as a team without any bias on racial or seniority grounds (unlike many south Asian teams). With a good mix of players from different religions or races.
Along with this with people like Sanga alway stressing on preparation and to play with integrity and dedication is a modern day throwback to the smash and grab and winning at all costs mentality.
The lack of the two factors mentioned above have been the main cause of the decline of morals and values of Sri Lankan society on a whole ( there have been notable exceptions though ).
Come on people, lets learn to live well as well as we play (well)!
Posted by: Malinda at July 27, 2008 8:00 AM
Well written Ashok!! I like the way you brought up the theme "The pride and passion of Sri Lankan cricket fans is never overdone or overaggressive"
I may not know how to explain this with more clear words but in my own words I would like to say that what you have written is true and I an proude to be bro as a Srilankan.I have been seeing and enjoying this luvly game of Cricket since when I was small and it's the only game i truely adore from my heart.I have seen the and heard about all the happenings around this game and I would say it's getting more intresting day by day.I have always loved the passion of the Indians who gives their heart and soul for this hame and I have seen their arragance too!! but I would say it's good to have this passion but don't over do it don't expect the unexpected .Indians my brothers it's the feeling of proudeness of our mother nation that we carry on this game let's just sit back and admire the game. Thumbs up for both teams!!
Posted by: Charindra at July 27, 2008 8:35 AM
Nice article. As a Sri Lankan I can say that the people of Sri Lanka are very passionate about their cricket. If we lose a few games it makes us a bit sad, but the world doesn't end. We realize that in the grand scheme of things, a game of cricket doesn't really matter. This is especially true for a nation that has been in a state of war for the past 25 years. It's the one thing that unifies the whole nation, especially when the greatest player in our history is a Tamil from a minority ethnic group. Cricket isn't a matter of life and death for us, but a necessary distraction that helps us forget about life for a while....
Posted by: donSilva at July 27, 2008 8:39 AM
Great Article shows the real insight of Sri Lankan Cricket. As very rightly says the Sri Lankan fans believe major them in cricket, i.e "Today you are a hero but tomorrow you will be a zero". I feel the Caribbean spectators too are in the same caliber. If you read the history of the game the Sir Lankan players are the most humble and lesser numbered in controversies. Sri Lanken fans are the people who have the broad minds to celebrate even the victories of their big brothers India and Pakistan. The supports offered by the two big brothers have been vital for the country especially when the chips were down, enable then to develop up the present level. Specially after winning the world cup in 96, Arjuna has thanked both the countries for their continues support. Arjuna had a great vision about how to compete with the big boys and how to introduce aggressiveness to the business without harming the quality and the discipline. The country was lucky with subsequent strong captains in the form of Jayasooriya, Attapattu and Mahela
Posted by: CHANDANA DXB at July 27, 2008 8:49 AM
"WELL WRITTEN"
Yes you correct about not knowing much Sri lankan cricket.
("I’m no expert on Sri Lankan cricket and its infrastructure")
That is why former witer "MUKKUL KESAVAN" most popular in this blog.
He well known all major cricket teams as well as most articles written about Indian team.
Bcos of that most indian blasted him , but he pvoved he was correct.
Truth is bitter... We have to accept it.
Any way Thank you & Indian cricket fans has to accept this.. but dont blame or break their (Team) homes.
Enjoy CRICKET...
Posted by: Ranil Perera at July 27, 2008 10:50 AM
Thank you for a very nice article. Being a Sri Lankan, it was a great complement from the big brother across the straights.
Well, We love our cricket and our cricketers no doubt. They are real good role models and very down to earth people. It was only recently i stepped in to Odel shopping complex and at the door was Kumar Sangakkara. I stopped and allowed him to move forward first. He said....no, you first. I said "Kumar please go ahead". He said..."no after you". Such is the simplicity of these world reknowed players. We all know the largess of Sanath Jayasuriya, Mahela Jayawardena and Murali. They have never forgotten their roots and always makes it a point to contribute to the benefit of establishments that has helped them to come up in life.
I sincerely hope our Sri Lankan players will abandon the IPL and tour England next year. It is within their right to earn as much money as possible during a playing career. But for us Sri Lankans, moderation is what we believe in.
Posted by: Jay at July 27, 2008 11:36 AM
While i realise your striking when the iron's hot by jumping on the SL bandwagon,as a journalist myself it seems that you wrote this after getting a quick spark of an idea fuelled by an assumption, and you later assembled the facts to suit your assumption. Though i agree with most of the ideas you have presented, the deeper sociological reason is that the larger sri lankan masses are not equipped to vocalise or actionise pretty much anything. Eg: while indians were having mass protest against a 3-4 rupee petrol price increase few weeks back, sri lankans barely let out a whimper against a 60 rupee hike.anyway i wrote this to point out to you or anybody else that the BLAZING PAIR sanath j/romesh k DID NOT win us the world cup by any stretch of the imagination.Quick research wd hv shown you that sri lanka played 6 matches in that world cup and the sanath/romesh partnerships were 5,53,83,12,1 and 12 giving us a grand average of 27.6 (btw that 83 came against kenya),hardly WC winning stuff!
Posted by: Uds at July 27, 2008 11:54 AM
Very rarely does an article get me to write something down but this one just about rounded up everything about being Srilankan and most of all Srilankan cricket, It's all in the way they play there cricket, and above all the integrity,honesty and innocence involved,something probably due to there great schools of cricket like "Ananda" and "Nalanda", schools of both Arjuna Ranatunga, Marvan Attapatu and Mahela Jayawardana, apart from all that it is the simple fact that they play cricket with the sort of hapiness that teenage boys have, that's something you hardly see in any other international team,it reminds me of the Peugeot advert " the silent individual".. way to go Srilanka....
Posted by: rushy46 at July 27, 2008 12:31 PM
I feel especially proud to be a Sri Lankan after reading this article. Hope the rest of the cricketing fraternity in the world would read this as well.
Posted by: Pem at July 27, 2008 12:54 PM
I am a Sri Lankan too. This is just a one test match and there are two more left in the series. India will bounce back and they got classy players who are much better than Sri Lankan players. You have to remember India played very well in Australia last summer but Sri Lanka didn't play well there. Therefore I think it is too harsh on Indian players to criticise like this.
Posted by: Sameer Yoonus at July 27, 2008 12:55 PM
i must agree with most of the comments made here.. discipline, behaviour and respect for the game and its rules is instilled in cricketers from school boy days.. all this thanks to the excellent past cricketers that the island has produced, if not talent wise, at least humanity wise.. sri lanka cricket has always seen the most humble of people on the field.. be it the best bowler in the world.. murali.. or the most destructive batsmen in the world.. sanath.. neither of them have their heads hung on an ego bubble.. u smile at them and u get one in return guaranteed..
compare that to some of the other egoistic cricketers around the world.. its wonderful how sri lankans have so wonderfully handled fame.. and ofcourse.. to repeat.. we're fiercely proud of our team.. we may not be the champions of the world.. but we take heart in the way we play and the fact that we respect and give back the game all that it has given us.. so all hail "mother cricket"..
Posted by: Sopaka at July 27, 2008 1:34 PM
I used to frequent the night clubs in Colombo in the mid '90's. After SL won the world cup most teams from SL , India & Pakistan used to hang out at the Blue Elephant. SL players were always approachable and friendly while the Pak and Indian players used to make you feel as if we were privileged to stand in the same room with them!
To this date if anybody approaches our Sana The Great he would humbly accommodate the fan. That is humility millions of dollars cannot corrupt. After a few pints I have been a nuisance to Great Sana on more than one occasion. To his full credit he has handled the situation with such finesse.
Posted by: chandramouli kanavi at July 27, 2008 3:56 PM
great article mr malik.having toured srilanka twice in 80s and 90s on club cricket tours,have always fascinated by their passion and love for cricket.the tale of wettimuny brothers is really admirable.this indian tour helped them to come out of financial mess but paid us back with interest with an innigs victory.keep it up lanka
Posted by: Prasad Ratnayake at July 27, 2008 5:03 PM
You very well said about the way we enjoy cricket Ashok !!. Being a Sri Lankan, I am proud of what you wrote. No matter whether we win or lose a game, we will always respect the other team, and would give them the due recognition for the work they have done. We know that we cannot win every game. Also, we than the Indians, Pakistanis and other asians who wre with us when our team was undrgoing insulting onslaughts in Australia during Murali's issues, as well as when some teams refused to play in Sri Lanka in 1996citing security reasons. As asians, we stood together. So, my aisan brothers, let's be together and try to make the best test and one day team from asia !!!
Posted by: Sameer Yoonus at July 27, 2008 5:59 PM
by the way sir, uve got the spelling of SERENDIB wrong..!!
Ashok responds: No I haven't. 'The Three Princes of Serendip' is the name of the old story; serendipity was the word coined from Serendip by Horace Walpole.
Posted by: Sameer Yoonus at July 27, 2008 6:36 PM
My apologies.. ofcourse u know best..!! though since school days we've been taught that sri lanka was once named the serendib..!!
Posted by: nuwan at July 27, 2008 8:33 PM
yes, both Serendip and Serendib are ok. if anyone got it wrong, it was Horace Walpole in the first place, because Serendib was the original word coined by arabian traders, princes etc.
Posted by: Jaytara at July 28, 2008 1:43 AM
Excellent article Mr.Malik; having visited Colombo a few times and watched SL vs Aus. ODI's in 2004, I can vouch for the bonhomie and the keen cricketing knowledge of Sri Lankan cricket fans. They never go over the top, yet support their team with verve and enthusiasm.
As for the Indian cricket team, its pathetic performance is representative of the rot that afflicts the BCCI; the Lalit Modis of this world are laughing all the way to the bank while Indian cricket is sinking into a hopeless morass.
I am sure Mr.Modi doesn't care one jot about the thumping defeat in the Test. After all, he doesn't make his money there, and the jingoistic Indian cricket fan is a sucker for the Bollywood-inspired tamasha of the IPL. You reap what you sow !!
Posted by: Rowan J at July 28, 2008 1:53 AM
The West Indian fans and Sri Lankan fans are unique in that they surround themselves in 'happiness' at the cricket - liquor, drums, trumpets, music, dancing etc. The result of the game matters less than the celebration of the event and if the home team wins, the celebrations are stepped up and continues for days, but if they lose, oh well, as long as a good time was had by all, thats ok. This is perhaps a more 'fatalistic' view of the world that these countries have being 'island' people and in the case of Sri Lanka, being buddhists in the main. The contrast also with Indian and Pakistani fans is also the consumption of alochol - defeating all logic, it appears to quell aggression rather than fuel it! Not the case in Australia or England, where most violence is driven by excessive alcohol consupmtion. I simply have no explanation for that but long may it add colour and movement to Cricket in general and Sri lankan cricket in particular!!
Posted by: Sen at July 28, 2008 2:25 AM
What an excellent and objective article!! I wish some other writers including few reporting on the present series could be as objective as you are!!
Posted by: firoz at July 28, 2008 2:38 AM
ah yes , the cricket cafe , queens rd.Had the bradman special there.Filling that.
Posted by: Nick Chandrasekera at July 28, 2008 2:52 AM
This is a wake up call for the cricket community on how 20/20 is impacting test cricket. Srilankan batting has always being strong (after all they hold the world records for the highest test score , the highest oneday score and the highest 20/20 score) but they haven't had someone to support Murali. Now Mendis is going to make Murali's job easier as there is no letup from both ends. This is going to be an interesting test for other test playing countries. It is this unconventional approach that make Srilanka so dangerous on their day even though the Indian batsmen didn't help themselves. For the sake of test cricket let's hope this is not going to be a one sided contest. The pleasing thing for me personally even though I have been away from Srilanka for more than 25 years is that the sportmanship of the cricketers and the spectators haven't changed that much. They applaud both sides and love to see a good contest.Winning is only satisfying when the game is played in the right spirit.
Posted by: Weekee at July 28, 2008 5:29 AM
Ashok Malik's article is a statement of fact. Well done.We being a small Nation has always being at the receiving end be it sports or politics,hence the resilient nature.We are survivors.Like most other countries "The Best in the World" tag (in any thing)is not what we are after but doing the right thing and doing it right.We do not try to correct others but only ourselves.
I think pundits like Bishen Singh Bedi and Kapil Dev are wasting their time and efforts criticizing others at every turn instead should focus on correcting their flock and improving their game.I won't be surprised if those interested join hands with Australia & Co to find some thing to shoot down new comer Ajantha Mendis too like what they tried on Murali.In such case too we will prevail.
We however appreciate the assistance given on numerous occasions by many supporters of our cricket and solicit same in the future too.
Posted by: Reddy at July 28, 2008 5:30 AM
I think the larger issues which most cricket nations should learn is to create a domestic structure that suits their social and geographical identity. Sri Lanka have invested heavily in schools cricket and they reap the rewards of that.Most boards world over just want to replicate the Australian model(which is excellent in itself) without trying to adapt it to local needs.
Most developing cricket nations would do well to look at the sri lankan model closely.This would help them understand that what works for Australia doesnt work for everyone and that you can create your own structure that incorporates the good things in other countries.
Posted by: Rosh at July 28, 2008 6:58 AM
Lovely article and some very good comments as well although Jay has not got the gist of what happened in 1996. That was one of those times when the saying that statistics do not always tell the story comes to mind.
Jay is right in saying that the Jaya/Kalu partnership did not contribute much - by way of runs. But they sure did psyche out several opposing bowlers not to mention captains. Er, the semi-finals and Azhar comes to mind. Remember he won the toss and did the unthinkable - decided to chase in a would-be pressure cooker situation ie. chasing a probable 250 like score in front expectant and screaming Indian fans. Why did he do that. Well when they first met Jayasuriya had blown them away. Here the sheer jubilation when Jayasuriya and Kalu got out early had to be seen to be believed. Of course India never got anywhere near the target.
My point that while the Jaya/Kalu combo did not put up sizable scores in tandem but they sure did derail the plans on opposing teams.
Posted by: charlie at July 28, 2008 7:15 AM
The article is a gem! Kudos mate! But the whole truth about SLC, cricketers and administrators are a bit different to what's said in the article (At least the way I understand it).
In Sri Lanka almost everything is ruined by corrupt politicians, and the mere fact that SL cricket team win all these games is a true compliment to the true sportsmanship and brilliance of a few. They have been lucky to have such talended players, but it's no bed of roses.
Lets hope that the new chief Arjuna is allowed to lead SLC independantly, coz there's no one better suited for the post than this great man!
Posted by: Ravi Kumar Putcha at July 28, 2008 7:30 AM
There is no denying that the Sri Lankan cricket team handed out a hammering to the Indian team. But merely on the strength of that, to declare them the "most underrated and under-appreciated top quality cricket team in the world" is a bit over the top considering that their best performers, with the exception of Murali perform very well at home, and struggle to come to terms with conditions away from home.
Sri Lanka's success is largely at home, whereas the much maligned Indian team - by the comments columns, that is - has had excellent success away and home in the last 8-10 years, so much so that in that respect they are second only to Australia.
Those cribbing about India's cricketers forget that in the space of the last five years, Australia have lost only two tests at home - both to India, and only once in the last 25 years have they lost at Perth, again to India.
Congratulations to Cricket SL for their success. Now how about replicating it away?
Posted by: P.Satish Kumar at July 28, 2008 7:35 AM
Avid Reader(what a bloody cowardly name to use!!)...
"believe Indian Cricket is a true image of India as a country."
This is an article about Sri Lanka, its cricket and its supporters. So if you agree with that then express your opinion about it. If you want to do India-bashing then SHUT UP!!
The very fact that you have to put down India to highlight Sri Lanka's so-called achievements is an indication of your insecurity.
Posted by: Gamini Dayaratne at July 28, 2008 7:39 AM
Excellent article!! Ashok has interpreted the Srilankan's passion for cricket really well. For Srilankan cricketers, upto now, cricket is not everything in their lives. It is just an important part. With all due respect to the rest, I also attribute their humble lifestyle to the faith of the majority Srilankans.
Although, I could not agree to many decisions of Arjuna, the administrator, I fully agree with his comparison of T20 cricket to 'instant noodles'. He was quite right in saying that the Indian cricketers were still in the T20 mode while playing in the 1st test.
Just recall the way Sehwag, Gambhir and even Sachin's approach. They all wanted to hit Mendis (and Murali) out of the ground! Dhoni's absesnce was badly felt behind the wickets.
My only hope is that Srilanka criket authorities will not organise a T20 tournament in the island in the footsteps of England, South Africa and Australia in the future.
Posted by: vikas at July 28, 2008 8:11 AM
India is a victim of monsters who are produts of its own creation. By allowing 15 degree rule it has allowed chuckers to have a field day.All of this is
done in exchange for votes.
Posted by: Jack at July 28, 2008 8:40 AM
With reference to Vikas's quotes:
For the sake of God...Please dont raise this topic and stop acting like a cry baby. I just read an article saying that the Indians were not happy with the referral system and here you are blaming Murali a so called "chucker"...I suggest you should open your minds and support good cricket rather than trying to find so called excuses to blame the loss!
Posted by: M Shakir Azeez at July 28, 2008 9:16 AM
Reading your article brought me some tears to my eyes. We used to get thrashed by all the countries played against us. We got used to this type of losing so it was a common factor to us.
The 1996 world cup changed the course of the cricketers and the sport loving public in Sri Lanka. We were on the rise and everybody loved the cricketers. Players like Sanath, Kalu, Aravinda, Arjuna, Murali, Vass, Mahanama, Hashan, Gurusinghe to name a few changed our attitude towards the game.
There were time we lost and times we won. We felt sad when we lost but gathered for the next series. When the team toured India in 2005, we lost the one days and test very badly. But all of us knew it's difficult to beat India in India and it's not us who are playing but our cricketers and they know how difficult it's when playing in the middle.
Our Media has a big part in educating the public by giving some valid points when we failed or win. We love Cricket and our present and past Cricketers!
Posted by: Jaytara at July 28, 2008 9:33 AM
Do not understand why Satish Koomar is getting worked up. Avid Reader is only calling a spade a spade,so why don't you wake up and smell the rot that pervades Indian cricket, reflecting the sorry state of Indian sport
Posted by: Rahul at July 28, 2008 9:45 AM
I completely disagree with Vikas's comments.The 15 degree rule was introduced after careful scrutiny of bowling actions of many bowlers ,eg.Shoaib Malik,Harbhajan Singh etc.They were violating the previous rule as well.Being an INDIAN I feel ashamed that VIkas had to bring this up as an excuse
Posted by: Kumar at July 28, 2008 10:12 AM
Thank you very Much Asok to shaped this imagination that most of the Sri lankans waiting to be exposed this to the world. Actually the Buddhism and it’s around culture are the main things to set this kind of environment in the fans minds. So As Sri Lankans we must have to thank India for gave their greatest Buddhism to us….
Posted by: Tara at July 28, 2008 11:03 AM
Vikas, India were thrashed fair and square, don't raise the Murali bogey, after all what is Bhajjie if not a slapping chucker, and how come such stalwarts like Tendulkar and Dravid don't walk when they nick the ball. They have been shamed by the referral system and should show some grace and retire instead of chasing after hollow records. Tendulkar can't hold a candle to Gavaskar, let alone Lara or the incomparable Sir Vivian Richards
Posted by: Manoj at July 28, 2008 11:18 AM
It's a brilliant article.,"Hats off for malik" for being neutral.,
One thing I can confirm is that most of the Sri Lankan players if not all of them are very humble, and down to earth.,They would basically entertain anyone for a auto graph or a picture with them.,and etc.,
But the same cannot be said about players from other countries.,and even thier spouses.
On one instance few years back at london heathrow when the Indian team was flying out to India, at the world duty free counter this so called proud lady dropped an item and expected the staff member to pick it up for her, since it was not the mistake of the staff memeber, she refused with this rude request.,for which the attitude was. "Do you know who I am.? I am Saurauv Ganguly's wife"
Even then very politely the staff member refused her request, and later on even the floor Mnanager had to get involved in this very unfortunate incident.,
If I was there when she said she was so and so., My answer would have been " So What"
Posted by: Vigyan at July 28, 2008 12:04 PM
The Sri Lankan team deserved its victory in the 1st Test. As an Indian, I'm rather taken aback by the media and public criticism of Indian team especially, its batting. Cricket in India unfortunately has a fanatical following. Few really understand the nuances of the game. For instance, I'm not sure any of the armchair Indian critic is aware of the last time a Test team was exposed to 2 unorthodox spinners, one of whom was playing his first Test and therefore a completely unknown commodity.
Few can imagine the difficulty as a batsman when there is sustained pressure from both ends with such a bowling attack. It's a reality that sports is not a culture in India; most people don't play any sport so they find it that much more difficult to fathom the vicissitudes of a sport.
As for Sri Lankans, perhaps it's their cultural moorings which have a significant Buddhist leaning that makes them more grounded in victory or defeat. I would never grudge a Sri Lankan victory, even against India.
Posted by: HM at July 28, 2008 12:26 PM
Dear Vikas - Well, you are providing a "real-time" sample for some facts highlighted in the article about cricket fan's mentality. I don't think there will be any SL fans to call Harbajan a "chucker" had he taken 11 wickets in the match. (I am sure you remember Harbajan's history, but that is all over for us).
I am sorry .. this is very childish.
Posted by: Jayasankar at July 28, 2008 12:28 PM
Hmm. Nice article and all that. But hey, romantic generalisation while easy, does not give you the true picture. Sri Lanka plays its cricket well. They have the best fielding side in Asia, but most of their success comes at home. They have always been thrashed in Australia (where Indians in recent times have shown some steel).
Murali and Vaas are not effective against Australia, they struggle in South Africa and have modest records elsewhere. In Colombo, the likes of Thilan Samaraweera makes centuries. But full credit to them, they played their cricket well. India has always struggled in Lanka.
Sri Lankan cricket administration is as corrupt and as rife with politics as any of their Asian counterparts. All their success comes despite the system. India, on the otehr hand, carries a bunch of egomaniacs who can't be dropped.
Posted by: Manesha at July 29, 2008 6:19 AM
Open your eyes Vikas!! you are still crying for what not worth for crying!!
this article about is about Srilankan cricket and and even you can take it as cricket in Asia ,it's about the passion and the hardhships about this lovely game and it does not matter evne if you are a Srilankan ,Indian or a Pakistani!! We love this game more than the others cause it's in our body and the passion comes from with in us.
Posted by: Ravishankar at July 29, 2008 7:59 AM
Mr.Malik a well written article.
We Lankans do love our cricket but its definitely some controlled passion.The highlight of our passion is that we love our cricket and apploud and appreciate any good cricket played by any cricketing nation .We are proud too that we haven't produced a demigod in srilankan cricket todate.
Posted by: Upul Rajapaksha at July 29, 2008 9:41 AM
nice article.. excellent job..
Anyway plenty of comments .. very interesting
All in all we are cricket lovers.. I think that’s the reason for all of fuss.. Indian or sri lankan both of us love for the game of cricket.. sometimes crazy .. win or loss we should be able to confront ..
Whoever playing well they can win .. we can see and enjoy the game .. we are lucky to see some real cricket playing by these excellent players ..
i hope all of people should enjoy the cricket rather than blaming or criticizing .. CHEERS
upul (sri lankan)
Posted by: eddy at July 30, 2008 11:47 AM
Ashok you decided not to post my thoughts on Tendulakrs display in the first test and Lara's record against Sri Lanka and Murli. You will no doubt not post this either but at least i know you read. All opinions should be posted...coward.
Posted by: Dani at July 30, 2008 1:03 PM
Well..I am an Indian (and tamil to boot). Sri Lanka is one country that has fascinated me a lot with its abundant natural beauty (reminds me of our very own Kerala though).
I have a little exposure to SL and the lifestyle of her citizens and it is completely Dravidian!(In my part of India we can occassionally see the SL TV channel Roopavahini and I formed my opinion based on that..would love to visit the country one day though!).
Coming to Cricket, SL has made amazing strides from what they used to be in the mid eighties (the days of Don Anurasiri, the good looking Guy De Alvis, the Ratnayakes, Mendis and of course Ranatunga). They always had the flair and were super fielders. But somehow they used to fail at the winning post.
I remember one match (at Sharjah?) against NZ played in early 90s which Mahanama captained where Gurusinha fought till the last ball (but they still lost by 1 run) and he had tears in his eyes.Nice to see SL win consistenly now.But dont count us out yet :)GLuck!
Posted by: eddy at July 31, 2008 8:01 AM
well done. things feel a bit better now youre 150 for no wicket dont they? :)
Posted by: Lerato at August 2, 2008 9:55 PM
Thanks Mr Malik for a beautifully written article. The team epitomises the nation and many non-Sri Lankans were delighted when Sri Lanka won the ICC Spirit of Cricket Award last year.
An incident that I witnessed summed up this spirit. During a match in South Africa, Murali - through sheer charm and humour - succeeded in getting the South African spectators to cheer for Sri Lanka! The man is a gem.
Posted by: Aravind at August 5, 2008 9:29 AM
The article seems to be written by a romantic tourist who is in love with a beautiful tourist spot. He himself says he is no authority on Srilanka's cricketing infrastrucutre, so why write an article and compare it to India and pakistan and say they are bad. i think the author has to do research before writing something as if out of his personal diary.
Posted by: Rajagopalan at August 12, 2008 5:06 AM
Whatever said and done, India seems to have lost its way in test cricket.. the mighty SRT prepared to overtake everyone else ended up sitting in the pavilion for most of the time and so did the MIGHTY indian batting line-up!
The fact that the Srilankan players approached their President to reschedule their itinerary for the next 20-20 itself speaks what must be going thru in Indian minds!! India should give up playing Test cricket and concentrate on Dollars and Dollars alone!! Sad times for a once bright cricketing nation.
Post your comment
Ashok Malik has been a journalist since 1991 and is currently senior editor at the Pioneer. His one unfulfilled journalistic ambition is to be a gossip writer in a film magazine. The cricket buff inside him is a split personality. The newsperson is convinced of IPL's potential and that, inevitably, it will gobble up the rest of cricket; the romantic dreams of a glorious day at the Elysian Oval, with Trumper scoring a century before lunch – and batting on forever.