« Test cricket needs Gayle | | India (and Scotland) a shoo-in for the finals »
May 21, 2009
Posted by Andy Zaltzman on 05/21/2009
History and stats point to Ashes glory for England
![]()
| ||
The announcement of the Australian touring party has cranked up the anticipation levels for the most hyped England series of recent times still further. This is a fortunate development, because the cricketing build-up, in the form of England’s alleged Test series against the supposed West Indies, has been numbingly undramatic, as is seemingly the modern way.
This was a short and not particularly sweet series, with most of the country, almost all of the cricket-watching world, and half of the participants seeming to take little interest in proceedings. England played increasingly well, confidently and decisively, but the overwhelming sensation as the visitors completed their contractual obligation of a second innings was: “What was the point of that?”
England failed to win even a single Test against West Indies for 16 years from 1974. They have just won two in a week and even the players themselves were struggling to look excited about it. There is much talk about the sanctity of Test cricket, but this series felt as special and meaningful as a Las Vegas wedding presided over by an unqualified Elvis impersonator who had lost his costume, wig and glasses in a poker game and was wearing a borrowed hospital smock instead.
The cricket-watching public stayed away in their millions. This was due to a number of mitigating factors, including, principally, that they are not imbeciles. Thanks to the internet, they now have easy access to meteorological records for the Durham area in May dating back thousands of years, as well as the ability to check scorecards from recent series in England and guess what kind of contest the West Indies were likely to provide. Perhaps they were also swayed by Chris Gayle’s pre-match posturing, which, following extensive computer analysis, has now been officially confirmed as the least inspiring team talk in the history of organised sport.
In five full matches since their abject capitulation in Jamaica, England’s batsmen − all of them, together, including Onions and Panesar − have averaged over 60 runs per wicket, with 12 hundreds and 12 half-centuries. This despite their best player, Pietersen, mostly saving his runs for when they are really needed, as is his tendency. They have now proved conclusively that they are good players against mediocre bowling attacks on friendly wickets backed up by fielders with sausages for fingers.
Whether this frenzy of accumulation has ironed out or merely camouflaged previous technical flaws will be revealed in two months’ time. The bowling was encouraging and impressive – Jimmy Anderson could have informed Taylor and Benn in writing several months in advance exactly where and when he was going to bowl those outswinging missiles of perfection to them, and they would still seen their off stumps annihilated. But (and this is a Mike-Gatting-sized but), West Indies are not Australia, and May is not July.
It is certainly unlikely that the Australians, tactical maestros that they are, will make the same mistake as Fidel Edwards, West Indies’ key bowler, in erroneously pinpointing Anderson as England’s key batsman. Perhaps the Barbados Ballista was duped by the Lancastrian’s world-record-breaking refusal to be out for nought – Bradman had four ducks quacking on his career board of shame by the equivalent stage of his career, and had taken 126 fewer wickets, making Anderson statistically by far the greatest all-round cricketer in history.
The upshot of all this is that my five-month-old son has already seen England score more hundreds (twelve) against West Indies than I saw in my first 12 years of cricket watching from 1981. He has also, more surprisingly, seen the West Indians plunder as many centuries (nine) off England’s bowlers as they did in 14 Tests between 1985 and 1990 – so he presumably thinks in his tiny bald head that Gordon Greenidge, Viv Richards and Richie Richardson were significantly worse than Devon Smith, Lendl Simmonds and Brendan Nash. Oh, the folly of youth. One day, I will sit him down and explain with the use of graphs why this is not the case. And he will humour me for a couple of minutes before putting on his Delhi Daredevils shirt and asking me what a Test match is.
History now points unerringly towards a home win in the Ashes – England have always won the urn after demolishing sub-standard opposition in a two-match early season series. Admittedly, this conclusion is based on the rather unscientific single previous example of 2005, but a fact is a fact. When you factor in that this West Indies team is better than the 2005 Bangladeshis, it becomes clear that England are all set to improve on their Ashes performance of four years ago, and win by at least 4-0.
They are, after all, unbeaten in six now, and coming off a run of three consecutive home Test wins. Australia, by contrast, are in disarray – they lost their most recent Test, have not won a series in England for eight years, have never won a Test in Cardiff, are bringing a squad with only one front-line bowler who has ever taken a Test wicket in England, have never won the Ashes with a player called Nathan in the squad, have not beaten the old enemy without a leg spinner for over 25 years, have never beaten England while there has been a black American president, have not won the urn when a Labour government in Britain has been within a year of being voted out of office, and traditionally struggle when a Queen has been on the throne for 57 years (England’s glorious win in 1894-95 will be preying on their minds day and night).
A further incontrovertible statistical truth is that England have never lost a home Test match finishing in May (10 wins, 4 draws), leading to the unarguable conclusion that the ECB should have crammed the entire five-Test Ashes series into this sacred month, to be followed by a 53-match one-day international series to bring the summer to a lucratively rousing climax.
Andy Zaltzman was born a satirist. He has a weekly podcast with John Oliver at The Times
|
|||||
Posted by: Andyroxmysox on 05/21/2009
first!
Posted by: rob heinen on 05/21/2009
My guess is that the ECB has done their numbers as well, came up with the same conclusion as you and planned the 2 test series against the West Indies solely for that reason.
Posted by: Sam on 05/21/2009
So, we're going to win the Ashes then?
I'm not scared of those Aussies. How can I be, I've never heard of any of them.
Posted by: Avni Malhotra on 05/21/2009
Hahaha!! you mesmerize me (and turn me into a laughing buddha!) every time you put your pen to paper Mr. Zaltzman!! And you have given so many statistically "significant" facts that now i earnestly hope england wins the Ashes!!
Black US Prez lucky for the english?? OMG!!
But Ashes or not.... please keep up the good work and continue to tickle our funny bones!!
Posted by: Jas on 05/21/2009
mate, thats bloody hilarious!
If only I could answer my stats exam in the same manner!
Posted by: Rehan on 05/21/2009
This was the best article yet! It had me chuckling the whole way through, and I even read paragraph twice because it was so funny! Andy, you are a genius! Keep up the magnificent nonsense!
Posted by: Suhas on 05/21/2009
Andy, you're all right.
I eagerly look forward to a 4-0 England victory as, among other reasons, it would be most interesting to read what you make of it
Posted by: Anant on 05/21/2009
Thats a wildly entertaining post! You're statistical observations are awesomely creative...BUT don't be too quick to dub it a metaphor or an exaggeration..ever heard of the butterfly effect? a single flap of a butterfly wing in one part of the world can cause nuclear war in another! so..lets see now..new black president implies 'change' implies good tie-ups with the UK on dealing with this recession implies strengthened UK economy implies better bank balances for cricketers implies KP and his brethren are in high spirits implies England win the ashes! There u go Mr. Zaltman!
Posted by: Damien on 05/21/2009
So, that's obviously incontrovertible proof! England will win the Ashes. Damnit. And us Aussies will just have to find some way to encourage Warne out of retirement. Anyone got a spare chocolate bar?
Posted by: Summit on 05/21/2009
absolutely hilarious. the aussies would be shaking in their boots after reading this. the best part was that the aussies have never beaten england while there was a black american president. way to go..
Posted by: Haseeb on 05/21/2009
As always, hilarious.
Posted by: President Payne on 05/21/2009
I very nearly just got thrown out of the quiet section of my library upon discovering that James Anderson is, statistically, the greatest all-round cricketer the game has ever seen. Many thanks Mr Zaltman for making procrastination from revision so enjoyable.
Posted by: waterbuffalo on 05/21/2009
My favourite part was the black president, 57 years for the Queen and Cardiff, though now it does seem to make sense because didn't the aussies lose a WC match there once? Anyway, on the strength of this statistically miraculously attentive article I am changing my original score of 5-0 for the aussies to 2-2 with one rain out. God save the Queen and Posh Spice!
Posted by: tonyp on 05/21/2009
What I don't understand is why the undoubtedly brilliant Mr Zaltzman has time to pen this sort of thing when his statistical expertise could be of so much benefit in the commercial sphere. This is just the sort of meticulously researched extrapolation they so dearly need.
Posted by: Henwelder on 05/21/2009
Superb as always Mr Zaltman, i look forward to your quirky articles, they are one of the few things that genuinely make me laugh out loud. Many thanks.
Posted by: Shankar on 05/21/2009
The best by Andy - or should I say, to paraphrase Homer Simpson, the best 'so far'. Keep it coming!
Posted by: thom on 05/21/2009
i guess im the only one here who didnt find that funny.. or maybe im the only aussie who read it.. you know what i did find funny.. all the poms in the comments section acting cool and cocky... hahahaha it seems like they actually think they can win a single match this series.. oh well.. im sure this comment will get a lot of nice backlash, but i dont care cos i wont ever be back on this comment board, BUT my response to all of it is this: in 2 months time.. come have a look back here and see who is right... we all know who it will be..
Posted by: JK on 05/22/2009
"Jimmy Anderson could have informed Taylor and Benn in writing several months in advance exactly where and when he was going to bowl those outswinging missiles of perfection to them, and they would still seen their off stumps annihilated" - hilarious!!! Excellent post AZ...may your tribe increase.....
Posted by: Aubs on 05/22/2009
Unfortunately, out of all your hilarious statistical stats at the end of this great article one of them might actually be a genuine reason for us losing the ashes. "have not beaten the old enemy without a leg spinner for over 25 years" is unfortunately a stat that now stands up head & shoulders above the rest. My kingdom for Warnie to un-retire!!!
Posted by: Vinod Gangaputhran on 05/22/2009
Wow....Andy-u r in good nick as usual.....nice opening...however the middle order and tail provided the real fireworks....nice statistical analysis....though you might want to add no Eng team lost when London was bombed either(ref-the 2005 bombings-and i am sorry if i have upset anyone'here by an attempt to make fun by drawing analogy to a tragic event-was never my intention to caus distress to anyone)...any wayz....how about writing on something on what it would take to get the likes of Warnie, mcgrath,gilly, Langer, Hayden, martyn, waugh to come of retirement to beef up the aus team...Adios
Posted by: giri on 05/22/2009
thats it, one more reason to keep freddie out of the ashes-james anderson is the best allrounder in test history. just one problem, after eng's win,who's gonna break the drinking binge record freddie set in 2005?
Posted by: rext on 05/22/2009
Yeah, very convincing but you overlooked our main weapon. We're digging up Don, propping him up at one end and you won't have a snowball's chance of getting him out! Unless you cheat. Again! And big Merv the selector will be there in his Hawaiian shirt should he be needed, and you all know what his intelligence can do. Yes I know, not much, but he won't need to do much to knock over a handful of Poms. And we're generally taller than youse and drink more beer, so what you could possibly base your assumptions on in the real world's absolutely beyond me!
Posted by: Flash Ash on 05/22/2009
Thom, Get a life mate!! Everyone knows the Aussies like to dish it, but have real trouble taking it!!
Great insights Andy, Jimmy can hold his head up high!!
Cheers
Posted by: RC on 05/22/2009
One of your best Andy!
Posted by: Prasanth Nottath on 05/22/2009
I loved this line "One day, I will sit him down and explain with the use of graphs why this is not the case. And he will humour me for a couple of minutes before putting on his Delhi Daredevils shirt and asking me what a Test match is." Brilliant. Hilarious and thought provoking at the same time.
Keep em coming, Andyman. You are the best thing to happen to us cricinfolovers since,...er... cricinfo.
Posted by: Dom on 05/22/2009
Thanks for continuing to prove that cricket, satire and whimsy, and perhaps most crucially of all, statistics, are a delicious combination.
The reference to your son's bald head made me think his hairstyle was much like yours.
Posted by: Atul Bhogle on 05/22/2009
Take a bow, Mr.Zaltzman. For a name which appears suspiciously of German origin, your humour is on par with PGW!
Posted by: Maurice Clark on 05/22/2009
Great article. Love the use of the statistics. What a great laugh to start the day.
Hey Thom, you should lighten up a little. It was a satirical article! I am an auzzie, and I loved it.
Posted by: Louise on 05/23/2009
Very, very funny. I'm an Oz fan as well and I think it is a cracking article. So refreshing after all the po-faced talk of the Ashes.
Posted by: Vineeth on 05/24/2009
Awesome work, Andy.
Posted by: mark on 05/24/2009
ha ha ha remember 2006 5-nil remember the name mitchel johnson he will be giving you poms nightmares real soon
Posted by: ted on 05/25/2009
5 nil the first time 80 years is the only stat you need to mention andy.if fat freddy does not play well be right.
Posted by: Sam on 05/26/2009
Mark, he already is giving us nightmares.
And Thom, for pity's sake...
If you're taking Andy seriously...
Posted by: Sanya on 05/27/2009
Yeah mate, Anderson is the best all-rounder in cricketing history. Atleast England have the best bowlers in the world-jimmy, Sidey, Freddie & Stuart provides a good support by taking key wickets. I'm predicting England will win 2-0 or 3-0 as I don't expect Oz to win an Ashes test with such bowlers. BTW Nice work, amazing statistics, all the statistics you provided ensure us that England is gonna win it. Keep it up!
Posted by: bgc on 05/27/2009
Flintoff's (lack of) fitness is crucial
How could you write about England's Ashes chances without mentioning Fintoff's fitness; and the devastating effect it will have if Flintoff is - by some miracle - fit?
If Flintoff is fit then - obviously! - England will have to play him. And England can only play Flintoff by dropping somebody better, unbalancing the side, and destroying team cohesion.
This could be the first Ashes to be decided by lack of injuries to a key player.
Posted by: John on 05/27/2009
this is utterly rubbish, Aus will smash Eng 5-0
Posted by: KG on 05/30/2009
Earth shattering this is. Worse is the fact Hughes has scored 3 centuries so by the law of averages he should have a horror Ashes series. Hey the WAGS are here too. Last time they came we lost 2-1 to the Saffas. Man this isn't looking good...
yo Thom ease up. He was joking.
Posted by: J Ci Swing on 05/30/2009
If Australia play at their best then Australia will win, but if they don't then England may win back the Ashes.
Posted by: nht on 06/02/2009
It just cracks me up the complacency of England and its fans. Never, ever, count the Aussies out of anything. If you watched their tour of South Africa earlier this year, you'd learn this. That tour was supposed to have been the coronation of South Africa as Test kings, but what we learned is Mitchell Johnson is one of the best all-rounders in the game today and Australian cricket is alive and well thank you very much. While I don't see Australia destroying England with five wins like 2006, I still see them pulling this out 2-1 or 3-1. Other than India and South Africa, England hasn't faced a serious test since the 2006 Ashes. Twice against New Zealand and West Indies is no indication of progress.
Posted by: santafanta on 06/04/2009
as we all know the poms will rely on their foreign players to try and make a fist the series, cant see England coming close unless Anderson can fires with bat and ball!!
Posted by: Rahul Oak on 06/04/2009
So it's official. Andy Zaltzman is England's answer to Glenn McGrath (at least in making pre-series predictions and possibly twisting his ankle on rouge cricket balls).
Posted by: Rahul Oak on 06/04/2009
And btw, I totally imagine the likes of 'nht' going on about "Never, ever, count the Aussies out of anything. If you watched their tour of South Africa ... yada yada" to be one of the types who watch Lord of the Rings and comment on how unrealistic hobbits (and elves for that matter) are. Cheer up mate!
Posted by: Drop Bear on 06/04/2009
The comments on this article show that only about half of all Australians actually have a sense of humour.
Nice work Andy!
Posted by: Clean Sweep on 06/10/2009
Gordon Brown out... LBW bowled Hilfenhaus :)
Posted by: The Shraink on 06/17/2009
It is an Ashes summer in England, and the Poms have just beaten an egg (West Indies)... of course they think they'll win.
If the Aussies win the first test in Cardiff, the series will immediately be at 2-0, Lords is an automatic write-off for the poms, that is why it is not the venue for the first test.
Pommie confidence is a wonderful thing to see. It is a beautiful bubble, inflated to grand proportions in the early Summer sunlight, kept wet by the English rain, and it floats gently and high on the hopes and dreams of the hopeful dreamers that are the barmy army and its cohorts...
but reality is a prick!
Posted by: EnglishtotheCore on 06/22/2009
The best team will win. England.
| Post your comment | |||
|
|
Andy Zaltzman was born in obscurity in 1974. He has been a sporadically-acclaimed stand-up comedian since 1999, and has appeared regularly on BBC Radio 4. He is currently one half of TimesOnline’s hit satirical podcast The Bugle, alongside John Oliver (The Daily Show with John Stewart). He also writes for The Times newspaper, and is the author of Does Anything Eat Bankers? (And 53 Other Indispensable Questions For The Credit Crunched).
Zaltzman’s love of cricket outshone his aptitude for the game by a humiliating margin. He once scored 6 in 75 minutes in an Under-15 match, and failed to hit a six between the ages of 9 and 23. He would have been ideally suited to Tests, had not a congenital defect left him unable to play the game to anything above genuine village standard. Aged 21, when fielding at deep midwicket, he dropped the same batsman three times in fifteen minutes, and has not been selected by England before or since
Recent Posts
- The Official Confectionery Stall Cricketing Morality Challenge
- Spaghetti Bolognaise with a side of moral quandary
- England's one-day masterplan
- Getting the choke out of the way
- 'Stalled' from doing the Ashes review
- A frisky evening with Statsguru
- England set for oddest Ashes win
- Fancy England scoring 1003 to win
- England's win and Ricky's flight to Argentina
- A quick Sunday stat

