Page2
The Confectionery Stall

« Come on, umpires. Walk faster please | | How to speed up over-rates, part 1 »

November 19, 2008

Posted by Andy Zaltzman on 11/19/2008

Broad appeal





'Howwwwwizzzzaaaaaaat?' © Getty Images

The second match between India and England was noteworthy for two things. Firstly, confirmation that one half-arsed warm-up game is insufficient preparation for taking on one of the world’s strongest teams on unfamiliar pitches. And secondly, for one of the greatest appeals in the history of cricket.

When Stuart Broad rent the skies of Indore with a caterwauled ‘Howwwwwizzzzaaaaaaat?’ after a well-bowled cutter trapped Rohit Sharma in front of his stumps, he did so with such assurance and certainty that a raised umpirical finger seemed a certainty. The only weakness in Broad’s appeal was the inconvenient truth that the ball had hit Sharma’s bat. And nothing else.

One can only imagine the mental processes that must have coursed through umpire Russell Tiffen’s brain at that moment. Marginal bat-pad appeals are what the professional umpire lives for, why he has spent years incarcerated within the ICC’s secret umpire training and indoctrination facility (rumoured to be in the basement of Wormwood Scrubs prison in London).

But this was not a questionable bat-pad or pad-bat incident. Sharma hit the ball with his bat, whilst his legs were still some distance away. And presumably Tiffen, elite umpire that he is, saw Sharma hit the ball with his bat whilst his legs were still some distance away. And yet Broad appealed with the confidence of a mathematics graduate asserting to an innumerate friend that 3 plus 3 equals 6.

Tiffen must have been momentarily overcome with feelings of confusion and doubt, a fear that his eyesight and/or sanity were failing him, that the cruel Gods of cricket were punishing him for poor decision in a previous match. The ball hit the bat, and the bat hit the ball, and yet there was the bowler leaping up and down, arms and head akimbo, as if the batsman himself had signed an admission of his own lbw guilt. No-one could have blamed Tiffen, in the circumstances, if he had raised the finger of doom out of pure discombobulation. It took a display of quite monumental calmness and self-assurance to give Sharma not out.

For Broad’s part, the appeal was so far-fetched and genuine that there can be no suggestion that this was a devious scheme to hoodwink the official and finesse a wicket from thin air. One can therefore ascribe his behaviour to a mixture of youthful excitement in the middle of an outstanding spell, the effects of the heat; perhaps an unfamiliarity with certain aspects of the lbw law, or the fact that Sharma’s bat might look a bit like a leg from certain angles. And to the England seamer’s new one-man campaign to balance the increasing dominance of bat over ball by trying to persuade the ICC that, on flat batting pitches, bowlers should be credited with a wicket for a nice piece of bowling.

 
Feedback Feedback

Comments

Posted by: Biswadeep on 11/19/2008

Hilarious, from beginning to end! :) "Wicket for a nice piece of bowling"?? lol.. :D :D

Posted by: Kunal on 11/19/2008

Good article in a lighter vein...........but memories of Sehwag getting banned for one match due to to "Excessive" appealing does come to mind. One can not help but wonder what would have happened if Broad was from India/Pakistan or Sri Lanka.

Posted by: Krishna on 11/19/2008

Incredibly funny article to cheer up a dreary work day. Keep them coming Andy!

Posted by: Rakshit on 11/19/2008

Good Article....Quite Hilarious..

Posted by: viren on 11/19/2008

This one of the funniest articles I have read in a long time! Simply because of the truth in it! I live in Brazil (and play for its National team) and I can watch the matches only over the internet, while watching this appeal, same thoghts passed through my head as well!!! I thought my eyes were betraying me, till I saw the replay... My congratulations to the umpire and to you Mr. Zaltzman for the entertainment!!!

Viren.

Posted by: Prathap on 11/19/2008

Ha ha ha.... I really wonder how one could dwell so much on a seemingly simple incident. Enjoyable post :)

Posted by: Gaurang on 11/19/2008

I am really agree with Andy. If Broad is from any of the continent side, up to the time he definitely got a ban.

Posted by: ravi on 11/19/2008

it was funny in parts, the article. but, come on, give the lad a break, there is no way he would have appealed so vehemently, had he even the slightest doubt that 'Sharma hit the ball with his bat whilst his legs were still some distance away'. it made for fun watching, though.

Posted by: Sanjay on 11/19/2008

I saw the match, the appeal was too much, Broad went on and on about it. It was obvious that the ball hit the bat and that was it.

Very funny article Andy...! Keep it up...

Posted by: Vipul on 11/19/2008

I strongly felt, when Stuart Broad said... Howwwwwizzzzaaaaaaat? Ideally Tiffin should have said - "Thats bad...!"

Posted by: Shekhar on 11/19/2008

This is the best thing I have read today. Hillarious to the core. I am almost tripping of my office chair. Now I know what they mean when they say "Cricket is a funny ole game". I always understood the old part but today I have first time understood why it is funny.

Posted by: NGD on 11/19/2008

Funny. Funny. Funny.
Keep it up!

Posted by: Anonymous on 11/19/2008

Hey Andy! u didn't have to read so much into it! Never the less, it's a good article.

Posted by: Shekhar on 11/19/2008

This is the best thing I have read today. Hillarious to the core. I am almost tripping of my office chair. Now I know what they mean when they say "Cricket is a funny ole game". I always understood the old part but today I have first time understood why it is funny.

Posted by: Murali on 11/19/2008

Funny article. But, remember the match referee was from Subcontinent and player was from England. if it had been other way around, the player would have received a heavy fine, if not a one match ban

Posted by: ashfatsuha on 11/19/2008

yes, anywhere but from the subcontinent. I fear what would've happened if he were to be from Bangladesh.......perhaps banned for life!
Fine article though

Posted by: K Singh on 11/19/2008

Broad is very fortunate that he does not represent an asian team. they would have docked 20-30% of his match fee. I do feel bad at times about recent BCCI's behaviour but incidents like this one justify all that.

Posted by: Kunal on 11/19/2008

Andy, that was hilarious. Totally awesome! I do wish most newscasters/reporters could be half as funny. Mornings would be less depressing.

Posted by: kaiser1 on 11/19/2008

It is a very funny article to read . I enjoyed it to the core of my heart and brain. But still i wonder if Stuart Broad had been reported for excessive appealing and his father Mr. Chris Broad would have been dealing with the case of (spirit of the game), code of conduct or some other sort of behavioural conduct. It would certainly be an interesting scenario for the viewers to watch and read the news afterwards.
Thanks.

Posted by: Sravan on 11/19/2008

Lol!

I think the write up about Andy Zaltzman is as funny as this article:P!...

Posted by: Dev on 11/19/2008

That is such a great start to the day! That was hillarious, keep it up!

Posted by: Jayakrishnan on 11/19/2008

Now I understand........... "CRICKET IS A FUNNY GAME"

Posted by: Raman Chopra, Montreal on 11/19/2008

I saw it and for a moment I thought Ishant was OUT. So convincing was the appeal.The other issue about if Broad was from India/ Pakistan etc. ? Well some would argue look what Bhajji got away with ? This is the romance of cricket. Good or bad decisions will always happen. But Thank God the days of Evil decisions of Indo-Pak matches are over. Nice article. Loved it. Keep it up Andy.

Posted by: Hinders on 11/19/2008

Don't be so high and mighty about Broad, all of you calling for a ban.

We all know that Lalit Mohdi has the ICC in his pocket, hence why Harbajhans incident was dropped months ago, hence why he tried to have the 1st est moved, and hence why you guys seem to think that if you call for something to happen, it will.

It gets my goat, that as with every other sport, money now talks louder than fair play in cricket, too.

Bowlers make such mistakes - in a follow through, having bowled a ball at 85-90 mph, they're off balance, and sometimes what they think they've seen just isn't correct.

I bet if you asked Broad now, he'd say that at the time, he thought it was out, but havinv seen it since, he thinks its a stupid appeal to have made.

But not worth a ban.

Persistent and unnecessary appealing is a different matter, however.

You'll see Monty do plenty of that in the tests - now theres more of a candidate for a ban in my opinion.

Posted by: Sriram on 11/19/2008

yeah its true!!! very bad sight for Broad may be!!!!!!!! thank god most umpires would give tat as for bowler's confident appeal, gud umpiring!!!

Posted by: keshav on 11/19/2008

Funny, really funny. It is not broad appeal, the broadest appeal by Broad. He proved his name is Broad.

Thanks for the fun.

Posted by: anshuj on 11/19/2008

It is really very funny . I was watching on TV and did thought that Rohit was out , only watching is on slow motion i realized pad is nowhere close .
May be i and Borad have vision problem.

Anshuj

Posted by: Deepen on 11/19/2008

Great piece of article. Good work. Keep it up.

Posted by: Binesh, Mumbai on 11/19/2008

Andy, you just made me roll off my office chair with laughter! If i lose my job in recessionary times like these, i know whom to blame :-). Keep them coming mate.

Posted by: manish batsa on 11/19/2008

cricket and cricinfo needed you. welcome :D

Posted by: tony on 11/19/2008

if it was an indian appealing like broad and his father was the ref i am sure that the bowler would be suspended.

Posted by: Anonymous on 11/19/2008

Good Stuff.. enjoyed it..

Posted by: Bhagirath Gaonkar on 11/19/2008

A very funny article indeed. The appeal was simply ridiculous. If only Broad was from the sub-continent, I have absolutely no doubt that he would have been banned for at least 1 match apart from being flayed from the media the world over(especially Australia) for the 'unsportsmanlike' behavior and acrimonious conduct that brought disrepute to the 'gentleman's' game

Posted by: Sayf on 11/19/2008

Just saw the clip online.Whats more amusing to me that Broads appeal is Ravi Shastri the commentator going "thats close" as soon as Broad goes up.Its a few seconds before the replay comes on and up until that point, both Shastri and the other guy (Botham?)think its a good appeal.

Posted by: RP on 11/19/2008

Somehow, I like the young lad... one excessive appeal in an otherwise good performance may be excused; I also feel, now that India is on its ways, all the scribes seem to have suddenly taken a liking for the winning team, even some one like Tony claiming them to be the heir-apparent for the no. of position... I am an ardent Indian fan and no doubt, Dhoni, Yuvi & Company are doing a wonderful job, but to be no. 1, atleast wait for a couple of years of consistent performance in all forms of the game, then perhaps, you can lay claim on the no. 1 position... till then, simply wait and watch and admire the good stuff... Cheers, RP...

Posted by: sauvik on 11/19/2008

nice piece of stuff man. enjoyed it a lot. keep it up.

Posted by: Nick on 11/19/2008

In fairness to Broad, he did say after the game in an interview that had his Dad been the match referee he would have lost his match fee (Stuart that is). So he knows how lucky he was to get away with a slap on the wrist, and they probably understoon he's a young lad learning. No need for all the subcontinent drawbridge-raising and sour suggestions about what would have happened if Broad was from Asia - he isn't and therefore it's moot.

Posted by: Noel on 11/19/2008

What a totally pointless article. I hope every time someone is given out when they shouldn't have been you are not going to waste yours, mine and everyone elses time by writing an article like this. Broad is a young cricketer excited by playing cricket why try and question his character or his integrity.

Posted by: sumanth on 11/19/2008

hilarious!
extremely funny and marvellous...:)
keep the good work!
the bat looking like a leg lol!

Posted by: Sid on 11/19/2008

Awesome article! Had me laughing all the while, and certainly cheered me up at work! :)

Posted by: Ashish Nepal on 11/19/2008

This is issue trying to be raised for what???? for Indian field, umpire, or Indian game or sportsman spirit ???? nothing else but this is only anger of defeat...side you favour for.... indian has faced really bad time with 7 ture and 1 controversial appeal/bad decision in australia which made them to lose the test match series where the result could have been really opposite what happend in clear word is india should have own that test match serious. thank you gentlemen Andy Zaltzman ... thanks for your absurd writing

Posted by: richard lobo on 11/19/2008

dude
dats hillarious
cricinfo needs u

Posted by: Raghav on 11/19/2008

Very funny Andy Keep it up.

Posted by: Manoj Rawal on 11/19/2008

This was the best article really. What a way to start the article and what an ending... simply. i could not restrict laughing. Every word had a special tone. Broad appealed with the confidence of a mathematics graduate asserting to an innumerate friend that 3 plus 3 equals 6.One can therefore ascribe his behaviour to a mixture of youthful excitement in the middle of an outstanding spell, the effects of the heat; perhaps an unfamiliarity with certain aspects of the lbw law, or the fact that Sharma’s bat might look a bit like a leg from certain angles.These lines were like Cherry. really a funny article with Clear visions. Good Job!!Keep it up!!!

Posted by: Indian on 11/19/2008

Umpires learn from Mahanama, jus dont blindly follow the books, then there is no difference between u and us sittting here. Give a nice judgement keeping in view the spirit of the game and how the bans affect players and also the readers. They add nothing to the game atleast learn by now.

Posted by: Anonymous on 11/19/2008

Lucky Stuart If only Broad was from the sub-continent, I have absolutely no doubt that he would have been banned for at least 1 match apart from being flayed from the media the world over(especially Australia)

Posted by: Popey on 11/19/2008

It was a mistake. Kunal, Bhagirath - remember Harbhajan was let off on a racism charge and the rules of the game were changed specifically for Murali!

Posted by: Rags on 11/19/2008

Hilarious..'unfamiliarity with some aspects of lbw law'... indeed - ball hits bat..appeal very loudly and get an lbw was the strategy!! I am not sure if anyone has commented on this- I think it was Pathan taking a run from the batting end after touching the ball and Broad charging down the wicket, ostensibly to collect the ball and hit the stumps - got in Pathan's way and quite deliberately kept his right leg stuck out in the batsman's way - but as it turned out Broad was the one who fell!! Reminded me of the Gambhir incident!
Please correct me if I'm wrong - maybe the names perhaps but the event did happen!!

Posted by: Rishikesh Mehta on 11/19/2008

Funny as hell. First time I read this article and Andy, I've become your fan.

Posted by: Rahul Rasal on 11/19/2008

Enjoyed the article completly. Only thing I would disagree is, England team not getting enough practise (first 2 lines). I lived and played cricket in India and England, both countries. The flat Indian batting wickets do not need any special practise. In England, till you reach county or national level, everybody play cricket on pitches which are very much like Indian pitches. Rather, we have seen in the past that, English batsmen use to score 100s of runs from their first match in India.
Its hot, dry, flat and very good for batting.
Just give credit to Indian bowlers, who managed to put all that pressure on England. Also, India is a far better fielding side than England (Ian Bell's run out by Raina in 2nd match).
Just see the difference between line-length-swing of Zaheer-Munaf and English bowlers. Also, we have seen that Flintoff did create problems for Indians.

Posted by: RP on 11/19/2008

Somehow, I like the young lad... one excessive appeal in an otherwise good performance may be excused; I also feel, now that India is on its ways, all the scribes seem to have suddenly taken a liking for the winning team, even some one like Tony claiming them to be the heir-apparent for the no. of position... I am an ardent Indian fan and no doubt, Dhoni, Yuvi & Company are doing a wonderful job, but to be no. 1, atleast wait for a couple of years of consistent performance in all forms of the game, then perhaps, you can lay claim on the no. 1 position... till then, simply wait and watch and admire the good stuff... Cheers, RP...

Posted by: Martin on 11/19/2008

What a load of tosh. I fail to see where there is anything remotely funny in that article. Broad made a mistake, nothing more. And then we get the Indians saying any one of them would've been fined heavily for it. No, that is not excessive appealing, that is one appeal the lad got wrong.

At least Broad didn't give an unsporting wave to a man he had just got out. Was Harbhajan fined for that or have referees just given up with him now for fear the toys come out of the pram again?

Falling off office chairs??? Do me a favour, it didn't even raise a smile.

Posted by: karpagam on 11/19/2008

brilliant blog....keep writing....

Posted by: sups on 11/19/2008

outrageous...can't thank you enough Andy...this is exactly what we need amidst all the number crunching, opponent bashing and self promoting.
after all it is just a game and when someone so genuinely talented conjures up such an insanely funny and incredibly witty article practically out of thin air, one should just appreciate it and leave the bitching for some other post.
I have fallen head over heels Andy...please keep writing!!

Posted by: Ram on 11/19/2008

Very funny article Andy!"... or the fact that Sharma’s bat might look a bit like a leg from certain angles..." I almost tripped out of my chair laughing at this sentence :D. Good one!

Posted by: Debasis on 11/19/2008

This article of Andy has transcended into a piece of fine literature...keep it up..thanks.

Posted by: Hersh on 11/19/2008

Thank god for sarcasm

Posted by: Pedro Alleyne on 11/19/2008

I think Andy Zaltman must use his judgement correctly,and don't be so bias against the English bowlers.

Posted by: rohan on 11/19/2008

absolutely completely hilarious..funniest cricket article i've read!1

Posted by: Amar on 11/19/2008

Hilarious piece
And I should say the killer part is, "Tiffen must have been momentarily overcome with feelings of confusion and doubt..."

Good job Andy!

Posted by: Tonda on 11/19/2008

Andy Good article. Apparently some people are too shallow to understand that this article is a sarcasm. If they don't get it - then the apparently should not read or comment on it. And also, I agree with most of the comments on what would happen if Broad was from the sub-continent. It really does not matter at all. The decisions handed out to players from the sub-continent were right decisions in the minds of the umpires and the boards - so deal with it and stop complaining. I am from the sub-continent too and you have to respect the game. Remember how you explain the game - "Its a Gentleman's Game".

Cheers and Thanks Andy for some light hearted humour - which some people just don't get it.

Posted by: braga on 11/19/2008

humourous!! loved reading it!!!

Posted by: sunil on 11/19/2008

Hi andy,

this is my first read of your wriing. Loved it,totally remeniscent of ton Sharpe/Barry norman.
great stuff
I also think we can all learn from the match refree who recognised ayoung bowlers desire to do well for himself and his country.
More so stuart bRoads father can probably learn a lot from your article and the thought process es of the match refree.. Ps I am indian so do understand all the victimisation feeling, but we have to move on and it make it better for all.

Posted by: sumit on 11/19/2008

61 comments on the post.. (62 now!) Reliving Stuart Broad's heartfelt holler - Andy seems to have finally discovered the right balance for his comedic cricket crazy crackle!

A truly funny post - more power to you, Andy!!

P.S. - love your podcast :)

Posted by: ruchit on 11/19/2008

Now this is something what you call forced humour. Didn't find it funny at all. Guys who fell out of their chairs reading this must be nuts I guess.

Posted by: Sriram on 11/19/2008

Ruchit...I guess you could call those who fell out of their chairs slightly unbalanced? :-)

Although from India, I agree with Martin in that it probably was a one-time mistake, probably from enthusiasm, not worthy of such discussion/criticism.

Posted by: rsh on 11/19/2008

Hilarious! Keep up Andy! There is nothing against Broad, but I also hear indian fans. They rightly complain the ICC attitude, who are looking for some mistakes by indians to haul them up. And of course they will run away once BCCI shows its power. Sad, but true..

Posted by: Sai on 11/20/2008

And yet Broad appealed with the confidence of a mathematics graduate asserting to an innumerate friend that 3 plus 3 equals 6! lolz! Very funny article Mr.Andy.
And all you cry babies calling for Broad's ban remember that Flintoff's decision in the 2nD oDI. Chill guys! Don't make a mockery of a humorous article!

Posted by: Sid on 11/20/2008

Broad just might have started a minor revolution, something the commentators would refer to as 'Premeditated appeal' in the future. Commentary might run as:
" Nice flight by Harbhajan..he appeals for a premeditated leg-before, but Pietersen has hit a premeditated switch hit. Its caught on the third man boundary.. and the umpire decides its not-out. Looks like it was a premeditated decision..."

Posted by: Krishna on 11/20/2008

"Sharma’s bat might look a bit like a leg from certain angles"... Andy Zaltzman at his very best!!!

Posted by: karthik on 11/20/2008

Andy, you should be writing frontline articles, not just blogs! Incredibly funny take on a seemingly innocuous incident.. :)

Posted by: mike stirling on 11/20/2008

My late Great Uncle (not he wasn't a great uncle)would often regale us with stories of his "life on the frontier' as in the n/w frontier of India.
He recalled his efforts to explain the l.b.w. law 'to the wiley Pathan'.He was grateful to be alive the next day.His brother in law alas fell foul of cannibals in Africa when the no ball rule saw the local missionary given not out when on a herculean 7 off 65 balls. Both of these men died prior to the new 6 ball over and with the demise of the 8 ball over my uncle gave up the will to live. He was last seen riding a mule up the Kyhber pass muttering about Sikh warriors who would rather face frenzied Musselman than the demon leg breaks of Posit minor a terrible soldier
but wonderful cricketer.Needless to say my great uncle died before I was born yet I'm sure some of you recoil in horror at the prospect of facing a demon bowler on a wearing pitch. I have been a cricket lunatic (ask my wife) for almost 50 years.
With time Broad will improve

Posted by: Amar on 11/20/2008

Broad was desparately seeking a miracle when all else failed. Can't blame the poor bloke for trying:)
Great piece by Andy, and to all those losers who thought Broad was fair in his appeal, and there was nothing funny in this article, you need to get a sense of humour, especially if you happen to be an English fan!

Posted by: lizzyp29 on 11/20/2008

Oh dear, some of you are missing the point of this article. It's written with tounge firmly in cheek, but there's always someone who will start the whole asian vs non-asian debate off again. Maybe the appeal was excessive, and he did then possibly show some dissent, but guys ... it was one appeal, and the article is about that single incident. Get a life ........

Posted by: prasanth on 11/20/2008

thankyou for starting my day with a smile.

Posted by: Parag Vijay on 11/20/2008

Very nice article Andy. Funny from start till the end. I can only wonder what Stuart Broad must have thought after looking at the replay.LOL

Posted by: Madhusudana V N on 11/20/2008

Russell Tiffen punished by cruel gods for bad decisions in previous games... ha ha ha :-)

Posted by: Nikhil on 11/20/2008

how refreshingly brilliant! had me in stitches

Posted by: Colin Cowdery on 11/20/2008

What a hilarious article. I fell on the floor laughing laughing. One of the best articles in recent times

Posted by: Mathew Kuncheria on 11/20/2008

agree with lizzyp. pure tongue in cheek stuff.. when do Asians shake off this Communist way of looking at things? Read Zaltzman for the first time and I am not going to be a regular.

Posted by: Jai Praveen on 11/20/2008

Man, that was awesomely put.. I laughed my heart out.. Hats off to your uncanny ability to draw humour out of a simple incident!! :-)

Posted by: Ramesh KRishnamurthy on 11/20/2008

LOL. This is just too good. Cricinfo should make a weekly regular column - GO Zaltzman.

Posted by: Bhupesh on 12/11/2008

Simply wow...Simply the best I have read recently!

  Post your comment
Name:
Email Address:
Comments:
characters left

Andy Zaltzman was born in obscurity in 1974. He has been a sporadically-acclaimed stand-up comedian since 1999, and has appeared regularly on BBC Radio 4. He is currently one half of TimesOnline’s hit satirical podcast The Bugle, alongside John Oliver (The Daily Show with John Stewart). He also writes for The Times newspaper, and is the author of Does Anything Eat Bankers? (And 53 Other Indispensable Questions For The Credit Crunched).

Zaltzman’s love of cricket outshone his aptitude for the game by a humiliating margin. He once scored 6 in 75 minutes in an Under-15 match, and failed to hit a six between the ages of 9 and 23. He would have been ideally suited to Tests, had not a congenital defect left him unable to play the game to anything above genuine village standard. Aged 21, when fielding at deep midwicket, he dropped the same batsman three times in fifteen minutes, and has not been selected by England before or since

Search
  • ESPN
  • Soccernet
  • Scrum