On June 25, 1983, India won the Prudential Cup. The run-up to the silver jubilee has been marked by silly controversies and spurious theories. This (June 1) morning in The Pioneer, I looked back at simply the cricket
Before the Delhi Daredevils, there were Kapil’s Devils. For cricket fans of a certain generation, June 25, 1983, remains, quite without question, the date of their lives. It was the day India won the Prudential Cup and a bunch of nine journeymen and two all-time greats (one of them, Sunil Gavaskar, a trifle out of form) pulled off the biggest miracle in Indian sport.
India has won much since. Especially in the past decade, after the Sourav Ganguly-John Wright duumvirate took Indian cricket into the 21st century, literally and otherwise, and introduced it to a modern idiom, India has reached an ODI World Cup final, won the Twenty20 World Cup, won Test matches in Australia, Test series in England, Pakistan and the West Indies. Yet, a flurry of success and a hyperactive cricket media environment make remembering dates and landmarks impossible.
It began with a sign from the gods, but few chose to read it. On June 9, India took on the West Indies and helped by a plucky 89 from Yashpal Sharma gave the Goliaths from the Caribbean Islands something to chase. Rain interrupted play that day and the match continued on June 10. Incredibly, despite a never ending last wicket partnership of 71, the West Indies lost. It was their first defeat in three world cups, but critics preferred citing it as an early aberration rather than evidence of a maturing of Indian one-day cricket.
The rest of the story is well-known. There was Kapil Dev’s 175 not out in a victory against Zimbabwe that ultimately proved inconsequential. India still had to beat Australia in the final league game, which it did, with Roger Binny and Madan Lal taking eight wickets between them.
The match that showed the new Indian steel was, however, the second one against the West Indies. With Viv Richards scoring an imperious hundred, the defending champions won. Yet, India battled grittily. Mohinder Amaranth scored 80 ignoring short-pitched bowling and blows on the body. Dilip Vengsarkar was hit in the teeth and had to retire hurt. It was an honourable defeat; there was no surrender.
In a strange, pre-modern media age, Indians got to hear of the early stages of the Prudential Cup on the radio and courtesy BBC commentary, but saw none of it. Only two matches were telecast live – the semi-final against England and the final itself. Even here, telecast was interrupted by that old Doordarshan chestnut: “Satellite link is temporarily not available”.
To anyone who watched those two pulsating, drama-filled matches, almost every ball was etched in memory for years afterwards. The 60-overs a side limited-overs match – what would you call it today: S60? – was far closer to Test cricket than, well, sometimes even contemporary Test cricket is.
In the semi-final, England set India a target of 214 in 60 overs, an asking rate of just about 3.50. Today, it would seem a joke. Then, in the cautious words of one television commentator, it was described as “gettable”. After the openers went, Amarnath and Sharma – India’s unlikely middle order heroes in an entirely unlikely ODI tournament – grafted and defended and built their innings.
Then, just as all of those before their television sets felt it was too late, the Indians opened up. An array of boundaries followed. Sandeep Patil came in and hit a 32-ball 50 – yes, there was fast scoring even before M.S. Dhoni! – and India was in the final.
The final itself is, at least for this cricket fan, not so much a match as a blur of images – Balwinder Sandhu’s banana in-swinger that bowled Gordon Greenidge as he shouldered arms; Jeffrey Dujon slapping the turf on being deceived by a slower one from Amarnath (did he ever bowl a faster one?); Amarnath again ambling in to bowl and hitting Michael Holding high on the pad.
Each of those dismissals was meaningful. Greenidge’s departure meant that the West Indies didn’t get the quick, smooth start they wanted. With Dujon ended the West Indies’ last chance – from 76 for 6, wicketkeeper Dujon and Malcolm Marshall had taken the score to 119. In getting Holding, India got hold of the World Cup. It was all over.
Like Tololing or Tiger Hill in another contest, another time, India eventually won the Prudential Cup inch by inch, besting the West Indies lower order ball by ball, run by run. It was a gripping, low-key but epic final hour.
The morning was sunny. Kris Srikkanth came in and blazed away to 38 – it was an era before Virender Sehwag, remember, Indian openers were only expected to defend and play copybook shots. A rasping square drive on one knee, which sent an Andy Roberts delivery to the boundary, was perhaps the shot of the tournament.
Then, as easily as they had dazzled, the Indians imploded. One hundred and eighty-three seemed no score at all. After the match, Kapil Dev was asked what he had said to his team as he led them out to field. “I told the boys, let’s go and play,” said the prosaic captain, who spoke with deeds rather than words. It was left to Sunil Gavaskar to come up with a more inspirational call: “Chalo jawanon, chal ke ladenge (Onward soldiers, it’s time to fight).”
Greenidge’s lucky dismissal – Sandhu tried to explain later that he had deliberately swung the ball six inches but never mind – only brought in Viv Richards. The King smashed Madan Lal as only he could and the commentary team was speculating on the match being done in 30 overs. It was time for the mother of all miracle moments.
Richards pulled Madan Lal, got it a bit wrong but seemed about to get away with it anyway. The ball climbed, Kapil Dev, running backwards, his eyes only on the ball, grabbed it mid-air. Richards was gone; almost as Richie Benaud was beginning to say: “Richards miscues but it doesn’t matter ... Another boundary for the great man, the West Indies on course for a hat-trick ...”
After Richards walked back, there was a sense of urgency and new energy in the Indians. This wasn’t going to be a walkover, no it wasn’t. This was a team supposed to be split between the Bombay and Delhi/Punjabi camps, between Gavaskar and Kapil. Yet, by the middle of the West Indies innings, the collective brains trust of the Indian team was in business. Gavaskar was pointing to positions, advising Kapil on field placing, while Syed Kirmani and Amarnath watched. When it came to the crunch, the Indians didn’t let each other down. It was a fairy tale; and Cinderella did it with time to spare.
Great events lead to great mythology. Immediately after India’s biggest ODI cricket victory, Dom Moraes wrote another of his incomprehensible essays, attributing the achievement to disagreeable “north Indian nationalism”. I’m still trying to figure out what he meant.
Twenty-five years on, the Prudential Cup has spawned thousands of articles, dozens of self-styled experts and even some anodyne PhD theses – this changed the face of Indian cricket, made it an aspirational calling for young people, introduced money and ODI mania to Indian cricket fans and so on.
Actually, the Prudential Cup of 1983 did little of the sort. True, the winning XIV were feted, met by the prime minister, serenaded by Lata Mangeshkar, a custom-written song (the remarkably unmemorable Bharat vishwa vijeta) and given DDA apartments in Delhi.
Yet, India’s one-day cricket binge was at least four years away, and should correctly be dated to the hosting of the 1987 Reliance Cup. Cricket commerce arrived only in 1993-94, when the Board of Control for Cricket in India sold television rights to private channels and began monetising its key properties.
True, the Reliance Cup would not have happened – India would not have bid for the right to host the 1987 world cup – if Kapil’s Devils had not won. Yet, it is perhaps best to remember June 25, 1983, for what happened that day in London, not for peddling spurious, post facto theories. Every underdog has its day; this month, 25 years ago, we had ours.
That was a terrific read for a person who wasn't even born then! My dad always talks about it. Its great to hear another first person perspective.
Posted by: Mark777 at June 1, 2008 6:33 AM
That was Nothing but one big fluke frankly.Even Indian players who played then admit it,and also come out of your fantasy land.flurry of success?which one btw?Maybe in your dreams,India overall win/loss ratio in both tests and ODI,s is still appalling to say the least.
Just a big shame that a country with total population of 20 million rules the cricketing world(and even circus called IPL)in every sense and 1.1 Billion population country is never ever more than middling or simply mediocre.Victories over sides like WI and PAK are given here as a measure of Indian team recent success Wow some achievement indeed!
With an atitude like that India can never become even close to being a decent sporting nation. And don,t get me started on number of gold medals India have won in Olympics.
Just for a perspective, Combined population of America and Europe is less than India.
No wonder even likes of Dhoni and yuraj can send the whole nation in frenzy just by hitting couple of mistimed slogs.
Posted by: keyur at June 1, 2008 7:46 AM
lets not talk about population relativities. more than half od the population lives on less than US$1 a day. you would expect them to play sport i assume? also lets not forget how the GDP per capita has reduced much since 1750 where india was the richest country in the world. I still agree that the temperament of indians in sport is not as good as say an australian who has more to fight for to get in the team. An example would be where Ishant Sharma has been given 950000 US$ just becuase he had a good series in australia. But please do not comment on population as talent depends not only on temperament/attitude but also on oppurtunities which many indians so not get!!!
Posted by: sandeep at June 1, 2008 8:27 AM
wow!!! mark777 you really do have a big chip on your shoulder.the dignity of a nation is reflected in being humble on being at the top, not running other countries down like this on a public forum. makes me realize all the more, why the aussies are forever tagged by this bad boy image..
Posted by: PVC at June 1, 2008 8:53 AM
Great perspective, especially as I'm reading this hours before the first ever IPL finals. Though, if Indian cricket came of age with the Prudential World Cup, it was born in 1971 when Chandra spun out one of the greatest England teams on a magic morning at the Oval.
To the moaning about a nation of a billion people not dominating the world...what is almost never mentioned with that statistic is that most Indians never play any sport. Most Aussies do. The real stock of active Indian sports-people is a lot smaller than 20 million.
A hundred years from now, when India is a middle income nation and health/ space/ time/ equipment are less scarce than they are today, that might change. But for now, lets celebrate the remarkable achievements of the small number of Indians who are privileged enough to play.
Posted by: awas2007@hotmail.co.uk at June 1, 2008 10:10 AM
In the last 10 years or so India definitely has been a bit better than mediocre. What happened after that 1983 achievement was never transformed into India becoming a great cricketing nation but only for the game to become the only popular sport in India.
A little arrogance coming from an Aussi blogger is somewhat justified from a country with a smallish population when you have been the best in that sport for well over a decade. It’s a bit silly to get jealous of their success as some later bloggers after Mark777 have shown. WI before Aussies, with a battery of their fast bowlers and some good batsmen, were once the same cricketing powerhouse for a decade and that too from a nation even smaller than Australia.
In the current IPL, the best has actually come from the overseas players. The best captain (Shane Warne), the best all rounder (Shane Watson), the highest run scorer, another Aussie (Shaun Marsh), the best bowler a Pakistani (Sohail Tanvir). Pakistanis have again lived up to their reputation to keep coming up with one or two good fast bowlers. Other than that Graham Smith, Ntini and some of the others have been better than most Indians and Pakistanis.
Posted by: ashu at June 1, 2008 11:21 AM
Mark if you think ,victory over that West Indies team which didnt lose a single test series was a fluke ,then All the Aussie victories are a fluke as well.All great Aussies Bradman,Lillie,Benaud,Warne,ponting all had mediocre records against good opposition-read Ashes 81,05 and the India series in 98 and 01.and Malik is the typical Indian ,he thinks Sandhus ball was a fluke,I say Warnes Gatting ball was an even greater fluke.
[Ashok responds ... Dear Ashu, Thank you for calling me a "typical Indian", which I take as a compliment.
I don't know about you, but to me one of the definitions of "fluke" is an unusual, even freakish occurrence over which the protagonist does not have absolute control and which he or she cannot replicate at will. By that yardstick, Sandhu's inswinger to Greendige was a fluke and, yes, so was Warne's "Ball of the Century" to Gatting.]
Posted by: Hari Iyer at June 1, 2008 12:14 PM
I for one believe that the 83 World Cup was a turing point in the Cricketing History of the Subcontinent as post that the subcontinet has risen as a force to reckon both on and off the field.. I remember my neighbour coming running asking me to switch the TV screaming "Switch on the TV .. West Indies 65 for 5 yaar.. and Let ME assure you that these victories were no fluke..
Beating WI, Aus, England in 1983 then beating Pakistan in Sharjah in a final(bowling Pak for 85 with India scoring only 125), then the 1985 Benson and Hedges wherin India beat Aus, Eng, NZ, Pak (not once but twice), then the 1987 world cup where we made it to the Semis and not to mention the Asia Cup wins and the "Sachin Storm" in Shj.
Lets accept that that was a "Golden Era" with some memorable Test series wins as well for Indian cricket. Had we not won consistently between 1983-1985, we probably would not have been such ardent Cricket followers. As for Mark, I sense a condescending attitude which is best ignored..
Posted by: Savi at June 1, 2008 12:17 PM
Reading this article makes me wish I had been alive during 1983. It really marked the beginning of Indian ascendancy in international cricket. Regarding Mark777 - I live in Australia too and being an Indian I witnessed first hand the whole spat between India and Australia last summer and it probably was kind of hard for the Australians to be exposed as not being the gods of cricket as they always claimed to be. I'm guessing it was hard for the Australian supporters too.
Didn't stop me from gloating every chance I got though :)
Posted by: Anonymous at June 1, 2008 12:27 PM
The point is that India has gotten better since that historic world cup win. Sure we still have a long way to go. But we're getting better.
Posted by: Aditya Mookerjee at June 1, 2008 3:14 PM
All I remember of The Great Final is my father telling me that we are going to win the match, and I accepting our win before we won. I never knew what cricket was in those days, I must have been ten years old, and a few months more.
I do not remember the morning after, because no one discussed cricket with me, during those days. No one told me we had won the World Cup. All I knew about cricket were the rudimentary rules, like any other boy.
Posted by: saurah at June 1, 2008 7:47 PM
I was 3 years old when India won the 83 WC so i do not remember it, but i have heard a lot of stories about that win from my parents and relatives. In an age before satellite TV flooded our homes, everyone was sitting besides the radio, literally everyone from my extended family rejoicing every wicket taken. It must have been surreal. I had a similar moment when was following the Ind-Pak TM in Chennai, the same where Saching made 135 on AIR radio in my hostel( No Satellite then :D ) and we were devastated by the loss.
Such emotions have been replaced by advent of technology which enables watching a match even when you are in the Loo. Cricket has changed and so has the world with it, but what we have now is a more informed spectator and I hope as we move ahead, the bond between the viewer and the cricket strengthens.
Posted by: Jack at June 1, 2008 7:54 PM
I was very fortunate to be able to witness the Finals and follow a lot of the previous matches through the radio commentary. To win as many matches, especially over 120 over duration cannot be called a fluke. By that yardstick every world cup after that have also been big flukes. The fact that India has won no significant ODI matches before then, and has won several tournaments after that indicates that it was indeed a historic time, after which the Indian cricket team could believe they could compete with the best in the world. Yes, we are not undisputed world champions, but we have consistantly been winning big games over the years. We still have a long way to go , but are on the right track. Though not a big fan of IPL, I think it will help the younger cricketers tremendously, as they will be rubbing shoulders with iconic players. Mark needs to realise that the world order has indeed changed and it probably is hard to digest. A true sportsman will appreciate other's achievments.
Posted by: Sachal at June 1, 2008 10:08 PM
I still remember watching the 83 world cup on tv. I was 15 then, and I can still remember the catch taken by Kapil Dev. In the begining of this great article I was thinking to myself, the one thing I do remember (Kapil's catch) is not being mentioned! lol.....I also remember the envious look and feeling I had that India had won the world cup, but we Pakistani's havent! I was student of Mayo College, Ajmer at that time but at heart still a Pakistani, despite being a Hindu.
Well we got our own back in 1992. Lets see who gets the second first! Cheers
Posted by: Amit at June 1, 2008 10:48 PM
If Greenidge's dismissal was a fluke only because Sandhu didn't anticipate the ball swinging so much (which is what you think in spite of his claiming otherwise), then surely most of the seam bowlers in the world (Mcgrath, Asif included) get wickets by fluke for more often than not they do not know which way the ball is going to move off the pitch.
The first thing any sane sports writer should do is, by default, give credit to the sportsman.
Ashok, fluke in sports is less common than you think.
Posted by: Manish at June 2, 2008 12:37 AM
This article reminds me of my childhood days of 1983. We were hearing the commentary on BBC radio and watching the finals live for probably the first time of the World Cup. Kapil and his team had created history on the first match itself by beating the World Champions. That made us believe that we can win in One-day cricket. Certainly cricket has been never the same again in this country in dire need of Sporting heroes. World Championship of cricket in 1985 and rest was history. Salute to the Kapil's daredevils.
Posted by: NS at June 2, 2008 2:16 AM
That will probably be the greatest victory for Indian cricket atleast in limited overs cricket. To beat such a team twice in a tournament is not 'fluke'. Every member of the team chipped in and the WI were over confident in the final. Yes the shot of the tournament was the square drive by Kris Srikkanth off Andy Roberts. It was long before we came to know a certain Sehwag and Jayasuriya. Here was guy, that too an Indian, who played criket far ahead of his time and so unfortunate that people fail to recognise that.
And to Mark777 this tournament win was not a fluke because 2 years later we won another big tournament in your soil and we beat you soundly on the way. I think in chasing your total we probably lost only 1 or 2 wickets. Australia was weak during that period. Period. T
oday Australia is strong because others are relatively weak. Try to appreciate achievements. But i guess you Aussies never know that right, like you need to cheat openly to win tests at Sydney.
Posted by: nick at June 2, 2008 6:11 AM
Mark777, as an Anglo Aussie cricket supporter - or more importantly, a world cricket supporter, you are a completly ignorant moron, and yes its geese like you that do give Aussie's a bad name.
Good article by the way - i remember watching it as a kid.
Posted by: Ravi at June 2, 2008 7:08 AM
I had just finished my medical school at the the time India won the Prudential World Cup in 1983.Having not had the chance to watch the Finals live on Doordarshan,I could only catch it on the Radio.But,that historic day is etched in my memory as it is in the memory of millions of Indians.
The period 1983 to 1985 was a golden period for the cricketing shorter stuff in India. No wonder that grandmothers,mothers/daughters-in-laws all woke up very early to watch Live-the World Championship of Cricket in Australia in 1985.The pattern of fans in India changed during that period and this change had begun largely during the World Cup victory in England in the summer of 1983.
What Kapil and his Devils achieved in England was magic but certainly not a fluke as could be seen by the Indians consistent progress all through the course of the 1983 World Cup.To call the Indian victory a fluke would be similar to calling Warne & Co. winning the inaugural T20 IPL Cup yesterday a fluke!
Posted by: davi at June 2, 2008 10:06 AM
Yes a golden age for Indian cricket... but lets not get carried away. We still have a long way to go with ability and talent based selection, cricket schools and equal opportunity, etc
Mark777 has a (small) point in that WI and Aus are small nations who make the most of their talent through professionalism and dedication - and the best training and development methods.
We should use their model as an example - even the poorest kid might be our next hero.
Posted by: Venkat at June 2, 2008 10:27 AM
Wow Ashok!!! Myself being an avid cricket fan could actually visualise the match while reading each line. Guess those were the good old days when Doordarshan would telecast (LIVE) sometimes read as LIVE as in I LIVE IN A VILLA. And who can forget the ceremony that followed after Kapil held the WC in his hands. And Shrikkant Smoking away in the background. Thanks again for reliving those glorious moments of INDIAN CRICKET
Posted by: jondavluc at June 2, 2008 12:44 PM
ashu shane has done a lot of balls just like that in his time its not a fluke that guy can spin a lot do your studies trust me i have a dvd of him he has made a lot better delievers than the gatting ball. Indian supporters on here from what i read you are not any better than us Australians stop being hypocrites though i agree why you'd be offended by mark his comments a far from the truth Indians have for quite sometime being a good cricket team India need some good fielders though
and again dhoni is one good batter i am like his rough as gut batting and unique and but simple good captain skills so he i think could lead India into one great future
good work ashok i am liking your work interesting idea to talk about the past instead of ipl there is too many articles now about the ipl that are all the same
Posted by: RS at June 2, 2008 12:59 PM
Thank you for bringing back memories of being 16 again, watching the game on a black and white TV, brought in specially for the occasion, the despair at watching Gavaskar fall again in the tournament, the joy of Cheeka's cover drive, of my father coming back from office and watching the game. Of Greenidge being foxed, along with us, of the sense of possible when Llyod and Gomes were out (I was actually very afraid of Larry Gomes taking the game away), of giving up when Marshall and Dujon seemed to take it away, and the final overs of Amarnath accelerating and then deaccelerating (has any other bowler done that ever) to get Holding. Of crackers in Calcutta at midnight. Of screaming headlines the next day. It was a different time and era, a time of summer and hope. Thanks for bringing it back. Memorably.
Posted by: Ashu at June 2, 2008 1:30 PM
It is very refreshing to see a Blog owner on this site respond, you never see that in cricinfo. Honestly I am flattered that Ashok found my comments are worth responding!!
Back to the article,it was good except the jibe on sandhu's ball. I didn't have the good fortune of seeing this Live, but of the countless accounts of that momentous day, this is one of the best I have seen.
As for Mark's comments maybe there is some truth after all, remember we have won 1 silver and 2 bronzes in the last 6 Olympic games.
Posted by: Mohamed Z. Rahaman (Breado) at June 2, 2008 4:21 PM
Nice article, but several points missed. WI knew that India were no pushover. Just a couple of months before, India beat WI in an ODI in Berbice, Guyana.
Nevertheless, for most of us West Indians, it was unthinkable that India could beat us in the WC. That it happened is a combination of overconfidence on the WI part and and a very fighting and scrappy Indian team.
Kapil's 175 in an earlier match should have been an indication for the WI not to take India lightly. Kapil was quoted during the break in innings as saying that "we cannot hope to contain them, we have to bowl them out".
Whatever team you favour, one must give India its due. Personally, it was bitter sweet. I travelled to England and Lords to see my beloved WI win and I was let down, But I was happy for India and the lads from the land of my forefathers.
MOhamed Z. Rahaman (Breado)
Posted by: Anand at June 2, 2008 8:34 PM
I agree that WC 1983 was a major milestone for Indian cricket but personally believe that the 85 world championship of cricket in Australia is the one that had a bigger hand in turning Indian cricket around. I wouldnt take credit away from the hard work put in by Kapil and his boys in the 83 WC but the win is a combination of the efforts of India and the complacency of the WI team. It took India almost another 5 years to beat the WI in an ODI after the 83 WC. In the next 25 matches that followed between the two sides, India won only 3 of them.
But definitely the 83 WC made the Indian team believe more in themselves and take the ODI game more seriously. It also unearthed players like Srikkanth who were unconventional but effective.
The 85 WCC win not only saw India maintain a 100% win record in the tournament but also saw them blow away oppositions in almost all the matches. That was followed immediately by a victory in Rothman's cup Sharjah.
Yet a WC win is a WC win and always special
Posted by: Tejaswi at June 2, 2008 8:58 PM
Is there any way I can get hold of that article by Dom Moraes?
Posted by: manoj at June 3, 2008 3:04 AM
I don't know about you Ashok, But I was able to see the whole final! I was 11 and still remember it and how we celebrated after! For almost the whole innings i kept my fist together with one nail digging into the other hand and afraid to let go for obvious suspicions. It ended very well!! The windies choked. It was scary since all the biggies were there -lloyd, viv (i remember him getting out), the left gomes i think.. Thanks for writing about it!
Posted by: joe shah at June 3, 2008 11:55 AM
Um, maark777 please do not ever again forget to take your medication. By the way saw highlights of the match on Public Service Channel in the USA in 1983 and was delighted to have seen cricket covered on national TV there.
Posted by: Mohamed Z. Rahaman (Breado) at June 3, 2008 3:23 PM
to: Joe Shah
PSC is probably local to the county and state you were in at the time. Cricket has never been covered on National TV here in teh US. I know - I have been living here since 1980. I went to England to see WC 1983 and I paid a small fee to see WC 1987 and WC 1992 via statalite at a local college auditorium. Those were the days before the small dish statalite and internet.
Please check my previous comment. I still believe that not enough is said about India's win vs WI at Berbice, Guyana a few months earlier. That win is what I think made the Indians believe they could do it again.
Posted by: mahindra at June 3, 2008 10:31 PM
i really enjoyed the article.It brought back memories of when iwas a 14 year old listening to the game on radio in Berbice,Guyana.I think that the catch by Kapil Dev chaged the game.
Even though I backed the West Indies I wasn not disappointed with the result because I felt that Richards did not do his best.There was some politics involved. Even in those days there was insularity in west Indian cricket.Remember LLoyd is from Guyana and Richards from Antigua.Something was not right.
I was also at Albion,Berbice when Kapil Dev scored 71 39 balls and Gavaskar made 91in 1983. Great match!
As for Mark777 remember Australia will not remain no 1 forever.One gets the impression that umpires officiating in test matches involving Australa always give descisions in favour of Australia.
Posted by: saurabh somani at June 4, 2008 6:43 AM
had commented on this before, but dont know why my comments dont seem to be there...
ashok, just wanted to say that it is always a pleasure to read your articles. it's stuff like this that makes cricinfo the best cricket website.
i was one year old when india won the cup...but your piece (and some others on the net) have made me feel as if i didn't miss it.
and mark777, you have done an admirable job of displaying ignorance of cricket history, petulance, and a lack of logic - all in one para. way to go!!!
Posted by: Arjun at June 7, 2008 4:02 AM
Created History. We r Proud that we could witness that though we were very young that time.
Posted by: Jason at June 23, 2008 5:27 AM
One can't help but be in awe of the WI team in 83. India likewise had some memorable cricketers. Could the Indian victory have been a fluke? Surely, not to take anything away from the honest efforts of Ireland in the most recent world cup, but their surviving the first round was rather fluke-ish. I think the issue of a fluke here is irrelevant.
The Indian victory did something wonderful for cricket as a whole. It supercharged the attitude and interest in cricket in India and gave them longevity as a cricketing nation. One only needs to look at the systematic demise of cricket in Zimbabwe to really appreciate the effects of that Indian victory.
I was a big fan of Zimbabwe in the 96 world cup, not because I thought they had a chance of winning, but because they appeared to have become a stable cricketing nation.
I would like nothing more than to see 30 or 40 member nations someday, and the Indian victory in 83 earned them a permanent membership. That is surely important to all of us.
Posted by: vidhu Balakrishnan at June 25, 2008 2:01 PM
It is 25 years since India won the prudential world cup under Kapil Dev who was only 24 years old then. Captaining the Indian team at that age and also winning the world cup is no joke.
You never had the “jockeys”bowling for West Indies at that time. If you remember these were the exact words used by Sir. Vivian Richards referring to the present day fast bowlers from the Caribbean Islands.
The 1983 West Indian fast bowling quartet comprised of Marshall, Garner, Holding and Roberts in their ranks, each one capable of sending down shivers down the spine of the batsmen. India infact beat the West Indies twice in that world cup.
For sheer caliber of the players the Players of that generation were far ahead of the present generation. There were world-class batsmen and bowlers not to forget the world-class all rounders in Imran Khan, Kapil Dev, Richard Hadlee and Ian Botham.You bet, you will never see such talented all rounders playing together at the same time.
The windies were the undisputed world champions then having won the cup in 1975 and 1979. When India was bundled out for 183 in the finals of the 1983 world cup, The west Indians were on the way to win the world cup for the third time in a row. Nobody gave India any chance considering the batting line up the West Indians had.
With the kind of players the West Indians had no team on earth stood any chance of beating them .It was a great team, each one a superstar in his own right. But what followed was one of the biggest upsets in one-day cricket. India beat the mighty West Indians to win the world cup for the first time at Lords.
It was unbelievable; the whole of India was celebrating and for the few Indians present on that day at Lords, it was agony and ecstasy. Agony when India was bundled out for 183 and ecstasy when Kapil Dev held the world cup with Indian team cheering from the Lords balcony.
The 1983 world cup winning team had six all rounders in Kapil dev, Roger Binny, Madan Lal , Kirti Azad, Sandeep Patil, and Mohinder Amarnath . Balwinder Singh Sandhu , the Number 11 batsman was no rabbit with the bat either. This combination of six all rounders in the team eventually helped India to win the world cup.
Madan Lal and Roger Binny were outstanding with the ball, Yashpal Sharma and Sandeep Patil with the bat. Kapil dev's hurricane 175* against Zimbabwe was the turning point in the world cup for the Indians.
They looked like being humbled by the Zimbabweans but Kapil Dev produced one of the finest knocks in one-day cricket that turned the tie in India's favour. His catch to get rid of the great Vivian Richards off Madan Lal was another gem.
Madan Lal had this to say about that dismissal, " Even today everybody talk about the catch taken by Kapil to dismiss Vivian Richard's but forget it was I who bowled that delivery.
K Srikkanth's cameo knock of 38 was the highest score in the finals. And that beauty of a delivery from Balwinder Singh Sandhu to dismiss Gordon Greenidge is still fresh in memory of many a viewer who happened to see that match. Mohinder Amarnath played a vital role in India's triumph. He was the man of the match in the semi finals as well as the finals.
Year 2008 and the world cup winning team is coming together at Lords. We still remember Srikkanth puffing away to glory at the Lord’s balcony. I am sure all those who have seen that match will feel nostalgic. Thanks a lot to Kapil Dev and his devils for providing us something, which we can talk about after 25 years. It is all part of history now. Can history repeat itself?
Post your comment
Ashok Malik has been a journalist since 1991 and is currently senior editor at the Pioneer. His one unfulfilled journalistic ambition is to be a gossip writer in a film magazine. The cricket buff inside him is a split personality. The newsperson is convinced of IPL's potential and that, inevitably, it will gobble up the rest of cricket; the romantic dreams of a glorious day at the Elysian Oval, with Trumper scoring a century before lunch – and batting on forever.